Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Environmental, social, and governance disclosure in response to climate policy uncertainty: Evidence from US firms

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Increasingly drastic governmental efforts in reducing environmental footprints in face of rising abnormal climate events have urged firms to redirect their strategy to withstand climate-induced policy uncertainty. Despite the incomplete regulatory framework for environment, social, and governance (ESG) reporting, many US firms have voluntarily incorporated ESG content into their public reports. Motivated by this sprouting ESG disclosure pattern of US firms, this study examines whether US firms adjust their ESG disclosure practices in face of changing climate policy. By employing fixed-effect estimations using firm-level and country-level data from various sources, we show that US firms disclose more ESG information following periods of heightened climate policy uncertainty (CPU), consistent with our prediction that firms employ ESG reporting to shelter themselves from CPU risks. Further analyses reveal that firms with more attentive audit committees, more severe financial constraints and earnings management problems, greater emissions and renewable energy consumption, and better comprehension of climate risks experience a stronger positive effect of CPU. Uncertain events and states’ ESG heterogeneity also strengthen the effect. Our results suggest investors analyze firms’ ESG reporting with care during heightened CPU periods and advise policymakers to accelerate their mandate of corporate ESG disclosure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Notes

  1. The data of global temperature are obtained from the US’s National Centers for Environmental Information. Website:https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/access/monitoring/climate-at-a-glance/global/time-series

  2. Nine heaviest emitting industries consist of Oil, Gas and Consumable Fuels; Electric Utilities; Gas Utilities; Independent Power Producers & Energy Traders; Multi-Utilities; Chemicals; Construction Materials; Metals and Mining; and Paper and Forest Products.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is funded by National Economics University, Vietnam.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Huy Viet Hoang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author has no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hoang, H.V. Environmental, social, and governance disclosure in response to climate policy uncertainty: Evidence from US firms. Environ Dev Sustain 26, 4293–4333 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02884-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02884-5

Keywords

Navigation