Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The Santa Monica prison and illegal cocaine: a mutual relationship

  • Published:
Crime, Law and Social Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper will demonstrate how women’s labor in the transnational cocaine commodity chain (TCCC) links together the Santa Monica women’s prison in Lima, Peru and the illicit cocaine market. Peru is one the fastest-growing economies in Latin America largely due to a neoliberal free market approach to economic development. It has encouraged foreign investment and also has a growing middle class. But a significant portion of the country’s population has not benefitted. This has resulted in some women turning to drug smuggling or selling in order to generate an income. Due to war on drug strategies, many of them are caught and sentenced on drug trafficking charges. I argue that the prison and larger criminal justice apparatus benefit financially from the growing number of drug arrests due to the systemic blackmail of incarcerated women. The cocaine sector benefits from the internment of its ex-workers. It is able to recruit new low-level employees and maintain the protection of middle managers. It is in this way that this prison and the illegal drug market are enmeshed together through the labor of subordinate female smugglers and retailers. This study is based on ethnographic dissertation fieldwork conducted in 2008–2009 in the Santa Monica prison.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Instituto Nacional Penitenciario (INPE) (2009). Informe estadistico. Peru:Lima.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Instituto Nacional Penitenciario (INPE). (2014). Informe estadistico. Lima, Peru.

  3. Carranza, E. (2012). Situacion penitenciaria en America Latina y el Caribe. Que hacer? Anuar ia de Derechos Humanos-Centro de Derechos Humanos de La Facultad de Derecho de La Universidad de Chile, 8, 31–66.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Muñoz Almazan, J. A. (2001). Nuevas tendencias en criminalidad femenina, etiologia del delito tráfico de drogas. Universidad de Chile.

  5. Torres, A. (2005). En encierro femenino en Ecuador: La persistencia del modelo conventual en un contexto de debilidad institucional. Quito, Ecuador.

  6. Jose Kampfner, C. (2005). Las mujeres olvidadas: women in Mexican prisons. In J. Sudbury (Ed.), Global Lockdown: Race, Gender and the Prison Industrial Complex. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Collins, P. H. (2000). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment (2nd ed., ). London:Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  9. McCall, L. (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 30(3), 1771–1800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mullings, L., & Wali, A. (2001). Stress and resilience: the social context of reproduction in central Harlem (p. p. 210). New York:Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Castro, D. (1994). War is our daily life: women’s participation in Sendero Luminoso. In G. Yeager (Ed.), Confronting Change, Challenging Tradition: Woman in Latin American History (pp. 219–225). Lenham: SR Books.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Boutron, C., & Constant, C. (2013). Gendering transnational criminality: the case of women’s imprisonment in Peru. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 39(1), 177–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. LeBaron, G., & Roberts, A. (2010). Toward a feminist political economy of capitalism and carcerality. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 36(1), 19–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bedford, K., & Shirin, M. R. (2010). Feminists theorize international poltical economy. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 36(1), 1–18.

  15. Shelden, R., & Brown, W. (2000). The crime control industry and the management of the surplus population. Critical Criminology, 9(1–2), 39–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wacquant, L. (2001). Deadly symbiosis: when ghetto and prison meet and mesh. Punishment and Society, 31(1), 95–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gilmore Wilson, R. (2007). Golden gulag: Prisons, surplus, crisis, and opposition in globalizing California. Berkeley:Univeristy of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Harrison, F. (2002). Global apartheid, foreign policy and human rights. Souls, 4(3), 48–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sudbury, J. (2004). Globalized punishment, localized resistance: prisons, neoliberalism and empire. Souls, 6(1), 55–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Reynolds, M. (2008). The war on drugs, prison building, and globalization: catalysts for the global incarceration of women. NWSA Journal, 20(2), 72–95.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bair, J. (2009). Global commodity chains: genealogy and review. In J. Bair (Ed.), Frontiers of commodity chain research. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Alacalde, C. (2010). The women in the violence: Gender, poverty and resistance in Peru. Nashville, TN:Vanderbilt University.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Maher, L. (1997). Sexed work: Gender, race and resistance in a Brooklyn drug market. Oxford:Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Schensul, J. J., & Lecompte, M. (1999). Designing & conducting ethnographic research. Walnut Cree:AltaMira Press.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Owen, B. (1998). “In the mix”: Struggle and survival in a women’s prison. Albany:State of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Jaramillo, M., & Saavedra, J. (2010). Inequality in post-structural reform Peru: the role of market forces and public policy. In L. Lopez-Calva, & N. Lustig (Eds.), Declining Inequality in Latin America: A Decade of Progress. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Fuentes-Nieva, R. & Galasso, N. (2014). Working for the few: Political capture and economic inequality. Oxfam GB: Oxford. Retrieved from http://www.ipu.org/splz-e/unga14/oxfam.pdf

  28. Tegel, S. (2012b). Peru backs the U.S. in the war on drugs. GlobalPost. Boston, MA. Retrieved from http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/news/regions/americas/120413/peru-backs-the-us-drug-war.

