Notes
For a related argument about the role of biological technology in causal selection, see Baxter (2019).
References
Baxter J (2019) How biological technology should inform the causal selection debate. Philos Theor Pract Biol 11(2):1–17
Dupras C, Ravitsky V (2016) Epigenetics in the neoliberal ‘regime of truth’: a biopolitical perspective on knowledge translation. Hastings Cent Rep 46:1–10
Dupré J (2013) Living causes. In: Aristotelian society supplementary volume, vol 87, no 1. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 19–37
Mitchell SD (2002) Integrative pluralism. Biol Philos 17(1):55–70
Pocheville A, Griffiths PE, Stotz K (2017) Comparing causes—an information-theoretic approach to specificity, proportionality and stability. In: Proceedings of the 15th congress of logic, methodology and philosophy of science. College Publications, London, pp 250–275
Richardson S (2017) Plasticity and programming: feminism and the epigenetic imaginary. Signs 41(1):29–52
Woodward J (2010) Causation in biology: stability, specificity, and the choice of levels of explanation. Biol Philos 25(3):287–318
Yablo S (1992) Cause and essence. Synthese 93(3):403–449
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Attah, N.O., DiMarco, M. & Plutynski, A. Microbiomes: proportional causes in context. Biol Philos 35, 22 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-020-9738-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-020-9738-3