1 Correction to: Boundary-Layer Meteorol (2015) 154:229–241 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-014-9978-3

We recently noticed systematic typographical errors in the equations that define the best-fit lines for Figs. 4, 5, and 6.

Equation 5 should read as

$$ \log_{10} \left( {\epsilon_{nonwaked} } \right) = 0.029U - 3.24. $$
(5)

Equation 6 should read as

$$ \log_{10} \left( {\epsilon_{waked} } \right) = 0.0017U - 1.2. $$
(6)

Equation 7 should read as

$$ \log_{10} \left( {\epsilon_{nonwaked} } \right) = 22.73\sigma_{U}^{2} - 3.3 . $$
(7)

Equation 8 should read as

$$ \log_{10} \left( {\epsilon_{waked} } \right) = 0.53\sigma_{U}^{2} - 1.25. $$
(8)

Equation 10 should read as

$$ \log_{10} \left( {\epsilon_{nonwaked} } \right) = 24.38 TI - 3.94. $$
(10)

Equation 11 should read as

$$ \log_{10} \left( {\epsilon_{waked} } \right) = 5.58 TI - 1.63. $$
(11)

All notation is as defined in the original article. The errors are only typographical and therefore do not affect results or change the best-fit lines that appear in Figs. 4, 5, and 6. We apologise for any inconvenience caused. We express appreciation to Dr. Norman Wildmann for inquiring about the equations and bringing the typographical errors to our attention.