Abstract
This article develops an “ordonomic” approach to business ethics in the age of globalization. Through the use of a three-tiered conceptual framework that distinguishes between the basic game of antagonistic social cooperation, the meta game of rule-setting, and the meta-meta game of rule-finding discourse, we address three questions, the answers to which we believe are crucial to fostering effective business leadership and corporate social responsibility. First, the purpose of business in society is value creation. Companies have a social mandate to organize mutually advantageous cooperation. Second, business ethics should teach the management competencies necessary to fulfill business’s societal mandate. These competencies are optimization competence in the basic game of value creation, governance competence in the meta game of (political) rule setting, and the three discourse-related skills of orientation competence, reception competence, and communication competence necessary for engaging in the meta-meta game. Third, companies can help solve global problems through global corporate citizenship if they participate as political and moral actors in rule-setting processes and rule-finding discourse aimed at laying the foundation for value creation on a global scale.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albach H. (2005) ‘Betriebswirtschaftslehre ohne Unternehmensethik’. ZfB – Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaftslehre 75(9): 809-831.
Albach, H. 2007 ‘Betriebswirtschaftslehre ohne Unternehmensethik – Eine Erwiderung’. ZfB – Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaftslehre 77(2): 195-206.
Arrow, K.: 1985, ‘The economics of agency’, in J. Pratt and R. Zeckhauser (eds.), Principals and agents: The Structure of business, (Harvard University Press, Boston), pp. 37-51.
Boatright, J.: forthcoming, ‘The Implications of the New Governance for Corporate Governance’, Paper Prepared for the Conference “Corporate Citizenship and New Governance” in Lutherstadt Wittenberg, Germany, November 2009
Bowie, N. E.:1999. Business ethics: A Kantian perspective, (Blackwell, Oxford).
Bowie, N.: 2000: ‘Kantian theory of leadership’, Leadership & Organization Development Journal 21(4), 185-193.
Bragues, G.: 2006, ‘Seek the Good Life, not Money: The Aristotelian Approach to Business Ethics’, Journal of Business Ethics 67(4), 341-357.
Brinkmann, J.: 2004, Corporate Citizenship und Public-Private Partnerships: Zum Potential der Kooperation zwischen Privatwirtschaft, Entwicklungszusammenarbeit und Zivilgesellschaft, WZGE-Studien No. 1 (Lutherstadt Wittenberg)
Buchanan, J. M., R. D. Tollison and G. Tullock (eds.): 1980), Toward a Theory of the Rent-Seeking Society, (Texas A & M University Economics Series, College Station).
Cottmann, T.: 2007, ‘e-mission 55: Flagge zeigen für den Klimaschutz’, in J. Rieksmeier (ed.), Praxisbuch: Politische Interessenvermittlung. Instrumente - Kampagnen - Lobbying, (VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden), pp. 196-201.
de Graaf, G.: 2006, ‘The Autonomy of the Contracting Partners: An Argument for Heuristic Contractarian Business Ethics’, Journal of Business Ethics 68(3), 347-361.
Denzau, A. T. and D. C. North: 1994, ‘Shared Mental Models: Ideologies and Institutions’, Kyklos 47(1), 3-31.
Donaldson, T. and T. W. Dunfee: 1999, Ties that bind: a social contracts approach to business ethics, (Harvard University Press, Cambridge).
Dunfee, T. W. and T. Donaldson: 1995, ‘Contractarian Business Ethics: Current Status and Next Steps’, Business Ethics Quarterly 5(2), 173-186.
Duska, R. F.: 1993, ‘Aristotle: A Pre-Modern Post-Modern? Implications for Business Ethics, by’, Business Ethics Quarterly 3(3), 227-250.
Eigen, P.: 2006, ‘Fighting Corruption in a Global Economy: Transparency Initiatives in the Oil and Gas Industry’, Houston Journal of International Law 29, 327-354.
Frenkel, S. J. and D. Scott: 2002, ‘Compliance, Collaboration, and Codes of Labor Practice: The Adidas Connection’, California Management Review 45(1), 29-49.
Friedman, M.: 1962, Capitalism and Freedom, (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London).
Friedman, M.: 1970, ‘The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits’, New York Times Magazine September 13, 1970, New York, 32–33, 122–126
Hardin, G.: 1968, ‘The Tragedy of the Commons’, Science 162, 1243-1248.
Hart, S. S.: 2005, Capitalism at the Crossroads: The unlimited business opportunities in solving the world's most difficult problems (Wharton School Publishing, Philadelphia).
Hart, S. S. and London, T.: 2005, ‘Developing native capability: What multinational corporations can learn from the base of the pyramid’, Stanford Social Innovation Review 3(2), 28-33.
Henderson, D.: 2001, Misguided Virtue. False Notions of Corporate Social Responsibility (New Zealand Business Roundtable, Wellington).
Henderson, D.: 2005, ‘The Role of Business in the World of Today’, Journal of Corporate Citizenship 17, 30-32.
Hiss, S. B.: 2004, ‘Does Corporate Social Responsibility Need Social Capital? The Example of the ‘Sector Model Social Responsibility’ of the ‘Foreign Trade Association of the German Retail Trade (AVE)’, a Public Private Partnership Project’, CSGR Working Paper No. 141/04 (University of Warwick, Coventry)
Hollenhorst, T. and C. Johnson: 2005, Tools for Corporate Social Responsibility: Forest Steward Council, (ifPeople, Atlanta).
Homann, K.: 2002, ‘Wider die Erosion der Moral durch Moralisieren’, in K. Homann (ed.), Vorteile und Anreize: Zur Grundlegung einer Ethik der Zukunft, (Mohr Siebeck. Tübingen), pp. 3-20.
Jensen, M. C.: 2002, ‘Value Maximization, Stakeholder Theory, and the Corporate Objective Function,’ Business Ethics Quarterly 12(2), 235-256.
Kell, G. and D. Levin: 2003, ‘The Global Compact Network: A Historic Experiment in Learning and Action’, Business and Society Review 108(2), 151-181.
Klein, B., R.G. Crawford and A. A. Alchian: 1978, ‘Vertical Integration, Appropriable Rents, and the Competitive Contracting Process’, Journal of Law and Economics 21 (2), 297-326.
Kreps, D. M.: 1990, ‘Corporate Culture and Economic Theory’, in J. E. Alt and K. A. Shepsle (eds.), Perspectives on Positive Political Economy, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge), pp. 90-143.
Kuhn, T. S.: 1962, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, (Chicago University Press, Chicago).
L’Etang, J.: 1992, ‘A Kantian approach to codes of ethics’, Journal of Business Ethics 11(10), 737-744.
L’Etang, J.: 1995: ‘Ethical corporate social responsibility: A framework for managers’, Journal of Business Ethics 14(2), 125-132.
Lakatos, I.: 1978, The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes: Philosophical Papers Volume 1, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
Mintz, S. M.: 1996, ‘Aristotelian virtue and business ethics education’, Journal of Business Ethics 15(8), 827-838.
Olson, M.: 1965: The Logic of Collective Action, (Harvard University Press, Cambridge).
Palazzo, G. and A. G. Scherer: 2006, ‘Corporate Legitimacy as Deliberation: A Communicative Framework’, Journal of Business Ethics 66(1), 71-88.
Pies, I., S. Hielscher and M. Beckmann: 2009, ‘Moral Commitments and the Societal Role of Business: An Ordonomic Approach to Corporate Citizenship’, Business Ethics Quarterly 19(3), 375-401.
Popper, K. R.: 1972, Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach, (Clarendon Prees, Oxford).
Prahalad, C. K.: 2004, Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid: Eradicating Poverty Through Profits, (Wharton School Publishing, Upper Saddle River).
Rawls, J.: 1971, A Theory of Justice, (Belknap Press of Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Mass.).
Rawls, J.: 1993, Political Liberalism, (Columbia University Press, New York).
Ruggie, J. G.: 2001, ‘global_governance.net: The Global Compact as Learning Network’, Global Governance 7, 371-378.
Schelling, T. C.: 1960, The Strategy of Conflict, (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.).
Scherer, A. G. and G. Palazzo: 2007, ‘Toward a Political Conception of Corporate Responsibility: Business and Society Seen From a Habermasian Perspective’, Academy of Management Review 32(4), 1096-1120.
Scott, R.S. and N. E. Bowie: 2002, ‘A Kantian perspective on the characteristics of ethics programmes’, Business Ethics Quarterly 14(2), 275-292.
Solomon, R. C.: 1992, ‘Corporate Roles, Personal Virtues: An Aristotelean Approach to Business Ethics, Business Ethics Quarterly, 2(3), 317-339.
Solomon, R. C.: 2004, ‘Aristotle, Ethics and Business Organizations’, Organization Studies 25 (6,) 1021-1043.
Steinmann, H. and A. Löhr: 1996, ‘A Republican Concept of Corporate Ethics’, in Urban, S. (ed.), Europe’s Challenges: Economic Efficiency and Social Solidarity (Gabler: Wiesbaden: Gabler), 21-60.
Sundaram, A. K. and A. C. Inkpen: 2004, ‘The Corporate Objective Revisited’, Organization Science 15(3), 350-363.
Tullock, G.: 1989, The Economics of Special Privilege and Rent-Seeking, (Kluwer Academic, Boston).
Ulrich, Peter: 2008: Integrative economic ethics: foundations of a civilized market economy, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
Mises, L. v.: 1996, Human Action, (Foundation for Economic Education, Irvington).
Mises, L. v.: 2008): Profit and Loss, (Ludwig von Mises Institute, Auburn, Alabama).
Williams, O. F.: 2004, ‘The UN Global Compact: The Challenge and the Promise’, Business Ethics Quarterly 14(4), 755-774.
Williamson, O.: 1985, The Economic Institutions of Capitalism, (Free Press, New York).
Willis, A.: 2003, ‘The Role of the Global Reporting Initiative’s Sustainability Reporting Guidelines in the Social Screening of Investments’, Journal of Business Ethics 43(3), 233-237.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pies, I., Beckmann, M. & Hielscher, S. Value Creation, Management Competencies, and Global Corporate Citizenship: An Ordonomic Approach to Business Ethics in the Age of Globalization. J Bus Ethics 94, 265–278 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0263-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0263-1