Abstract
The quality of parenting, composition and socio-economic status are family risk or protective factors on juvenile delinquency, however, there is not an instrument to help psychologists and social workers to specifically assess the adolescent offender’s family. This study set out to accomplish an additional validation study of the structured interview of family assessment risk (SIFAR), a structured professional judgment tool for the assessment of family risk and protective factors of juvenile delinquents. The statistical analyses included inter-rater reliability, convergent validity with YLS/CMI, the Partial Least Squares approach to structural equation modeling and receiving operator characteristics (ROC) analysis. A sample of 130 male adolescent delinquents detained in Portuguese forensic facilities and their parents, were paired analyzed. The YLS/CMI was used to analyze the convergent validity with SIFAR. SIFAR shows a strong correlation with the YLS/CMI family context, moderate to high values of inter-rater reliability; SIFAR factors show that they are predictive determinants of the Moderate Four risk factors. ROC analysis shows adequate accuracy power. The findings show that SIFAR it is useful as an additional assessment tool for structured risk assessment instruments since it allows understanding the vulnerabilities and strengths of the delinquent’s family.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andrews, D., & Bonta, J. (2010). The psychology of criminal conduct. Cincinnati: Anderson Publishing Co.
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1994). Advanced topics in structural equation models. In I. Richard & P. Bagozzi (Eds.), Advanced methods of marketing research (pp. 1–52). Cambridge: Blackwell.
Case, S., & Haines, K. (2009). Understanding youth offending. Risk factor research, policy and practice. Devon: Willan Publishing.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Constanzo, M., & Krauss, D. (2012). Forensic and legal psychology. Psychological science applied to law. New York: Worth Publishers.
de Ruiter, C., & Nicholls, T. (2011). Protective factors in forensic mental health: A new frontier. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 10, 160–170.
de Vogel, V., Robbé, M., de Ruiter, C., & Bouman, Y. (2011). Assessing protective factors in forensic psychiatric practice: Introducing the SAPROF. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 10, 171–177.
Diamantopoulos, A., Riefler, P., & Roth, K. (2008). Advancing formative measurement models. Journal of Business Research, 61, 1203–1218.
Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1993). An introduction to the bootstrap. New York: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
Farrington, D. P. (2004). O estudo do desenvolvimento da delinquência de Cambridge: Principais resultados dos primeiros 40 anos. In A. C. Fonseca (Ed.), Comportamento antissocial e família, uma abordagem cientifica (pp. 73–132). Coimbra: Livraria Almedina.
Farrington, D. P., Loeber, R., Jolliffe, D., & Pardini, D. A. (2008). Promotive and risk processes at different life stages. In R. Loeber, D. P. Farrington, M. Stouthamer-Loeber, & H. R. White (Eds.), Violence and serious theft. Developmental and prediction form childhood to adulthood (pp. 169–230). New York, NY: Routledge.
Fleiss, J. L. (1986). The design and analysis of clinical experiments. New York, NY: Wiley.
Fulero, S., & Wrightsman, L. (2009). Forensic psychology (3rd ed.). Belmont: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
Goodman, A., & Adler, J. (2010). Parenting projects, justice and welfare. In J. Adler & J. Gray (Eds.), Forensic psychology, concepts, debates and practice (pp. 404–422). New York: Willan Publishing.
Heilbrun, K., Yasuhara, K., & Shah, S. (2010). Violence risk assessment tools. Overview and critical analysis. In R. Otto & K. Douglas (Eds.), Handbook of violence risk assessment (pp. 8–21). New York: Routledge.
Henseler, J., Ringle, M., & Sinkowics, R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. Advances in International Marketing, 20, 277–319.
Hoge, R. (2010). Youth level of service/case management inventory. In R. Otto & K. Douglas (Eds.), Handbook of violence risk assessment (pp. 81–95). New York: Routledge.
Hoge, R., Andrews, D., & Leschied, A. (2002). Youth level of service/case management inventory. North Tonawanda, New York: Multi-Health Systems.
Hosmer, D. W., & Lemershow, S. (2000). Applied logistic regression. New York: Wiley.
Jones, D. (2008). Understanding criminal behaviour. Psychosocial approaches to criminality. Devon: Willan Publishing.
Lodewijks, H. P. B., de Ruiter, C., & Doreleijers, T. A. H. (2010). The impact of protective factors in desistance from violent reoffending: A study in three samples of adolescent violent offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25, 568–587.
Loeber, R., Farrington, D., Stouthamer-Loeber, M., & White, H. (2008). Violence and serious theft. Development and prediction from childhood to adulthood. New York: Taylor and Francis Group LLC.
Lohmöller, J.-B. (1989). Latent variable path modelling with partial least squares. Heidelberg, Germany: Physica Verlag.
Madsen, W. (2007). Collaborative therapy with multi-stressed families. London: The Guilford Press.
McGuire, J. (2004). Understanding psychology and crime. Perspectives on theory and action. New York: Open University Press.
Nunnally, J., & Bernstein, I. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Pakman, M. (2007). Risk reduction and the micropolitics of social justice in mental health care. In E. Aldarondo (Ed.), Advancing social justice through clinical practice (pp. 151–173). New Jersey: Lawrence Eribaum Associates.
Piquero, A., & Moffitt, T. (2010). Life-course persistent offending. In J. Adler & J. Gray (Eds.), Forensic psychology, concepts, debates and practice (pp. 201–222). New York: Willan Publishing.
Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Will, A. (2005). SmartPLS 2.0 M3 (Beta). http://www.smartpls.de. Accessed 28 March 2010.
Robbé, M., de Vogel, V., & Spa, E. (2011). Protective factors for violence risk in forensic psychiatric patients: A retrospective validation study of the SAPROF. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 10, 178–186.
Santos, D., & Alberto, I. (2015). Developing a family risk assessment tool in adolescent offenders: An exploratory study. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal. doi:10.1007/s10560-015-0409-1.
Wasserman, G., Keenan, K., Tremblay, R., Coie, J., Herrenkohl, T., Loeber, R., & Petechuck, D. (2004). Fatores de risco e fatores de proteção da delinquência infantil. Infância e Juventude, Revista do Instituto de Reinserção Social, 4(3), 51–86.
Welsh, B., & Farrington, D. (2010). Effective programs to prevent delinquency. In J. Adler & J. Gray (Eds.), Forensic psychology, concepts, debates and practice (pp. 378–403). New York: Willan Publishing.
Wold, H. (1982). Soft modeling: The basic design and some extensions. In K. G. Jöreskog & H. Wold (Eds.), Systems under indirect observation, Part II (pp. 1–54). Amsterdam: North Holland Press.
Wold, H. (1985). Partial least squares. In S. Kotz & N. L. Johnson (Eds.), Encyclopaedia of statistical sciences (Vol. 6, pp. 581–591). New York, NY: Wiley.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no financial support and no potential conflict of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
dos Santos, D.J.F., Alberto, I.M.M. & Marques, C.M.V.A. The Structured Interview of Family Assessment Risk: Convergent Validity, Inter-rater Reliability and Structural Relations. Child Adolesc Soc Work J 33, 487–497 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-016-0444-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-016-0444-6