Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Sentinel node micrometastases in breast cancer do not affect prognosis: a population-based study

  • Epidemiology
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) for axillary staging in breast cancer allows the application of more extensive pathologic examination techniques. Micrometastases are being detected more often, however, coinciding with stage migration. Besides assessing the prognostic relevance of micrometastases and the need for administering adjuvant systemic and regional therapies, there still seems to be room for improvement. In a population-based analysis, we compared survival of patients with sentinel node micrometastases with those with node-negative and node-positive disease in the era after introduction of SNB. Data from the population-based Eindhoven Cancer Registry were used on all (n = 6803) women who underwent SNB for invasive breast cancer in the Southeast Region of The Netherlands in the period 1996–2006. In 451 patients (6.6%) a sentinel node micrometastasis (pN1mi) was detected and in 126 patients (1.9%) isolated tumor cells (pN0(i+)). Micrometastases or isolated tumor cells in the SNB did not convey any significant survival difference compared with node-negative disease. After adjustment for age, pT, and grade, still no survival difference emerged pN1mi: [HR 0.9 (95% CI, 0.6–1.3)] and pN0(i+): [HR 0.4 (95% CI, 0.14–1.3)] and neither was the case after additional adjustment for adjuvant systemic therapy. Our practice-based study showed that the presence of sentinel node micrometastases in breast cancer patients has hardly any impact on breast cancer overall survival during the first years after diagnosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Louwman WJ, Voogd AC, Van Dijck JAAM et al (2008) On the rising trends of incidence and prognosis for breast cancer patients diagnosed 1975–2004: a long-term population-based study in southeastern Netherlands. Cancer Causes Control 19:97–106

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Schijven MP, Vingerhoets AJ, Rutten HJ et al (2003) Comparison of morbidity between axillary lymph node dissection and sentinel node biopsy. Eur J Surg Oncol 29(4):341–350

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ververs JM, Roumen RM, Vingerhoets AJ et al (2001) Risk, severity and predictors of physical and psychological morbidity after axillary lymph node dissection for breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 37(8):991–999

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cox CE, Bass SS, McCann CR et al (2000) Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with breast cancer. Ann Rev Med 51:525–542

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Veronesi U, Paganelli G, Galimberti V et al (1997) Sentinel-node biopsy to avoid axillary dissection in breast cancer with clinically negative lymphnodes. Lancet 349:1864–1867

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Veronesi U, Paganelli G, Viale G et al (2006) Sentinel-lymph-node biopsy as a staging procedure in breast cancer: update of a randomised controlled study. Lancet Oncol 7:983–990

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kuijt GP, van de Poll-Franse LV, Voogd AC et al (2007) Survival after negative sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer at least equivalent to after negative extensive axillary dissection. Eur J Surg Oncol 33(7):832–837

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Tjan-Heijnen VC, Bult P, de Widt-Levert LM et al (2001) Micro-metastases in axillary lymph nodes: an increasing classification and treatment dilemma in breast cancer due to the introduction of the sentinel lymph node procedure. Breast Cancer Res Treat 70(2):81–88

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Maaskant AJG, van de Poll-Franse LV, Voogd AC et al (2009) Stage migration due to introduction of the sentinel node procedure: a population-based study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 113(1):173–179

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. van der Heiden-van der Loo M, Bezemer PD, Hennipman A et al (2006) Introduction of sentinel node biopsy and stage migration of breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 32(7):710–714

  11. de Mascarel I, Bonichon G, Coindre J et al (1992) Prognostic significance of breast cancer axillary lymph node metastases assessed by two special techniques: reevaluation with longer follow-up. Br J Cancer 66:523–527

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hainsworth P, Tjandra J, Stillwell R et al (1993) Detection and significance of occult metastases in node-negative breast cancer. Br J Surg 80:459–463

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ludwig Breast Cancer Study Group (1990) Prognostic importance of occult axillary lymph node micrometastases from breast cancers. Lancet 335:1565–1568

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kuijt GP, Voogd AC, van de Poll-Franse LV et al (2005) The prognostic significance of axillary lymph-node micrometastases in breast cancer patients. Eur J Surg Oncol 31:500–505

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Nasser I, Lee A, Bosari S et al (1993) Occult axillary lymph node metastases in node-negative breast carcinoma. Hum Pathol 24:950–957

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Fitzgibbons P, Page D, Weaver D et al (2000) Prognostic factors in breast cancer: college of American Pathologists Consensus statement 1999. Arch Pathol Lab Med 124:966–978

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Grabau D (2008) Breast cancer patients with micrometastases only: is a basis provided for tailored treatment? Surg Oncol 17:211–217

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Tan LK, Giri D, Hummer AJ et al (2008) Occult axillary node metastases in breast cancer are prognostically significant: results in 368 node-negative patients with 20-year follow-up. J Clin Oncol 26:1803–1809

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mc Shane LM, Altman DG, Sauerbrei W et al (2006) REporting recommendations for tumor MARKer prognostic studies (REMARK). Breast Cancer Res Treat 100:229–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hermanek P, Sobin LH (eds) (1987) UICC TNM classification of malignant tumors. Springer, Berlin, pp 94–99

  21. Roumen RMH, Pijpers HJ, Thunissen FBJM et al (2000) Samenvatting van de richtlijn “Schildwachtklierbiopsie bij mammacarcinoom”. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 144:1864–1867

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Yeatman TJ, Nicolson GL (1993) Molecular basis of tumor progression: mechanisms of organ-specific tumor metastasis. Semin Surg Oncol 9:256–263

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Yeatman TJ, Cox CE (1999) The significance of breast cancer lymph node micrometastases. Surg Oncon Clin N Am 3:481–496

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mansi JL, Gogas H, Bliss JM et al (1999) Outcome of primary-breast-cancer patients with micrometastases: a long-term follow-up study. Lancet 354:197–202

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Al-Hajj M, Wicha MS, Benito-Hernandez A et al (2003) Prospective identification of tumorigenic breast cancer cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:3983–3988

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Chen SL, Hoehne FM, Guiliano AE (2007) The prognostic significance of micrometastases in breast cancer: a SEER population-based analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 14(12):3378–3384

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Gobardhan PD, Elias SG, Madsen EVE et al (2009) Prognostic value of micrometastases in sentinel lymph nodes of patients with breast carcinoma: a cohort study. Ann Oncol 20(1):41–48

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Hansen NM, Grube B, Ye X et al (2009) Impact of micrometastases in the sentinel node of patients with invasive breast cancer. JCO 27:4679–4684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. de Boer M, van Deurzen CHM, van Dijck JAAM et al (2009) Micrometastases or isolated tumor cells and the outcome of breast cancer. NEJM 361(7):653–663

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adriana J. Maaskant-Braat.

Additional information

An invited commentary to this article can be found at doi:10.1007/s10549-010-1176-5.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maaskant-Braat, A.J., van de Poll-Franse, L.V., Voogd, A.C. et al. Sentinel node micrometastases in breast cancer do not affect prognosis: a population-based study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 127, 195–203 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-010-1086-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-010-1086-6

Keywords

Navigation