Skip to main content
Log in

Crustal Structure of Turkey from Aeromagnetic, Gravity and Deep Seismic Reflection Data

  • Published:
Surveys in Geophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, aeromagnetic and gravity anomalies obtained from the General Directorate of Mineral Research and Exploration were subjected to upward continuation to 3 km from the ground surface to suppress shallow effects and to expose only regional, deep sources. Then, a reduction to pole (RTP) map of aeromagnetic anomalies was produced from the 3 km upward continued data. A sinuous boundary to the south of Turkey is observed in the RTP map that may indicate the suture zone between the Anatolides and African/Arabian Plates in the closure time of the Tethys Ocean. The sinuous boundary can be correlated with the recent palaeo-tectonic maps. The southern part of the sinuous boundary is quite different and less magnetic in comparison with the northern block. In addition, maxspots maps of the aeromagnetic and gravity anomalies were produced to find out and enhance the boundaries of tectonic units. Crustal thickness, recently calculated and mapped for the western Turkey, is also extended to the whole of Turkey, and the crustal thicknesses are correlated with the previous seismological findings and deep seismic sections. The average crustal thickness calculations using the gravity data are about 28 km along the coastal regions and increase up to 42 km through the Iranian border in the east of Turkey. Density and susceptibility values used as parameters for construction of two-dimensional (2D) gravity and magnetic models were compiled in a table from different localities of Turkey. 2D models indicate that all of the anomalous masses are located in the upper crust, and this could be well correlated with the earthquakes which occurred at shallow depths.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Angus DA, Wilson DC, Sandvol E, Ni JF (2006) Lithospheric structure of the Arabian and Eurasian collision zone in eastern Turkey from S-wave receiver functions. Geophys J Int 166:1335–1346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arslan S, Akin U, Alaca A (2010) Investigation of crustal structure of Turkey by means of gravity data. Mineral Res Expl Bull 140:55–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Artemieva IM, Thybo H (2008) Deep Norden: highlights of the lithospheric structure of northern Europe, Iceland and Greenland. Episodes 31:98–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Ates A, Kearey P (2000) Interpretation of gravity and aeromagnetic anomalies of the Konya region, South central Turkey. J Balkan Geophys Soc 3:37–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Ates A, Kearey P, Tufan S (1999) New gravity and magnetic anomaly maps of Turkey. Geophys J Int 136:499–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ates A, Bilim F, Buyuksarac A (2005) Curie point depth investigation of central Anatolia, Turkey. Pure Appl Geophys 162:357–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ates A, Bilim F, Buyuksarac A, Bektas O (2008) A tectonic interpretation of the Marmara Sea, NW Turkey from geophysical data. Earth Planets Space 60:169–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Ates A, Buyuksarac A, Bilim F, Bektas O, Sendur C, Komanovali G (2009) Spatial correlation of the aeromagnetic anomalies and seismogenic faults in the Marmara region, NW Turkey. Tectonophysics 478:135–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aydemir A (2008) Hydrocarbon potential of the Tuzgolu (Salt Lake) Basin, Central Anatolia, Turkey: a comparison of geophysical investigation results with the geochemical data. J Pet Sci Eng 61:33–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aydemir A (2009) Tectonic investigation of central Anatolia, Turkey using geophysical data. J Appl Geophys 68:321–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aydemir A (2011) An integrated geophysical investigation of Haymana Basin and hydrocarbon prospective Kirkkavak formation in Central Anatolia, Turkey. Petrol Geosci 17:91–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aydemir A, Ates A (2006a) Interpretation of Suluklu-Cihanbeyli-Goloren magnetic anomaly, Central Anatolia, Turkey: an integration of geophysical data. Phys Earth Planet Inter 159:167–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aydemir A, Ates A (2006b) Structural interpretation of the Tuzgolu and Haymana Basins, Central Anatolia, using seismic, gravity and aeromagnetic data. Earth Planets Space 58:951–961

    Google Scholar 

  • Becel A, Laigle M, de Voogd B, Hirn A, Taymaz T, Galve A, Shimamura H, Murai Y, Lepine JC, Sapin M, Ozalaybey S (2009) Moho, crustal architecture and deep deformation under the North Marmara Trough, from the SEISMARMARA Leg 1 offshore-onshore reflection-refraction survey. Tectonophysics 467:1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bektas O, Ravat D, Buyuksarac A, Bilim F, Ates A (2007) Regional geothermal characterization of East Anatolia from aeromagnetic, heat flow and gravity data. Pure Appl Geophys 164:975–998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilim F (2007) Investigations into the tectonic lineaments and thermal structure of Kutahya–Denizli region, western Anatolia, from using aeromagnetic, gravity and seismological data. Phys Earth Planet Inter 165:135–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilim F (2011) Investigation of the Galatian volcanic complex in the northern central Turkey using potential field data. Phys Earth Planet Inter 185:36–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilim F, Ates A (1999) A computer program to estimate the source body magnetization direction from magnetic and gravity anomalies. Comput Geosci 25:241–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilim F, Ates A (2004) An enhanced method for estimation of body magnetization direction from pseudogravity and gravity data. Comput Geosci 30:161–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilim F, Ates A (2007) Identifying block rotations from remanent magnetization effect: example from northern Central Anatolia. Earth Planets Space 59:33–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Bingöl E (1989) 1/2,000,000 Scale Geological Map of Turkey, Publication of the Mineral Research and Exploration (MTA) of Turkey, Ankara

  • Biryol CB, Beck SL, Zandt G, Ozacar AA (2011) Segmented African lithosphere beneath the Anatolian region inferred from the teleseismic P-wave tomography. Geophys J Int 184:1037–1057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blakely RJ (1996) Potential theory in gravity and magnetic applications. Cambridge University Press, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Blakely RJ, Simpson RW (1986) Approximating edges of source bodies from magnetic or gravity anomalies. Geophysics 51:1494–1498

    Google Scholar 

  • Buyuksarac A (2007) Investigation into the regional wrench tectonics of inner East Anatolia (Turkey) using potential field data. Phys Earth Planet Inter 160:86–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buyuksarac A, Jordanova D, Ates A, Karloukovski V (2005) Interpretation of the gravity and magnetic anomalies of the Cappadocia region, Central Turkey. Pure Appl Geophys 162:2197–2213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buyuksarac A, Taymaz T, Ates A, Bilim F, Aydemir A, Bektas O, Yolsal S, Cubuk Y (2009) Gravity anomalies and crustal structure of Turkey. In: Proceedings of international symposium on historical earthquakes and conservation of monuments and sites in the Eastern Mediterranean Region, 500th anniversary year of the 1509 September 10, Marmara Earthquake, 10–12 September 2009, Istanbul

  • Cakir O, Erduran M (2011) On the P and S receiver functions used for inverting the one-dimensional Upper Mantle shear-wave velocities. Surv Geophys 32:71–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demir D, Bilim F, Aydemir A, Ates A (2012) Modelling of Thrace Basin, NW Turkey using gravity and magnetic anomalies with control of seismic and borehole data. J Pet Sci Eng. doi:10.1016/j.petrol.2012.03.013

  • Dobrin MB, Savit CH (1988) Introduction to geophysical prospecting. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gans CR, Beck SL, Zandt G, Biryol CB, Ozacar AA (2009) Detecting the limit of slab break-off in central Turkey: new high-resolution Pn tomography results. Geophys J Int 179:1566–1572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Genc Y, Yurur MT (2010) Coeval extension and compression in Late Mesozoic-Recent thin-skinned extensional tectonics in Central Anatolia. J Struct Geol 32:623–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gok R, Pasyanos ME, Zor E (2007) Lithospheric structure of the continent–continent collision zone: eastern Turkey. Geophys J Int 169:1079–1088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gursoy H, Piper JDA, Tatar O, Temiz H (1997) A palaeomagnetic study of the Sivas basin, Central Turkey: crustal deformation during lateral extrusion of the Anatolian Block. Tectonophysics 271:89–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gursoy H, Piper JDA, Tatar O, Mesci L (1998) Paleomagnetic study of the Karaman and Karapinar volcanic complexes, Central Turkey, Neotectonic rotation in the South-central sector of the Arabian Block. Tectonophysics 299:191–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kearey P (1991) A possible source of the south-central England magnetic anomaly, basaltic rocks beneath the London Platform. J Geol Soc London 148:775–780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kearey P, Brooks M, Hill I (2002) An introduction to exploration geophysics. Blackwell, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearey P, Klepeis KA, Vine FJ (2009) Global tectonics, 3rd edn. Blackwell, UK

  • McClusky S, Balassanian S, Barka A, Demir C, Ergintav S, Georgiev I, Gurkan O, Hamburger M, Hurst K, Kahle H, Kastens K, Kekelidze G, King R, Kotzev V, Lenk O, Mahmoud S, Mishin A, Nadariya M, Ouzounis A, Paradissis D, Peter Y, Prilepin M, Reilinger R, Sanli I, Seeger H, Tealeb A, Toksoz MN, Veis G (2000) Global positioning system constraints on plate kinematics and dynamics in the Eastern Mediterranean and Caucasus. J Geophys Res 105:5695–5719

    Google Scholar 

  • Moix P, Beccaletto L, Kozur HW, Hochard C, Rosselet F, Stampfli GM (2008) A new classification of the Turkish terranes and sutures and its implication for the paleotectonic history of the region. Tectonophysics 451:7–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Necioglu A, Maddison B, Turkelli N (1981) A study of crustal and upper mantle structure of northwestern Turkey. Geophys Res Lett 8:33–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neev D, Hall JK, Saul JM (1982) The Pelusium Megashear system across Africa and associated lineament swarms. J Geophys Res 87:1015–1030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onal KM, Buyuksarac A, Aydemir A, Ates A (2008) Investigation of the deep structure of the Sivas basin (innereast Anatolia, Turkey) with geophysical methods. Tectonophysics 460:186–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozturk F (1997) Investigations into magnetic and gravity anomalies of the region between Kirikkale and Tuz Lake. MSc Thesis, Ankara University, Turkey (unpublished) (in Turkish with English abstract)

  • Piper JDA, Gursoy H, Tatar O, Beck ME, Rao A, Kocbulut F, Mesci BL (2010) Distributed neotectonic deformation in the Anatolides of Turkey: a palaeomagnetic analysis. Tectonophysics 488:31–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reilinger R, McClusky S, Vernant P, Lawrence S, Ergintav S, Cakmak R, Ozener H, Kadirov F, Guliev I, Stepanyan R, Nadariya M, Hahubia G, Mahmoud S, Sakr K, ArRajehi A, Paradissis D, Al-Aydrus A, Prilepin M, Guseva T, Evren E, Dmitrotsa A, Filikov SV, Gomez F, Al-Ghazzi R, Karam G (2006) GPS constraints on continental deformation in the Africa-Arabia-Eurasia continental collision zone and implications for the dynamics of plate interactions. J Geophys Res 111:B05411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riad S, El Etr HA (1985) Bouguer anomalies and lithosphere-crustal thickness in Uganda. J Geodyn 3:169–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riad S, Refai E, Ghalib M (1981) Bouguer anomalies and crustal structure in the Eastern Mediterranean. Tectonophysics 71:253–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivero L, Pinto V, Casas A (2002) Moho depth structure of the eastern part of the Pyrenean belt derived from the gravity data. J Geodyn 33:315–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders P, Priestley K, Taymaz T (1998) Variations in the crustal structure beneath western Turkey. Geophys J Int 134:373–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sengor AMC, Yilmaz Y (1981) Tethyan evolution of Turkey: a plate tectonic approach. Tectonophysics 75:181–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spector A, Grant FS (1970) Statistical models for interpreting aeromagnetic data. Geophysics 35:293–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Storetvedt KM (1990) The Tethys Sea and the Alpine-Himalayan orogenic bels; mega-elements in a new global tectonic system. Phys Earth Planet Inter 62:141–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storetvedt KM (2003) Global wrench tectonics. Fagbokforlaget, Norway

    Google Scholar 

  • Storetvedt KM, Longhinos B (2011) Evolution of the north Atlantic: paradigm shift in the offing. New Concepts Glob Tectonics Newsl 51:9–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Telford WM, Geldart LP, Sheriff RE (1990) Applied geophysics, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tezel T, Erduran M, Alptekin O (2007) Crustal shear wave velocity structure of Turkey by surface wave dispersion analysis. Ann Geophys 50:177–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Tezel T, Shibutani T, Kaypak B (2010) Crustal structure variation in western Turkey inferred from receiver function analysis. Tectonophysics 492:240–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tirel C, Gueydan F, Tiberi C, Brun JP (2004) Aegean crustal thickness inferred from gravity inversion. Geodynamical implications. Earth Planet Sci Lett 228:267–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Authors are grateful to the General Directorate of Mining Research and Exploration of Turkey for the provision of gridded aeromagnetic and gravity data that were used for a Turkish Scientific Research Council (TUBITAK) and European Scientific Exchange Program (ESEP) during 1997. Our kindest thanks go to Prof. Karsten M. Storetvedt and Dr. M. Nuri Dolmaz for their comprehensive and delicate review of this paper. We also thank Prof. Rycroft for the editorial handling of our paper. Reduction to the Pole transformation map was produced by using GEOSOFT-OASIS software. Seismic sections used in this study were provided by the General Directorate of Petroleum Affairs for a Cumhuriyet University Scientific Research Project (Project No: CUBAP M-394). This research was also granted and supported by TUBITAK (Project No: 107Y288).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Attila Aydemir.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ates, A., Bilim, F., Buyuksarac, A. et al. Crustal Structure of Turkey from Aeromagnetic, Gravity and Deep Seismic Reflection Data. Surv Geophys 33, 869–885 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-012-9195-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-012-9195-x

Keywords

Navigation