Skip to main content
Log in

The Safety and Efficacy of Therapeutic ERCP in the Pediatric Population Performed by Adult Gastroenterologists

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is much less commonly performed in the pediatric population compared to adults. As a result, few pediatric gastroenterologists receive adequate training in ERCP. At many institutions, pediatric ERCP is performed by adult gastroenterologists not formally trained in pediatric gastroenterology.

Aim

The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of ERCP performed in pediatric patients by adult gastroenterologists in a single tertiary care center.

Methods

We performed a retrospective analysis of pooled endoscopic procedures in pediatric patients (age <18 years) at the University of Maryland Medical Center, between 2003 and 2011, by two adult therapeutic endoscopists. Neither endoscopist had formal training in pediatric ERCP prior to 2003. Outcome measures included the procedure indications, cannulation success rates, procedure success rates, type of anesthesia, therapeutic interventions, frequency and type of procedure related complications, and technical complexity.

Results

Forty-five patients were included with a mean age of 12 years (range 6–17). There were a total of 70 ERCP procedures. Choledocholithiasis was the most common indication. Modes of anesthesia included monitored anesthesia care (31, 44.3 %), general anesthesia (22, 31.4 %) and moderate conscious sedation (17, 24.3 %). The papilla cannulation success rate was 98.6 % (69/70). Therapeutic maneuvers included 31 biliary sphincterotomies, ten pancreatic sphincterotomies, 17 pancreatic duct stents, 16 bile duct stents, two cystgastrostomy stents, four biliary stricture dilations, one minor papillotomy site dilation, one mechanical lithotripsy and one ampullectomy. The procedural success rate was 97.1 % (68/70). The overall complication rate was 7.1 % (5/70) with a post-ERCP pancreatitis rate of 4.3 % (3/70). Complications included infection (moderate-1), bleeding (moderate-1), and post-ERCP pancreatitis (mild-1, moderate-2).

Conclusions

ERCP procedures in pediatric patients can be safely and efficaciously performed by adult gastroenterologists trained in advanced endoscopy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McCune WS, Shorb PE, Moscovitz H. Endoscopic cannulation of the ampulla of vater: a preliminary report. Ann Surg. 1968;167:752–756.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hsu RK, Draganov P, Leung JW, et al. Therapeutic ERCP in the management of pancreatitis in children. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;51:396–400.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cotton PB, Laage NJ. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in children. Arch Dis Child. 1982;57:131–136.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cheng CL, Fogel EL, Sherman S, et al. Diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in children: a large series report. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2005;41:445–453.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Guitron A, Adalid R, Barinagarrementeria R, et al. Endoscopic cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in pediatric patients. Rev Gastroenterol Mex. 1998;63:211–216.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Prasil P, Laberge JM, Barkun A, et al. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in children: a surgeon’s perspective. J Pediatr Surg. 2001;36:733–735.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dua K, Miranda A, Santharam R, Ramanujam S, Werlin S. ERCP in the evaluation of abdominal pain in children. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;68:1081–1085.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Durakbasa CU, Balik E, Yamaner S, et al. Diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in children and adolescents: experience in a single institution. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2008;18:241–244.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Poddar U, Thapa BR, Bhasin DK, et al. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the management of pancreaticobiliary disorders in children. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2001;16:927–931.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Paris C, Bejjani J, Beaunoyer M, et al. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is useful and safe in children. J Pediatr Surg. 2010;45:938–942.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Otto AK, Neal MD, Slivka AN, et al. An appraisal of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for pancreaticobiliary disease in children: our institutional experience in 231 cases. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:2536–2540.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Johanson JF, Cooper G, Eisen GM, et al. Quality assessment of ERCP. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;56:165–169.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cotton LB, Lehman G, Vennes J, et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc. 1991;37:383–393.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Rabenstein T, Schneider HT, Nicklas M, et al. Impact of skill and experience of the endoscopist on the outcome of endoscopic sphincterotomy techniques. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;50:628–636.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Williams EJ, Taylor S, Fairclough P, Hamlyn A, et al. Are we meeting the standards set for endoscopy? Results of a large-scale prospective survey of endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatograph practice. Gut. 2007;56:821–829.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Loperfido S, Angelini G, Benedetti G, et al. Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;48:1–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Cotton PB, Garrow DA, Gallagher J, et al. Risk factors for complications after ERCP: a multivariate analysis of 11,497 procedures over 12 years. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;70:80–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Guelrud M, Mujica C, Jaen D, et al. The role of ERCP in the diagnosis and treatment of idiopathic and recurrent pancreatitis in children and adolescents. Gastrointest Endosc. 1994;40:428–436.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Iqbal CW, Baron TH, Moir CR, et al. Post-ERCP pancreatitis in pediatric patients. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2009;49:430–434.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Arata S, Takada T, Hirata K, et al. Post-ERCP pancreatitis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2010;17:70–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Varadarajulu S, Wilcox CM, Hawes RH, et al. Technical outcomes and complications of ERCP in children. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;60:367–371.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lauren Halvorson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Halvorson, L., Halsey, K., Darwin, P. et al. The Safety and Efficacy of Therapeutic ERCP in the Pediatric Population Performed by Adult Gastroenterologists. Dig Dis Sci 58, 3611–3619 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-013-2857-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-013-2857-9

Keywords

Navigation