Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A supercoarsening multigrid method for poroelasticity in 3D coupled flow and geomechanics modeling

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Computational Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Galerkin finite-element discretization of the force balance equation typically leads to large linear systems for geomechanical problems with realistic dimensions. In iteratively coupled flow and geomechanics modeling, a large linear system is solved at every timestep often multiple times during coupling iterations. The iterative solution of the linear system stemming from the poroelasticity equations constitutes the most time-consuming and memory-intensive component of coupled modeling. Block Jacobi, LSOR, and Incomplete LU factorization are popular preconditioning techniques used for accelerating the iterative solution of the poroelasticity linear systems. However, the need for more effective, efficient, and robust iterative solution techniques still remains especially for large coupled modeling problems requiring the solution of the poroelasticity system for a large number of timesteps. We developed a supercoarsening multigrid method (SCMG) which can be multiplicatively combined with commonly used preconditioning techniques. SCMG has been tested on a variety of coupled flow and geomechanics problems involving single-phase depletion and multiphase displacement of in-situ hydrocarbons, CO2 injection, and extreme material property contrasts. Our analysis indicates that the SCMG consistently improves the convergence properties of the linear systems arising from the poroelasticity equations, and thus, accelerates the coupled simulations for all cases subject to investigation. The joint utilization of the two-level SCMG with the ILU1 preconditioner emerges as the most optimal preconditioning/iterative solution strategy in a great majority of the problems evaluated in this work. The BiCGSTAB iterative solver converges more rapidly compared to PCG in a number of test cases, in which various SCMG-accelerated preconditioning strategies are applied to both iterators.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arbogast, T., Wheeler, M.F., Yotov, I.: Logically rectangular mixed methods for flow in heterogeneous domains. In: Aldama, A., et al. (eds.), Computational Methods in Water Resources XI, pp. 621–628. Computational Mechanics Publications, Southampton, UK (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Arbogast, T., Wheeler, M.F., Yotov, I.: Mixed finite elements for elliptic problems with tensor coefficients as cell-centered finite differences. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 34(2), 828–852 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Arbogast, T., Dawson, C.N., Keenan, P.T., Wheeler, M.F., Yotov, I.: Enhanced cell-centered finite differences for elliptic equations on general geometry. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 19(2), 404–425 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Aziz, K., Settari, A.: Petroleum Reservoir Simulation. Applied Science Publishers Ltd., London, UK (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Beattie, C.I., Boberg, T.C., McNab, G.S.: Reservoir simulation of cyclic steam stimulation in the Cold Lake oil sands. SPE Reserv. Eng. 6(2), 200–206 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bachman, R.C., Harding, T.G., Settari, A., Walters, D.A.: Coupled simulation of reservoir flow, geomechanics, and formation plugging with application to high-rate produced water reinjection. SPE 79695. In: SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium, Houston, Texas, USA, 3–5 Feb 2003

  7. Bank, R.E., Douglas, C.C.: Sharp estimates for multigrid rates of convergence with general smoothing and acceleration. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 22(4), 617–633 (1985)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Braess, D.: On the combination of multigrid methods and conjugate gradients. In: Hackbusch, W., Trottenberg, U. (eds.), Multigrid Methods. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 1228, pp. 52–64. Springer, Berlin (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chadwick, R.A., Holloway, S., Kirby, G.A., Gregersen, U., Johannessen, P.N.: The Utsira Sand, Central North Sea—an assessment of its potential for regional CO2 disposal. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies (GHGT-5), Cairns, Australia (2000)

  10. Charlier, R., Fourmaintraux, D., Samier, P., Radu, J.-P., Guiducci, C.: Numerical simulation of the coupled behavior of faults during the depletion of a high-pressure/high-temperature reservoir. SPE/ISRM 78199. In: SPE/ISRM Rock Mechanics Conference, Irving, Texas, USA, 20–23 Oct 2002

  11. Collins, P.M.: Geomechanical effects on the SAGD process. SPE/PS-CIM/CHOA 97905. In: SPE/PS-CIM/CHOA International Thermal Operations and Heavy Oil Symposium, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 1–3 Nov 2005

  12. Coombe, D., Tremblay, B., Tran, D., Ma, H.: Coupled hydro-geomechanical modelling of the cold production process. SPE 69719. In: SPE International Thermal Operations and Heavy Oil Symposium, Porlamar, Margarita Island, Venezuela, 12–14 March 2001

  13. Dean, R.H., Schmidt, J.H.: Hydraulic fracture predictions with a fully coupled geomechanical reservoir simulator. SPE J. 14(4), 132–140 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dean, R.H., Gai, X., Stone, C.M., Minkoff, S.E.: A comparison of techniques for coupling porous flow and geomechanics. SPE J. 11(1), 707–714 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gutierrez, M., Lewis, R.W.: The role of geomechanics in reservoir simulation. SPE/ISRM 47392. In: SPE/ISRM Rock Mechanics in Petroleum Engineering, Trondheim, Norway, 8–10 July 1998

  16. Gai, X., Dean, R.H., Wheeler, M.F., Liu, R.: Coupled geomechanical and reservoir modeling on parallel computers. SPE 79700. In: SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium, Houston, Texas, USA, 3–5 Feb 2003

  17. Gai, X., Sun, S., Wheeler, M.F., Klie, H.: A timestepping scheme for reservoir flow and geomechanics on nonmatching grids. SPE 97054. In: SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, Texas, USA, 9–12 Oct 2005

  18. Gai, X.: A coupled geomechanics and reservoir flow model on parallel computers. Ph.D. thesis, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas (2004)

  19. Gutierrez, M., Lewis, R.W., Masters, I.: Petroleum reservoir simulation coupling fluid flow and geomechanics. SPE Reserv. Evalu. Eng. 4(3), 164–172 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hughes, T.J.R.: The Finite Element Method. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey (1987)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Ito, Y.: The introduction of the microchanneling phenomenon to cyclic steam stimulation and its application to the numerical simulator (sand deformation concept). SPE J. 24(4), 417–430 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Jeannin, L., Mainguy, M., Masson, R., Vidal-Gilbert, S.: Accelerating the convergence of coupled geomechanical-reservoir simulations. Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech. 31(10), 1163–1181 (2007)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Kettler, R.: Analysis and comparison of relaxation schemes in robust multigrid and preconditioned conjugate gradient methods. In: Hackbusch, W., Trottenberg, U. (eds.) Multigrid Methods. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 960, pp. 502–534. Springer, Berlin (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Killough, J.E., Wheeler, M.F.: Parallel iterative linear equation solvers: an investigation of domain decomposition algorithms for reservoir simulation. SPE 16021. In: SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium, San Antonio, Texas, USA, 1–4 Feb 1987

  25. Kim, J., Tchelepi, H.A., Juanes, R.: Stability, accuracy and efficiency of sequential methods for coupled flow and geomechanics. SPE 119084. In: SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium, The Woodlands, Texas, USA, 2–4 Feb 2009

  26. Lacroix, S., Vassilevski, Y.V., Wheeler, M.F.: Iterative Solvers of the Implicit Parallel Accurate Reservoir Simulator, I: Single Processor Case. Technical Report TICAM 00-28. The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas (2000)

  27. Lake, L.W.: Enhanced Oil Recovery. Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lewis, R.W., Sukirman, Y.: Finite element modeling of three-phase flow in deforming saturated oil reservoirs. Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech. 17(8), 577–598 (1993)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Liu, Q., Stone, T., Han, G., Marsden, R., Shaw, G.: Coupled stress and fluid flow using a finite element method in a commercial reservoir simulator. SPE 88616. In: SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition, Perth, Australia, 18–20 Oct 2004

  30. Mattax, C.C., Dalton, R.L.: Reservoir Simulation. Society of Petroleum Engineers, Monograph, vol. 13. Henry L. Doherty series, Richardson, Texas (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Minkoff, S.E., Stone, C.M., Bryant, S., Peszynska, M., Wheeler, M.F.: Coupled fluid flow and geomechanical deformation modeling. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 38(1–2), 37–56 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ponting, D.: Corner point geometry in reservoir simulation. In: Proceedings of the First ECMOR Conference, Cambridge, UK (1989)

  33. Russell, T., Wheeler, M.: Finite element and finite difference methods for continuous flows in porous media. In: Ewing, R.E. (ed.) The Mathematics of Reservoir Simulation, pp. 35–106. SIAM, Philadelphia (1983)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  34. Saad, Y.: Iterative Methods for Sparse Linear Systems, 2nd edn. SIAM, Philadelphia (2003)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Samier, P., Onaisi, A., Fontaine, G.: Comparisons of uncoupled and various coupling techniques for practical field examples. SPE J. 11(1), 89–102 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Settari, A., Mourits, F.M.: Coupling of geomechanics and reservoir simulation models. In: Siriwardane, H.J., Zeman, M.M. (eds.) Computer Methods and Advances in Geomechanics, Balkema, Rotterdam, pp. 2151–2158 (1994)

  37. Settari, A., Mourits, F.M.: A coupled reservoir and geomechanical simulation system. SPE J. 3(3), 219–226 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Settari, A., Walters, D.A.: Advances in coupled geomechanical and reservoir modeling with applications to reservoir compaction. SPE J. 6(3), 334–342 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Solomon, S.: Carbon Dioxide Storage: Geological Security and Environmental Issues—Case Study on the Sleipner Gas Field in Norway. Bellona report, The Bellona Foundation (2007)

  40. Stone, H.L.: Estimation of three-phase relative permeability and residual oil data. J. Can. Pet. Technol. 12(4), 53–61 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Thomas, L.K., Chin, L.Y., Pierson, R.G., Sylte, J.E.: Coupled geomechanics and reservoir simulation. SPE J. 8(4), 350–358 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Tran, D., Settari, A., Nghiem, L.: New iterative coupling between a reservoir simulator and a geomechanics module. SPE J. 9(3), 362–369 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Tran, D., Shrivastava, V., Nghiem, L., Kohse, B.: Geomechanical risk mitigation for CO2 sequestration in saline aquifers. SPE 125167. In: SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, 4–7 Oct 2009

  44. van der Vorst, H.A.: BI-CGSTAB: A fast and smoothly converging variant of BI-CG for the solution of nonsymmetric linear systems. SIAM J. Sci. Statist. Comput. 13(2), 631–644 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  45. Wallis, J.R., Kendall, R.P., Little, T.E.: Constrained residual acceleration of conjugate residual methods. SPE 13536. In: SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium, Dallas, Texas, USA, 10–13 Feb 1985

  46. Walters, D.A., Settari, A., Kry, P.R.: Coupled geomechanical and reservoir modeling investigating poroelastic effects of cyclic steam stimulation in the Cold Lake reservoir. SPE Reserv. Evalu. Eng. 5(6), 507–516 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Wan, J., Durlofsky, L.J., Hughes, T.J.R., Aziz, K.: Stabilized finite element methods for coupled geomechanics-reservoir flow simulations. SPE 79694. In: SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium, Houston, Texas, USA, 3–5 Feb 2003

  48. Watts, J.W.: An iterative matrix solution method suitable for anisotropic problems. SPE J. 11(1), 47–51 (1971)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  49. Watts, J.W.: A method for improving line successive overrelaxation in anisotropic problems—a theoretical analysis. SPE J. 13(2), 105–118 (1973)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  50. Wheeler, J.A., Smith, R.A.: Reservoir simulation on a hypercube. SPE Reserv. Eng. 5(4), 544–548 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Zienkiewicz, O.C., Taylor, R.L.: Finite Element Method, vols. 1–3. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2000)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Houston, TX, USA

    Faruk O. Alpak

  2. The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA

    Mary F. Wheeler

Authors
  1. Faruk O. Alpak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mary F. Wheeler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Faruk O. Alpak.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alpak, F.O., Wheeler, M.F. A supercoarsening multigrid method for poroelasticity in 3D coupled flow and geomechanics modeling. Comput Geosci 16, 953–974 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-012-9297-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-012-9297-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation