Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Postcolonial nature conservation in practice: the everyday challenges of on-ground urban nature conservation, Cape Town, South Africa

  • Published:
GeoJournal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a time of biodiversity loss, conservation management literature in Cape Town focuses on biodiversity preservation and top-down management responses. Contributing a more nuanced and politicised understanding of conservation management, this paper examines the challenges of everyday nature conservation and collaboration that occurs nearby Cape Town’s persistently racially-segregated and historically neglected townships. The analysis is based on in-depth interviews with on-ground nature conservators and participant observations in collaborative conservation arrangements with local township residents. Examining the literature on Cape Town’s colonial and apartheid conservation histories, I also consider how manifest through the identified everyday challenges are persistent colonial legacies—including deeply racialised relations, exclusionary conservation practices, and a focus on biodiversity conservation to the neglect of community needs. However, on-ground relations and everyday practices also reveal significant contestations to and transformations away from colonising legacies. The analysis contributes towards a discussion of what it means to be a ‘postcolonial’ nature conservator in Cape Town.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. This term is found throughout the interview transcripts and in my participant observation research notes of this study, including in a conservators’ narrative in this paper. It is also in nature conservation advocacy documents in Cape Town, see for example Pitt and Boulle’s (2010) book about urban nature conservators on the Cape Flats, in which Chapter 2 is called “Spreading the message”. The City of Cape Town’s series of Biodiversity factsheet includes “Cape Town’s Unique Biodiversity—How Can You Help” [sic] and suggests we can help by “Spread[ing] the message”. “The message of biodiversity” is also used in conservators’ narratives in Graham, 2010.

  2. For an overview of South Africans’ attitudes towards cross-racial interaction and reconciliation in the post-apartheid nation see the Institute for Justice and Reconciliation’s (IJR) report on annual national surveys between 2003 and 2013: Wale 2014. Reflecting on Reconciliation—Lessons from the past, prospects for the future. Cape Town: IJR http://reconciliationbarometer.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/IJR-SA-Reconciliation-Barometer-Report-2014.pdf

    Some implications of disturbing racial attitudes emerging from this report are examined in Davis (2014). SA Reconciliation Barometer 2014: The struggle against Apartheid amnesia. The Daily Maverick. 7 Dec.

    http://www.dailymaverick.co.za/article/2014-12-04-sa-reconciliation-barometer-2014-the-struggle-against-apartheid-amnesia/#.VIARLFeUe0K.

References

  • Adams, W. M., & Hutton, J. (2007). People, parks and poverty: Political ecology and biodiversity conservation. Conservation & Society, 5(2), 147–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, W. M., & Mulligan, M. (2003). Introduction. In W. M. Adams & M. Mulligan (Eds.), Decolonizing nature: Strategies for conservation in a post-colonial era (pp. 1–15). London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adhikari, M. (2011). The anatomy of a South African Genocide: The extermination of the Cape San peoples. Ohio: Ohio University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ahluwalia, P., & Zegeye, A. (2003). Between black and white: Rethinking coloured identity. African Identities, 1(2), 253–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, P. M. L., & O’Farrell, P. J. (2012). An ecological view of the history of the City of Cape Town. Ecology and Society, 17(3), 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Besteman, C. (2008). Transforming Cape Town. California: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bickford-Smith, V. (1995). South African urban history, racial segregation and the unique case of Cape Town? Journal of Southern African Studies, 21(1), 63–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bickford-Smith, V. (2009). Creating a city of the tourist imagination: The case of Cape Town, ‘The fairest Cape of them all’. Urban Studies, 46(9), 1763–1785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bickford-Smith, V., Van Heyningen, E., & Worden, N. (1999). Cape Town in the twentieth century: An illustrated social history. Cape Town: New Africa Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, K. (2002). Cultural constructions of the wild: The rhetoric and practice of wildlife conservation in the Cape Colony at the turn of the twentieth Century. South African Historical Journal, 47(1), 75–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carruthers, J. (2006). Tracking in game trails: Looking afresh at the politics of environmental history in South Africa. Environmental History, 11, 804–829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cilliers, S. S., & Siebert, S. J. (2012). Urban ecology in Cape Town: South African comparisons and reflections. Ecology and Society, 17(3), 1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • City of Cape Town (CCT). (2009). Environmental Resource Management DepartmentBiodiversity Management Branch Strategic Plan 20092019. City of Cape Town.

  • City of Cape Town (CCT). (2012). City of Cape Town2011 CensusCape Town. http://www.capetown.gov.za/en/stats/Documents/2011%20Census/2011_Census_Cape_Town_Profile.pdf (Accessed 26 November 2013).

  • Cock, J., & Fig, D. (2000). From colonial to community based conservation: Environmental justice and the national parks of South Africa. Society in Transition, 31(1), 22–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlberg, A., Rohde, R., & Sandell, K. (2010). National parks and environmental justice: Comparing access rights and ideological legacies in three countries. Conservation and Society, 8(3), 209–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeGeorges, P. A., & Reilly, B. K. (2009). The realities of community based natural resource management and biodiversity conservation in Sub-Saharan Africa. Sustainability, 1(3), 734–788.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elmqvist, T., Fragkias, M., Goodness, J., Güneralp, B., Marcotullio, P. J., McDonald, R. I., et al. (Eds.). (2013). Urbanization, biodiversity and ecosystem services: Challenges and opportunities—a global assessment. Dordrecht, Heidelberg, New York, London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernstson, H. (2013). Re-translating nature in post-apartheid Cape Town: The material semiotics of people and plants at Bottom Road. In Actor-network theory for development: working paper series (p. 35).

  • Ernstson, H. (forthcoming). Situating ecologies and re-distributing expertise: the material semiotics of people and plants at Bottom Road, Cape Town. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research.

  • Gobster, P. H. (2002). Managing urban parks for a racially and ethnically diverse clientele. Leisure Sciences, 24(2), 143–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodness, J., & Anderson, P. M. L. (2013). Local assessment of Cape Town: navigating the management complexities of urbanization, biodiversity, and ecosystem services in the Cape Floristic Region. In T. Elmqvist, M. Fragkias, J. Goodness, B. Güneralp, P. J. Marcotullio, R. L. McDonald, et al. (Eds.), Urbanization, biodiversity and ecosystem services: Challenges and opportunities—a global assessment (pp. 461–484). Dordrecht, Heidelberg, New York, London: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, M. (2015a). Everyday human (in)securities in protected urban nature - collaborative conservation at Macassar Dunes/Wolfgat reserves, Cape Town, South Africa. Geoforum, 64, 25–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, M. (2015b). Postcolonial Nature Conservation and Collaboration in Urban Protected Areas: Everyday relations at Macassar Dunes/Wolfgat reserves, Cape Town, South Africa. PhD thesis, Stockholm University.

  • Green, L. (2007). Changing nature: Working lives on Table Mountain, 1980–2000. In S. Field, R. Meyer, & F. Swanson (Eds.), Imagining the city: Memories and cultures in Cape Town (pp. 173–190). Cape Town: Human Sciences Research Council Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grove, R. (1987). Early themes in African Conservation: The Cape in the nineteenth century. In D. Anderson & R. Grove (Eds.), Conservation in Africa, people, policies and practice (pp. 173–190). Cambridge. U.K: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, S. (2006). Networking people and nature in the city: Inspiration, issues and challenges. Cape Town: SANBI and Cape Flats Nature. http://www.cepf.net/Documents/Cape_Flats_Nature.pdf (Accessed 12 July 2014).

  • Holmes, P. M., Dorse, C., Stipinovich, A., Purves, A., Wood, J., Gibbs, D., & Ernstzen, R. (2012a). Conservation implementation plan for strandveld in the Metro South-East—Final Report August 2012. South Africa: Cape Town.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, P., Rebelo, A., Dorse, C., & Wood, J. (2012b). Can Cape Town’s unique biodiversity be saved? Balancing conservation imperatives and development needs. Ecology & Society, 17(2), 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katzschner, T. (2013). Cape flats nature: Rethinking urban ecologies. In L. Green (Ed.), Reimagining the nature-culture divide in the global South (pp. 202–226). Cape Town: HSRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, F. (2000). Environmentalism in South Africa: A sociopolitical perspective. Macalester International, 9(1), 156–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Layne, T. (2013). Ordinary magic: The alchemy of biodiversity and development in Cape Flats Nature. Solutions, 4(3), 84–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masuku Van Damme, L. S., & Meskell, L. (2009). Producing conservation and community in South Africa. Ethics, Place and Environment: A Journal of Philosophy and Geography, 12(1), 69–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meskell, L. (2012). The Nature of Heritage: The New South Africa. Malden: Wiley, Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Farrell, P. J., Anderson, P. M. L., Le Maitre, D. C., & Holmes, P. M. (2012). Insights and opportunities offered by a rapid ecosystem service assessment in promoting a conservation agenda in an urban biodiversity hotspot. Ecology and Society, 17(3), 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olwage, E. (2013). Growing together: Exploring the politics of knowing and conserving (bio)diversity in a small conservancy in Cape Town. Masters thesis, University of Cape Town.

