Abstract
Stormwater is one of the last major untapped urban water resources that can be exploited as an alternative water source in Australia. The information in the current Australian Guidelines for Water Recycling relating to stormwater harvesting and reuse only emphasises on a limited number of stormwater quality parameters. In order to supply stormwater as a source for higher value end-uses, a more comprehensive assessment on the potential public health risks has to be undertaken. Owing to the stochastic variations in rainfall, catchment hydrology and also the types of non-point pollution sources that can provide contaminants relating to different anthropogenic activities and catchment land uses, the characterisation of public health risks in stormwater is complex, tedious and not always possible through the conventional detection and analytical methods. In this study, a holistic approach was undertaken to assess the potential public health risks in urban stormwater samples from a medium-density residential catchment. A combined chemical–toxicological assessment was used to characterise the potential health risks arising from chemical contaminants, while a combination of standard culture methods and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) methods was used for detection and quantification of faecal indicator bacteria (FIB) and pathogens in urban stormwater. Results showed that the concentration of chemical contaminants and associated toxicity were relatively low when benchmarked against other alternative water sources such as recycled wastewater. However, the concentrations of heavy metals particularly cadmium and lead have exceeded the Australian guideline values, indicating potential public health risks. Also, high numbers of FIB were detected in urban stormwater samples obtained from wet weather events. In addition, qPCR detection of human-related pathogens suggested there are frequent sewage ingressions into the urban stormwater runoff during wet weather events. Further water quality monitoring study will be conducted at different contrasting urban catchments in order to undertake a more comprehensive public health risk assessment for urban stormwater.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chen, W., Westerhoff, P., Leenheer, J., & Booksh, K. (2003). Fluorescence excitation–emission matrix regional integration to quantify spectra for dissolved organic matter. Environmental Science and Technology, 37, 5701–5710.
Chong, M.N., Aryal, R.K., Sidhu, J.P.S., Tang, J.Y.T., Toze, S. and Gardner, T. (2011). Urban stormwater quality monitoring: from sampling to water quality analysis. Symposium on Environmental Monitoring, The 7th International Conference on Intelligent Sensors, Sensor Networks and Information Processing (ISSNIP 2011), Adelaide, Australia, 6–9 December 2011.
Duncan, H.P. (2003) Stormwater quality, In: T.H.F. Wong (Ed.), Australian runoff quality, Sydney Australia: Institution of Engineers, Australia (available from http://www.arq.org.au).
Erikkson, E., Baun, A., Scholes, L., Ledin, A., Ahlman, S., Revitt, M., Noutsopoulos, C., & Mikkelsen, P. S. (2007). Selected stormwater priority pollutants—a European perspective. Science of the Total Environment, 383, 41–51.
ISO International Organization of Standardization (1998). Water quality—determination of the inhibitory effect of water samples on the light emission of Vibrio fisheri (Luminescent bacteria test)—part 3: method using freeze-dried bacteria, Geneva Switzerland.
Khan, S., Lau, S. L., Kayhanian, M., & Stenstrom, M. K. (2006). Oil and grease measurement in highway runoff—sampling time and event mean concentrations. Journal of Environmental Engineering ASCE, 132, 415–422.
Kim, L. H., Kayhanian, M., & Stenstrom, M. K. (2004). Event mean concentration and loading of litter from highways during storms. Science of the Total Environment, 330, 101–113.
Macova, M., Toze, S., Hodgers, L., Mueller, J. F., Bartkow, M., & Escher, B. I. (2011). Bioanalytical tools for the evaluation of organic micropollutants during sewage treatment, water recycling and drinking water generation. Water Research, 45, 4238–4247.
NRMMC, EPHC & NHMRC. (2009). Australian guidelines for water recycling: managing health and environmental risks (phase 2)—stormwater harvesting and reuse, Canberra, Australia
Vezzaro, L., & Mikkelsen, P. S. (2011). Application of global sensitivity analysis and uncertainty quantification in dynamic modelling of micropollutants in stormwater runoff. Environmental Modelling and Software. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.09.012.
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to Urban Land Development Authority (ULDA) for the agreement to provide Fitzgibbon site as the case study catchment and Bligh Tanner Pty Ltd for their role in facilitating the case study and stormwater sampling. This research was undertaken as part of the Queensland Urban Water Security Research Alliance (UWSRA), a scientific collaboration between the Queensland Government, CSIRO Water for a Healthy Country Flagship, The University of Queensland and Griffith University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chong, M.N., Sidhu, J., Aryal, R. et al. Urban stormwater harvesting and reuse: a probe into the chemical, toxicology and microbiological contaminants in water quality. Environ Monit Assess 185, 6645–6652 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-012-3053-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-012-3053-7