Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Common Factors as a Road Map to MFT Model Integration: Implications for Training Therapists

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Contemporary Family Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Historically, model integration was reserved for experienced therapists (Lebow, J Marital Fam Ther 13:1–14, 1987. doi:10.1111/j.1752-0606.1987.tb00678.x). Currently, many marriage and family therapy (MFT) training programs encourage trainees to develop an integrative therapy approach. This relatively new phenomenon of encouraging integration during training is not often discussed. One challenge of developing an integrative approach to therapy practice is that trainees may not receive formal training in how to thoughtfully integrate models (Lebow, J Marital Fam Ther 13:1–14, 1987. doi:10.1111/j.1752-0606.1987.tb00678.x). Training therapists would benefit from an explicit road map to integration, the common factors approach is one such roadmap. The common factors approach may be a useful integrational construct (Weeks and Chad, Guid Couns 19:57–64, 2004. doi:10.1177/1066480708323205) for guiding trainees in their initial understanding of model integration. The present conceptual paper presents a rationale for the usefulness of common factors in informing integration and supports a more prominent role of common factors in MFT training.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahn, H., & Wampold, B. E. (2001). Where oh where are the specific ingredients? A meta-analysis of component studies in counseling and psychotherapy. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 48, 251–257. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.48.3.251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andolfi, M., Ellenwood, A. E., & Wendt, R. N. (1993). The creation of the fourth planet: Beginning therapists and supervisors inducing change in families. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 21, 301–312. doi:10.1080/01926189308251001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, J. D., Norcross, J. C., & Halgin, R. P. (1992). Training in psychotherapy integration. In J. C. Norcross & M. R. Goldfried (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy integration (pp. 563–592). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barth, D. F. (2014). Integrative clinical social work practice: A contemporary perspective. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Blow, A. J., Sprenkle, D. H., & Davis, S. D. (2007). Is who delivers the treatment more important than the treatment itself? The role of the therapist in common factors. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 33, 298–317. doi:10.1111/j.1752-0606.2007.00029.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bordin, E. (1979). The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the alliance. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 16, 252–260. doi:10.1037/h0085885.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breunlin, D. C., Pinsof, W., Russell, W. P., & Lebow, J. (2011). Integrative problem-centered metaframeworks therapy I: Core concepts and hypothesizing. Family Process, 50, 293–313.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, M., & Mcleod, J. (2007). A pluralistic framework for counseling and psychotherapy: Implications for research. Counseling and Psychotherapy Research, 7, 135–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, S. D., Lebow, J. L., & Sprenkle, D. H. (2011). Common factors of change in couple therapy. Behavior Therapy, 43, 36–48. doi:10.1016/j.beth.2011.01.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, P., & Berg, I. K. (2008). Interviewing for solutions (4th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glebova, T., Bartle-Haring, S., Gangamma, R., Knerr, M., Delaney, R. O., Meyer, K., et al. (2011). Therapeutic alliance and progress in couple therapy: Multiple Perspectives. Journal of Family Therapy, 33, 42–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henggeler, S. W., & Sheidow, A. J. (2002). Conduct disorder and delinquency. In D. H. Sprenkle (Ed.), Effectiveness research in marriage and family therapy (pp. 27–52). Alexandria, VA: American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubble, M. A., Duncan, B. L., & Miller, S. (1999). The heart and soul of change: What works in therapy. Washington, DC: The American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Karam, E. A., Blow, A. J., Sprenkle, D. H., & Davis, S. D. (2014). Strengthening the systemic ties that bind: Integrating common factors into marriage and family therapy curricula. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 1–14. doi:10.1111/jmft.12096.

  • Kazdin, A. E., & Nock, M. K. (2008). Delineating mechanisms of change in child and adolescent therapy: Methodological issues and research recommendations. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 44, 1116–1129. doi:10.1111/1469-7610.00195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, M. J. (1992). Psychotherapy outcome research: Implications for integrative and eclectic therapists. In J. C. Norcross & M. R. Goldfried (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy integration (pp. 94–129). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laszloffy, T. A. (2000). The implications of client satisfaction feedback for beginning family therapists: Back to the basics. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 26, 391–397. doi:10.1111/j.1752-0606.2000.tb00308.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lebow, J. L. (1984). On the value of integrating approaches to family therapy. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 10, 127–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lebow, J. L. (1987). Developing a personal integration in family therapy: Principles for model construction and practice. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 13, 1–14. doi:10.1111/j.1752-0606.1987.tb00678.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lebow, J. L. (1997). The integrative revolution in couple and family therapy. Family Process, 36, 1–17. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.17.2.181.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lebow, J. L. (2013). Couple and family therapy: An integrative map of the territory. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebow, J. L., & Gurman, A. S. (1995). Research assessing couple and family therapy. Annual Review of Psychology, 46, 27–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Loganbill, C., Hardy, E., & Delworth, U. (1982). The spirit of generativity. The Counseling Psychologist, 10, 65–67. doi:10.1177/0011000082101008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFarlane, W. R., Dixon, L., Lukens, E., & Lucksted, A. (2002). Severe mental illness. In D. H. Sprenkle (Ed.), Effectiveness research in marriage and family therapy (pp. 225–288). Alexandria, VA: American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, T. S., & Prior, D. (2003). Theory of change projects in MFT programs. Contemporary Family Therapy, 25, 133–151. doi:10.1177/1066480703255463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norcross, J. S., & Goldfried, M. R. (Eds.). (2005). Handbook of psychotherapy integration (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norcross, J. C., & Newman, C. F. (1992). Psychotherapy integration: Setting the context. In J. C. Norcross & M. R. Goldfried (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy integration (pp. 3–45). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norcross, J. C., & Newman, C. F. (2003). Psychotherapy integration: Setting the context. In J. C. Norcross & M. R. Goldfried (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy integration (pp. 3–45). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Northey, W. F., Jr. (2002). Characteristics and clinical practices of marriage and family therapists: A national survey. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 28, 487–494. doi:10.1111/j.1752-0606.2002.tb00373.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Orlinsky, D. E., & Rønnestad, M. H. (2005). How psychotherapists develop: A study of therapeutic work and professional growth. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Piercy, F. P., & Sprenkle, D. H. (1988). Family therapy theory-building questions. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 14, 307–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinsof, W. M., Breunlin, D. C., Russell, W. P., & Lebow, J. (2011). Integrative problem-centered metaframeworks therapy II: Planning, conversing and reading feedback. Family Process, 50, 314–336.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shadish, W. R., & Baldwin, S. A. (2003). Meta-analysis of MFT interventions. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 29, 547–570. doi:10.1111/j.1752-0606.2003.tb01694.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. L., & Southern, S. (2005). Integrative confusion: An examination of integrative models in couple and family therapy. The Family Journal, 13, 392–399. doi:10.1177/1066480705278468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sprenkle, D. H., & Blow, A. J. (2004). Common factors and our sacred models. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 30, 113–129. doi:10.111/j.1752-0606.2004.tb01228.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sprenkle, D. H., Blow, A. J., & Dickey, M. H. (1999). Common factors and other non-technique variables in MFT. In M. A. Hubble, B. L. Duncan, & S. D. Miller (Eds.), The heart and soul of change: What works in therapy (pp. 329–360). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sprenkle, D. H., Davis, S. D., & Lebow, J. L. (2009). Common factors in couple and family therapy: The overlooked foundation for effective practice. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolk, Y., & Perlesz, A. J. (1990). Do better trainees make worse family therapists? A follow-up study of client families. Family Process, 26, 45–58. doi:10.1111/j.1545-5300.1990.00045.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Symonds, D., & Horvath, A. O. (2004). Optimizing the alliance in couple therapy. Family Process, 43, 443–455. doi:10.1111/j.1545-5300.2004.00033.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taibbi, R. (1996). Doing family therapy: Craft and creativity in clinical practice. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wampold, B. E. (2001). The great psychotherapy debate: Models, methods, and findings. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weeks, G. R., & Chad, C. L. (2004). The intersystem model of psychotherapy: An integrated systems treatment approach. Guidance & Counseling, 19, 57–64. doi:10.1177/1066480708323205.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, M. (2007). Maps of narrative practice. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolfe, R., & Palmer, S. (2000). Integrative and eclectic counseling and psychotherapy. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Human Development, Marriage and Family Therapy, Virginia Tech., Blacksburg, VA, USA

    Carissa D’Aniello

Authors
  1. Carissa D’Aniello
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carissa D’Aniello.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

D’Aniello, C. Common Factors as a Road Map to MFT Model Integration: Implications for Training Therapists. Contemp Fam Ther 37, 176–182 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-015-9338-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-015-9338-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation