Skip to main content
Log in

Employee Participation in Cause-Related Marketing Strategies: A Study of Management Perceptions from British Consumer Service Industries

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of cause-related marketing (CRM) is to publicise and capitalise on a firm’s corporate social performance (CSP) by enhancing its legitimacy in the eyes of its stakeholders. This study focuses on the firm’s internal stakeholders – i.e. its employees – and the extent of their involvement in the selection of social campaigns. Whilst the difficulties of managing a firm that has lost or damaged its legitimacy in the eyes of its employees are well known, little is understood about the extent to which managers and their social partners listen to and involve their employees in the legitimation process. Through telephone interviews with non-profit organisations and senior managers of service sector firms, the extent of employee involvement in CRM campaigns and the perceived benefits of doing so are investigated.␣Amongst other things, we find that (i) the extent of employee participation varies significantly across firms; (ii) larger CRM campaigns tend to be managed centrally with relatively less employee participation than smaller ones and (iii) financial services firms are more likely to make CRM decisions centrally, with relatively less employee participation than retail services firms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adkins, S.: 1999, Cause Related Marketing: Who Cares Wins, (Elsevier Ltd, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Albinger, H. S. and Freeman, S. J.: 2000, “Corporate Social Performance and Attractiveness as an Employer to Different Job Seeking Population”, Journal of Business Ethics, 28(3), 243-253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Algesheimer, R., Dholakia, U. and Herrmann, A.: 2005, “The Social Influence of Brand Community: Evidence from European Car Club”, Journal of Marketing, 69(3), 19-34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, D. G., Shore, L. M. and Griffeth, R. W.: 2003, “The Role of Perceived Organizational Supp.ort and Supportive Human Resource Practices in the Turnover Process”, Journal of Management, 29(1), 99-118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andreasen, A.: 1996, “Profits for Non-profits: Find a Corporate Partner”, Harvard Business Review, 74(6), 47-59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arya, B. and Salk, J.: 2006, “Cross-Sector Alliance Learning and Effectiveness of Voluntary Codes of Corporate Social Responsibility”, Business Ethics Quarterly, 16(2), 211-234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atteberry, N. E.: 2007, “Multidisciplinary Team Building in Radiology through use of Shared Governance Principles”, Journal of Radiology Nursing, 26(3), 99-101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Backhaus, K. B., Stone, B. A. and Heiner, K.: 2002, “Exploring the Relationship between Corporate Social Performance and Employer Attractiveness”, Business and Society, 41(3), 292-318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balmer, J. M. T., Fukukawa, K. and Gray, E. R.: 2007, “The Nature and Management of Ethical Corporate Identity: A Commentary on Corporate Identity, Corporate Social Responsibility and Ethics”, Journal of Business Ethics, 76(1), 7-15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartkus, B. R.: 1997, “Employee Ownership as Catalyst of Organizational Change”, Journal of Organizational Change Management, 10(4), 331-344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basil, D. Z. and Weber, D.: 2006, “Values Motivation and Concern for Appearances: The Effect of Personality Traits on Responses to Corporate Social Responsibility”, International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector, 11(1), 61-72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beatty, S. E., Mayer, M., Coleman, J. E., Reynolds, K. E. and Lee, J.: 1996, “Customer-Sales Associate Retail Relationship”, Journal of Retailing, 72(3), 223-247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker-Olsen, K. and Hill, R.: 2005, “The Impact of Perceived Corporate Social Responsibility on Consumer Behaviour”, Journal of Business Research, 59(1), 46-53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, I., Cunningham, P. and Drumwright, M.: 2004, “Social Alliances: Company/Nonprofit Collaboration”, California Management Review, 47(1), 58-90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berglind, M. and Nakata, C.: 2005, “Cause-Related Marketing: More Buck than Bang?”, Business Horizons, 48(5), 443-453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloemer, J., Ruyter, K. and Peeters, P.: 1998, “Investigating Drivers of Bank Loyalty: The Complex Relationship between Image, Service Quality and Satisfaction”, International Journal of Bank Marketing, 16(7), 276-286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bronn, P. S. and Vrioni, A. B.: 2001, “Corporate Social Responsibility and Cause-Related Marketing: An Overview”, International Journal of Advertising, 20(2), 207-222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bussell, H. and Forbes, D.: 2002, “Understanding the Volunteer Market: The What, Where, Who of Volunteering”, International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 7(3), 244-257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D., Craven, B. and Shrives, P.: 2003, “Voluntary Social Reporting in Three FTSE Sectors: A Comment on Perception and Legitimacy”, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 14(4), 558-581.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpini, M. D., Cook, F. L. and Jacobs, L. R.: 2004, “Public Deliberation, Discursive Participation, and Citizen Engagement: A Review of the Empirical Literature”, Annual Review of Political Science, 7, 315-344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, H.: 2006, “Integrating the Role of Sales Agent into the Branding Model in the Insurance Industry”, Journal of American Academy of Business, 8(2), 278-285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, I.: 2000, “Retail Power, Competition and Local Consumer Choice in the UK Grocery Sector”, European Journal of Marketing, 34(8), 975-1002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson, M. B. E.: 1995, “A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance”, Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92-117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collier, J. and Esteban, R. (2007), “Corporate Social Responsibility and Employee Commitment”, Business Ethics, A European Review, 16(1), 19-33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cotton, J. L., Vollrath, D. A., Froggatt, K. L., Lengnick-Hall, M. L. and Jennings, K. R.: 1988, “Employee Participation: Diverse Forms and Different Outcome”, Academic of Management Review, 13(1), 8-22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, A., Zagelmeyer, S. and Marchington, M.: 2006, “Embedding Employee Involvement and Participation at Work”, Human Resource Management Journal, 16(3), 250-267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crane, A. and Matten, D.: 2004, Business Ethics: A European Perspective – Managing Corporate Citizenship and Sustainability in the Age of Globalization, (Oxford University Press, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Creyer, E. and Ross, W.: 1996, “The Impact of Corporate Behaviour on Perceived Product Value”, Marketing Letters, 7(2), 175-185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crosby, L., Evans, K. and Cowles, D.: 1990, “Relationship Quality in Services Selling: An Interpersonal Influence Perspective”, Journal of Marketing, 54(3), 68-81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danford, A., Richardson, M., Stewart, P., Tailby, S. and Upchurch, M.: 2004, “High Performance Work Systems and Workplace Partnership: A Case Study of Aerospace Workers”, New Technology, Work and Employment, 19(1), 14-29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, J.: 1997, “Cancer Sells”, Working Woman, 22(5), 36-39.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Bussy, N., Ewing, M., and Pitt, L.: 2003, “Stakeholder Theory And Internal Marketing Communications: A Framework For Analysing The Influence Of New Media.” Journal of Marketing Communications, 9: 147-161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drumwright, M. E. and Murphy, P. E.: 2001, “Corporate Societal Marketing”, in Bloom, P. N. and Gundlach, G. T. (eds.), Handbook of Marketing and Society, (Sage Publication, London), pp. 162-183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Du, S., Bhattacharya, C.B. and Sen, S.: 2007, “Reaping Relational Rewards from Corporate Social Responsibility: The Role of Competitive Position”, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 24(3), 224-241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckel, P. D.: 2000, “The Role of Shared Governance in Institutional Hard Decisions: Enabler or Antagonist?”, The Review of Higher Education, 24(2), 15-39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberger, R., Jones, J. R., Aselage, J. and Sucharski, I. L.: 2004, Perceived Organizational Support, (Oxford University Press, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellen, S., Webb, P. and Mohr, D. J.: 2006, “Building Corporate Associations: Consumer Attributions for Corporate Socially Responsible Programs”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(2), 147-157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodijk, R.: 2003, “Partnership at Corporate Level: The Meaning of the Stakeholder Model”, Journal of Change Management, 3(3), 225-241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, R.: 2002, “The Social Accounting Project and Accounting Organizations and Society”, Accounting Organization and Society, 27(7), 687-708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, M.: 2007, “Stakeholder Engagement: Beyond the Myth of Corporate Responsibility”, Journal of Business Ethics, 74, 315-327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handelman, J. M. and Arnold, S. J.: 1999, “The Role of Marketing Actions with a Social Dimension: Appeals to the Institutional Environment”, Journal of Marketing, 63(3), 33-48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartline, M. D. and Ferrell, O. C.: 1996, “The Management of Customer-Contact Service Employees: An Empirical Investigation”, Journal of Marketing, 60(4), 52-70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hemingway, C. A.: 2005, “Personal Values as a Catalyst for Corporate Social Entrepreneurship”, Journal of Business Ethics, 60(3), 233-249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrbach, O. and Mignonac, K.: 2004, “How Organizational Image Affects Employee Attitudes”, Human Resource Management Journal, 14(4), 76-88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Homburg, C. and Stock, R. M.: 2005, “Exploring the Conditions under Which Salesperson Work Satisfaction Can Lead to Customer Satisfaction”, Psychology and Marketing, 22(5), 393-420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hung, D. Y., Rundall, T. G., Cohen, D. J., Tallia, A. F. and Carbtree, B. F.: 2006, “Productivity and Turnover in PCPs: The Role of Staff Participation in Decision-Making”, Medical Care, 44(10), 946-951.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. and Grayson, K.: 2005, “Cognitive and Affective Trust in Service Relationship”, Journal of Business Research, 58(4), 550-507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, S. A., Suter, T. A. and Koch, E.: 2006, “Affinity Credit Cards as Relationship Marketing Tools: A Conjoint Analytic Exploration of Combined Product Attributes”, Sport Marketing Quarterly, 15(3), 138-146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keiningham, T. L., Aksoy, L., Cooil, B. Perterson, K. and Vavra, T. G.: 2006, “A Longitudinal Examination of the Asymmetric Impact of Employee and Customer Satisfaction on Retail Sales”, Managing Service Quality, 16(5), 442-459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishnan, M. S., Ramaswamy, V. M., Mary, C. and Damien, P.: 1999, “Customer Satisfaction for Financial Services: The Role of Products, Services, and Information Technology”, Management Science, 45(9), 1194-1209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lafferty, B. A., Goldsmith, R. E., & Hult, G. T. (2004). The Impact of the Alliance on the Partners: A Look at Cause-Brand Alliances, Psychology of Marketing, 21(7), 509-531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, C. G. and C. Liston-Heyes: 2009, ‹Cause-Related Marketing in the Retail and Finance Sectors: An Exploratory Study of the Determinants of Cause Selection and Non-Profit Alliances’, Non-Profit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly (forthcoming)

  • Luo, X. and Bhattacharya, C. B.: 2006, “Corporate Social Responsibility, Customer Satisfaction, and Market Value”, Journal of Marketing, 70(4), 1-18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machleit, K. A., Meyer, T. and Eroglu, S. A.: 2005, “Evaluating the Nature of Hassles and Uplifts in the Retail Shopp.ing Context”, Journal of Business Research, 58(5), 665-663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahnert, K. F. and Torres, A. M.: 2007, “The Brand Inside: The Factors of Failure and Success in Internal Branding”, Irish Marketing Review, 19(1), 54-63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maignan, I. and Ralston, D. A.: 2002, “Corporate Social Responsibility in Europe and the U.S.: Insights from Business’ Self-Presentation”, Journal of International Business Studies, 33(3), 497-514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maio, E.: 2003, “Managing Brand in the New Stakeholder Environment”, Journal of Business Ethics, 44(3), 235-246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAlister, D. T. and Ferrell, L.: 2002, “The Role of Strategic Philanthropy in Marketing Strategy”, European Journal of Marketing, 36(5), 689-705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McBride, A. and Mustchin, S.: 2007, “Lifelong Learning Partnership and Modernization in NHS”, International Journal of Human Resource, 18(9), 1608-1626.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menon, A. and Menon, A.: 1997, “Enviropreneurial Marketing Strategy: The Emergence of Corporate Environmentalism as Market Strategy”, Journal of Marketing, 61(1), 51-67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michel, L.: 2007, “Understanding Decision Making in Organizations to Focus Its Practices Where It Matters”, Measuring Business Excellence, 11(1), 33-45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mori, L. and Taffler, R.: 2004, “Does Corporate Philanthropy Exist?: Business Giving to the Arts in the UK”, Journal of Business Ethics, 54(2), 149-161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morsing, M. and Schultz, M.: 2006, “Corporate Social Responsibility Communication; Stakeholder Information, Response and Involvement Strategies”, Business Ethics: A European Review, 15(4), 323-338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullen, J.: 1997, “Performance-Based Corporate Philanthropy: How “Giving Smart” Can Further Corporate Goal”, Public Relations Quarterly, 42(3), 42-48.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Statistic UK.: 2007, UK Standard Industrial Classification and Economic Activities 2007 (SIC 2007), (Office of National Statistic, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, D. L., Swift, T. and Hunt, K.: 2001, “Questioning the Role of Stakeholder Engagement in Social and Ethical Accounting, Auditing and Reporting”, Accounting Forum, 25(3), 264-282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Packer, A. H. and Sharrar, G. K.: 2003, “Linking Lifelong Learning, Corporate Social Responsibility, and the Changing Nature of Work”, Advances in Developing Human Resource, 5(3), 332-341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palazzo, G. and Scherer, A. G.: 2006, “Corporate Legitimacy as Deliberation: A Communicative Framework”, Journal of Business Ethics, 66, 71-88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedrini, M.: 2007, “Human Capital Convergences in Intellectual Capital and Sustainability Report”, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 8(2), 346-366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peloza, J. and Hassay, D. N.: 2006, “Intra-organizational Volunteerism: Good Soldiers, Good Deeds and Good Politics”, Journal of Business Ethics, 64, 357-379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polonsky, M. J. and Wood, G.: 2001, “Can the Overcommercialization of Cause-Related Marketing Harm Society?”, Journal of Macromarketing, 21:1, 8-22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rafiq, M. and Ahmed, P. K.: 1993, “The Scope of Internal Marketing: Defining the Boundary between Marketing and Human Resource Management”, Journal of Marketing, 9(3), 219-232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahaman, A. S., Lawrence, S. and Roper, J.: 2004, “Social and Environmental Reporting at the VRA: Institutionalised Legitimacy or Legitimation Crisis?”, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 15(1), 35-56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramaswami, S. N., Strader, T. J. and Brett, K.: 