Abstract
In Gedankenexperiment mentioned in the title, the imprecision in space-time measurement is related to the spreading of clock’s wave-function with the passage of time required for the measurement. Special relativity puts a bound on the measurement time, it cannot be reduced arbitrarily as the signal used for the measurement cannot propagate with speed greater than that of light. In view of this reasoning, one is led to conclude that the clock should be heavy enough to slow down its wave-function from spreading with time. However, the general relativity puts an upper bound on clock’s mass, since its size must remain greater then the Schwarzschild radius associated to it. This way one reaches a limit in length measurement. However, as is discussed below, an additional insight into the question comes by taking into account self-gravitational effects. As a result, the uncertainty in length measurement is reduced to the Planck length.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Weisskopf, V., Wigner, E.P.: Z. Phys. 63, 54 (1930). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01336768
Casimir, H.B.G.: Indag. Math. 10, 261 (1948)
Casimir, H.B.G.: Kon. Ned. Akad. Wetensch. Proc. 51, 793 (1948)
Casimir, H.B.G.: Front. Phys. 65, 342 (1987)
Casimir, H.B.G.: Kon. Ned. Akad. Wetensch. Proc. 100(3–4), 61 (1997)
Welton, T.A.: Phys. Rev. 74, 1157 (1948). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.74.1157
Bohr, N., Rosenfeld, L.: Kgl. Danske Vidensk. Selskab. Math.-Fys. Medd. Bd. 12, N8 (1933)
Bohr, N., Rosenfeld, L.: Phys. Rev. 78, 794 (1950). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.78.794
Bronstein, M.: Phys. Zeitschrift der Sowjetunion 9, 140 (1936)
Bronstein, M.: ZhETF 6, 195 (1936)
Bronstein, M.: Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 44, 267 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-011-1285-4
Anderson, J.L.: Rev. Mex. Fis. 03(3), 176 (1954)
Regge, T.: Nuovo Cim. 7, 215 (1958)
Peres, A., Rosen, N.: Phys. Rev. 118, 335 (1960). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.118.335
Osborne, M.F.M.: Phys. Rev. 75, 1579 (1949). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.75.1579
Wigner, E.P.: Phys. Rev. 120, 643 (1960). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.120.643
Wigner, E.P.: J. Math. Phys. 2, 207 (1961). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1703701
Wigner, E.P.: Rev. Mod. Phys. 29, 255 (1957). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.29.255
Salecker, H., Wigner, E.P.: Phys. Rev. 109, 571 (1958). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.109.571
Mead, C.A.: Phys. Rev. 135, B849 (1964). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.135.B849
Karolyhazy, F.: Nuovo Cim. A 42, 390 (1966). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02717926
Diosi, L., Lukacs, B.: Phys. Lett. A 142, 331 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9601(89)90375-7
Ng, Y.J., Van Dam, H.: Mod. Phys. Lett. A 9, 335 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217732394000356
Diosi, L., Lukacs, B.: Europhys. Lett. 34, 479 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1209/epl/i1996-00482-6. [arXiv:quant-ph/9501001]
Adler, R.J., Nemenman, I.M., Overduin, J.M., Santiago, D.I.: Phys. Lett. B 477, 424 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0370-2693(00)00233-1. [arXiv:gr-qc/9909017]
Ng, Y.J., van Dam, H.: Phys. Lett. B 477, 429 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0370-2693(00)00232-X. [arXiv:gr-qc/9911054]
Baez, J.C., Olson, S.J.: Class. Quant. Grav. 19, L121 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/19/14/101. [arXiv:gr-qc/0201030]
Ng, Y.J., van Dam, H.: Class. Quant. Grav. 20, 393 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/20/2/311. [arXiv:gr-qc/0209021]
Barrow, J.D.: Phys. Rev. D 54, 6563 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.54.6563
Carlip, S.: Class. Quant. Grav. 25, 154010 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/25/15/154010. [arXiv:0803.3456 [gr-qc]]
Giulini, D., Grossardt, A.: Class. Quant. Grav. 28, 195026 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/28/19/195026. [arXiv:1105.1921 [gr-qc]]
van Meter, J.R.: Class. Quant. Grav. 28, 215013 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/28/21/215013. [arXiv:1105.1579 [quant-ph]]
Arnowitt, R.L., Deser, S., Misner, C.W.: In: Gravitation: an introduction to current research. Edited by L. Witten (Wiley, New York, 1962), Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 40, 1997 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-008-0661-1[arXiv:gr-qc/0405109]
Arnowitt, R., Deser, S., Misner, C.W.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 4, 375 (1960). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.4.375
Misner, C.W.: Phys. Rev. 130, 1590 (1963). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.130.1590
Duff, M.J.: Phys. Rev. D 7, 2317 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.7.2317
Duff, M.J.: Annals Phys. 79, 261 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(73)90292-3
Maziashvili, M.: Annals Phys. 383, 545 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2017.06.007. [arXiv:1603.04144 [hep-ph]]
Maziashvili, M., Silagadze, Z.K.: J. Phys. Conf. Ser. (in press) arXiv:1812.03993 [quant-ph]
Acknowledgements
Author is indebted to Avtandil Achelashvili and Zurab Kepuladze for useful discussions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Maziashvili, M. Salecker–Wigner–Karolyhazy Gedankenexperiment in light of the self-gravity. Gen Relativ Gravit 52, 70 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-020-02722-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-020-02722-x