Abstract
When evaluating the atmospheric environment in regional strategic environment assessment (R-SEA), the variation and choice of the spatial scale have a substantial influence on the conclusions of the assessment. In this study, we used numerical simulation to investigate the spatial-scale effect. Two varying spatial extents and two varying spatial details of pollutant emission data (emission inventories in this case) were provided for numerical modeling, and output distributions of atmospheric pollutants at different air pollution levels were compared. The results show that the resolution and spatial range of data collection do indeed influence the atmospheric prediction and assessment results in R-SEA. The spatial-scale effect is more significant under the air pollution condition than under excellent and good air quality conditions. A comparison of varying spatial extents of emission inventory shows that narrowing the prediction area to a local scale is more conducive to identifying the impact of local pollution sources. A comparison of varying spatial details of emission inventory indicates that a higher resolution is favorable for identifying local high concentrations of pollutants and their locations.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Gunn, J. H., & Noble, B. F. (2009). Integrating cumulative effects in regional strategic environmental assessment frameworks: lessons from practice. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 11(03), 267–290. https://doi.org/10.1142/s1464333209003361
Thérivel, R., & Partidário, M. R. (1996). The practice of strategic environmental assessment. London: Earthscan Publication Limited.
Fischer, T. B., & Onyango, V. (2012). Strategic environmental assessment-related research projects and journal articles: an overview of the past 20 years. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 30(4), 253–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2012.740953
João, E. (2002). How scale affects environmental impact assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 22(2), 289–310.
João, E. (2007). A research agenda for data and scale issues in strategic environmental assessment (SEA). Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 27(5), 479–491.
Goodchild, M. F. (2011). Scale in GIS: an overview. Geomorphology, 130(1), 5–9.
Tate, N. J., & Atkinson, P. M. (2001). Modelling scale in geographical information science. Chichester: Wiley.
Goodchild, M. F., & Quattrochi, D. A. (1997). Introduction: scale, multiscaling, remote sensing, and GIS. In D. A. Quattrochi & M. F. Goodchild (Eds.), Scale in remote sensing and GIS. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis Publishers.
Peterson, D. L., & Parker, T. V. (1998). Dimensions of scale in ecology, resource managements and society. In D. L. Peterson & T. V. Parker (Eds.), Ecological scale theory and applications. New York: Columbia University Press.
Gontier, M. (2007). Scale issues in the assessment of ecological impacts using a GIS-based habitat model—a case study for the Stockholm region. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 27(5), 440–459.
João, E. (2007). The importance of data and scale issues for strategic environmental assessment (SEA). Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 27(5), 361–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2007.02.008
Partidário, M. R. (2007). Scales and associated data—what is enough for SEA needs? Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 27, 460–478.
Li, C. H. (2009). Impact of spatial scales on non-polluting ecological impact evaluation result—using environmental impact assessment of development area as an example. Channel Science(6), 14–15.
Karstens, S. A. M., Bots, P. W. G., & Slinger, J. H. (2007). Spatial boundary choice and the views of different actors. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 27(5), 386–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2007.02.002
Dehkordi, F. A., Khazaei, N., & Minaei, T. D. (2008). Changing scale in environmental impact assessment (case studies: Sefid roud Dam, Iran and Haizuka Dam, Japan). Journal of Environmental Studies, 34(45), 107–120.
Keshkamat, S. S., Kooiman, A., van Maarseveen, M. F. A. M., der Veen, A. V., & Zuidgeest, M. H. P. (2012). A boundary object for scale selection—moderating differences and synergising understanding. Ecological Economics, 76, 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.01.013
Huang, Y., Ma, W., & Yu, Q. (2003). Mathematical modeling for air quality prediction in environmental assessment of urban comprehensive transportation planning. Shanghai Environmental Sciences (5), 335–338.
Seyfried, M. S., & Wilcox, B. P. (1995). Scale and the nature of spatial variability: field examples having implications for hydrologic modeling. Water Resources Research, 31(1), 173–184. https://doi.org/10.1029/94wr02025
Trivedi, M. R., Berry, P. M., Morecroft, M. D., & Dawson, T. P. (2008). Spatial scale affects bioclimate model projections of climate change impacts on mountain plants. Global Change Biology, 14(5), 1089–1103. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01553.x
Heng, B. C. P., Scott, C. F., Sander, G. C., Wheatley, A. D., & Chandler, J. H. (2009). Modelling spatial and temporal scale effects in soil erosion. Geophysical Research Abstracts, 11.
Stroh, E., Harrie, L., & Gustafsson, S. (2007). A study of spatial resolution in pollution exposure modelling. International Journal of Health Geographics, 6(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-072X-6-19
Tan, J., Zhang, Y., Ma, W., Yu, Q., Wang, J., & Chen, L. (2015). Impact of spatial resolution on air quality simulation: a case study in a highly industrialized area in Shanghai, China. Atmospheric Pollution Research, 6(2), 322–333.
Thompson, T. M., Saari, R. K., & Selin, N. E. (2014). Air quality resolution for health impact assessment: influence of regional characteristics. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 14(2), 969–978. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-969-2014
Skamarock, W. C., & Klemp, J. B. (2008). A time-split nonhydrostatic atmospheric model for weather research and forecasting applications. Journal of Computational Physics, 227(7), 3465–3485.
Wang, W., Bruyere, C., & Duda, M. (2011). Advanced research WRF (ARW) user’s guide version 3.2.
Scire, J. S., Strimaitis, D. G., & Yamartino, R. J. (1999). A user’s guide for the CALPUFF dispersion model. Earth Technology, Concord, MA.
Holmes, N. S., & Morawska, L. (2006). A review of dispersion modelling and its application to the dispersion of particles: an overview of different dispersion models available. Atmospheric Environment, 40(30), 5902–5928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.06.003
Tan, J. N., Yu, Q., Ma, W. C., Ma, J. L., Cheng, J., & Zhang, Y. (2014). Development of refined emission inventory of air pollutants: a case study of Shanghai Baoshan District. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 34(5).
Tsai, Y. I., & Cheng, M. T. (1999). Visibility and aerosol chemical compositions near the coastal area in Central Taiwan. The Science of Total Environment, 231, 37–51.
Xu, H., Cao, J., Shen, Z., Liu, S., Zhang, T., & Zhou, J. (2015). Characterization of chemical composition for fine particle matter collected in different air quality grades in Xi’an in winter. Science & Technology Review, 33(6), 31–36. https://doi.org/10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2015.06.004
Chio, C.-P., Cheng, M.-T., & Wang, C.-F. (2004). Source apportionment to PM10 in different air quality conditions for Taichung urban and coastal areas, Taiwan. Atmospheric Environment, 38(39), 6893–6905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.08.041
Sokhi, R. S., José, R. S., Kitwiroon, N., Fragkou, E., Pérez, J. L., & Middleton, D. R. (2006). Prediction of ozone levels in London using the MM5–CMAQ modelling system. Environmental Modelling & Software, 21(4), 566–576.
Gardner, M. W., & Dorling, S. R. (2000). Statistical surface ozone models: an improved methodology to account for non-linear behaviour. Atmospheric Environment, 34(1), 21–34.
Ma, W. C., Zhao, H. J., Li, L., Zhou, Y. D., Pan, H., & Bao, C. K. (2015). Spatial scale of regional plan environmental impact assessment: the Gaoqiao Town and Pudong New District cases in Shanghai, China. Progress in Geography, 34(6), 739–748. https://doi.org/10.18306/dlkxjz.2015.06.009
Zhao, Y., Qiu, L., Xu, R., Xie, F., Zhang, Q., Yu, Y., et al. (2015). Advantages of city-scale emission inventory for urban air quality research and policy: the case of Nanjing, a typical industrial city in the Yangtze River Delta, China. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions, 15(21), 18691–18746. https://doi.org/10.5194/acpd-15-18691-2015
Stroud, C. A., Makar, P. A., Moran, M. D., Gong, W., Gong, S., Zhang, J., et al. (2011). Impact of model grid spacing on regional- and urban- scale air quality predictions of organic aerosol. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 11(7), 3107–3118. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-3107-2011
Markakis, K., Valari, M., Perrussel, O., Sanchez, O., & Honore, C. (2015). Climate forced air-quality modeling at urban scale: sensitivity to model resolution, emissions and meteorology. Atmospheric Chemistry & Physics, 15(4), 4767–4821.
Kooiman, A., & Keshkamat, S. S. (2012). Scale in regional environmental planning: the reconstruction of North-Brabant, the Netherlands. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 14(01), 1250004. https://doi.org/10.1142/s1464333212500044
State Environmental Protection Administration (SEPA) (2003). Technical guidelines for plan environmental impact assessment (on trial). (HJ/T 130-2003). http://english.sepa.gov.cn/Resources/standards/others1/Technical_Guideline_EIA/200710/t20071024_112076.shtml Access date 1 September 2003
State Environmental Protection Administration (SEPA) (2003). Technical guidelines for environmental impact assessment of development area. (HJ/T 131-2003). http://english.sepa.gov.cn/Resources/standards/others1/Technical_Guideline_EIA/200710/t20071024_112077.shtml. Access date 1 September 2003
Ministry of Environmental Protection of the People's Republic of China (MEP) (2014). Technical guidelines for plan environmental impact assessment general principles. (HJ 130–2014). http://english.sepa.gov.cn/Resources/standards/others1/Technical_Guideline_EIA/201605/t20160516_337733.shtml. Access date 1 September 2014
Ministry of Environmental Protection of the People's Republic of China (MEP) (2008). Guidelines for environmental impact assessment atmospheric environment. (HJ 2.2-2008). http://english.sepa.gov.cn/Resources/standards/others1/Technical_Guideline_EIA/201102/t20110215_200731.shtml. Access date 1 April 2009
Huang, S. F., Xia, D. X., Gao, J., & Jiang, J. H. (2012). Strategic environmental assessment of key industry development in the West Taiwan Straits Economic Zone: China Environmental Press.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 71173049).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, X., Zhang, Y., Wang, Y. et al. The Spatial-Scale Effect of an Atmospheric Environmental Impact Assessment in Regional Strategic Environmental Assessment (R-SEA). Environ Model Assess 23, 529–556 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-018-9590-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-018-9590-x