Abstract
Using a simulated, two-party negotiation, we examined how characteristics of the actor, target, and situation affected deception. To trigger deception, we used an issue that had no value for one of the two parties (indifference issue). We found support for an opportunistic betrayal model of deception: deception increased when the other party was perceived as benevolent, trustworthy, and as having integrity. Negotiators’ goals also affected the use of deception. Individualistic, cooperative, and mixed dyads responded differently to information about the other party’s trustworthiness, benevolence, and integrity when deciding to either misrepresent or leverage their indifference issue. Mixed dyads displayed opportunistic betrayal. Negotiators in all-cooperative and all-individualistic dyads used different information in deciding whether to leverage their indifference issues and used the same information (benevolence) differently in deciding whether to misrepresent the value of their indifference issue.
References
Aquino K. (1998) The Effects of Ethical Climate and the Availability of Alternatives on the Use of Deception During Negotiation. International Journal of Conflict Management 9:195–217
Boon S. D., Holmes J. G. (1991) The Dynamics of Interpersonal Trust: Resolving Uncertainty in the Face of Risk. In Hinde R. A., Groebel J. (eds), Cooperation and Prosocial Behavior. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
Bok S. (1978) Lying: A Moral Choice in Public and Private Life. New York, Pantheon
Bryk A. S., Raudenbush S. W. (1992) Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. Thousand Oaks CA, Sage
Butterfield K. D., Trevino L. K., Weaver G. R. (2000) Moral Awareness in Business Organizations: Influences of Issue-Related and Social Context Factors. Human Relations 53:981–1018
Camac C. (1992) Information Preferences in Two-Person Social Dilemmas. In Liebrand W. B. G., Messick D. M., Wilke H. A. M. (eds), Social Dilemmas: Theoretical Issues and Research Findings. Oxford, Pergamon Press
Carnevale, P. J., C. Wan, R. Dalal, and K. M. O’Connor: 2001, ‚Strategic Misrepresentation of Indifference in Bilateral Negotiation’, Presented at International Association of Conflict Management Conference, Cergy, France
Dees J. G., Cramton P. C. (1991) Shrewd Bargaining on the Moral Frontier: Toward a Theory of Morality in Practice. Business Ethics Quarterly 1:135–167
De Dreu C. K. W., Boles T. (1998) Share and Share Alike or Winner Take all?: The Influence of Social Value Orientation upon Choice and Recall of Negotiation Heuristics. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 76:253–276
De Dreu C. K. W., Weingart L. R., Kwon S. (2000) Influence of Social Motives on Integrative Negotiations: A Meta-analytic Review and Test of Two Theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 78:889–905
Deutsch M. (1982) Interdependence and Psychological Orientation. In Derlega V. J., Grzelak J. (eds), Cooperation and Helping Behavior: Theories and Research. New York, Academic Press
Dillard J. P., Palmer M. T., Kinney T. A. (1995) Relational Judgments in an Influence Context. Human Communication Research 21:331–353
Doney P. M., Cannon J. P., Mullen M. (1998) Understanding the Influence of National Culture on the Development of Trust. Academy of Management Journal 23:601–620
Eisenberger R., Lynch P., Aselage J., Rohdieck S. (2004) Who Takes the Most Revenge? Individuals Differences in Negative Reciprocity Norm Endorsement. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 30:787–799
Ekman P. (2001) Telling Lies: Clues to Deceit in the Marketplace, Politics and Marriage. New York, W. W. Norton & Co
Elangovan A., Shapiro D. (1998) Betrayal of Trust in Organizations. Academy of Management Review 23:547–566
Ferrell O. C., Gresham L. G. (1985) A Contingency Framework for Understanding Ethical Decision Making in Marketing. Journal of Marketing 49:87–96
Fiske S. T. (1993) Social Cognition and Social Perception. Annual Review of Social Psychology 44:155–194
Giebels E., De Dreu C., Van de Vliert E. (1998) Social Motives and Trust in Negotiation: The Disruptive Effects of Punitive Capability. Journal of Applied Psychology 83:408–422
Hegarty W. H., Sims H. P. (1978) Some Determinants of Unethical Decision Behavior: An Experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology 4:451–457
Jones T. M. (1991) Ethical Decision-Making by Individuals in Organizations: An Issue Contingent Model. Academy of Management Review 16:366–395
Jones T. M., Ryan L. V. (1997) The Link Between Ethical Judgment and Action in Organizations: A Moral Approbation Approach. Organization Science 8:663–680
Kelley H. H., Stahelski A. J. (1970) Social Interaction Basis of Cooperators and Competitors Beliefs about Others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 7:401–419
Kenny D., Kashy D., Bolger N. (1998) Data Analysis in Social Psychology. In Gilbert D. T., Fiske S. T. (eds), The Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol 2, 4th ed. New York, McGraw Hill, pp 233–265
Kollock P. (1994) The Emergence of Exchange Structures: An Experimental Study of Uncertainty, Commitment and Trust. The American Journal of Sociology 100:313–345
Larrick R., Blount S. (1995) Social Context in Tacit Bargaining Games: Consequences for Perceptions of Affinity and Cooperative Behavior. In Kramer R. M., Messick D. M. (eds), Negotiation as a Social Process: New trends. Thousand Oaks, CA Sage Publications Inc
Lewicki R. (1983) Lying and Deception: A Behavioral Model. In Bazerman M. H., Lewicki R. J. (eds), Negotiating in Organizations. Beverly Hills, Sage
Lewicki R., McAllister D., Bies R. (1998) Trust and Distrust: New Relationships and Realities. Academy of Management Review 23:438–458
Lewicki, R. J., M. A. Stevenson, and B. B. Bunker: 1997, ‚The Three Components on Interpersonal Trust: Instrument Development and Differences Across Relationships’, Paper Presented at the Academy of Management Meeting
Liebrand W. B. G., Jansen R. W. T. L., Rijken V. M., Suhre C. J. M. (1986) Might Over Morality: Social Values and the Perception of Other Players in Experimental Games. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 22:203–215
McAllister D. J. (1995) Affect and Cognition-based Trust as Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations. Academy of Management Journal 38:24–59
McKnight D. H., Cummings L. L., Chervany N. L. (1998) Initial Trust Formation in New Organizational Relationships. Academy of Management Review 23:473–490
Matheson K., Holmes J. G., Kristiansen C. M. (1991) Observational Goals and the Integration of Trait Perceptions and Behavior: Behavioral Prediction Versus Impression Formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 27:138–160
Molm L. D., Takhashi N., Peterson G. (2000) Risk and Trust in Social Exchange: An Experimental Test of a Classical Proposition. The American Journal of Sociology 105:1396–1427
Morris M. W., Larrick R. P., Su S. K. (1999) Misperceiving Negotiation Counterparts: When Situationally Determined Bargaining Behaviors are Attributed to Personality Traits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77:52–67
Moskowitz D. S., Suh E. J., Desaulniers J. (1994) Situational Influences on Gender Differences in Agency and Communion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 66:753–761
Murnighan J. K., Babcock L., Thompson L., Pillutla M. (1999) The Information Dilemma in Negotiations: Effects of Experience, Incentives and Integrative Potential. International Journal of Conflict Management 10:313–339
O’Connor K., Carnevale P. (1997) A Nasty but Effective Negotiation Strategy: Misrepresentation of a Common-value Issue. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin 23:504–519
Olekalns M., Smith P. (2005) Moments in Time: Metacognition, Trust and Outcomes in Negotiation. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin 31:1696–1707
Olekalns M., Smith P. L. (2003) Testing the Relationships Among Negotiators’ Motivational Orientations, Strategy Choices and Outcomes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 39:101–117
Sattler D. N, Kerr N. L. (1991) Might Versus Morality Explored: Motivational and Cognitive Bases for Social Motives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 60:756–765
Schul Y., Mayo R., Burnstein E. (2004) Encoding Under Trust and Distrust: The Spontaneous Activation of Incongruent Cognitions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 86:668–679
Schweitzer M. E., DeChurch L. A., Gibson D. E. (2005) Conflict Frames and the Use of Deception: Are Competitive Negotiators Less Ethical? Journal of Applied Social Psychology 35:2123–2149
Schweitzer M. E., Croson R. (1999) Curtailing Deception: The Impact of Direct Questions on Lies and Omissions. International Journal of Conflict Management 10:225–248
Sheppard B. H., Sherman D. M. (1998) The Grammars of Trust: A Model and General Implications. Academy of Management Review 23:422–438
Spranca M., Minsk E., Baron J. (1991) Omission and Commission in Judgment and Choice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 27:76–105
Steinel W., De Dreu C. K. W. (2004) Social Motives and Strategic Misrepresentation in Social Decision Making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 86:419–434
Tannen D. (1994) Gender & Discourse. New York, Oxford
Ten Velden, F. S., B. Beersma, and C. K. W. De Dreu: 2004, ‚Heterogeneous Social Motives in Negotiating Groups: The Moderating Effects of Decision Rule and Interest Position’, Paper Presented at the 17th Annual Conference of the International Association for Conflict Management, Pittsburgh, PA
Tenbrunsel A. (1998) Misrepresentation and Expectations of Misrepresentation in an Ethical Dilemma: The Role of Incentives and Temptation. Academy of Management Journal 41:330–349
Trevino L. K. (1986) Ethical Decision Making in Organizations: A Person-situation Interactionist Model. Academy of Management Review 11:601–617
Van Kleef G. A., De Dreu C. K. W. (2002) Social Value Orientation and Impression Formation: A Test of Two Competing Hypotheses about Information Search in Negotiation. International Journal of Conflict Management 13:59–77
Weingart, L., J. Brett, M. Olekalns, and P. Smith: ‚Managing Differences in Orientation and Strategy in Group Negotiation’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (under review)
White C. H., Burgoon J. K. (2001) Adaptation and Communicative Design: Patterns of Interaction in Truthful and Deceptive Conversations. Human Communication Research 27:9–37
Yamagishi T., Yamagishi M. (1994) Trust and Commitment in the United States and Japan. Motivation and Emotion 18:9–66
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Mara Olekalns is a Professor of Management (Negotiations) at the Melbourne Business School, University of Melbourne. Her research focuses on communication processes in negotiation. In her research, she has investigated how strategy sequences shape negotiation outcomes. She is extending this research to investigate how impressions and communication shape trust in negotiation. Her work on communication processes in negotiation has been published in Journal of Applied Psychology, Human Communication Research, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, and Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes.
Philip L. Smith is a Professor in the Department of Psychology, University of Melbourne. His primary research interest is in building quantitative models of the human visual system. He also applies his modeling expertise to analyses of communication processes in negotiation, focusing on the relationships between situational and dispositional factors, strategy sequences and negotiation outcomes. It has been published in leading management and psychology journals, including Human Communication Research, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, and Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes.
Authors' Note The research reported in this paper was supported by a Discovery Grant from the Australian Research Council. We thank Ania Ratzik and Rudi Crncec for assistance with data coding. Correspondence should be addressed to Mara Olekalns, Melbourne Business School, University of Melbourne, 200 Leicester St, Carlton, Victoria, 3053, Australia or via email to m.olekalns@mbs.edu
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Olekalns, M., Smith, P.L. Loose with the Truth: Predicting Deception in Negotiation. J Bus Ethics 76, 225–238 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9279-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9279-y