  • Patel, Z. (2006). Of questionable value: The role of practitioners in building sustainable cities. Geoforum, 37(5), 682–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, L. M., Moll, E. J., Collins, R., & Hockings, M. T. (2012). Development of a compendium of local, wild-harvested species used in the informal economy trade, Cape Town, South Africa. Ecology & Society, 17(2), 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitt, B., & Boulle, T. (2010). Growing together: Thinking and practice of urban nature conservators. Cape Town: SANBI Cape Flats Nature.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rebelo, A. G. (1992). Red data book species in the cape floristic region: Threats, priorities and target species. Transactions Royal Society of South Africa, 48(1), 55–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rebelo, A. G., Holmes, P. M., Dorse, C., & Wood, J. (2011). Impacts of urbanization in a biodiversity hotspot: Conservation challenges in metropolitan Cape Town. South African Journal of Botany, 77(1), 20–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redford, K. H., & Sanderson, S. E. (2006). No roads, only directions. Conservation and Society, 4(3), 379–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. G. (2011). Ethical obligations, pragmatism, and sustainability in real world conservation. Biological Conservation, 144(3), 958–965.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seekings, J. (2010). Race, Class and Inequality in the South African City. CSSR Working Paper No. 283. Cape Town: Centre for Social Science Research, Social Surveys Unit, University of Cape Town.

  • Singh, J., & van Houtum, H. (2002). Post-colonial nature conservation in southern Africa: Same emperors, new clothes? GeoJournal, 58(4), 253–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sundberg, J. (2004). Identities in the making: Conservation, gender and race in the Maya Biosphere Reserve, Guatemala. Gender, Place and Culture, 11(1), 43–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanepoel, J. (2013). Custodians of the Cape Peninsula: A Historical and Contemporary Ethnography of Urban Conservation in Cape Town. Masters thesis, Stellenbosch University.

  • Tofa, M. (2011). Unsettling openings: Collaborative environmental management and Maōri in Taranaki. PhD thesis, Macquarie University.

  • Trzyna, T. (Ed.). (2014). Urban protected areas: Profiles and best practice guidelines. best practice protected area guidelines series No. 22. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Sittert, L. (2003). The bourgeois eye aloft: Table Mountain in the Anglo urban middle class imagination, c.1891-1952. Kronos, 29, 161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Sittert, L. (2010). The intimate politics of the Cape Floral Kingdom. South African Journal of Science, 106(3–4), 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Sittert, L. (in review). Elbows over the fence: Rondevlei and the invention of community-based conservation in apartheid Cape Town. In H. Ernstson., S. Sörlin (Eds) (Forthcoming in 2016). Grounding urban natures: Histories and futures of urban ecologies.

  • Walters, L. (2011). Draft management plan for Wolfgat nature reserve. Cape Town, South Africa: City of Cape Town.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welch-Devine, M., Hardy, D., Brosius, J. P., & Heynen, N. (2014). A pedagogical model for integrative training in conservation and sustainability. Ecology and Society, 19(2), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Western, J.C. (1996) [1st edition 1981]. Outcast Cape Town. Berkeley and Los Angeles, California: University of California Press.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marnie Graham.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Graham, M. Postcolonial nature conservation in practice: the everyday challenges of on-ground urban nature conservation, Cape Town, South Africa. GeoJournal 82, 43–62 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-015-9661-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-015-9661-3

Keywords

Navigation