Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

“Lifestyle Leapfrogging” in Emerging Economies: Enabling Systemic Shifts to Sustainable Consumption

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Consumer Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper combines the concept of leapfrogging with systems-thinking approaches to outline the potentials for and barriers to enabling systemic shifts to strong sustainable consumption in the emerging economies of China and India. New urban consumers in China and India have the potential to “lifestyle leapfrog” the high impact lifestyle models of the industrialized countries while simultaneously improving their quality of life. This paper argues that by implementing systemic approaches in the consumption domains of mobility and housing, the historical trajectory of high environmental footprints of mobility and housing can be avoided. The analysis based on systems-thinking principles identifies existing barriers and possible solutions. The importance of policies for strong sustainable consumption is highlighted to induce positive feedbacks in the areas of markets and society facilitating both efficient technology uptake and behavioural changes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, C. (1964). Notes on the synthesis of form. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

  • Alexander, C. (2012). The battle for the life and beauty of the earth: A struggle between two world-systems. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Anantharaman, M. (2016). Elite and ethical: The defensive distinctions of middle-class bicycling in Bangalore, India. Journal of Consumer Culture. doi:10.1177/1469540516634412.

  • Balachandra, P., Ravindranath, D., & Ravindranath, N. H. (2010). Energy efficiency in India: Assessing the policy regimes and their impacts. Energy Policy, 38(11), 6428–6438.

  • Baviskar, A. (2011). Cows, cars and cycle-rickshaws: Bourgeois environmentalism and the battle for Delhi’s streets. In A. Baviskar & R. Ray (Eds.), New Delhi: Routledge (pp. 391–418).

  • Berrah, N, Feng F, Priddle, & R, Wang, L. (2007). Sustainable energy in China: The closing window of opportunity. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank. Washington, D.C.

  • Bleischwitz, R., Bahn-Walkowiak, B., Irrek, W., Schepelmann, P., Schmidt-Bleek, F., Giljum, S., Lutter, S. et al. (2009). Eco-innovation—putting the EU on the path to a resource and energy efficient economy. Wuppertal Spezial 38.

  • Chai, K., & Yeo, C. (2012). Overcoming energy efficiency barriers through systems approach—A conceptual framework. Energy Policy, 46(2012), 460–472.

  • Choucri, N. (1998). Leapfrogging for technology. Knowledge Networking, 2, 40–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhary, A., Sagar, A.D., & Mathur, A. (2012). Innovating for energy efficiency: A perspective from India. Innovation and Development 2(1), 45-66.

  • Cui, B. (2012). Chinese fear price hikes after electricity reforms. Chinadialogue, 6 September 2012. Accessed 28 September 2015 from: http://www.chinadialogue.net/article/show/single/en/5149-Chinese-fear-price-hikes-after-electricity-reforms.

  • Davis, S. J., & Caldiera, K. (2010). Consumption based accounting of CO2 emissions. Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(12), 5687–5692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, D. & Jackson, T. (2007). Sustainable consumption: Perspectives from social and cultural theory. RESOLVE Working Paper 05-08, University of Surrey.

  • Fath, B. (2014). Sustainable systems promote wholeness-extending transformations: The contributions of systems thinking. Ecological Modelling, 293(2014), 42–48.

  • Feng, D., Sovacool, B., & Vu, K. M. (2010). The barriers to energy efficiency in China: Assessing household electricity savings and consumer behavior in Liaoning Province. Energy Policy, 38, 1202–1209.

  • Fernandes, L., & Heller, P. (2006). Hegemonic aspirations. Critical Asian Studies, 38(4), 495–522.

  • Fuchs, D. A., & Lorek, S. (2005). Sustainable consumption governance: A history of promises and failures. Journal of Consumer Policy 28(3), 261-288

  • Geels, F. W. (2010). Ontologies, socio-technical transitions (to sustainability), and the multi-level perspective. Research Policy, 39, 495–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geels, F. W., McMeekin, A., Mylan, J., & Southerton, D. (2015). A critical appraisal of sustainable consumption and production research: The reformist, revolutionary and reconfiguration positions. Global Environmental Change, 34, 1–12.

  • Goldemberg, J. (1998). Leapfrogging energy technologies. Energy Policy, 2(10), 729–741.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldenberg, J., & Oreg, S. (2007). Laggards in disguise: Resistance to adopt and the leapfrogging effect. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 74, 1272–1281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, S. (2013). No country for cyclists. OPEN Magazine. Retrieved from http://www.openthemagazine.com/article/nation/no-country-for-cyclists.

  • Han, W. (2009). Practice and experience of promoting efficient lighting in China. Presentation at the International Conference on Green Industry in Asia, September 11th, 2009. Beijing: China Standard Certification Center (CSC).

  • Hargreaves, T., Longhurst, N., & Seyfang, G. (2013). Up, down, round and round: connecting regimes and practices in innovation for sustainability. Environment and Planning A, 45(2), 402–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho, P. (2005). Greening industries in newly industrialising countries: Asian-style leapfrogging? International Journal for Environment and Sustainable Development, 4(3).

  • Hobday, M. (1994). Export-led technology development in the four dragons: The case of electronics. Development and Change 25(2), 333–361.

  • Huang, M. & Gong, Y. (2010). China should support solar thermal energy research. Science and Development Network, London. http://www.scidev.net/en/opinions/china-should-support-solar-thermal-energy-research-1.html.

  • Jackson, T. (2005). Motivating sustainable consumption: A review of evidence on consumer behavior and behavioral change. London: Policy Studies Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, T. (2008). The challenge of sustainable lifestyles. State of the world 2008, innovations for a sustainable economy. Washington, D.C.: Worldwatch Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lange, H., & Meier, L. (2009). The new middle classes: Globalizing lifestyles, consumerism and environmental concern. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M., Roux, D., Cherrier, H., & Cova, B. (2011). Anti-consumption and consumer resistance: Concepts, concerns, conflicts and convergence. European Journal of Marketing 45 (11/12)

  • Liu, K. (2010). Government subsidies brighten sales of compact fluorescent lamps in China. China Economic News Service, Taiwan Economic Reviews.

  • Lorek, S., & Fuchs, D. (2013). Strong sustainable consumption governance—Precondition for a degrowth path? Journal of Cleaner Production, 38, 36–43.

  • Luhmann, N. (1992). Operational closure and structural coupling: The differentiation of the legal system. Cardoso Law Review, 13, 1419–1441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maréchal, K. (2010). Not irrational but habitual: The importance of “behavioural lock-in” in energy consumption. Ecological Economics, 69, 1104–1114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mawdsley, E. (2004). India’s middle classes and the environment. Development and Change, 35(1), 79–103.

  • McNeil, M. A., Iyer, M., Meyers, S., Letschert, V. E., & McMahon, J. E. (2008). Potential benefits from improved energy efficiency of key electrical products: The case of India. Energy Policy, 36(9), 3467–3476.

  • Myers, N., & Kent, J. (2003). New consumers: The influence of affluence on the environment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100(8), 4963–4968.

  • Munasinghe, M. (1999). Is environmental degradation an inevitable consequence of economic growth: Tunneling through the environmental Kuznets Curve. Ecological Economics 29(1999), 89–109.

  • Nair, J. (2005). The promise of the metropolis: Bangalore’s twentieth century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patten, B. C. (1978). A systems approach to the concept of environment. Ohio. Journal of Science, 78, 206–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patten, B. C. (1991). Network ecology: Indirect determination of the life-environment relationship in ecosystems. In M. Higashi & T. Burns (Eds.), Theoretical studies of ecosystems: The network perspective (pp. 288–351). New York: Cambridge University Press.

  • Seyfang, G. (2010). Community action for sustainable housing: Building a low-carbon future. Energy Policy, 38(12), 7624–7633.

  • Perkins, R. (2003). Environmental leapfrogging in developing countries: A critical assessment and reconstruction. Natural Resources Forum, 27, 177–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pucher, J., Korattyswaropam, N., Mittal, N., & Ittyerah, N. (2005). Urban transport crisis in India. Transport Policy, 12(3), 185–198.

  • Rahul, T. M., & Verma, A. (2013). Economic impact of non-motorized transportation in Indian cities. Research in Transportation Economics, 38(1), 22–34.

  • REN21. (2015). Renewables 2014: global status report. Paris: REN21 Secretariat.

  • Rock, M., et al. (2008). A hard slog, not a leap frog: Globalization and sustainability transitions in developing Asia. Technological Forecasting & Social Change.

  • Sauter, R., Watson, J. (2008). Technology leapfrogging: A review of the evidence a report for DFID. Sussex Energy Group SPRU (Science and Technology Policy Research), University of Sussex.

  • Schroeder, P., & Chapman, R. (2014). Renewable energy leapfrogging in China’s urban development? Current status and outlook. Sustainable Cities and Society, 11(2014), 31–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sedlacko, M., Martinuzzi, A., Røpke, I., Videira, N., & Antunes, P. (2014). Participatory systems mapping for sustainable consumption: Discussion of a method promoting systemic insights. Ecological Economics, 106(2014), 33–43.

  • Senge, P. (1990) The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. London: Century

  • Seyfang, G. (2006). Ecological citizenship and sustainable consumption: Examining local organic food networks. Journal of Rural Studies, 22(4), 383–395.

  • Sorrell, S. (2007). The rebound effect: An assessment of the evidence for economy-wide energy savings from improved energy efficiency. UKERC Report.

