Abstract
We propose a new phenomenological model to represent the impact of wind-waves on the dissipation of turbulence kinetic energy near the sea surface. In this model, the momentum flux at a given height results from the averaged contribution of eddies attached to the sea surface whose sizes are related to the surface geometry. This yields a coupling between long wind-waves and turbulence at heights of about 10 m. This new wind-and-waves coupling is thus not exclusively confined to the short wave range and heights below 5 m, where most of the momentum transfer to the waves is known to occur. The proposed framework clarifies the impact of wind-waves on Monin–Obukhov similarity theory, and the role of long wind-waves on the observed wind-wave variability of momentum fluxes. This work reveals which state variables related to the wind-wave coupling require more accurate measurements to further improve wind-over-waves models and parametrizations.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Belcher S, Hunt J (1993) Turbulent shear flow over slowly moving waves. J Fluid Mech 251:109–148. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112093003350
Belcher S, Hunt J (1998) Turbulent flow over hills and waves. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 30(1):507–538. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fluid.30.1.507
Brown GS (1979) Estimation of surface wind speeds using satellite-borne radar measurements at normal incidence. J Geophys Res Sol Earth 84(B8):3974–3978. https://doi.org/10.1029/JB084iB08p03974
Businger J (1988) A note on the businger-dyer profiles. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 42(1–2):145–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00119880
Cifuentes-Lorenzen A, Edson JB, Zappa CJ (2018) Air-sea interaction in the southern ocean: exploring the height of the wave boundary layer at the air–sea interface. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 169(3):461–482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-018-0376-0
Donelan MA, Hamilton J, Hui W (1985) Directional spectra of wind-generated ocean waves. Philos Trans R Soc A 315(1534):509–562. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1985.0054
Dorman GE, Mollo-Christensen E (1973) Observation of the structure on moving gust patterns over a water surface (“cat’s paws”). J Phys Oceanogr 3(1):120–132. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1973)003<0120:OOTSOM>2.0.CO;2
Drennan WM, Graber HC, Donelan MA (1999) Evidence for the effects of swell and unsteady winds on marine wind stress. J Phys Oceanogr 29(8):1853–1864. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1999)029<1853:EFTEOS>2.0.CO;2
Dulov V, Kudryavtsev V, Bol’Shakov A (2013) A field study of whitecap coverage and its modulations by energy containing surface waves. In: Donelan MA, Drennan WM, Saltzman ES, Wanninkhof R (eds) Gas transfer at water surfaces. American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC, pp 187–192. https://doi.org/10.1029/gm127p0187
Edson JB, Zappa CJ, Ware J, McGillis WR, Hare JE (2004) Scalar flux profile relationships over the open ocean. J Geophys Res Oceans. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JC001960
Edson J, Crawford T, Crescenti J, Farrar T, Frew N, Gerbi G, Helmis C, Hristov T, Khelif D, Jessup A, Jonsson H, Li M, Mahrt L, McGillis W, Plueddemann A, Shen L, Skyllingstad E, Stanton T, Sullivan P, Sun J, Trowbridge J, Vickers D, Wang S, Wang Q, Weller R, Wilkin J, Williams AJ, Yue DKP, Zappa C (2007) The coupled boundary layers and air-sea transfer experiment in low winds. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 88(3):341–356. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-88-3-341
Edson JB, Jampana V, Weller RA, Bigorre SP, Plueddemann AJ, Fairall CW, Miller SD, Mahrt L, Vickers D, Hersbach H (2013) On the exchange of momentum over the open ocean. J Phys Oceanogr 43(8):1589–1610. https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-12-0173.1
Elfouhaily T, Chapron B, Katsaros K, Vandemark D (1997) A unified directional spectrum for long and short wind-driven waves. J Geophys Res Oceans 102(C7):15,781–15,796. https://doi.org/10.1029/97JC00467
Elperin T, Kleeorin N, Rogachevskii I, Zilitinkevich S (2002) Formation of large-scale semiorganized structures in turbulent convection. Phys Rev E 66(6):66,305–66,320. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.66.066305
Fairall C, Bradley EF, Hare J, Grachev A, Edson J (2003) Bulk parameterization of air–sea fluxes: updates and verification for the coare algorithm. J Clim 16(4):571–591. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2003)016<0571:BPOASF>2.0.CO;2
Foken T (2006) 50 years of the Monin–Obukhov similarity theory. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 119(3):431–447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-006-9048-6
Geernaert G (1990) Bulk parameterizations for the wind stress and heat fluxes. In: Geernaert GL, Plant WL (eds) Surface waves and fluxes. Springer, pp 91–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2069-9_5
Gent P, Taylor P (1976) A numerical model of the air flow above water waves. J Fluid Mech 77(1):105–128. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112076001158
Gioia G, Guttenberg N, Goldenfeld N, Chakraborty P (2010) Spectral theory of the turbulent mean-velocity profile. Phys Rev Lett 105(18):184,501. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.184501
Grodsky SA, Kudryavtsev VN, Bentamy A, Carton JA, Chapron B (2012) Does direct impact of SST on short wind waves matter for scatterometry? Geophys Res Lett 39:L12602. https://doi.org/10.1029/2012gl052091
Hara T, Belcher SE (2002) Wind forcing in the equilibrium range of wind–wave spectra. J Fluid Mech 470:223–245. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112002001945
Hara T, Sullivan PP (2015) Wave boundary layer turbulence over surface waves in a strongly forced condition. J Phys Oceanogr 45(3):868–883
Hogstrom ULF (1996) Review of some basic characteristics of the atmospheric surface layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 78(2):215–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00120937
Hristov T (2018) Mechanistic, empirical and numerical perspectives on wind-waves interaction. In: Procedia IUTAM, vol 26. Elsevier B.V., pp 102–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.piutam.2018.03.010
Hristov T, Ruiz-Plancarte J (2014) Dynamic balances in a wavy boundary layer. J Phys Oceanogr 44(12):3185–3194. https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-13-0209.1
Hristov T, Friehe C, Miller S (1998) Wave-coherent fields in air flow over ocean waves: identification of cooperative behavior buried in turbulence. Phys Rev Lett 81(23):5245. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.5245
Hristov T, Miller S, Friehe C (2003) Dynamical coupling of wind and ocean waves through wave-induced air flow. Nature 422(6927):55. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01382
Husain N, Hara T, Buckley M, Yousefi K, Veron F, Sullivan P (2019) Boundary layer turbulence over surface waves in a strongly forced condition: LES and observation. J Phys Oceanogr. https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-19-0070.1
Janssen PA (1999) On the effect of ocean waves on the kinetic energy balance and consequences for the inertial dissipation technique. J Phys Oceanogr 29(3):530–534. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1999)029<0530:OTEOOW>2.0.CO;2
Janssen PA, Viterbo P (1996) Ocean waves and the atmospheric climate. J Clim 9(6):1269–1287. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1996)009<1269:OWATAC>2.0.CO;2
Janssen PaEM (1989) Wave-induced stress and the drag of air flow over sea waves. J Phys Oceanogr 19(6):745–754. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1989)019<0745:WISATD>2.0.CO;2
Kaimal JC, Wyngaard J, Izumi Y, Coté O (1972) Spectral characteristics of surface-layer turbulence. Q J R Meteorol Soc 98(417):563–589. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49709841707
Katul GG, Manes C (2014) Cospectral budget of turbulence explains the bulk properties of smooth pipe flow. Phys Rev E 90(6):063,008. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.90.063008
Katul GG, Konings AG, Porporato A (2011) Mean velocity profile in a sheared and thermally stratified atmospheric boundary layer. Phys Rev Lett 107(26):268,502. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.268502
Kawamura H, Toba Y (1988) Ordered motion in the turbulent boundary layer over wind waves. J Fluid Mech 197:105–138. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112088003192
Kitaigorodskii S (1973) Physics of air–sea interactions. Israël Program for scientific translations
Kudryavtsev V, Chapron B (2016) On growth rate of wind waves: impact of short-scale breaking modulations. J Phys Oceanogr 46(1):349–360. https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-14-0216.1
Kudryavtsev V, Makin V (2001) The impact of air-flow separation on the drag of the sea surface. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 98(1):155–171. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018719917275
Kudryavtsev VN, Makin VK (2004) Impact of swell on the marine atmospheric boundary layer. J Phys Oceanogr 34(4):934–949. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(2004)034<0934:IOSOTM>2.0.CO;2
Kudryavtsev V, Myasoedov A, Chapron B, Johannessen JA, Collard F (2012) Imaging mesoscale upper ocean dynamics using synthetic aperture radar and optical data. J Geophys Res Oceans. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011jc007492
Kudryavtsev V, Chapron B, Makin V (2014) Impact of wind waves on the air–sea fluxes: a coupled model. J Geophys Res Oceans 46(2):1022–1037. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JC009412
Li D, Katul GG, Bou-Zeid E (2012) Mean velocity and temperature profiles in a sheared diabatic turbulent boundary layer. Phys Fluids 24(10):105,105. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4757660
Li Q, Gentine P, Mellado JP, McColl KA (2018) Implications of nonlocal transport and conditionally averaged statistics on Monin–Obukhov similarity theory and townsend’s attached eddy hypothesis. J Atmos Sci 75(10):3403–3431. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-17-0301.1
Liu WT, Tang W (1996) Equivalent neutral wind. Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Technical Report
Longuet-Higgins MS (1963) The generation of capillary waves by steep gravity waves. J Fluid Mech 16(1):138–159. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112063000641
Mahrt L, Vickers D, Howell J, Højstrup J, Wilczak JM, Edson J, Hare J (1996) Sea surface drag coefficients in the risø air sea experiment. J Geophys Res Oceans 101(C6):14,327–14,335. https://doi.org/10.1029/96JC00748
Makin V, Kudryavtsev V (1999) Coupled sea surface-atmosphere model: 1. Wind over waves coupling. J Geophys Res Oceans 104(C4):7613–7623. https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JC900006
Makin VK, Mastenbroek C (1996) Impact of waves on air–sea exchange of sensible heat and momentum. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 79(3):279–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00119442
Marshall J, Ferrari R, Forget G, Maze G, Andersson A, Bates N, Dewar W, Doney S, Fratantoni D, Joyce T et al (2009) The climode field campaign: observing the cycle of convection and restratification over the gulf stream. Bull Am Meteorl Soc 90(9):1337–1350. https://doi.org/10.1175/2009BAMS2706.1
Marusic I, Monty JP (2019) Attached eddy model of wall turbulence. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 51:49–74. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-fluid-010518-040427
Monin A, Yaglom A (1975) Statistical fluid mechanics. Translated from original Russian 1967 version. MIT press, Cambridge, MA
Panofsky HA (1963) Determination of stress from wind and temperature measurements. Q J R Meteorol Soc 89(379):85–94. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49708937906
Phillips OM (1977) The dynamics of the upper ocean. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Phillips OM (1985) Spectral and statistical properties of the equilibrium range in wind-generated gravity waves. J Fluid Mech 156:505–531. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112085002221
Phillips W, Wu Z, Lumley J (1996) On the formation of longitudinal vortices in a turbulent boundary layer over wavy terrain. J Fluid Mech 326:321–341. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112096008336
Pineau-Guillou L, Ardhuin F, Bouin MN, Redelsperger JL, Chapron B, Bidlot JR, Quilfen Y (2018) Strong winds in a coupled wave-atmosphere model during a north atlantic storm event: evaluation against observations. Q J R Meteorol Soc 144(711):317–332. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3205
Plant WJ (1982) A relationship between wind stress and wave slope. J Geophys Res Oceans 87(C3):1961–1967. https://doi.org/10.1029/JC087iC03p01961
Reul N, Branger H, Giovanangeli JP (1999) Air flow separation over unsteady breaking waves. Phys Fluids 11(7):1959–1961. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.870058
Shimura T, Mori N, Takemi T, Mizuta R (2017) Long-term impacts of ocean wave-dependent roughness on global climate systems. J Geophys Res Oceans 122(3):1995–2011. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016jc012621
Soloviev YP, Kudryavtsev V (2010) Wind-speed undulations over swell: field experiment and interpretation. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 136(3):341–363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-010-9506-z
Suzuki N, Hara T, Sullivan PP (2013) Impact of breaking wave form drag on near-surface turbulence and drag coefficient over young seas at high winds. J Phys Oceanogr 43(2):324–343. https://doi.org/10.1175/jpo-d-12-0127.1
Townsend AA (1980) The structure of turbulent shear flow. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Vandemark D, Edson JB, Chapron B (1997) Altimeter estimation of sea surface wind stress for light to moderate winds. J Atmos Ocean Technol 14(3):716–722. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(1997)014<0716:AEOSSW>2.0.CO;2
Villas Boas AB, Ardhuin F, Ayet A, Bourassa MA, Chapron B, Brandt P, Cornuelle BD, Farrar JT, Fewings MR, Fox-Kemper B et al (2019) Integrated observations of global surface winds, currents, and waves: requirements and challenges for the next decade. Front Mar Sci 6:425. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2019.00425
Yurovskaya M, Dulov V, Chapron B, Kudryavtsev V (2013) Directional short wind wave spectra derived from the sea surface photography. J Geophys Res Oceans 118(9):4380–4394. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrc.20296
Zhang FW, Drennan WM, Haus BK, Graber HC (2009) On wind-wave-current interactions during the shoaling waves experiment. J Geophys Res Oceans 114(C1):2. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JC004998
Zilitinkevich S, Elperin T, Kleeorin N, Rogachevskii I, Esau I, Mauritsen T, Miles M (2008) Turbulence energetics in stably stratified geophysical flows: strong and weak mixing regimes. Q J R Meteorol Soc 134(633):793–799. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.264
Acknowledgements
The code used to generate the figures is available upon request to the corresponding author. The authors thank the anonymous reviewers for the comments that helped improve the original manuscript. The authors wish to acknowledge V.N. Kudryavtsev for sharing the code and for the insightful help, and M.N. Bouin and S. Brumer for interesting discussions. AA was supported by DGA Grant No. D0456JE075 and French Brittany Regional Council. Finally, the authors also wish to acknowledge the support from ANR Caravele.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Appendix 1: Coupling Between Short Wind-Waves and Atmospheric Turbulence
Details are provided on the coupling between short wind-waves and atmospheric turbulence, following the wind-over-waves model presented in Kudryavtsev et al. (2014) and references therein. The short wind-wave model is first described, and expressions for wave-induced stress are then presented.
Waves are described by their wavenumber k, frequency \(\omega \), phase speed c, and direction of propagation \(\psi \), and follow the dispersion relation \(\omega ^2 = gk + T_{sw} k^3\) where \(T_{sw}\) is the dynamical surface water tension. The wave field is specified by means of the directional spectrum \(S^d(k, \psi )\). We also introduce the saturation spectrum \(B(k, \psi ) = k^4S^d(k, \psi )\), which will be used in the following.
As proposed by Kudryavtsev et al. (2014), the full wave spectrum can be defined as a composition of a short-wave spectrum \(B_{sw}\) and a long-wave spectrum \(B_{lw}\) (in this study, the fetch-dependent spectrum of Donelan et al. 1985, is used). The weighted sum between \(B_{lw}\) and \(B_{sw}\) represents a wind-driven sea spectrum, without the presence of non-local waves (swell). It is in a one-to-one relation with the local atmospheric state. The short-wave spectrum is coupled to atmospheric turbulence through form drag, and further affects the momentum WBL through airflow separation stresses. The long-wave part is prescribed given some parameters (here spatial fetch).
The short-wave component \(B_{sw}\) describes both gravity waves and parasitic capillary waves. The latter are generated on the forward face of shorter gravity waves (in the wavelength range 0.03–0.3 m), as they approach their maximum steepness, which, for longer gravity waves, would lead to breaking (Longuet-Higgins 1963).
The gravity short wind-wave spectrum results from a balance between wind forcing (\(\beta \)), non-linear energy losses due to wave breaking (or generation of parasitic capillary waves for shorter waves), and generation of short waves by large breakers (or of parasitic capillary waves by steep and shorter waves, \(Q_b\)). The balance equation reads
with \(\beta _v(k, \psi ) = \beta (k, \psi ) - 4\nu k^2/\omega \) the effective growth rate (with \(\nu \) air viscosity), and \(a = 2.2 \times 10^{-3}\) and \(n_g = 10\) two tuning constants fitted to observations (from Yurovskaya et al. 2013). Expression for the source term \(Q_b\) can be found in Appendix A of Kudryavtsev et al. (2014).
The short parasitic capillary waves, corresponding to waves of wavelengths of \(3 \times 10^{-4}\) m or less, follow the balance Eq. 34 without the wind input term, and with modified constants a and \(n_g\). For this range of waves for which wave breaking does not occur, the non-linear term is associated to a non-linear saturation of the wave spectrum.
Both equations are solved by iterations, given a wind forcing resulting from the WBL model (Eq. 28), and expressed as
where \(c_\beta = 3 \times 10^{-2}\) is Plant’s constant and \(h(k) = 0.1\,{k}^{-1}\) is the inner region height. Note that since wind input depends on the ratio between friction velocity and wave phase speed, it is supported mostly by slow (and short) waves (Plant 1982).
To solve Eq. 28, the wave-induced stress must be specified. Let \({{\tilde{T}}}\) and \({{\tilde{T}}}_a\) be the intensity of form drag and airflow separation induced by a wave component of wavenumber k. Both these effects act over a shallow atmospheric layer, up to heights \(h(k) \sim 0.1 k^{-1}\) and \(h_{a} (k) \sim 0.3 k^{-1}\), respectively (Kudryavtsev et al. 2014). We further assume, for simplicity, that form drag (respectively airflow separation) is constant up to h (resp. \(h_a\)) and cancels for \(z>h\) (resp. \(z>h_a\)). This yields the following expression for the total wave-induced stress
where He(x) is the Heaviside step function (\(\hbox {He}(x)=1\) for \(x>0\) and 0 otherwise). This expression couples the short wind-wave model (Eq. 34) to the SBL model (Eq. 28).
Form drag describes the impact of the wind-to-waves energy transfer on atmospheric turbulence, and is expressed as
where \(\rho _w\) and \(\rho _a\) are the density of water and air respectively.
Waves of wavelength greater than 0.3 m generate an additional stress due to airflow separation on top of breaking waves (Reul et al. 1999). The expression for airflow separation stress for a given wavenumber depends on wave-breaking statistics. However, following Phillips (1985), wave-breaking statistics can be related to wave energy dissipation (the second term from the left in Eq. 34). For waves in the equilibrium range, on top of which most of airflow separation events occur, the spectral balance (Eq. 34) is further assumed to be reduced only to a balance between wind input and dissipation. This results in the following expression for airflow separation for \(U[h_a(k)] > c\)
where \(f_g(k)\) is a cut-off function restricting airflow separation in the equilibrium range, and \(c_{db}\) is the local roughness on top of breaking crests, which has a mean value of 0.35 (see Kudryavtsev and Makin 2001). For \(U[h_a(k)] < c\), airflow separation is assumed to vanish (i.e. \(T_a = 0\)) which limits airflow separation to slow (short) waves (similar to form drag).
Appendix 2: Expressions for the Eddy Anisotropy and the Businger–Dyer Momentum Function
The Businger–Dyer universal momentum function (Businger 1988), derived from the Kansas measurements, reads
This empirical function was recovered by Katul et al. (2011), by considering an eddy anisotropy of the form
This expression was obtained from measurements of turbulent vertical velocity spectra (from Kaimal et al. 1972).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ayet, A., Chapron, B., Redelsperger, J.L. et al. On the Impact of Long Wind-Waves on Near-Surface Turbulence and Momentum Fluxes. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 174, 465–491 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-019-00492-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-019-00492-x