Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Organizing for Commons-Enabling Decision-Making Under Conflicting Institutional Logics in Social Entrepreneurship

  • Published:
Group Decision and Negotiation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Social entrepreneurship develops innovative opportunities and solutions aimed to (re)generate the common good. This emerging organizational form poses unprecedented challenges to group decision and negotiation studies. This article leverages conceptual tools from the literature on the commons and institutional logics as it explores the organizational conditions of social entrepreneurship that trigger commons-enabling decision-making in its organizational field. Through an inductive analysis of a longitudinal case, this study proposes a model that highlights the critical role of the bridging organization that can be introduced by the social entrepreneur in a previously fragmented organizational field. This bridging organization is in the condition to develop an innovative co-creation logic that can serve as a common ground to enable collaboration between actors from diverse and even conflicting institutional logics. The proposed model suggests that a practice-driven path to the construction of such a common ground for decision-making is more effective than a disclosure-driven path, which is based on classical conflict analysis techniques. The ICT-enabled activity system developed by the social entrepreneur injects transparency and traceability into a previously opaque field, thus creating the conditions for distributed, flexible, and complementary sense- and decision-making processes that develop and protect the commons.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aaltonen A, Lanzara GF (2015) Building governance capability in online social production: insights from wikipedia. Organ Sci 36:1649–1673

    Google Scholar 

  • Abele S, Stasser G, Chartier C (2010) Conflict and coordination in the provision of public goods: a conceptual analysis of continuous and step-level games. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 14:385–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Açıkgöz A, Günsel A, Kuzey C, Zaim H (2016) Team foresight in new product development projects. Gr Decis Negot 25:289–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angelsberger M, Kraus S, Mas-Tur A, Roig-Tierno N (2017) International opportunity recognition: an overview. J Small Bus Strategy 27:19–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Ansari S, Wijen F, Gray B (2013) Constructing a climate change logic: an institutional perspective on the “tragedy of the commons”. Organ Sci 24:1014–1040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ansell C (2011) Pragmatist democracy: evolutionary learning as public philosophy. Oxford University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Armitage D, Marschke M, Plummer R (2008) Adaptive co-management and the paradox of learning. Glob Environ Change 18:86–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Au WT, Chung MW (2007) Effect of order of contribution in a sequential public goods dilemma. Gr Decis Negot 16:437–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee SB, Jackson L (2017) Microfinance and the business of poverty reduction: critical perspectives from rural Bangladesh. Hum Relat 70:63–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battilana J, D’Aunno T (2009) Institutional work: actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Battilana J, Dorado S (2010) Building sustainable hybrid organizations: the case of commercial microfinance organizations. Acad Manag J 53:1419–1440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battilana J, Lee M (2014) Advancing research on hybrid organizing – insights from the study of social enterprises. Acad Manag Ann 8:397–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beers PJ, Boshuizen HPA, Kirschner PA, Gijselaers WH (2006) Common ground, complex problems and decision making. Gr Decis Negot 15:529–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkes F (2009) Evolution of co-management: role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning. J Environ Manag 90:1692–1702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolton R, Hannon M (2016) Governing sustainability transitions through business model innovation: towards a systems understanding. Res Policy 45:1731–1742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonomi S, Ricciardi F, Rossignoli C (2017) Network organisations for externality challenges: how social entrepreneurship co-evolves with ICT-enabled solutions. Int J Knowl Base Dev 8:346–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryman A, Bell E (2011) Business research methods. OUP Oxford, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantino V, Devalle A, Cortese D, Ricciardi F, Longo M (2017) Place-based network organizations and embedded entrepreneurial learning: emerging paths to sustainability. Int J Entrep Behav Res 23:504–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Celino A, Concilio G (2011) Explorative nature of negotiation in participatory decision making for sustainability. Gr Decis Negot 20:255–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiles TH, Bluedorn AC, Gupta VK (2007) Beyond creative destruction and entrepreneurial discovery: a radical austrian approach to entrepreneurship. Organ Sci 28:467–493

    Google Scholar 

  • Crona BI, Parker JN (2012) Learning in support of governance: theories, methods, and a framework to assess how bridging organizations contribute to adaptive resource governance. Ecol Soc 17:32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dacin MT, Dacin PA, Tracey P (2011) Social entrepreneurship: a critique and future directions. Organ Sci 22:1203–1213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dees JG (2012) A tale of two cultures: charity, problem solving, and the future of social entrepreneurship. J Bus Ethics 111:321–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietz T, Ostrom E, Stern PC (2003) The struggle to govern the commons. Science 302:1907–1912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Digan SP, Kerrick S, Cumberland DM, Garrett R (2017) The roles of knowledge and organizational form on opportunity evaluation. J Small Bus Strategy 27:65–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Doherty B, Haugh H, Lyon F (2014) Social enterprises as hybrid organizations: a review and research agenda. Int J Manag Rev 16:417–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorado S (2005) Institutional entrepreneurship, partaking, and convening. Organ Sci 26:385–414

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebrahim A, Battilana J, Mair J (2014) The governance of social enterprises: mission drift and accountability challenges in hybrid organizations. Res Organ Behav 34:81–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt KM, Graebner ME, Sonenshein S (2016) Grand challenges and inductive methods: rigor without rigor mortis. Acad Manag J 59:1113–1123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engelmann W (1994) Conditions for disarmament: a game theoretical model. Gr Decis Negot 3:321–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fehr E, Gintis H (2007) Human motivation and social cooperation: experimental and analytical foundations. Annu Rev Sociol 33:43–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferraro F, Etzion D, Gehman J (2015) Tackling grand challenges pragmatically: robust action revisited. Organ Sci 36:363–390

    Google Scholar 

  • Garud R, Hardy C, Maguire S (2007) Institutional entrepreneurship as embedded agency: an introduction to the special issue. Organ Sci 28:957–969

    Google Scholar 

  • Germak AJ, Robinson JA (2014) Exploring the motivation of nascent social entrepreneurs. J Soc Entrep 5:5–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood R, Hinings CR, Whetten D (2014) Rethinking institutions and organizations. J Manag Stud 51:1206–1220

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulati R, Puranam P, Tushman M (2012) Meta-organization design: rethinking design in interorganizational and community contexts. Strat Manag J 33:571–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hahn T (2011) Self-organized governance networks for ecosystem management: who is accountable? Ecol Soc 16:18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardin G (1968) The tragedy of the commons. Science 162:1243–1248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kent D, Dacin MT (2013) Bankers at the gate: microfinance and the high cost of borrowed logics. J Bus Ventur 28:759–773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lachmann LM (1970) The legacy of Max Weber. Heinemann, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence TB, Hardy C, Phillips N (2002) Institutional effects of interorganizational collaboration: the emergence of proto-institutions. Acad Manag J 45:281–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence TB, Leca B, Zilber TB (2013) Institutional work: current research, new directions and overlooked issues. Organ Sci 34:1023–1033

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy JK, Hipel KW, Howard N (2009) Advances in drama theory for managing global hazards and disasters. Part I: theoretical foundation. Gr Decis Negot 18:303–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mair J, Robinson J, Hockerts K (2006) Social entrepreneurship. Palgrave Macmillan Ltd., New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mair J, Mayer J, Lutz E (2015) Navigating institutional plurality: organizational governance in hybrid organizations. Organ Sci 36:713–739

    Google Scholar 

  • Maitlis S, Christianson M (2014) Sensemaking in organizations: taking stock and moving forward. Acad Manag Ann 8:57–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markin E, Swab RG, Marshall DR (2017) Who is driving the bus? An analysis of author and institution contributions to entrepreneurship research. J Innov Knowl 2:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarter MW, Budescu DV, Scheffran J (2011) The give-or-take-some dilemma: an empirical investigation of a hybrid social dilemma. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 116:83–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller TL, Grimes MG, McMullen JS, Vogus TJ (2012) Venturing for others with heart and head: how compassion encourages social entrepreneurship. Acad Manage Rev 37:616–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson M (1965) The logic of collective action: public goods and the theory of groups. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Olugbola SA (2017) Exploring entrepreneurial readiness of youth and startup success components: entrepreneurship training as a moderator. J Innov Knowl 2:155–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (1990) Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (1995) Designing complexity to govern complexity. In: Hanna S, Munasinghe M (eds) Property rights and the environment: social and ecological issues. Beijer International Institute of Ecological Economics and The World Bank, Washington, pp 33–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E, Burger J, Field CB, Norgaard RB, Policansky D (1999) Revisiting the commons: local lessons, global challenges. Science 284:278–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pache A-C, Santos F (2010) When worlds collide: the internal dynamics of organizational responses to conflicting institutional demands. Acad Manage Rev 35:455–476

    Google Scholar 

  • Pache AC, Santos F (2013) Inside the hybrid organization: selective coupling as a response to competing institutional logics. Acad Manag J 56:972–1001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pacheco DF, York JG, Dean TJ, Sarasvathy SD (2010) The coevolution of institutional entrepreneurship: a tale of two theories. J Manag 36:974–1010

    Google Scholar 

  • Peredo AM, Chrisman JJ (2006) Toward a theory of community-based enterprise. Acad Manage Rev 31:309–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew AM (1990) Longitudinal field research on change: theory and practice. Organ Sci 1:267–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierce P, Ricciardi F, Zardini A (2017) Smart cities as organizational fields: a framework for mapping sustainability-enabling configurations. Sustainability 9:1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pless NM (2012) Social entrepreneurship in theory and practice—an introduction. J Bus Ethics 111:317–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purdy JM, Gray B (2009) Conflicting logics, mechanisms of diffusion, and multilevel dynamics in emerging institutional fields. Acad Manag J 52:355–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport A, Suleiman R (1992) Equilibrium solutions for resource dilemmas. Gr Decis Negot 1:269–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ribeiro-Soriano D, Urbano D (2009) Overview of collaborative entrepreneurship: an integrated approach between business decisions and negotiations. Gr Decis Negot 18:419–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricciardi F, Zardini A, Rossignoli C (2018) Business network commons: emerging architectures of resilience-oriented organizational fields. J Bus Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.01.005

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos FM (2012) A positive theory of social entrepreneurship. J Bus Ethics 111:335–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santos F, Pache A-C, Birkholz C (2015) Making hybrids work: aligning business models and organizational design for social enterprises. Calif Manage Rev 57:36–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shakun MF (2013) The connectedness decision paradigm: group decision, negotiation and leadership in world problems. Gr Decis Negot 22:599–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma G, Bansal P (2017) Partners for good: how business and NGOs engage the commercial–social paradox. Organ Sci 38:341–364

    Google Scholar 

  • Smets M, Morris T, Greenwood R (2012) From practice to field: a multilevel model of practice-driven institutional change. Acad Manag J 55:877–904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith WK, Gonin M, Besharov ML (2013) Managing social-business tensions: a review and research agenda for social enterprise. Bus Ethics Q 23:407–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spicer A, Sewell G (2010) From national service to global player: transforming the organizational logic of a public broadcaster. J Manag Stud 47:913–943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suleiman R, Budescu DV, Rapoport A (2001) Provision of step-level public goods with uncertain provision threshold and continuous contribution. Gr Decis Negot 10:253–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton P, Ocasio W (2008) Institutional logics. In: Greenwood R, Oliver C, Sahlin K, Suddaby R (eds) The sage handbook of organizational institutionalism. Sage, London, pp 99–129

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tracey P, Phillips N, Jarvis O (2011) Bridging institutional entrepreneurship and the creation of new organizational forms: a multilevel model. Organ Sci 22:60–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk E, Wit A, Wilke H, Budescu DV (2004) What we know (and do not know) about the effects of uncertainty on behavior in social dilemmas. In: Suleiman R, Budescu DV, Fischer I, Messick DM (eds) Contemporary psychological research on social dilemmas. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 315–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Vargo SL, Maglio PP, Akaka MA (2008) On value and value co-creation: a service systems and service logic perspective. Eur Manag J 26:145–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vittikh VA (2015) Introduction to the theory of intersubjective management. Gr Decis Negot 24:67–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weick KE (1988) Enacted sensemaking in crisis situations. J Manag Stud 25:305–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weick KE, Sutcliffe KM, Obstfeld D (2005) Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organ Sci 16:409–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wooten M, Hoffman AJ (2008) Organizational fields: past, present, and future. In: Greenwood R, Oliver C, Suddaby R, Sahlin K (eds) Handbook of organizational institutionalism. Sage Publications, London, pp 130–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang DD, Swanson LA (2014) Linking social entrepreneurship and sustainability. J Soc Entrep 5:175–191

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Business Administration, University of Verona, Via Cantarane 24, 37129, Verona, Italy

    Cecilia Rossignoli

  2. Department of Management, University of Turin, Corso Unione Sovietica 218 bis, 10131, Turin, Italy

    Francesca Ricciardi

  3. Department of Law, eCampus University, Via Isimbardi, 10, 22060, Novedrate, Como, Italy

    Sabrina Bonomi

Authors
  1. Cecilia Rossignoli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Francesca Ricciardi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sabrina Bonomi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesca Ricciardi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rossignoli, C., Ricciardi, F. & Bonomi, S. Organizing for Commons-Enabling Decision-Making Under Conflicting Institutional Logics in Social Entrepreneurship. Group Decis Negot 27, 417–443 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-018-9564-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-018-9564-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation