Abstract
The proposition put forth in this paper is that whether—and the extent to which—harm or potential harm to the environment (its natural resources, living beings, and their ecosystems) is identified, resisted, mitigated, or prevented is linked to the nature and scope of public access to information, participation in governmental decision-making, and access to justice—which are often referred to as “environmental due process” or “procedural environmental rights.” Using examples in the United States of attacks on law school clinics and denial of standing in court, this paper argues that restrictions on public access to information, participation in decision-making, and access to justice create legacies and “cultures of silence” that reduce the likelihood that future generations will be willing and able to contest environmental harm.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
In late September 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the judgment of the district court to dismiss Kivalina’s case. On 4 October 2012, Kivalina filed a petition for the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit to rehear the case en banc.
References
Agnew, R. (2013). The ordinary acts that contribute to ecocide: A criminological analysis. In N. South & A. Brisman (Eds.), Routledge international handbook of green criminology (pp. 58–72). Oxford: Routledge.
Associated Press (2012). National briefing: West: California: Suit that called whales slaves is dismissed. The New York Times. February 9: A15.
Beierle, T. C., & Cayford, J. (2002). Democracy in practice: Public participations in environmental decisions. Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future.
Brisman, A. (2008). Crime-environment relationships and environmental justice. Seattle Journal for Social Justice, 6(2), 727–817.
Brisman, A. (2012). The cultural silence of climate change contrarianism. In R. White (Ed.), Climate change from a criminological perspective (pp. 41–70). New York: Springer.
Brosi, B. J., & Biber, E. G. N. (2010). Officious intermeddlers or citizen experts? Petitions and public production of information in environmental law. UCLA Law Review, 58, 321–400.
Brosi, B. J., & Biber, E. G. N. (2012). Citizen involvement in the U.S. endangered species act. Science, 337(6096), 802–803.
Bruch, C., Coker, W., & VanArsdale, C. (2001). Constitutional environmental law: giving force to fundamental principles in Africa. Columbia Journal of Environmental Law, 26, 131–210.
Cole, L. F. (1992). Empowerment as the key to environmental protection: the need for environmental poverty law. Ecology Law Quarterly, 19, 619–683.
Comer, R. D. (2004). Constitutional conflicts on public lands: cooperative conservation: the federalism underpinnings to public involvement in the management of public lands. University of Colorado Law Review, 75, 1133–1157.
Cover, R. (1986). Violence and the word. Yale Law Journal, 95(8), 1601–1629.
Crary, D., & Watson, J. (2011). PETA lawsuit seeks to expand animal rights. Associated Press/Yahoo! News (Online). (October 25th) http://news.yahoo.com/peta-lawsuit-seeks-expand-animal-rights-222219887.html
Dernbach, J. C. (2002). Synthesis. In J. C. Dernbach (Ed.), Stumbling toward sustainability (pp. 1–42). Washington, DC: Environmental Law Institute.
Fleury-Steiner, B., & Nielsen, L. B. (2006). Introduction: A constitutive perspective of rights. In B. Fleury-Steiner & L. B. Nielsen (Eds.), The new civil rights research: A constitutive approach (pp. 1–14). Aldershot: Ashgate.
Green, A. (2012). Silence in the courtroom. Law and Literature, 24, 80–99.
Hampshire, J., Hills, E., & Iqbal, N. (2005). Power relations in participatory research and community development. Human Organization, 64(4), 340–349.
Hunter, D., Salzman, J., & Zaelke, D. (2002). International environmental law and policy, 2/e. New York: Foundation.
Hurley, L. (2011). Endangered species: Obama plan to cap funding for ESA petitions angers litigants. Greenwire (Online). (March 23rd) http://www.eenews.net/public/Greenwire/2011/03/23/2
Irwin, F., & Bruch, C. (2002). Public access to information, participation, and justice. In Dernbach, J.C. (Ed.), Stumbling toward sustainability (pp. 511–539).
Kemmis, D., & McKinney, M. (2011). Collaboration and the ecology of democracy. Sustainable Development Law & Policy, 12(1), 46–50, 69–70.
Kirk, E. A., & Blackstock, K. L. (2011). Enhanced decision making: balancing public participation against ‘better regulation’ in British environmental permitting regimes. Journal of Environmental Law, 23(1), 97–116.
Kuehn, R. R. (2000). Denying access to legal representation: the attack on the Tulane environmental law clinic. Washington University Journal of Law and Policy, 4, 33–147.
Kuehn, R. R., & Joy, P. A. (2003). An ethics critique of interference in law school clinics. Fordham Law Review, 71, 1971–2049.
Luban, D. (2002). Silence! Four ways the law keeps poor people from getting heard in court. Legal Affairs, (May/June), 54–58.
Luban, D. (2003). Taking out the adversary: the assault on progressive public-interest lawyers. California Law Review, 91, 209–246.
Lynch, M. J., & Stretesky, P. B. (1998). Uniting class, race and criticism through the study of environmental justice. The Critical Criminologist, 9(1), 1–6.
Lynch, M. J., & Stretesky, P. B. (1999). Criticism and clarifying the analysis of environmental justice: further thoughts on the critical analysis of environmental justice issues. The Critical Criminologist, 9(3), 5–8.
Lynch, M. J., & Stretesky, P. (2003). The meaning of green: contrasting criminological perspectives. Theoretical Criminology, 7(2), 217–238.
Lynch, M. J., Stretesky, P. B., & McGurrin, D. (2002). Toxic crimes and environmental justice: Examining the hidden dangers of hazardous waste. In G. W. Potter (Ed.), Controversies in white collar crime (pp. 109–136). Cincinnati: Anderson.
McInerney-Lankford, S., Darrow, M., & Rajamani, L. (2011). Human rights and climate change. Washington, DC: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank.
Mitchell, R. C., Mertig, A. G., & Dunlap, R. E. (1992). Twenty years of environmental mobilization: Trends among national environmental organizations. In R. E. Dunlap & A. G. Mertig (Eds.), American environmentalism: The U.S. environmental movement, 1970–1990 (pp. 11–26). Washington, DC: Taylor and Francis.
O’Connor, J. (1993). The promise of environmental democracy. In R. Hofrichter (Ed.), Toxic struggles: The theory and practice of environmental justice (pp. 47–57). Philadelphia: New Society Publishers.
Patlis, J. M. (2003). Riders on the storm, or navigating the crosswinds of appropriations and administration of the endangered species act: a play in five acts. Tulane Environmental Law Journal, 16, 257–329.
Pellow, D. N. (2004). The politics of illegal dumping: an environmental justice framework. Qualitative Sociology, 27(4), 511–525.
Pellow, D. N. (2013). Environmental justice, animal rights, and total liberation: From conflict and distance to points of common focus. In N. South & A. Brisman (Eds.), Routledge international handbook of green criminology (pp. 331–346). Oxford: Routledge.
Peterson, L., Lininger, J. C., Bergoffen, M., Snape, B., & Bradley, C. (2011). Natural resource “Conflicts” in the U.S. Southwest: A story of hype over substance. Sustainable Development Law & Policy, 12(1): 32–35, 61–63.
Preston, B. J. (2011). The use of restorative justice for environmental crime. Criminal Law Journal, 35(3), 136–153.
Restani, M., & Marzluff, J. M. (2002). Funding extinction? Biological needs and political realities in the allocation of resources to endangered species recovery. BioScience, 52(2), 169–177.
Rowan, M. (2012). Democracy and punishment: A radical view. Theoretical Criminology, 16(1), 43–62.
Ryall, Á. (2011). Access to environmental information in Ireland: implementation challenges. Journal of Environmental Law, 23(1), 45–71.
Sarat, A. (2001). Situating law between the realities of violence and the claims of justice: An introduction. In A. Sarat (Ed.), Law, violence, and the possibility of justice (pp. 3–16). Princeton, NJ, and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Schelly, D., & Stretesky, P. B. (2009). An analysis of the “path of least resistance” argument in three environmental justice success cases. Society and Natural Resources, 22(4), 369–380.
Schwartz, J. (2010). Courts emerging as battlefield for fights over climate change. The New York Times. January 27th: A1, A4
Simon, D. R. (2000). Corporate environmental crimes and social inequality: new directions for environmental justice research. American Behavioural Scientist, 43, 633–645.
South, N., & Brisman, A. (2013). Critical green criminology, environmental rights and crimes of exploitation. In S. Winlow & R. Atkinson (Eds.), New directions in crime and deviancy (pp. 99–110). London: Routledge.
The Stanford Environmental Law Society. (2001). The endangered species act: A Stanford environmental law society handbook. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Stephens, S. (1996). Reflections on environmental justice: children as victims. Social Justice, 23(4), 62–86.
Stretesky, P. B. (2003). Environmental inequity and the distribution of air lead levels across U.S. counties: Implications for the production of racial inequality. Sociological Spectrum, 23(1), 91–118.
Stretesky, P. B., & Hogan, M. J. (1998). Environmental justice: an analysis of superfund sites in Florida. Social Problems, 45(2), 268–287.
Stretesky, P. B., & Lynch, M. J. (1999). Environmental justice and prediction of distance to accidental chemical releases in Hillsborough County, Florida. Social Science Quarterly, 80(4), 830–846.
Stretesky, P. B., & Lynch, M. J. (2011). Coal strip mining, mountaintop removal, and the distribution of environmental violations across the United States, 2002–2008. Landscape Research, 36(2), 209–230.
Stretesky, P. B., Johnston, J., & Arney, J. (2003). Environmental inequity: an analysis of large-scale hog operations in 17 States, 1982–1997. Rural Sociology, 68(2), 231–252.
Stretesky, P. B., Huss, S., Lynch, M. J., Zahran, S., & Childs, B. (2011). The founding of environmental justice organizations across counties during the 1990s and 2000s: civil rights and environmental cross movement effects. Social Problems, 58(3), 330–360.
Sugg, I. C. (1993–1994). Caught in the act: Evaluating the endangered species act, its effects on man and prospects for reform. Cumberland Law Review, 24, 1–78.
Watson, J. (2012a). San Diego judge to decide future of whale case. Associated Press/Yahoo! News (Online). (February 6th) http://news.yahoo.com/san-diego-judge-decide-future-whale-case-201027887.html
Watson, J. (2012b). Slavery protections for animals? Judge to decide. Associated Press/Yahoo! News (Online). (February 7th) http://news.yahoo.com/slavery-protections-animals-judge-decide-234713082.html
Watson, J. (2012c). Judge tosses case seeking rights for orcas. Associated Press/Yahoo! News (Online). (February 8th) http://news.yahoo.com/judge-tosses-case-seeking-rights-orcas-231152842.html
Waver, M. (2012). Where standing closes a door, may intervention open a window? Article III, rule 24(A), and climate change solutions. Environmental Law Reporter News & Analysis, 42, 10945–10959.
White, R. (2007). Green criminology and the pursuit of social and ecological justice. In P. Beirne & N. South (Eds.), Issues in green criminology: Confronting harms against environments, humanity and other animals (pp. 32–54). Cullompton: Willan.
White, R. (2013). Environmental harm: An eco-justice perspective. Bristol: The Policy Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brisman, A. The violence of silence: some reflections on access to information, public participation in decision-making, and access to justice in matters concerning the environment. Crime Law Soc Change 59, 291–303 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-013-9416-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-013-9416-3