2000, “Determinants of On-Line Channel Use for Purchasing Financial Products”, International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 5(2), 95-118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rau, B. L. and Feinauer, D.: 2006, “The Role of Internal Agents in Starting Salary Negotiations”, Human Resource Management Review, 16(1), 47-66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riordan, C. M., Gatewood, R. D. and Bill, J. B.: 1997, “Corporate Image: Employee Reactions and Implications for Managing Corporate Social Performance”, Journal of Business Ethics, 16(4), 401-412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sargeant, A.: 2001, “Relationship Fundraising: How to Keep Donors Loyal?”, Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 12(2), 177-192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saura, I. G., Contri, G. B., Taulet, A. C. and Velazquez, B. M.: 2005, “Relationship among Customer Orientation, Service Orientation and Job Satisfaction in Financial Services”, International Journal of Service Industry Management, 16(5), 497-525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott-Ladd, B. and Chan, C. C. A.: 2004, “Emotional Intelligence and Participation in Decision-Making: Strategies for Promoting Organizational Learning and Change”, Strategic Change, 13(2), 95-105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, S., Bhattacharya, C. B. and Korschun, D.: 2006, “The Role of Corporate Social Responsibility in Strengthening Multiple Stakeholder Relationships: A Field Experiment”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(2), 158-166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, S. and Morwitz, V. G.: 1996, “Consumer Reactions to a Provider’s Position on Social Issue: The Effect of Varying Frames of Reference”, Journal of Consumer Psychology, 5(1), 27-48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soutar, G., McNeil, M. and Molster, C.: 1994, “Impact of the Work Environment of Ethical Decision Making: Some Australian Evidence”, Journal of Business Ethics, 13(5), 327-339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Straughan, R. D. and Cooper, M. J.: 2002, “Managing Internal Marketing: A Conceptual Framework Adapted from SERVQUAL”, Marketing Review, 2(3), 253-265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, M. C.: 1995, “Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches”, Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571-610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Summer, J.: 2005, ‹Employees – Your Most Important Stakeholders’, Corporate Responsibility Management. http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb5846/is_200504/ai_n23804560?tag=content;col1

  • Tuffrey, M.: 2003, Good Companies, Better Employees: How Successful Companies Meet Human Resource Needs through Community Involvement, (The Corporate Citizenship Company, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Turban, D. B. and Greening, D. W.: 1996, “Corporate Social Performance and Organizational Attractiveness to Prospective Employee”, Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 658-672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valor, C.: 2007, “A Global Strategic Plan for Corporate Philanthropy”, Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 12(3), 280-297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Buren III, H.: 2001, “If Fairness is the Problem, is Consent the Solution? Integrating ISCT and Stakeholder Theory”, Business Ethics Quarterly, 11(3), 481-499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Den Berg, A.: 2004, “The Contribution of Work Representation to Solving the Governance Structure Problem”, Journal of Management and Governance, 8(2), 129-148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dolen, W., de Ruyter, Ko. And Lemmink, J.: 2004, “An Empirical Assessment of the Influence of Customer Emotions and Contact Employee Performance on Encounter and Relationship Satisfaction”, Journal of Business Research, 57(4), 437-444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varadarajan, P. R. and Menon, A.: 1988, “Cause-Related Marketing: A Coalignment of Marketing Strategy and Corporate Philanthropy”, Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 58-74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verbos, A. K., Gerard, J. A., Forshey, P. R., Harding, C. S. and Miller, J. S.: 2007, “The Positive Ethical Organization: Enacting a Living Code of Ethical Organizational Identity”, Journal of Business Ethics, 76(1), 17-33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiser, J. and Zadek, S.: 2000, Conversations with Disbelievers: Persuading Companies to Address Social Challenges, (The Ford Foundation, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wulfson, M.: 2001, “The Ethics of Corporate Social Responsibility and Philanthropic Venture”, Journal of Business Ethics, 29(1), 135-145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, J. and Lim, J. C.: 1999, “Organizational Support in the Workplace: The Case of Korean Hospital Employee”, Human Relations, 52(7), 923-945.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeithaml, V. A., Berry, L. L. and Parasuraman, B. A.: 1998, “Communication and Control Processes in the Delivery of Service Quality”, Journal of Marketing, 52(2), 35-48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Catherine Liston-Heyes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liu, G., Liston-Heyes, C. & Ko, WW. Employee Participation in Cause-Related Marketing Strategies: A Study of Management Perceptions from British Consumer Service Industries. J Bus Ethics 92, 195–210 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0148-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0148-3

Keywords

Navigation