Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of Business Greening and Green IT Capital on Business Competitiveness

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite the fact that the association between business greening and its competitiveness has been confirmed, the effects of green IT capital on the relationship between business greening and competitiveness have largely not been investigated by researchers. To address this gap in the research, this study aims to introduce and define the new concept of green IT capital to bridge the gap for business greening. The results of a sample survey of 148 companies from the top 1,000 manufacturers in Taiwan confirmed that the degree of business greening has significant positive effects on business investment in green IT human capital, green IT structural capital, and green IT relational capital as well as business competitiveness. In addition, the three dimensions of green IT capital positively relate to business competitiveness. In mediating effect, green IT relational capital partially mediates the links between the degree of business greening and business competitiveness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bagozzi, R. P., & Edwards, J. R. (1998). A general approach for representing constructs in organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 1(1), 45–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandalos, D. L. (2002). The effects of item parceling on goodness-of-fit and parameter estimate bias in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(1), 78–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R., & Kenny, D. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social-psychological research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indices in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, M. A., & Rondinelli, D. A. (1998). Proactive corporate environmental management: A new industrial. Academy of Management Executive, 12(2), 38–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bharadwaj, A. S. (2000). A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: An empirical investigation. MIS Quarterly, 24(1), 169–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bock, G. W., Zmud, R. W., Kim, Y. G., & Lee, J. N. (2005). Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: Examining the role of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological force and organizational climate. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 87–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brislin, R. W. (1986). The wording and translation of research instruments. In W. J. Lonner & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Field methods in cross-cultural research (pp. 137–164). California: Beverly Hills.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brynjolfsson, E., Hitt, L. M., & Yang, S. (2002). Intangible assets: Computers and organizational capital. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1, 137–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buysse, K., & Verbeke, A. (2003). Proactive environmental strategies: A stakeholder management perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 24(5), 453–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlisle, Y. M., & Faulkner, O. D. (2004). Corporate social responsibility a stages framework. European Business Journal, 16(4), 143–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y. S. (2008). The positive effect of green intellectual capital on competitive advantages of firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 77(3), 271–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y. S., Lai, S. B., & Wen, C. T. (2006). The influence of green innovation performance on corporate advantage in Taiwan. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(4), 331–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cordano, M., & Frieze, I. H. (2000). Pollution reduction preferences of U.S. environmental managers: Applying Ajzen’s theory of planned behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 627–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coyne, K. P. (1986). Sustainable competitive advantage—What it is, what it isn’t. Business Horizons, 29(1), 54–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damanpour, F., & Schneider, M. (2006). Phases of the adoption of innovation in organizations: Effects of environment, organization and top managers. British Journal of Management, 17(3), 215–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davern, M., & Kauffman, R. (2000). Discovering value and realizing potential from IT investments. Journal of Management Information Systems, 16(4), 121–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, P., Birkin, F., & Woodward, D. (2002). Financial comparability and environmental diversity: An international context. Business Strategy and the Environment, 11(6), 343–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, L., Johnston, R., Brignall, S., Silvestro, R., & Voss, C. (1991). Performance measurement in service business. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florida, R. (1996). Lean and green: The move to environmentally conscious manufacturing. California Management Review, 39(1), 80–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S. L. (1985). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 986–1014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, C. L., & Kung, F. H. (2011). Environmental consciousness and intellectual capital management: Evidence from Taiwan’s manufacturing industry. Management Decision, 49(9), 1405–1425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Industrial Development Bureau, Ministry of Economic Affairs, Taiwan, R.O.C. (1999). Industrial sustainable excellence award. http://proj08.ekm.org.tw/isea/method03.htm. January 6, 2013.

  • Ingram, R., & Frazier, K. (1980). Environment performance and corporate disclosure. Journal of Accounting Research, 18(7), 614–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, B., Peterson, R., Portney, R., & Stavins, R. (1993). Environmental regulation and competitiveness of US manufacturing: What does the evidence tell us? Journal of Economic Literature, 33(1), 132–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, H. T., & Kaplan, R. S. (1987). Relevance lost: The rise and fall of management accounting. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1988). LISREL 7: A guide to the program and application. Chicago: SPSS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kao, M. R., Liu, C. Y., Huang, Y. C., & Chang, N. J. (2010). A research of the relationship among business green management, environmental performance and competitive advantage. Journal of Management & Systems, 17(2), 255–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klassen, R. D., & McLaughlin, C. P. (1996). The impact of environmental management on firm performance. Management Science, 42(8), 1199–1214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laudon, K. C., & Laudon, J. P. (2000). Management information systems: Organization and technology in the networked enterprise (6th edn). Prentice-Hall Inc.

  • Makower, J. (2012). State of green business 2012. GreenBiz Group.

  • Molla, A., & Abareshi, A. (2012). Organizational green motivations for information technology: Empirical study. Journal of Computer Information System, 52(3), 92–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molla, A., Cooper, V. A., & Pittayachawan, S. (2011). The green IT readiness (G-readiness) of organisations: An exploratory analysis of a construct and instrument. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 29(1), 67–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nehrt, C. (1998). Maintainability of first mover advantages when environmental regulations differ between countries. Academy of Management Review, 23(1), 77–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peattie, K. (2001). Golden goose or wild goose? The hunt for the green consumer. Business Strategy and the Environment, 10(4), 187–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pike, S., Roos, G., & Marr, B. (2005). Strategic management of intangible assets and value drivers in R&D organizations. R&D Management Special Issue Innovation and Intangible Assets, 35(2), 111–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., & Millar, V. E. (1985). How information gives you competitive advantage. Harvard Business Review, 63(4), 149–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., & Van der Linde, C. (1999). Green and competitive: Ending the stalemate. Journal of Business Administration and Policy Analysis, 73, 215–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravindra, P. S., & Pradeep, K. K. (2012). Greening of industries for sustainable growth: An exploratory study on durable, non-durable and services industries. International Journal of Social Economics, 39(8), 551–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, J. W., Beath, C. M., & Goodhue, D. L. (1996). Develop long-term competitiveness through it assets. Sloan Management, 38(1), 31–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russo, M. V., & Fouts, P. A. (1997). A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 534–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seng, J. L., & Tsai, W. (2007). An IT capital performance indicator study: Evidence from a Taiwan’s financial service industry case study. International Journal of Accounting, Auditing, Performance Evaluation, 4(4–5), 501–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrivastava, P. (1995). Environmental technologies and competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 16(S1), 183–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sun-Jen Huang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chuang, SP., Huang, SJ. Effects of Business Greening and Green IT Capital on Business Competitiveness. J Bus Ethics 128, 221–231 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2094-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2094-y

Keywords

Navigation