Skip to main content
Log in

Propagating organization: an enquiry

  • Published:
Biology & Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An organized being is then not a mere machine, for that has merely moving power, but it possesses in itself formative power of a self-propagating kind which it communicates to its materials though they have it not of themselves; it organizes them, in fact, and this cannot explained by the mere mechanical faculty of motion.

Immanuel Kant – Critique of Judgement.

Abstract

Our aim in this article is to attempt to discuss propagating organization of process, a poorly articulated union of matter, energy, work, constraints and that vexed concept, “information”, which unite in far from equilibrium living physical systems. Our hope is to stimulate discussions by philosophers of biology and biologists to further clarify the concepts we discuss here. We place our discussion in the broad context of a “general biology”, properties that might well be found in life anywhere in the cosmos, freed from the specific examples of terrestrial life after 3.8 billion years of evolution. By placing the discussion in this wider, if still hypothetical, context, we also try to place in context some of the extant discussion of information as intimately related to DNA, RNA and protein transcription and translation processes. While characteristic of current terrestrial life, there are no compelling grounds to suppose the same mechanisms would be involved in any life form able to evolve by heritable variation and natural selection. In turn, this allows us to discuss at least briefly, the focus of much of the philosophy of biology on population genetics, which, of course, assumes DNA, RNA, proteins, and other features of terrestrial life. Presumably, evolution by natural selection—and perhaps self-organization—could occur on many worlds via different causal mechanisms. Here we seek a non-reductionist explanation for the synthesis, accumulation, and propagation of information, work, and constraint, which we hope will provide some insight into both the biotic and abiotic universe, in terms of both molecular self reproduction and the basic work energy cycle where work is the constrained release of energy into a few degrees of freedom. The typical requirement for work itself is to construct those very constraints on the release of energy that then constitute further work. Information creation, we argue, arises in two ways: first information as natural selection assembling the very constraints on the release of energy that then constitutes work and the propagation of organization. Second, information in a more extended sense is “semiotic”, that is about the world or internal state of the organism and requires appropriate response. The idea is to combine ideas from biology, physics, and computer science, to formulate explanatory hypotheses on how information can be captured and rendered in the expected physical manifestation, which can then participate in the propagation of the organization of process in the expected biological work cycles to create the diversity in our observable biosphere. Our conclusions, to date, of this enquiry suggest a foundation which views information as the construction of constraints, which, in their physical manifestation, partially underlie the processes of evolution to dynamically determine the fitness of organisms within the context of a biotic universe.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Here we use the word “constraint” in a very general sense that includes “global constraints” (e.g. conservation of energy, symmetry conditions etc.,) and “local constraints” or boundary conditions (e.g. initial conditions, reflection or absorption at a spatial location).

References

  • Apter MJ, Wolpert L (1965) Cybernetics and development. I. Information theory. J Theor Biol 8:244–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayle K (1999) The condition of virtuality. In: Peter L (ed) The digital dialectic. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Hood L, Galas D (2003) The digital code of DNA. Nature 421:444–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman S (1993) The origins of order: self-organization and selection in evolution. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman S (2000) Investigations. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman S (2006) The third culture beyond reductionism: reinventing the sacred. Edge.org, November 20, 2006

  • Kauffman S, Clayton P (2006) On emergence, agency, and organization. Biol Philos 21:501–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee DH, Severin K, Reza Ghadiri M (1997a) Autocatalytic networks: the transition from molecular self-replication to molecular ecosystems. Curr Opin Chem Biol 1:491–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee DH, Severin K, Yokobayashi Y, Reza Ghadiri M (1997b) Emergence of symbiosis in peptide self-replication through a hypercyclic network. Nature 390:591–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logan RK (2006) The extended mind model of the origin of language and culture. In Nathalie G, Jean P, Van B, Diederik A (eds) Evolutionary epistemology, language and culture. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan RK (2007) The extended mind: the origin of language and culture. University of Toronto Press, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Mavelli F, Luisi PL (1996) Autopoietic self-reproducing vesicles: a simplified kinetic model. J Phys Chem 100:16600–16607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard SJ (2000a) The concept of information in biology. Philos Sci 67:177–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard SJ (2000b) Reply to commentaries. Philos Sci 67:214–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monod J (1971) Chance and necessity. Knopf, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramo P, Kessel J, Yli O (2006) Perturbation avalanches and criticality in gene regulatory networks. J Theor Biol 242(1):164–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schrödinger E (1992) What is life? Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Serra R, Kessell J, Semeria A (2004) Genetic network models and statistical properties of gene expression data in knock-out experiments. J Theor Biol 227(1):149–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shannon CE (1948) A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst Technical J 27:379–423, 623–656

  • Shiryayev AN (ed) (1993) Selected works of A.N. Kolmogorov, vol III, Information theory and the theory of algorithms (mathematics and its applications). Kluwer Academic Publishing, New York

  • Shmulevich I, Kauffman SA, Aldana M (2005) Eukaryotic cells are dynamically ordered or critical but not chaotic. PNAS 102: 13439–13444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sievers D, von Kiedrowski G (1994) Self-replication of complementary nucleotide-based oligomers. Nature 369:221–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silberstein M (2003) Reduction, emergence and explanation. In: Peter M, Michael S (eds) The Blackwell guide of the philosophy of science. Blackwell Publishing, Williston, VT

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith E, Harold M (2004) Universality in intermediary metabolism. Santa Fe Institute Working Paper. http://www.santafe.edu/research/publications/workingpapers/04-07-024.pdf

  • Sterelny K, Griffiths PE (1999) Sex and death. University of Chicago, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert K. Logan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kauffman, S., Logan, R.K., Este, R. et al. Propagating organization: an enquiry. Biol Philos 23, 27–45 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-007-9066-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-007-9066-x

Keywords

Navigation