Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

CEO Foreign Experience and Green Innovation: Evidence from China

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We examine whether and how CEO foreign experience affects firm’s green innovation. Using a sample of Chinese public companies and hand-collected CEO foreign experience data, we document a positive association between CEO foreign experience and corporate green innovation. Furthermore, consistent with the view that CEOs with foreign experience would play a more significant role when provided with more resources, we find that the positive relationship is more pronounced in less financially constrained firms, in state-owned enterprises, and in less competitive industries. Additional analyses indicate that enhanced environmental ethics and general competency are two potential mechanisms through which CEO foreign experience affects corporate green innovation. Finally, we find that CEO foreign experience is positively related to green innovation quality and internationalization. Collectively, these findings suggest that CEO foreign experience is a significant factor for corporate green innovation in emerging markets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Throughout the paper, we call this group of people “returnee managers” and use it interchangeably with “CEOs with foreign experience”.

  2. Green innovation refers to the improvement of products or manufacturing processes to reduce energy consumption or to generate less waste and thus create a lower environmental burden (Chen et al., 2006; Rennings, 2000).

  3. The China Statistical Yearbook 2016 shows that the number of individuals who received foreign training and then returned to China increased from about 5000 in 1995 to over 400,000 in 2015.

  4. While Post et al. (2011) find that boards with a higher proportion of Western European directors are more likely to implement environmental governance structures or processes, we differ from Post et al. (2011) in the following ways. First, Post et al. (2011) focus on board composition/diversity and look at 78 firms from the Fortune 1000 that have more Western European directors. Thus, their focus is on the monitoring/advisory role played by directors, which is related to corporate governance. We, on the other hand, focus on the role played by CEOs. Second, the concept of “foreign” in their paper is nationality. In contrast, we examine the effect of social interactions through learning/working in foreign countries/regions on executives with the same ethnicity who return to work in their home countries. Post et al. (2011) does not have this “returnee” concept. Third, in addition to the “environmental ethics” argument Post et al. (2011) explored, we also propose that foreign experience enhances the general competencies of CEOs. Finally, it is not clear where the companies in Post et al. (2011) are located. Therefore, it is possible that their findings are driven by the geographic location of firms. We do not have this issue because our sample includes Chinese public firms only.

  5. Literature also finds that foreign experience may lead to an increased interest in world economic conditions, greater open-mindedness and tolerance of differences, increased empathy (Black & Duhon, 2006; Thomlison, 1991), and increased sense of responsibility and respect for others (Chieffo & Griffiths, 2004). Many of these personality outcomes may influence a CEO’s motivation toward pursuing socially responsible activities.

  6. Domain-specific knowledge also includes better management practice and managerial skills if the returnee CEOs have chances to observe or experience them.

  7. Foreign experience also increases the CEO’s global network (Edström & Galbraith, 1977; Suutari & Makela, 2007). As new and difficult demands during the innovation process arise, the CEO with foreign experience has a novel and valuable network on which to draw for advice and assistance. Moreover, Giannetti et al. (2015) suggest that hiring managers/directors who have gained either education or work experience while living abroad in developed countries help transmit knowledge about management practices and corporate governance to firms in emerging markets.

  8. In footnote 7, we mentioned that foreign experience increases the CEO’s global network. Global networks would be very helpful when CEOs with foreign experience need advice or assistance. However, when it comes to capital, since most companies raise funds from financial institutions in their own country, CEOs with foreign experience are at a disadvantage compared to their local peers because they usually have limited connections with critical local constituents.

  9. According to the securities laws in China, a company reporting losses in two consecutive fiscal years should be labeled with a special treatment sign (ST/*ST). These firms are subject to a daily price fluctuation limit of 5% and will be terminated from listing if they report losses in four consecutive years and report negative net assets in three consecutive years. Stocks labeled with PT are those that are suspended from trading.

  10. While the IPC Green Inventory List is usually used to identify green innovations, we do find patents that are obviously “green”, but their IPC numbers are not in the IPC Green Inventory List. To be as comprehensive as possible, we use textual analysis method to further identify green innovations. Our results are robust, however, if we only rely on the IPC Green Inventory List to identify green innovations.

  11. Invention patents refer to new technical solutions for products, methods, or improvements. A utility model refers to a new technical solution suitable for practical use proposed for the shape, structure, or combination of the product. Appearance design refers to a new design that is esthetically pleasing and suitable for industrial applications based on the overall or partial shape of the product, its combination, and the combination of color, shape, and group.

  12. We follow Development Policy and Analysis Division (DPAD) and Social Affairs of the United Nations Secretariat (UN/DESA) to define the developed country or region.

  13. There are 72 observations with foreign CEOs. It accounts for 0.57% of our sample.

  14. SA index is calculated with the following equation: \(SA=-0.737*Size+0.043*{Size}^{2}-0.04*Age\), where size is the logarithm of total assets (in million RMB) and age is the firm age (in years). We calculate FC as the logarithm of the absolute value of SA.

  15. Note the measure is the natural logarithm of one plus the number of green patents, so the raw number is 0.232 (= e0.209− 1).

  16. We did another robustness check. We reduce the panel dataset to one observation per CEO by taking average of all the variables at the CEO level and re-run the regression. Consistent with our main finding, we find that the CEO foreign experience is positively related to green innovation measures.

References

  • Adams, W. (1968). The brain drain. New York: Macmilllan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahuja, G., Lampert, C. M., & Tandon, V. (2008). Moving beyond Schumpeter: Management research on the determinants of technological innovation. Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 1–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amit, R., & Schoemaker, P. J. (1993). Strategic assets and organizational rent. Strategic Management Journal, 14(1), 33–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amore, M. D., & Bennedsen, M. (2016). Corporate governance and green innovation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 75, 54–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arena, C., Michelon, G., & Trojanowski, G. (2018). Big egos can be green: A study of CEO hubris and environmental innovation. British Journal of Management, 29(2), 316–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azoulay, P., Liu, C. C., & Stuart, T. E. (2017). Social influence given (partially) deliberate matching: Career imprints in the creation of academic entrepreneurs. American Journal of Sociology, 122(4), 1223–1271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ba, S., Lisic, L. L., Liu, Q., & Stallaert, J. (2013). Stock market reaction to green vehicle innovation. Production and Operations Management, 22(4), 976–990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagnoli, M., & Watts, S. G. (2003). Selling to socially responsible consumers: Competition and the private provision of public goods. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 12(3), 419–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. (1992). Integrating organizational behaviour and strategy formulation research: A resource based analysis. Advances in Strategic Management, 8(1), 39–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berrone, P., Cruz, C., Gomez-Mejia, L. R., & Larraza-Kintana, M. (2010). Socioemotional wealth and corporate responses to institutional pressures: Do family-controlled firms pollute less? Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(1), 82–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berrone, P., Fosfuri, A., Gelabert, L., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (2013). Necessity as the mother of ‘green’ inventions: Institutional pressures and environmental innovations. Strategic Management Journal, 34(8), 891–909.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, M. A., & Rondinelli, D. A. (1998). Proactive corporate environmental management: A new industrial revolution. Academy of Management Executive, 12(2), 38–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhagwati, J., & Hamada, K. (1974). The brain drain, international integration of markets for professionals and unemployment: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Development Economics, 1(1), 19–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, H. T., & Duhon, D. L. (2006). Assessing the impact of business study abroad programs on cultural awareness and personal development. Journal of Education for Business, 81(3), 140–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandt, L., & Li, H. (2003). Bank discrimination in transition economies: Ideology, information, or incentives? Journal of Comparative Economics, 31(3), 387–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. R., Martinsson, G., & Petersen, B. C. (2012). Do financing constraints matter for R&D? European Economic Review, 56(8), 1512–1529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caligiuri, P., & Tarique, I. (2009). Predicting effectiveness in global leadership activities. Journal of World Business, 44(3), 336–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao, F., Sun, J., & Yuan, R. (2019). Board directors with foreign experience and stock price crash risk: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 46(9–10), 1144–1170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, M. A., Sanders, W. G., & Gregersen, H. B. (2001). Bundling human capital with organizational context: The impact of international assignment experience on multinational firm performance and CEO pay. Academy of Management Journal, 44(3), 493–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y. S., Chang, C. H., & Wu, F. S. (2012). Origins of green innovations: The differences between proactive and reactive green innovations. Management Decision, 50(3), 368–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y. S., Lai, S. B., & Wen, C. T. (2006). The influence of green innovation performance on corporate advantage in Taiwan. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(4), 331–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chieffo, L., & Griffiths, L. (2004). Large-scale assessment of student attitudes after a short-term study abroad program. Frontiers: the Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad, 10(1), 165–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho, Y. S., & Lee, J. H. (2014). Returnee directors in Korean firms: Drivers and influence. Strategic Management Research, 17(1), 113–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dachs, B., & Pyka, A. (2010). What drives the internationalisation of innovation? Evidence from European patent data. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 19(1), 71–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai, Y., Kong, D., & Liu, S. (2018). Returnee talent and corporate investment: Evidence from China. European Accounting Review, 27(2), 313–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeRue, D. S., & Wellman, N. (2009). Developing leaders via experience: The role of developmental challenge, learning orientation, and feedback availability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(4), 859.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dragoni, L., Oh, I. S., Tesluk, P. E., Moore, O. A., VanKatwyk, P., & Hazucha, J. (2014). Developing leaders’ strategic thinking through global work experience: The moderating role of cultural distance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(5), 867–882.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edström, A., & Galbraith, J. R. (1977). Transfer of managers as a coordination and control strategy in multinational organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22, 248–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Endicott, L., Bock, T., & Narvaez, D. (2003). Moral reasoning, intercultural development, and multicultural experiences: Relations and cognitive underpinnings. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 27(4), 403–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faccio, M. (2006). Politically connected firms. The American Economic Review, 96, 369–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang, V. W., Tian, X., & Tice, S. (2014). Does stock liquidity enhance or impede firm innovation? The Journal of Finance, 69(5), 2085–2125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fee, A., Gray, S. J., & Lu, S. (2013). Developing cognitive complexity from the expatriate experience: Evidence from a longitudinal field study. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 13(3), 299–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Kranz, D., & Santaló, J. (2010). When necessity becomes a virtue: The effect of product market competition on corporate social responsibility. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 19(2), 453–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García-Quevedo, J., Segarra-Blasco, A., & Teruel, M. (2018). Financial constraints and the failure of innovation projects. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 127, 127–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giannetti, M., Liao, G., & Yu, X. (2015). The brain gain of corporate boards: Evidence from China. The Journal of Finance, 70(4), 1629–1682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godart, F. C., Maddux, W. W., Shipilov, A. V., & Galinsky, A. D. (2015). Fashion with a foreign flair: Professional experiences abroad facilitate the creative innovations of organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 58(1), 195–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hadlock, C. J., & Pierce, J. R. (2010). New evidence on measuring financial constraints: Moving beyond the KZ index. The Review of Financial Studies, 23(5), 1909–1940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, B. H., & Lerner, J. (2010). The financing of R&D and innovation. Handbook of the Economics of Innovation. North Holland, 1, 609–639.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9, 193–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, B., & Seabrooke, L. (2020). Transnational professionals. Annual Review of Sociology, 46, 399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S. L. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 986–1014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He, X., & Jiang, S. (2019). Does gender diversity matter for green innovation? Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(7), 1341–1356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hegarty, W. H., & Sims, H. P. (1978). Some determinants of unethical decision behavior: An experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63(4), 451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, M. C. (2005). Career imprints: Creating leaders across an industry (Vol. 16). Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horbach, J. (2008). Determinants of environmental innovation—New evidence from German panel data sources. Research Policy, 37(1), 163–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, J. W., & Li, Y. H. (2017). Green innovation and performance: The view of organizational capability and social reciprocity. Journal of Business Ethics, 145(2), 309–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, S. K. (2013). The impact of CEO characteristics on corporate sustainable development. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 20(4), 234–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutton, A. P. (2005). Determinants of managerial earnings guidance prior to regulation fair disclosure and bias in analysts’ earnings forecasts. Contemporary Accounting Research, 22(4), 867–914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyytinen, A., & Toivanen, O. (2005). Do financial constraints hold back innovation and growth? Evidence on the role of public policy. Research Policy, 34, 1385–1403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iliev, P., & Roth, L. (2018). Learning from directors’ foreign board experiences. Journal of Corporate Finance, 51, 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kacperczyk, A. (2009). Inside or outside: The social mechanisms of entrepreneurships choices. Evidence from the mutual fund industry. University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kassinis, G., & Vafeas, N. (2006). Stakeholder pressures and environmental performance. Academy of Management Journal, 49(1), 145–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenney, M., Breznitz, D., & Murphree, M. (2013). Coming back home after the sun rises: Returnee entrepreneurs and growth of hightech industries. Research Policy, 42(2), 391–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development (Vol. 1). Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K. H., & Min, B. (2015). Green R&D for eco-innovation and its impact on carbon emissions and firm performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 108, 534–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leung, A. K., Maddux, W. W., Galinsky, A. D., & Chiu, C. (2008). Multicultural experience enhances creativity: The when and how. American Psychologist, 63(3), 169–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, D., Zheng, M., Cao, C., Chen, X., Ren, S., & Huang, M. (2017). The impact of legitimacy pressure and corporate profitability on green innovation: Evidence from China top 100. Journal of Cleaner Production, 141, 41–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, M., Mobley, W. H., & Kelly, A. (2013). When do global leaders learn best to develop cultural intelligence? An investigation of the moderating role of experiential learning style. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 12(1), 32–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Z., Liao, G., & Wang, Z. (2018). Green loan and subsidy for promoting clean production innovation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 187, 421–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liao, G., Ma, M. S., & Yu, X. (2016). Transporting transparency: Director foreign experience and corporate information environment. Working Paper

  • Liao, Z. (2016). Temporal cognition, environmental innovation, and the competitive advantage of enterprises. Journal of Cleaner Production, 135, 1045–1053.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, H., Zeng, S. X., Ma, H. Y., Qi, G. Y., & Tam, V. W. (2014). Can political capital drive corporate green innovation? Lessons from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 64, 63–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, R. J., Tan, K. H., & Geng, Y. (2013). Market demand, green product innovation, and firm performance: Evidence from Vietnam motorcycle industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 40, 101–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marquis, C., & Tilcsik, A. (2013). Imprinting: Toward a Multilevel Theory. Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 195–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2004). Corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 54(4), 323–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oltra, V. (2008). Environmental innovation and industrial dynamics: the contributions of evolutionary economics. Cahiers du GREThA, 28, 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng, Y. S., & Lin, S. S. (2008). Local responsiveness pressure, subsidiary resources, green management adoption and subsidiary’s performance: Evidence from Taiwanese manufactures. Journal of Business Ethics, 79(1–2), 199–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1955). The child’s construction of reality. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., & van der Linde, C. (1995). Green and competitive: Ending the stalemate. Harvard Business Review, 73(5), 120–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, B. Z., & Schmidt, W. H. (1984). Values and the American manager: An update. California Management Review, 26(3), 202–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Post, C., Rahman, N., & Rubow, E. (2011). Green governance: Boards of directors’ composition and environmental corporate social responsibility. Business and Society, 50(1), 189–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potoski, M., & Prakash, A. (2005). Green clubs and voluntary governance: ISO 14001 and firms’ regulatory compliance. American Journal of Political Science, 49(2), 235–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qi, G. Y., Shen, L. Y., Zeng, S. X., & Jorge, O. J. (2010). The drivers for contractors’ green innovation: An industry perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(14), 1358–1365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qin, F. (2007). Transnational mobility, social embeddedness, and new institutions: The return of Chinese engineers from the US. Working Paper MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rehfeld, K. M., Rennings, K., & Ziegler, A. (2007). Integrated product policy and environmental product innovations: An empirical analysis. Ecological Economics, 61(1), 91–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ren, S., Wang, Y., Hu, Y., & Yan, J. (2021). CEO hometown identity and firm green innovation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(2), 756–774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rennings, K. (2000). Redefining innovation: Eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics. Ecological Economics, 32(2), 319–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rennings, K., & Rammer, C. (2011). The impact of regulation-driven environmental innovation on innovation success and firm performance. Industry and Innovation, 18(03), 255–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricks, D. A., Toyne, B., & Martinez, Z. (1990). Recent developments in international management research. Journal of Management, 16(2), 219–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, M. J., & Beamish, P. W. (2017). The scaffolding activities of international returnee executives: A learning based perspective of global boundary spanning. Journal of Management Studies, 54(4), 511–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. H. (1971). The individual, the organization, and the career: A conceptual scheme. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 7(4), 401–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, F. (1999). New perspectives on economics growth and technological innovation. Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solinger, D. (1991). Urban reform and relational contracting in post-Mao China. In R. Baum (Ed.), Reform and reaction in Post-Mao China: The road to Tiananmen (pp. 104–123). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suutari, V., & Mäkelä, K. (2007). The career capital of managers with global careers. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(7), 628–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, J., Li, S., & Xia, J. (2007). When ‘iron fist’, ‘visible hand’, and ‘invisible hand’ meet: Firm-level effects of varying institutional environments in the Chinese economy. Journal of Business Research, 60, 786–794.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J., Piasno, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomlison, T. D. (1991). Effects of a study-abroad program on university students: Toward a predictive theory of intercultural contact. Paper presented at the annual intercultural and communication conference, 22 February 1991, Miami, FL.

  • Tilcsik, A. (2012). Remembrance of things past: Individual imprinting in organizations. Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • To, A. H., Ha, D. T. T., Nguyen, H. M., & Vo, D. H. (2019). The impact of foreign direct investment on environment degradation: Evidence from emerging markets in Asia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(9), 1636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tong, Z. (2011). Firm diversification and the value of corporate cash holdings. Journal of Corporate Finance, 17(3), 741–758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Bergh, J. C. (2008). Environmental regulation of households: An empirical review of economic and psychological factors. Ecological Economics, 66(4), 559–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waddell, B. J., & Fontenla, M. (2015). The Mexican Dream? The effect of return migrants on hometown development. The Social Science Journal, 52(3), 386–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X., & Li, J. (1999). Levying of eco-environmental compensation fees in China: An analysis and proposals. Environmental Management, 24(3), 353–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wen, W., Cui, H., & Ke, Y. (2020). Directors with foreign experience and corporate tax avoidance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 62, 101624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wen, W., & Song, J. (2017). Can returnee managers promote CSR performance? Evidence from China. Frontiers of Business Research in China, 11(1), 12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wimbush, J. C., & Shepard, J. M. (1994). Toward an understanding of ethical climate: Its relationship to ethical behavior and supervisory influence. Journal of Business Ethics, 13(8), 637–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie, X., Huo, J., Qi, G., & Zhu, K. X. (2016). Green process innovation and financial performance in emerging economies: Moderating effects of absorptive capacity and green subsidies. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 63(1), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie, X., Zhu, Q., & Wang, R. (2019). Turning green subsidies into sustainability: How green process innovation improves firms’ green image. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(7), 1416–1433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xin, K. R., & Pearce, J. L. (1996). Guanxi: Connections and substitutes for formal institutional support. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1641–1658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J., Kong, D. M., & Wu, J. (2018). Doing good business by hiring directors with foreign experience. Journal of Business Ethics, 153, 859–876.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zou, H. L., Zeng, S. X., Lin, H., & Xie, X. M. (2015). Top executives’ compensation, industrial competition, and corporate environmental performance: Evidence from China. Management Decision, 53(9), 2036–2059.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zweig, D. (2006). Competing for talent: China’s strategies to reverse the brain drain. International Labor Review, 145, 65–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Shuili Du (Section Editor), three anonymous reviewers, Yong Du, Lijie Yao, Xiaojian Tang, Qingbo Yuan, Frank Zhang, Junsheng Zhang, and workshop participants at Soochow University and Tongji University for helpful comments. We appreciate the support by the Research Funds of National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 71772131), Research Funds of National Social Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 18BGL065). Any errors that remain are our own.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yuting Qian or Yao Zhang.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix A

The Classification of Green Patents

We use two criteria to determine whether a patent is a green patent. If a patent meets either of the following two criteria, we define it as a green patent.

  1. (1)

    We use the text analysis method to read the patent title. If the title of the patent declaration contains one or more of the twenty-five keywords listed below, the patent is classified as a green patent. The keywords are: garbage, environmental protection, waste water, waste gas, waste liquid, three wastes, sewage, waste, recovery, dust, odor, solid waste, pollution, flue gas, particles, sulfur dioxide, dust removal, desulfurization, new energy, smoke, dust emission, energy conservation, emission reduction, recycling, and green.

  2. (2)

    We then use the IPC Green Inventory list to identify green patents. The IPC Green Inventory is developed by the IPC Committee of Experts to facilitate searches for patent information related to Environmentally Sound Technologies (ESTs). As shown in Table 10 below, if the IPC classification number is C10L3/00, F02C3/28, H01M4/86, H01M8/00, H01M12/00, F03D, F24J1/00, F24J3/00, F24J3/06, B61, H02J, E04B1/62, E04B1/74, E04B1/88, E04B1/90, or F03G7/08, we classify the patent as a green patent.

Table 10 The IPC green inventory list

Appendix B

See Table 11.

Table 11 Variable definitions

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Quan, X., Ke, Y., Qian, Y. et al. CEO Foreign Experience and Green Innovation: Evidence from China. J Bus Ethics 182, 535–557 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04977-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04977-z

Keywords

Navigation