Skip to main content
Log in

An Examination of the Relationship Between Ethical Work Climate and Moral Awareness

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper draws from the fields of history, sociology, psychology, moral philosophy, and organizational theory to establish a theoretical connection between a social/organizational influence (ethical work climate) and an individual cognitive element of moral behavior (moral awareness). The research was designed to help to fill a gap in the existing literature by providing empirical evidence of the connection between organizational influences and individual moral awareness and subsequent ethical choices, which has heretofore largely been merely assumed. Results of the study provide evidence that ethical work climate (EWC) is a primary predictor of individual moral awareness, and that the influence of social factors often overrides the effects of individual differences in a work group setting. Implications for future research are provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abelson R. P., Levi A. (1985) Decision Making and Decision Theory. In: Lindzey G., Aronson E. (eds) Handbook of Social Psychology, Volume 1, Theory and Method, 3rd ed. Random House, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Agarwal J., Malloy D. C. (1999) Ethical Work Climate Dimensions in a Not-for-profit Organization: An Empirical Study. Journal of Business Ethics 20:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arlow P. (1991) Characteristics in College Students’ Evaluations of Business Ethics and Corporate Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 10:63–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett J. H., Karson M. J. (1989) Managers, Values, Executive Decisions: An Exploration of the Role of Gender, Career Stage, Organizational Level, Function, and the Importance of Ethics, Relationships and Results in Managerial Decision-Making. Journal of Business Ethics 8:35–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron R. M., Kenny D. A. (1986) The Moderator–Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51:1173–1182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baucus, M. S., & P. L. Rechner: 1995. ‘Framing and Reframing: A Process Model of Ethical Decision Making’, in D. Nigh and D. Collins (eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Meeting of the International Association for Business and Society, 2–7

  • Baucus, M. S., & P. L. Rechner: 1996. ‘Choosing and Constructing Frames in Ethical Decision Making’, Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Cincinnati, Ohio

  • Bebeau, M.: 1994. in J. R. Rest and D. Narváez (eds.), Moral Development in the Professions (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, Hillsdale, NJ)

  • Bebeau M., Brabeck M. (1989) Ethical Sensitivity and Moral Reasoning Among Men and Women in the Professions. In: Brabeck M. (ed) Who cares? Theory, research and educational implications of the ethic of care. Praeger, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein I. H. (1988) Applied Multivariate Analysis. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Blasi A. (1980) Bridging Moral Cognition and Moral Action: A Critical Review of the Literature. Psychological Bulletin 88:1–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blum L. (1991) Moral Perception and Particularity. Ethics 101:701–725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blum L. A. (1994) Moral Perception and Particularity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Bok, D.: 1976, ‘Can Ethics Be Taught?’ Change, October: 26–30

  • Brandt R. B. (1995) Morality, Utilitarianism, and Rights. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Butterfield, K. D., L. K. Treviño and G. R. Weaver: 1996, ‘Moral Awareness in Organizations: A Socialization Perspective’, unpublished paper presented at the Fifty-seventh Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, (Boston, MA)

  • Butterfield, K. D., L. K. Treviño and G. R. Weaver: 1997, ‘Moral Awareness in Organizations: Influences of Societal and Organizational Socialization’, Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Boston

  • Butterfield K. D., Treviño L. K., Weaver G. R. (2000) Moral Awareness in Business Organizations: Influences of Issue-Related and Social Context Factors. Human Relations 53:981–1018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne B. M. (2001) Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. Lawrence Erlbaum, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen D. V. (1995) Creating Ethical Work Climates: A Socioeconomic Perspective. The Journal of Socio-Economics 24:317–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cullen J. B., Victor B., Bronson J. W. (1993) The Ethical Climate Questionnaire: An Assessment of its Development and Validity. Psychological Reports 73:667–674

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullen J. B., Victor B., Stephens C. U. (1989) An Ethical Weather Report: Assessing the Organization’s Ethical Climate. Organizational Dynamics 18:50–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deal T. E., Kennedy A. A. (1982) Corporate Cultures: The Rites and Rituals of Corporate Life. Perseus Books, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • DeConinck J. B., Lewis W. F. (1997) The Influence of Deontological and Teleological Considerations and Ethical Climate on Sales Managers’ Intentions to Reward or Punish Sales Force Behavior. Journal of Business Ethics 16:497–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derry R. (1989) An Empirical Study of Moral Reasoning. Journal of Business Ethics 8:855–862

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deshpande S. P. (1996a) Ethical Climate and The Link Between Success and Ethical Behavior: An Empirical Investigation of a Non-Profit Organization. Journal of Business Ethics 15:315–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deshpande S. P. (1996b) The Impact of Ethical Climate Types on Facets of Job Satisfaction: An Empirical Investigation. Journal of Business Ethics 15:655–660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch M. (1974) Awakening the Sense of Injustice. In: Lerner M., Ross M. (eds.), The Quest for Justice: Myth, Reality, Ideal. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Montreal

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch M. (1985) Distributive Justice: A Social Psychological Perspective. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim E. (1895/1962) The Rules of Sociological Method. The Free Press of Glencoe, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim E. (1937/1996) Professional Ethics and Civic Morals. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • England G. W. (1978) Managers and Their Value Systems: A Five-Country Comparative Study. Columbia Journal of World Business 13:35–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, A.: 2002. ‘When it comes to ethics, B-schools get an F’, The Washington Post (August 4), B4

  • Field R. H. G., Abelson M. A. (1982) Climate: A Reconceptualization and Proposed Model. Human Relations 35:181–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fritzsche, D.: 1988. ‘An Examination of Marketing Ethics: Role of the Decision Maker, Consequences of the Decision, Management Position, and Sex of the Respondent’, Journal of Macromarketing, Fall: 29–39

  • Gaertner K. (1991) The Effect Of Ethical Climate on Managers’ Decisions. In: Coughlin R. M. (eds) Morality, Rationality and Efficiency: New Perspectives on Socio-Economics. M. E. Sharpe, Armonk, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Gautschi F. H. III, Jones T. M. (1998) Enhancing the Ability of Business Students to Recognize Ethical Issues: An Empirical Assessment of the Effectiveness of a Course in Business Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 17:205–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan C. (1982) In a Different Voice. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Gioia D. A. (1992) Pinto Fires and Personal Ethics: A Script Analysis of Missed Opportunities. Journal of Business Ethics 11:379–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gouldner A. W. (1957) Cosmopolitans and Locals: Toward an Analysis of Latent Social Roles – I. Administrative Science Quarterly 2:281–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gouldner A. W. (1958) Cosmopolitans and Locals: Toward an Analysis of Latent Social Roles – II. Administrative Science Quarterly 3:444–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter M. (1985) Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology 91:481–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haan N., Aerts E., Cooper B. A. (1985) On Moral Grounds. University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare B. (2004) Celebration of Fools: An Inside Look at the Rise and Fall of J C Penney. AMACOM, American Management Association, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede G. (1998) Attitudes, Values and Organizational Culture: Disentangling the Concepts. Organization Studies 19:477–492

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu L.-T., Bentler P. M., (1999) Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria versus New Alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 6:1–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hume D. (1751) An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals. A. Millar, London

    Google Scholar 

  • James L. R., Jones A. P. (1974) Organizational Climate: A Review of Theory and Research. Psychological Bulletin 81:1096–1112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson R. A., Neelankavil J. P., Jadhav A. (1986) Developing the Executive Resource. Business Horizons 29:33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones T. M. (1991) Ethical Decision Making by Individuals in Organizations: An Issue-Contingent Model. Academy of Management Review 16:366–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones T. M., Ryan L. V. (1997) The Link Between Ethical Judgment and Action in Organizations: A Moral Approbation Approach. Organization Science 8:663–680

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones T. M., Ryan L. V. (1998) The Effect of Organizational Forces on Individual Morality. Business Ethics Quarterly 8:431–445

    Google Scholar 

  • Joyce W. F., Slocum J. W. Jr. (1979) Climates in Organizations. In: Kerr S. (eds) Organizational Behavior. Grid, Columbus, OH

    Google Scholar 

  • Joyce W. F., Slocum J. W. Jr. (1984) Collective climate: Agreement as a Basis for Defining Aggregate Climates in Organizations. Academy of Management Journal 27:721–742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kant I. (1785/1959) Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals. Liberal Arts Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg L. (1973) Continuities in Childhood and Adult Moral Development Revisited. In: Baltes P. B., Schaie K.(eds) Life-Span Development Psychology: Personality and Socialization. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg L. (1981) The Philosophy of Moral Development, Vol 1. Harper & Row, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg L. (1984) The Psychology of Moral Development, Vol 2. Harper & Row, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Korsgaard C. M. (1996) Creating the Kingdom of Ends. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Langdale, C. H.: 1983. Moral orientations and moral development: The analysis of care and justice reasoning across different dilemmas in females and males from childhood through adulthood. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard University

  • Logsdon J. M., Yuthas K. (1997) Corporate Social Performance, Stakeholder Orientation, and Organizational Moral Development. Journal of Business Ethics 16:1213–1226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luthar H. K., DiBattista R. A., Gautschi T. (1997) Perceptions of What the Ethical Climate is and What it Should Be: The Role of Gender, Academic Status, and Ethical Education. Journal of Business Ethics 16:215–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyons N. P. (1983) The Perspectives: On self, Relationships, and Morality. Harvard Educational Review 53:125–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer J. (1988) Themes of Social Responsibility: A Survey of Three Professional Schools. Journal of Business Ethics 7:313–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNichols C. W., Zimmer T. W. (1985) Situational Ethics: An Empirical Study of Differentiators of Student Attitudes. Journal of Business Ethics 4:175–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merton R. K. (1957) Social Theory and Social Structure. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Moberg D. J., Seabright M. A. (2000) The Development of Moral Imagination. Business Ethics Quarterly 10:845–884

    Google Scholar 

  • Opotow S. (1990) Moral Exclusion and Injustice: An Introduction. Journal of Social Issues 46:1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson D. K. (2002) The Relationship Between Unethical Behavior and the Dimensions of the Ethical Climate Questionnaire. Journal of Business Ethics 41:313–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rachels J. (2003a) The Right Thing To Do, 3rd ed. McGraw-Hill, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Rachels J. (2003b) The Elements of Moral Philosophy 4th ed. McGraw-Hill, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Rechner P. L., Baucus M. S. (1997) Business Ethics as a Lifelong Journey: Developing Reflective Judgment, Self-awareness, and Empathy. In: Waddock S. A. (eds) Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy (Supplement 2). JAI Press, Greenwich, CT

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichers A., Schneider B. (1990) Climate and Culture: An Evolution of Constructs. In: Schneider B. (eds) Organizational Climate and Culture. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest J. R. (1986) Manual for the Defining Issues Test. Center for the Study of Ethical Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest J. R. (1994) Background: Theory and Research. In: Rest J. R., Narváez D. (eds) Moral Development in the Professions. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, Hillsdale, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest J., Narvaez D., Bebeau M. J., Thoma S. J. (1999) Postconventional Moral Thinking. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, Mahwah, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, S. J. 2002. Identifying Ethical Issues: The Roles of Issue Characteristics, Individual Differences, and Context in Managerial Sensemaking. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis

  • Ruegger E., King E. W. (1992) A Study of the Effect of Age and Gender Upon Student Business Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 11:179–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salmans S. (1987) Suddenly Business Schools Tackle Ethics. New York Times Education Life, August 2:64–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider B. (1973) The Perception of Organizational Climate: The Customer’s View. Journal of Applied Psychology 57:248–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider B. (1983) An Interactionist Perspective. In: Feimer N. W., Geller E. S. (eds) Environmental Psychology: Directions and Perspectives. Praeger, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider B., Reichers A. E. (1983) On the Etiology of Climates. Personnel Psychology 36:19–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwepker C. H. Jr., Ferrell O. C., Ingram T. N. (1997) The Influence of Ethical Climate and Ethical Conflict on Role Stress in the Sales Force. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 25:99–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaub M. K., Finn D. W., Munter P. (1993) The Effects of Auditors’ Ethical Orientation on Commitment and Ethical Sensitivity. Behavioral Research in Accounting 5:145–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard J. M. (2002) Sociology 8th ed. Wadsworth Thomson Learning, Stamford, CT

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard J. M., Shepard J., Wimbush J. C., Stephens C. U. (1995) The Place of Ethics in Business: Shifting Paradigms?. Business Ethics Quarterly 5:577–601

    Google Scholar 

  • Sims R., Keon T. L. (1997) Ethical Work Climate as a Factor in the Development of Person-Organization Fit. Journal of Business Ethics 16:1095–1105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smelser N. J., Swedberg R. (1994) The Sociological Perspective on the Economy. In: Smelser N. J., Swedberg R.(eds) The Handbook of Economic Sociology. Princeton University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith A. (1759/1986) The Theory of Moral Sentiments. In: Heilbroner R. L. (eds) The Essential Adam Smith. W. W. Norton & Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon R. C. (1992) Ethics and Excellence. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Staub E. (1989) The Roots of Evil: The Psychological and Cultural Origins of Genocide. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens C. U., Lewin A. Y. (1992) Bounded Morality: A Cross-Level Model of the Determinants of Ethical Choice in Organizations. In: Ludwig D., Paul K. (eds) Contemporary Issues in the Business Environment. The Edwin Mellen Press, Lewiston/Queenston/Lampeter

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterner J. (1990) Other People’s Money: The Ultimate Seduction. Applause Theatre Book, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens G. (1984) Business Ethics and Social Responsibility: The Responses of Present and Future Managers. Akron Business and Economics Review 15:6–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Treviño L. K., Butterfield K. D., McCabe D. L. (1998) The Ethical Context in Organizations; Influences on Employee Attitudes and Behaviors. Business Ethics Quarterly 8:447–476

    Google Scholar 

  • Victor B., Cullen J. B. (1987) A Theory and Measure of Ethical Climate in Organizations. In: Frederick W. C. (eds) Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, Vol 9. JAI Press, Greenwich, CI

    Google Scholar 

  • Victor B., Cullen J. B. (1988) The Organizational Bases of Ethical Work Climates. Administrative Science Quarterly 33:101–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber J. (1995) Influences Upon Organizational Ethical Subclimates: A Multi-departmental Analysis of a Single Firm. Organization Science 6:509–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werhane, P. H.: 1998. ‘Moral Imagination and the Search for Ethical Decision-Making in Management’, Business Ethics Quarterly, The Ruffin Series, Special Issue No. 1, 75–98

  • Williams B. (1985) Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson J. (1983) Social Theory. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimbush J. C., Shepard J. M. (1994) Toward an Understanding of Ethical Climate: Its Relationship to Ethical Behavior and Supervisory Influence. Journal of Business Ethics 13:637–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wimbush J. C., Shepard J. M., Markham S. E. (1997a) An Empirical Examination of the Multi-dimensionality of Ethical Climate in Organizations. Journal of Business Ethics 16:67–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wimbush J. C., Shepard J. M., Markham S. E. (1997b) An Empirical Examination of the Relationship Between Ethical Climate and Ethical Behavior from Multiple Levels of Analysis. Journal of Business Ethics 16:1705–1716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wyld D. C., Jones C. A. (1997) The Importance of Context: The Ethical Work Climate Construct and Models of Ethical Decision Making – An Agenda for Research. Journal of Business Ethics 16:465–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Craig V. VanSandt.

EXHIBIT A

EXHIBIT A

PLEASE ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS ABOUT THE GENERAL CLIMATE IN YOUR COMPANY IN TERMS OF HOW IT REALLY IS IN YOUR COMPANY, \(\underline{{\rm NOT}}\) HOW YOU WOULD PREFER IT TO BE. PLEASE BE AS CANDID AS POSSIBLE; REMEMBER, ALL YOUR RESPONSES WILL REMAIN STRICTLY ANONYMOUS AND CONFIDENTIAL.

PLEASE INDICATE THE EXTENT TO WHICH YOU AGREE WITH EACH OF THE FOLLOWING STATEMENTS ABOUT YOUR COMPANY. USE THE SCALE BELOW AND INDICATE ON THE ANSWER SHEET NEXT TO THE NUMBER OF THE CORRESPONDING STATEMENT THE NUMBER WHICH BEST REPRESENTS YOUR ANSWER.

TO WHAT EXTENT ARE THE FOLLOWING STATEMENTS TRUE ABOUT YOUR COMPANY?

COMPLETELY FALSE

MOSTLY FALSE

SOMEWHAT FALSE

SOMEWHAT TRUE

MOSTLY TRUE

COMPLETELY TRUE

1

2

3

4

5

6

  1. 1.

    (EI) In this company, people are mostly out for themselves.

  2. 2.

    (EI) In this company, people protect their own interest above other considerations.

  3. 3.

    (EI) People in this company are very concerned about what is best for themselves.

  4. 4.

    (EI) There is no room for one’s own personal morals or ethics in this company.

  5. 5.

    (EL) Decisions here are primarily viewed in terms of contributions to profit.

  6. 6.

    (EL) People are concerned with the company’s interests – to the exclusion of all else.

  7. 7.

    (EL) People are expected to do anything to further the company’s interests.

  8. 8.

    (EL) Work is considered sub-standard only when it hurts the company’s interests.

  9. 9.

    (EC) Efficient solutions to problems are always sought here.

  10. 10.

    (EC) In this company, each person is expected, above all, to work efficiently.

  11. 11.

    (EC) The major responsibility for people in the company is to consider efficiency first.

  12. 12.

    (EC) The most efficient way is always the right way in this company.

  13. 13.

    (BI) In this company, our major concern is always what is best for the other person.

  14. 14.

    (BI) In this company, people look out for each other’s good.

  15. 15.

    (BI) It is expected that each individual is cared for when making decisions here.

  16. 16.

    (BI) What is best for each individual is a primary concern in this organization.

  17. 17.

    (BL) Our major consideration is what is best for everyone in this company.

  18. 18.

    (BL) People are very concerned about what is generally best for employees in the company.

  19. 19.

    (BL) People in this company view team spirit as important.

  20. 20.

    (BL) The most important concern is the good of all the people in the company.

  21. 21.

    (BC) It is expected that you will always do what is right for the customer and public.

  22. 22.

    (BC) People in this company are actively concerned about the customer’s, and the public’s interest.

  23. 23.

    (BC) People in this company have a strong sense of responsibility to the outside community.

  24. 24.

    (BC) The effect of decisions on the customer and the public are a primary concern in this company.

  25. 25.

    (PI) Each person in this company decides for himself what is right and wrong.

  26. 26.

    (PI) In this company, people are expected to follow their own personal and moral beliefs.

  27. 27.

    (PI) In this company, people are guided by their own personal ethics.

  28. 28.

    (PI) The most important consideration in this company is each person’s sense of right and wrong.

  29. 29.

    (PL) Everyone is expected to stick by company rules and procedures.

  30. 30.

    (PL) It is very important to follow strictly the company’s rules and procedures here.

  31. 31.

    (PL) Successful people in this company go by the book.

  32. 32.

    (PL) Successful people in this company strictly obey the company policies.

  33. 33.

    (PC) In this company, people are expected to strictly follow legal or professional standards.

  34. 34.

    (PC) In this company, the law or ethical code of their profession is the major consideration.

  35. 35.

    (PC) People are expected to comply with the law and professional standards over and above other considerations.

  36. 36.

    (PC) The first consideration is whether a decision violates any law.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

VanSandt, C.V., Shepard, J.M. & Zappe, S.M. An Examination of the Relationship Between Ethical Work Climate and Moral Awareness. J Bus Ethics 68, 409–432 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9030-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9030-8

Keywords

Navigation