  29. Revenue Watch Institute (2012). Peru: Extractive industries. New York City.

  30. Bury, J. (2005). Mining mountains: neoliberalism, land tenure, livelihoods and the new Peruvian mining industry in Cajamarca. Environement and Planning, 27(2), 221–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Jasper, M. L., & Seelke, C. R. (2008). Peru: Political Situation. Washington DC:Economic Conditions and U.S. Relations.

  32. Castro, J. F., Baca, J., & Juan, O. (2012). (Re)Counting the poor in Peru: a multidimensional approach. Journal of Economics, 49(1), 37–65.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Osorio Amezaga, M. J. (2013). Unemployment and economic growth in Peru: 2001–2012. Columbia University. Retrieved from http://qmss.columbia.edu/storage/Amezaga MJ.pdf.

  34. Metaal, P., & Youngers, C., (eds.) (2011). Systems overload: drug laws and prisons in Latin America. Transnational Institute & Washington Office on Latin America: Amsterdam/Washington DC. (p. 98).

  35. Whittington, L. (2013). The balloon effect, in effect: humala, Peru, and the drug dilemma. Retrieved from http://www.coha.org/the-balloon-effect-in-effect-humala-peru-and-the-drug-dilemma-part-1-of-2/.

  36. Hearn, K. (2012). Success in Colombia shifts drug war to Peru. Washington DC:The Washington Times Retrieved from http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/may/7/success-in-colombia-shifts-drug-war-to-peru/?page=all..

    Google Scholar 

  37. Tegel, S. (2012a). Peru, Latin america’s hidden growth story. Boston:GlobalPost Retrieved from http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/news/regions/americas/120217/peru-latin-america-economy-growth..

    Google Scholar 

  38. Hays-Mitchell, M. (2002). Coping with austerity: a gendered perspective on neoliberal restructuring in Peru. Gender & Development, 10(3), 71–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Ypeij, A. (1998). Transferring risks: microproduction and subcontracting in the footwear and garmet industries of lima, Peru. Latin American Perspectives, 25(2), 84–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Tanski, J. (1994). The impact of crisis, stabilization and structural adjustment on women in Lima, Peru. World Development, 22, 1627–1642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Wilson, S., & Zambrano, M. (1994). Cocaine, commodity chains, and drug politics: a transnational approach. In G. Gereffi, & M. Korzeniewicz (Eds.), Commodity chains and global captialism (pp. 297–313). Westport: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Ministro de Trabajo y Promoción del Empleo. (2008). La mujer en el mercado laboral Peruano. Lima (p. 98).

  43. Linares, L. A. (2010). Informal economy budget analysis in Peru and metropolitan lima (p. p. 45). Cambridge:MA Retrieved from http://wiego.org/sites/wiego.org/files/publications/files/Aliaga-Linares_WIEGO_WP13.pdf..

    Google Scholar 

  44. Economist Intelligence Unit (2012). Peru: Healthcare and pharmaceuticals report/industry briefing and forecasts. New York.

  45. Andina. (2012). Seguro gratuito para cáncer es un gran avance para el desarrollo de Perú. (2012). Andina: Agencia Peruana de Noticias. Lima, Peru. Retrieved from http://www.andina.com.pe/agencia/noticia-seguro-gratuito-para-cancer-es-un-gran-avance-para-desarrollo-peru-422416.aspx.

  46. El comercio. (2012). Se necesitarian S/0.3.000 millones para financiar seguro oncologico gratuito. (2012). El comercio. Lima, Peru.

  47. Morrison, A. (2007). Crimen y violencia. In M. M. Guigale, V. Fretes-Cibils, & J. L. Newman (Eds.), An opportunity for a different Peru : prosperous, equitable, and governable (pp. 811–829). Washington: Retrieved from https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/6633.World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Overseas Security Advisory Council (OSAC). (2013). Peru 2012 crime and safety report. Retrieved from https://www.osac.gov/pages/ContentReportDetails.aspx?cid=12225.

  49. Rotta, S. (2013). Anti-corruption in the police: progress made and pending issues. Retrieved from http://blog.transparency.org/2013/03/15/anti-corruption-in-the-police-progress-made-and-pending-issues/.

  50. Transparency International. (2013). Global corruption barometer. Retrieved from http://www.transparency.org/gcb2013/country/?country=peru.

  51. Bloom, B. (1996). Triple jeopardy: Race, class, and gender as factors in women’s imprisonment (p. 492). Riverside::University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Sudbury, J. (2005). Introduction: Feminist critiques, transnational landscapes, abolitionist visions. In J. Sudbury (Ed.), Global lockdown: Race, gender, and the prison industiral complex (pp. xi–xviii). New York:: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Research and Development Institutes, Inc, 71 West 23rd Street, 4th Floor, New York, NY, 10010, USA

    Stephanie Campos

Authors
  1. Stephanie Campos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephanie Campos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Campos, S. The Santa Monica prison and illegal cocaine: a mutual relationship. Crime Law Soc Change 65, 251–268 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-015-9577-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-015-9577-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation