Abstract
Quantitative analysts or “Quants” are a source of competitive advantage for financial institutions. They occupy the relatively powerful but often misunderstood role of modeling, structuring, and pricing complex financial instruments in the capital markets. But Quants often function in a discipline free from ethical burdens. Models used to price complex instruments are usually beyond the mathematical understanding of financial sector participants who rely heavily on the integrity of the Quant who built them. Although there has been some attempt to cover the ethics of mathematics applied to the capital markets, designing a set of rules to guide the ethical behavior of Quants cannot be made explicit and remains inexpressible. Because Quants generally experience a sense of detachment from moral obligation, there is a growing need to convert moral detachment into engagement. Our framework is indebted to key elements of Wittgenstein’s practical ethics philosophy and Rawls’ justice principle. The burden of balancing justice as fairness as defined by Rawls with the inability to explicitly articulate ethical rules as defined by Wittgenstein must fall to the Quant. We propose that the threshold delineating the barrier between ethical detachment and engagement can only be defined by the Quants themselves. It is their moral duty to disclose their level of ethical engagement when their models are put into practice.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Doeblin’s framework of stochastic processes with continuous paths was consistent with Kolmogorov's analytic theory for Markov processes but he was drafted to go to the front during World War II. To avoid sharing his ideas with the Nazis Doeblin first burned his notes and committed suicide. Some of his notes, however, were kept safe by the National Academy of Science of France. The academy safe was opened in May 2000 and it was then that the extent of his work became apparent (Jarrow and Protter 2004).
References
Alt, F. L. (1972). Archaeology of computers: Reminiscences, 1945–1947. Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery, 15(7), 693–694.
Angel, J. J., & McCabe, D. (2013). Fairness in financial markets: the case of high frequency trading. Journal of Business Ethics, 112, 585–595.
Ardalan, K. (2004). On the theory and practice of finance. International Journal of Social Economics, 31(7), 684–705.
Arendt, H. (1958). The human condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bachelier, L. (1900). Théorie de la speculation. Annales Scientifiques de l’École Normale Supérieure, 3(17), 21–86.
Barry, B. (1973). The liberal theory of justice: A critical examination of the principal doctrines. In J. Rawls (Ed.), A theory of justice. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Beggs, J. M., & Dean, K. L. (2007). Legislated ethics or ethics education? Faculty views in the post-Enron era. Journal of Business Ethics, 71, 15–37.
Bird, K., & Sherwin, M. J. (2006). American Prometheus: The triumph and tragedy of J. Robert Oppenheimer. New York: Random House.
Black, F., & Scholes, M. (1973). The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. Journal of Political Economy, 81, 637–659.
Boatright, J. R. (1996). Business ethics and the theory of the firm. American Business Law Journal, 34, 217–238.
Boatright, J. R. (2010). Finance ethics: Critical issues in theory and practice. New Jersey: Wiley.
Bru, B., & Yor, M. (2002). Comments on the life and mathematical legacy of Wolfgang Doeblin. Finance and Stochastics, 6, 3–47.
Burrell, G., & Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological paradigms and organizational analysis. Aldershot: Gower.
Cassidy, D. C. (2009). J. Robert Oppenheimer and the American Century. New York: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Danielson, M. G., & Lipton, A. F. (2010). Ethics and the introductory finance course. Journal of Business Ethics Education, 7, 85–102.
Derman, E. (2004). My life as a quant: Reflections on physics and finance. New Jersey: Wiley.
Engelen, P. J., & Van Liedekerke, L. (2007). The ethics of insider trading revisited. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(4), 497–507.
Franklin, J. (2004). On the parallel between mathematics and morals. Philosophy, 79, 97–119.
Frederick, R. E., & Hoffman, W. M. (1990). The individual investor in securities markets: An ethical analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 9, 579–589.
Haug, E. G., & Taleb, N. N. (2011). Option traders use (very) sophisticated heuristics, never the Black–Scholes–Merton formula. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 77, 97–106.
Hicks, John R. (1931). The theory of uncertainty and profit. Economica, 32(May), 170–189.
Hicks, J. R. (1939). Value and capital. New York: Oxford University Press.
Itô, K. (1944). Stochastic integral. Proceedings of the Imperial Academy Tokyo, 20, 519–524.
Itô, K. (1951). Multiple Wiener integral. Journal of the Mathematical Society of Japan, 3, 157–169.
Jarrow R., & Protter, P. (2004). A short history of stochastic integration and mathematical finance: the early years, 1880–1970. Lecture Notes-Monograph Series 45, A Festschrift for Herman Rubin, pp. 75–91.
Johnson, T. (2012). A context for financial mathematics: Ethics in the face of uncertainty. Working Paper, Heriot Watt University.
Karpoff, J. M., Lee, D. S., & Martin, G. S. (2008). The consequences to managers for financial misrepresentation. Journal of Financial Economics, 88, 193–215.
Knight, F. H. (1921). Risk, uncertainty and profit. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Knight, F. H. (1930). Statics and dynamics: Some queries regarding the mechanical analogy in economics. In R. B. Emmett (Ed.), Selected essays by Frank Knight, vol. 1 (p. 1999). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Kolmogorov, A. N. (1931). On analytic methods in probability theory. In A. N. Shiryaev (Ed.), Selected works of A. N. Kolmogorov; Volume II: Probability theory and mathematical statistics. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1992, pp. 62–108. [Original: Uber die analytischen Methoden in der Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung, Math. Ann. 104, 1931, 415-458.].
Levy, P. (1955). W. Döblin (V. Doeblin) (1915–1940) Revue d’histoire des sciences et de leurs applications 8, pp. 107–115.
Malcolm, N. (1958). Ludwig Wittgenstein: A memoir. New York: Oxford University Press.
Markowitz, H. M. (1952). Portfolio selection. The Journal of Finance, 7(1), 77–91.
McGee, R. W. (2007). Applying ethics to insider trading. Journal of Business Ethics, 77, 205–217.
Merton, R. C. (1973). Theory of rational option pricing. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science (The RAND Corporation), 4(1), 141–183.
Nelson, S. A. (1904). The A B C of options and arbitrage. New York: The Wall Street Library.
Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, state, and utopia. New York: Basic Books.
Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (OFHEO) (2003). Report of the special examination of Freddie Mac.
Raines, J. P., & Leathers, C. G. (1994). Financial derivative instruments and social ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 13, 197–204.
Rawls, J. (1958). Justice as fairness. The Philosophical Review, 67(2), 164–194.
Rawls, J. (1985). Justice as fairness: Political not metaphysical. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 14, 223–251.
Rawls, J. (1999). A theory of justice (revised edn). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Samuelson, P. A., & Merton, R. C. (1974). Generalized mean-variance tradeoffs for best perturbation corrections to approximate portfolio decisions. Journal of Finance, 29(1), 27–40.
Sharpe, W. F. (1963). A simplified model for portfolio analysis. Management Science, 9(2), 277–293.
Shefrin, H., & Statman, M. (1993). Ethics, fairness and efficiency in financial markets. Financial Analysts Journal, 49(6), 21–29.
Thiele, T. N. (1880). Sur la compensation de quelques erreurs quasi-systématiques par la méthode des moindres carrés, Reitzel, Copenhagen. {Note: This article was published simultaneously in Danish and French}.
West, J. M. (2012). Money mathematics: Examining ethics education in quantitative finance. Journal of Business Ethics Education, 9, 25–40.
Williams, J. B. (1938). The theory of investment value. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wilmott, P. (2000). The use and misuse of mathematics in finance. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A, 358(1765), 63–73.
Wittgenstein, L. (1921). Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Wittgenstein, L. (1969). On certainty. New York: Harper.
Wittgenstein, L. (1980). Culture and value. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Wittgenstein, L. (1993). A lecture on ethics. In J. Klaage & A. Nordman (Eds.), Ludwig Wittgenstein: Philosophical occasions (1912–1951) (pp. 115–155). Indianapolis: Hackett.
Acknowledgment
I wish to thank the editor and an anonymous reviewer for their valuable comments and inputs.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
West, J. Quantitative Method in Finance: From Detachment to Ethical Engagement. J Bus Ethics 129, 599–611 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2193-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2193-9