Abstract
The empirical finding that countries endowed with vast reserves of natural resources are expected to experience slower economic growth – the resource curse hypothesis – has sparked debate in the literature about whether natural resources are a curse or a boon. In this study, we re-investigate the natural resource, corruption and growth nexus by using a relatively longer dataset for a panel of countries. Unlike previous attempts, we take into account the potential endogeneity and asymmetric effect in our analysis by applying a recently developed panel quantile estimator. We also focus on the role of corruption in influencing the impact of natural resources on economic growth. Broadly the findings are indicative of an asymmetric effect of resources as the sign and magnitude of natural resources’ impact on economic growth varies over different income quantiles. Although the overall results are mixed, but the results based on fuel export and oil–gas rents as measures of resource endowment are consistent with the ‘resource curse’ hypothesis. Nonetheless, the findings suggest that corruption is critical in determining the marginal impact of natural resources on growth and in many cases, it has effectively transformed the negative effects of natural resources to positive effects in low-to-middle-income countries.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
For example, in a recent study Okada and Samreth (2017) find that more oil rent leads to significantly high levels of corruption.
It is worth noting that whereas Gerelmaa and Kotani (2016) and Okada and Samreth (2017) used cross-section quantile regression, Wang et al. (2021) applied the technique to time series data. To our knowledge, no attempt has been made previously to analyse the issue using a panel quantile methodology.
Keeping the space constraint in mind, we only provide a brief discussion on the available theoretical literature. See, for example, Van der Ploeg (2011), Dauvin and Guerrerio (2017), Badeeb et. al. (2017), Papyrakis (2017),Vahabi (2018) and Zhang, and Brouwer, (2020) for a detailed and systematic review of literature.
According to IMF (2012), a country is resource-rich if its natural resources generate at least 20% of its merchandise exports or government revenues from oil, gas, or minerals. According to the World Bank (2014), countries with average rents from natural resources (excluding forests) that exceed 5 percent of GDP are considered resource wealthy.
We consider ICRG based corruption index over WGI and Transparency International due to two considerations. First, ICRG data method has remained unchanged over the period. Second, the definition of corruption of ICRG matches our requirement for this study.
We call the relation ‘asymmetry’ when the sign and size of estimated coefficients vary across the quantile.
References
Aidt TS (2009) Corruption, institutions, and economic development. Oxford Rev Econ Policy 25(2):271–291
Andvig JC, Moene KO (1990) How corruption may corrupt. J Econ Behav Organization 13(1):63–76
Apergis N, El-Montasser G, Sekyere E, Ajmi AN, Gupta R (2014) Dutch disease effect of oil rents on agriculture value added in Middle East and North African (MENA) countries. Energy Econ 45:485–490
Arellano M, Bover O (1995) Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. J Econom 68(1):29–51
Arin KP, Braunfels E (2018) The resource curse revisited: a Bayesian model averaging approach. Energy Econ 70:170–178
Auty R (1993) Sustaining development in mineral economies: the resource curse thesis, Oxford University Press, New York
Auty R (2001) Resource abundance and economic development, World Institute for Development Economics Research, Oxford University Press, New York
Badeeb RA, Lean HH, Clark J (2017) The evolution of the natural resource curse thesis: a critical literature survey. Resour Policy 51:123–134
Bardhan P (1997) Corruption and development: a review of issues. J Econ Literature 35:1320–1346
Barro RJ (2003) Determinants of economic growth in a panel of countries. Ann Econ Financ 4:231–274
Bhattacharyya S, Hodler R (2014) Do natural resource revenues hinder financial development? the role of political institutions. World Dev 57:101–113
Blackburn K, Bose N, Haque EM (2006) The incidence and persistence of corruption in economic development. J Econ Dyn Control 30:2447–2467
Blackburn K, Bose N, Haque EM (2008) ‘Endogenous corruption in economic development’, Unpublished Working Paper, Department of Economics, University of Wisconsin
Blanco L, Grier R (2012) Natural resource dependence and the accumulation of physical and human capital in Latin America. Resour Policy 37(3):281–295
Blundell R, Bond S (1998) Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. J Econom 87(1):115–143
Bond SR, Malik A (2009) Natural resources, export structure, and investment. Oxf Econ Pap 61(4):675–702
Bonet-Morón J, Pérez-Valbuena GJ, Marín-Llanes L (2020) Oil shocks and subnational public investment: the role of institutions in regional resource curse. Energy Econ 92:105002
Brunnschweiler CN (2008) Cursing the blessings? natural resource abundance, institutions, and economic growth. World Develop 36(3):399–419
Canarella G, Pollard S (2004) Parameter hetetrogeneity in the neoclassical growth model: a quantile regression approach. J Econ Dev 29:1–31
Cockx L, Francken N (2016) Natural resources: a curse on education spending? Energy Policy 92:394–408
Collier P, Hoeffler A (2009) Testing the neocon agenda: democracy in resource-rich societies. Eur Econ Rev 53(3):293–308
Damette O, Seghir M (2018) Natural resource curse in oil exporting countries: a nonlinear approach. Int Econ 156:231–246
Dauvin M, Guerreiro D (2017) The paradox of plenty: a meta-analysis. World Dev 94:212–231
Deacon R (2011) The political economy of the natural resource curse: a survey of theory and evidence. Found Trends (r) Microecon 7(2):111–208
Deacon R, Rode A (2015) Rent seeking and the resource curse. Companion Political Econ Rent Seek 227(14):227–247
Douangngeune B, Hayami Y, Godo Y (2005) Education and natural resources in economic development: Thailand compared with Japan and Korea. J Asian Econ 16(2):179–204
Edwards S (1998) Openness, productivity and growth: what do we really know? Econ J 108(447):383–398
Eregha PB, Mesagan EP (2016) Oil resource abundance, institutions and growth: evidence from oil producing African countries. J Policy Model 38(3):603–619
Funke M, Strulik H (2000) On endogenous growth with physical capital, human capital and product variety. Eur Econ Rev 44(3):491–515
Gatti R, Paternostro S, Rigolini J (2003) Individual attitudes toward corruption: do social effects matter? The World Bank
Gelb AH (1988) Oil windfalls: blessing or curse? Oxford University Press, New York
Gerelmaa L, Kotani K (2016) Further investigation of natural resources and economic growth: do natural resources depress economic growth? Resour Policy 50:312–321
Gylfason T (2001) Natural resources, education, and economic development. Eur Econ Rev 45:847–859
Gylfason T, Herbertsson TT, Gylfi G (1999) A Mixed blesing: natural resources and economic growth. Macroecon Dyn 3:204–225
Henderson DJ, Papageorgiou C, Parmeter CF (2012) Growth empirics without parameters. Econ J 122(559):125–154
Henry A (2019) Transmission channels of the resource curse in Africa: a time perspective. Econ Model 82:13–20
IMF (2012) macroeconomic policy frameworks for resource rich developing countries—background paper 1—supplement 1. International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC
Isham J, Woolcock M, Pritchett L, Busby G (2005) The varieties of resource experience: natural resource export structures and the political economy of economic growth. World Bank Econ Rev 19(2):141–174
Ji K, Magnus JR, Wang W (2014) Natural resources, institutional quality, and economic growth in China. Environ Resour Econ 57:323–343
Kaldor M, Karl TL, Said Y (2007) Oil wars. Pluto, London
Kim D-H, Lin S-C (2017) Natural resources and economic development: new panel evidence. Environ Resour Econ 66:363–391
Koenker R, Hallock KF (2001) Quantile regression. J Econ Perspect 15(4):143–156
Kolstad I (2009) The resource curse: which institutions matter? Appl Econ Lett 16(4):439–442
Lane P, Tornell A (1996) Power, growth, and the voracity effect. J Econ Growth 1:213–241
Lashitew AA, Werker E (2020) Do natural resources help or hinder development? resource abundance, dependence, and the role of institutions. Resour Energy Econ 61:1–21
Lee ML, Liu BC, Wang P (1994) Education, human capital enhancement and economic development: comparison between Korea and Taiwan. Econ Educ Rev 13(4):275–288
Leff N (1964) Economic development through bureaucratic corruption. Am Behav Sci 8(3):8–14
Leite C and Weidmann J (1999) Does Mother Nature corrupt? Natural resources, corruption, and economic growth Tech Rep WP/99/85 Int Monet Fund, Washington, DC.
Machado JA, Silva JS (2019) Quantiles via moments. J Econ 213(1):145–173
Matsuyama K (1992) Agricultural productivity, comparative advantage, and economic growth. J Econ Theory 58:317–334
Mauro P (1995) Corruption and growth. Q J Econ 110(3):681–712
Mehlum H, Moene K, Torvik R (2006) Institutions and the resource curse. Econ J 116:1–20
Méon PG, Sekkat K (2005) Does corruption grease or sand the wheels of growth? Public Choice 122(1):69–97
Méon PG, Weill L (2010) Is corruption an efficient grease?. World Dev 38(3):244–259
Myrdal G (1968) Asian drama: an inquiry into the poverty of nations. Pantheon, New York
Nannicini T, Billmeier A (2011) Economies in transition: how important is trade openness for growth? Oxford Bull Econ Stat 73(3):287–314
Norman CS (2009) Rule of law and the resource curse: abundance versus intensity. Environ Resour Econ 43:183–207
Okada K, Samreth S (2017) Corruption and natural resource rents: evidence from quantile regression. Appl Econ Lett 24(20):1490–1493
Papyrakis E (2017) The resource curse - what have we learned from two decades of intensive research: introduction to the special issue. J Develop Stud 53(2):175–185
Papyrakis E, Gerlagh R (2007) Resource abundance and economic growth in the United States. Eur Econ Rev 51(4):1011–1039
Powell D (2020) Quantile treatment effects in the presence of covariates Available at: https://sites.google.com/site/davidmatthewpowell/quantile-regression-with-nonadditive-fixed-effects
Robinson J, Torvik R, Verdier T (2006) Political foundations of the resource curse. J Dev Econ 79:447–468
Ross ML (2015) What have we learned about the resource curse? Annu Rev Polit Sci 18:239–259
Sachs J, Warner AM (1995) Natural Resources Abundance and economic growth. National bureau for Economic Research. NBER, (Working Paper 5398), NBER. Cambridge
Sachs JD, Warner AM (1999) The big push, natural resource booms and growth. J Dev Econ 59:43–76
Sachs JD, Warner AM (2001) The curse of natural resources. Eur Econ Rev 45:827–838
Saha S, Sen K (2021) The corruption–growth relationship: does the political regime matter? J Inst Econ 17(2):243–266
Salai-I-Martin X, Subramanian A (2003) Addressing the natural resource curse: an illustration from Nigeria Working paper 9804, NBER Cambridge
Sharma C, Mitra A (2019) Corruption and economic growth: some new empirical evidence from a global sample. J Int Dev 31(8):691–719
Sharma C, Pal D (2021) Revisiting resource curse puzzle: new evidence from heterogeneous panel analysis. Appl Econ 53(8):897–912
Shaxson N (2005) New approaches to volatility: dealing with the “Resource Curse” in sub-Saharan Africa. Int Aff 81(2):311–324
Smith B (2004) Oil wealth and regime survival in the developing world, 1960–1999. Am J Political Sci 48(2):232–246
Steinberg D (2017) Resource shocks and human capital stocks–brain drain or brain gain? J Dev Econ 127:250–268
Stijns JPC (2005) Natural resource abundance and economic growth revisited. Resour Policy 30(2):107–130
Swaleheen M (2011) Economic growth with endogenous corruption: an empirical study. Public Choice 146(1–2):23–41
Tornell A, Lane PR (1999) The voracity effect. Am Econ Rev 89(1):22–46
Torvik R (2002) Natural resources, rent seeking and welfare. J Dev Econ 67:455–470
Tsui KK (2011) More oil, less democracy: evidence from worldwide crude oil discoveries. Econ J 121(551):89–115
Vahabi M (2018) The resource curse literature as seen through the appropriability lens: a critical survey. Public Choice 175(3):393–428
Van der Ploeg F (2011) Natural resources: curse or blessing? J Econ Literature 49:366–420
Wang L, Luo GL, Sharif A, Dinca G (2021) Asymmetric dynamics and quantile dependency of the resource curse in the USA. Resour Policy 72:102104
Wiens D (2014) Natural resources and institutional development. J Theor Polit 26(2):197–221
World Bank (2014) Sustaining economic growth in Africa, IMF/World Bank spring meetings 2014: development committee communique
Yang B (2010) Resource curse: the role of institutions versus policies. Appl Econ Lett 17(1):61–66
Young AT, Higgins MJ, Levy D (2013) Heterogeneous convergence. Econ Lett 120:238–241
Zhang Q, Brouwer R (2020) Is China affected by the resource curse? a critical review of the Chinese literature. J Policy Model 42(1):133–152
Acknowledgements
Authors thanks an anonymous referee for his/her useful comments and helpful suggestions on the previous version of this paper. Any errors or omissions are solely of the authors’.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sharma, C., Mishra, R.K. On the Good and Bad of Natural Resource, Corruption, and Economic Growth Nexus. Environ Resource Econ 82, 889–922 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-022-00694-x
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-022-00694-x