  • Sovacool, B. K. (2014). What are we doing here? Analyzing fifteen years of energy scholarship and proposing a social science research agenda. Energy Research & Social Science, 1(2014), 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spangenberg, J. H. (2001). The environmental Kuznets curve: A methodological artefact? Population and Environment, 23(2), 175–191.

  • Stern, D. I. (2004). The rise and fall of the environmental Kuznets curve. World Development, 32(8), 1419–1439.

  • Swim, J. K., Clayton, S., & Howard, G. S. (2011). Human behavioral contributions to climate change psychological and contextual drivers. American Psychologist, 66(4), 251–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiwari, G., & Jain, D. (2013). Promoting low carbon transport in India: NMT Infrastructure in India: Investment, policy and design. Retrieved from http://trid.trb.org/view.aspx?id=1267790.

  • Tsinghua University Building Energy Research Center. (2007). Annual report on China building energy efficiency 2007–2012. Beijing: Tsinghua University Building Energy Research Centre.

  • Tsinghua University Building Energy Research Center. (2012). Annual Report on the Development of Building Energy Saving in China 2012. Beijing: Tsinghua University Building Energy Research Center.

  • Tukker, A. (2005). Leapfrogging into the future: Developing for sustainability. International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development 1(1/2):65.

  • Tukker, A., Huppes, G., Guinée, J. B., Heijungs, R.,  de Koning, A., & van Oers, L. et al. (2006). Environmental Impact of Products (EIPRO) Analysis of the life cycle environmental impacts related to the final consumption of the EU-25. Technical Report Series, EUR 22284 EN, 1 - 136.

  • UNEP (2012) Global outlook on SCP policies: Taking action together. Nairobi: United Nations Environmental Programme.

  • UNEP-DTIE. (2006). Sustainable consumption and production: How development agencies make a difference. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), Division of Technology, Industry and Economics (DTIE), Paris.

  • Unruh, G. C., & Carrillo-Hermosilla, J. (2006). Globalizing carbon lock-in. Energy Policy 34(2006), 1185–1197.

  • Upadhya, C. (2009). India’s “new middle class” and the globalising City: Software professionals in Bangalore, India (pp. 253–268). In: H. Lange & L. Meier (Eds.), The new middle classes. Globalizing lifestyles, consumerism and environmental concern. Dordrecht et al.: Springer Sciene+Business Media.

  • van den Bergh, J. C. J. M. (2011). Energy conservation more effective with rebound policy. Environmental and Resource Economics, 48, 43–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitousek, P. M., Mooney, H. A., Lubchenco, J., & Melillo, J. M. (1997). Human domination of Earth’s ecosystems. Science, 277(5325), 494–499.

  • Wackernagel, M., Schulz, N. B., Deumling, D., Linares, A. C., Jenkins, M., Kapos, V., & Randers, J. (2002). Tracking the ecological overshoot of the human economy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99(14), 9266–9271.

  • Warde, A. (2005). Consumption and theories of practice. Journal of Consumer Culture, 5(2), 131–153.

  • Whitmarsh, L. (2009). Behavioral responses to climate change: Asymmetry of intentions and impacts. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 13–23.

  • Wiedmann, T., Minx, J., Barrett, J., & Wackernagel, M. (2006). Allocating ecological footprints to final consumption categories with input–output analysis. Ecological Economics, 56(1), 28–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilhite, H. (2008). Consumption and the transformation of everyday life: A view from South India. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Xinhua. (2012). China’s urbanization to further boom. 4 May 2012. Accessed on 28 September 2015 from: http://www.china.org.cn/china/2012-05/04/content_25299433.htm.

  • Yale Project on Climate Change Communication. (2012). Climate change on the Indian mind. Retrieved from http://environment.yale.edu/climate-communication/files/Climate-Change-Indian-Mind.pdf.

  • Young, W., Hwang, K., McDonald, S., & Oates, C. J. (2010). Sustainable consumption: green consumer behaviour when purchasing products. Sustainable Development, 18, 20–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, N., McNeil, M. and Levine, M. (2009). Energy for 500 million homes: drivers and outlook for residential energy consumption in China, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, LBNL Paper LBNL-2417E

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Development Studies (IDS), University of Sussex, Library Road, University of Sussex, Brighton, BN1 9RE, UK

    Patrick Schroeder

  2. Collaborating Center on Sustainable Consumption and Production (CSCP), Hagenauer Strasse 30, 42107, Wuppertal, Germany

    Patrick Schroeder

  3. Justice Community and Leadership Program, Saint Mary’s College of California, 1928 St. Mary’s Road, Moraga, CA, 94575, USA

    Manisha Anantharaman

Authors
  1. Patrick Schroeder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Manisha Anantharaman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrick Schroeder.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schroeder, P., Anantharaman, M. “Lifestyle Leapfrogging” in Emerging Economies: Enabling Systemic Shifts to Sustainable Consumption. J Consum Policy 40, 3–23 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-016-9339-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-016-9339-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation