Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Additional findings at preoperative MRI: a simple golden rule for a complex problem?

  • Invited Commentary
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

The Original Article was published on 22 July 2010

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Houssami N, Ciatto S, Macaskill P et al (2008) Accuracy and surgical impact of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer staging: systematic review and meta-analysis in detection of multifocal and multicentric cancer. J Clin Oncol 26:3248–3258

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Brennan ME, Houssami N, Lord S et al (2009) Magnetic resonance imaging screening of the contralateral breast in women with newly diagnosed breast cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of incremental cancer detection and impact on surgical management. J Clin Oncol 27(33):5640–5649

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sardanelli F (2010) Overview of the role of pre-operative breast MRI in the absence of evidence on patient outcomes. Breast 19:3–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Solin LJ (2010) Counterview: pre-operative breast MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) is not recommended for all patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer. Breast 19:7–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sardanelli F, Boetes C, Borisch B et al (2010) Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: recommendations from the EUSOMA working group. Eur J Cancer 46:1296–1316

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mann RM, Loo CE, Wobbes T et al (2010) The impact of preoperative breast MRI on the re-excision rate in invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast. Breast Cancer Res Treat 119:415–422

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fischer U, Zachariae O, Baum F, von Heyden D, Funke M, Liersch T (2004) The influence of preoperative MRI of the breasts on recurrence rate in patients with breast cancer. Eur Radiol 14:1725–1731

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pengel KE, Loo CE, Teertstra HJ et al (2009) The impact of preoperative MRI on breast-conserving surgery of invasive cancer: a comparative cohort study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 116:161–169

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Solin LJ, Orel SG, Hwang WT, Harris EE, Schnall MD (2008) Relationship of breast magnetic resonance imaging to outcome after breast-conservation treatment with radiation for women with early-stage invasive breast carcinoma or ductal carcinoma in situ. J Clin Oncol 26:386–391

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hwang N, Schiller DE, Crystal P, Maki E, McCready DR (2009) Magnetic resonance imaging in the planning of initial lumpectomy for invasive breast carcinoma: its effect on ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence after breast-conservation therapy. Ann Surg Oncol 16:3000–3009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bleicher RJ, Ciocca RM, Egleston BL et al (2009) Association of routine pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging with time to surgery, mastectomy rate, and margin status. J Am Coll Surg 209:180–187

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nakamura R, Nagashima T, Sakakibara M et al (2008) Breast-conserving surgery using supine magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Breast 17:245–251

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sakakibara M, Nagashima T, Sangai T et al (2008) Breast-conserving surgery using projection and reproduction techniques of surgical-position breast MRI in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. J Am Coll Surg 207:62–68

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Alderliesten T, Loo C, Paape A et al (2010) On the feasibility of MRI-guided navigation to demarcate breast cancer for breast-conserving surgery. Med Phys 37:2617–2626

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Turnbull L, Brown S, Harvey I et al (2010) Comparative effectiveness of MRI in breast cancer (COMICE) trial: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 375:563–571

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Morris EA (2010) Should we dispense with preoperative breast MRI? Lancet 375:528–530

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Linda A, Zuiani C, Londero V, Bazzocchi M (2008) Outcome of initially only magnetic resonance mammography-detected findings with and without correlate at second-look sonography: distribution according to patient history of breast cancer and lesion size. Breast 17:5–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Demartini WB, Eby PR, Peacock S, Lehman CD (2009) Utility of targeted sonography for breast lesions that were suspicious on MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192:1128–1134

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Destounis S, Arieno A, Somerville PA et al (2009) Community-based practice experience of unsuspected breast magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities evaluated with second-look sonography. J Ultrasound Med 28:1337–1346

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Meissnitzer M, Dershaw DD, Lee CH, Morris EA (2009) Targeted ultrasound of the breast in women with abnormal MRI findings for whom biopsy has been recommended. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:1025–1029

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Abe H, Schmidt RA, Shah RN et al (2010) MR-directed (“Second-Look”) ultrasound examination for breast lesions detected initially on MRI: MR and sonographic findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:370–377

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Carbognin G, Girardi V, Calciolari C et al (2010) Utility of second-look ultrasound in the management of incidental enhancing lesions detected by breast MR imaging. Radiol Med. doi:10.1007/s11547-010-0561-9

  23. Elshof LE, Rutgers EJ, Deurloo EE et al (2010) A practical approach to manage additional lesions at preoperative breast MRI in patients eligible for breast conserving therapy: results. Breast Cancer Res Treat. doi:10.1007/s10549-010-1064-z

  24. Perlet C, Heywang-Kobrunner SH, Heinig A et al (2006) Magnetic resonance-guided, vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: results from a European multicenter study of 538 lesions. Cancer 106:982–990

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Tozaki M, Yamashiro N, Suzuki T et al (2009) MR-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: is it an essential technique? Breast Cancer 16:121–125

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Han BK, Schnall MD, Orel SG, Rosen M (2008) Outcome of MRI-guided breast biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191:1798–1804

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. El Khouli RH, Macura KJ, Barker PB et al (2009) MRI-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: a phantom and patient evaluation of targeting accuracy. J Magn Reson Imaging 30:424–429

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Li J, Dershaw DD, Lee CH, Kaplan J, Morris EA (2009) MRI follow-up after concordant, histologically benign diagnosis of breast lesions sampled by MRI-guided biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:850–855

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Friedman P, Enis S, Pinyard J (2009) Magnetic resonance imaging-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: an initial experience in a community hospital. Can Assoc Radiol J 60:196–200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Malhaire C, El Khoury C, Thibault F et al (2010) Vacuum-assisted biopsies under MR guidance: results of 72 procedures. Eur Radiol 20:1554–1562

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Schrading S, Simon B, Braun M, Wardelmann E, Schild HH, Kuhl CK (2010) MRI-guided breast biopsy: influence of choice of vacuum biopsy system on the mode of biopsy of MRI-only suspicious breast lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:1650–1657

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Meeuwis C, Peters NH, Mali WP et al (2007) Targeting difficult accessible breast lesions: MRI-guided needle localization using a freehand technique in a 3.0 T closed bore magnet. Eur J Radiol 62:283–288

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Liberman L, Holland AE, Marjan D et al (2007) Underestimation of atypical ductal hyperplasia at MRI-guided 9-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188:684–690

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Lee JM, Kaplan JB, Murray MP et al (2007) Underestimation of DCIS at MRI-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:468–474

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Lee JM, Kaplan JB, Murray MP et al (2007) Imaging histologic discordance at MRI-guided 9-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:852–859

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Heywang-Köbrunner SH, Sinnatamby R, Consensus Group et al (2009) Interdisciplinary consensus on the uses and technique of MR-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (VAB): results of a European consensus meeting. Eur J Radiol 72:289–294

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Fischer U, Schwethelm L, Baum FT, Luftner-Nagel S, Teubner J (2009) Effort, accuracy and histology of MR-guided vacuum biopsy of suspicious breast lesions–retrospective evaluation after 389 interventions. Rofo 181:774–781

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dipartimento di Scienze Medico-Chirurgiche, Unità di Radiologia, Università degli Studi di Milano, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Via Morandi 30, 20097, San Donato Milanese, Milan, Italy

    Francesco Sardanelli

Authors
  1. Francesco Sardanelli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesco Sardanelli.

Additional information

This is an invited commentary to article doi:10.1007/s10549-010-1064-z.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sardanelli, F. Additional findings at preoperative MRI: a simple golden rule for a complex problem?. Breast Cancer Res Treat 124, 717–721 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-010-1144-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-010-1144-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation