Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Bills as Band-Aids: Hopes and Challenges of Expanding Pharmacists’ Prescriptive Authority to Include Contraceptives

  • Published:
HEC Forum Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper critically examines the implications of state efforts to expand prescriptive authority of pharmacists, which will allow them to prescribe various types of hormonal contraceptives. With this expansion, women no longer need to see a physician before being prescribed such contraceptives, but instead, they must answer self-assessment questionnaires at the pharmacy to ensure that their chosen method is safe and appropriate. This paper argues that while these measures to expand pharmacists’ prescriptive authority will surely meet the stated goal to increase access to hormonal contraceptives, the measures may have detrimental consequences that have largely been downplayed. Studies consistently show that the OB-GYN is a significant primary care provider identified by young female patients, and some of the main reasons provided by these young women for going to the OB-GYN is to discuss, or obtain a prescription for, contraceptives. Through the expansion of pharmacists’ prescriptive authority, a likely consequence is that some women will relinquish going to the OB-GYN. However, the OB-GYN provides important services beyond contraceptives, such as preventive screenings for hypertension, cardiovascular diseases, alcohol abuse, mental health, etc., and there is evidence supporting both the effectiveness and cost–benefits of these interventions. By increasing access to contraceptives, the likely result is that many women will have less interaction with a physician and will receive fewer preventive screenings. I do not wish to suggest that these bills should not pass, nor that OB-GYNs should hold contraceptives hostage, only that there are consequences to expanded prescriptive authority that must be anticipated. Further, expanding prescriptive authority obscures the real problem: some individuals have trouble accessing the health care system, not merely trouble accessing hormonal contraceptives. The expansion of prescriptive authority to include contraceptives applies a Band-Aid to treat one aspect of this problem. What is needed is not merely expanded access to hormonal contraceptives, but better access to health care in general.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Excluding miscarriages.

  2. Which type of contraceptive, whether oral, patch, ring, or injection, is state dependent.

References

  • American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). (2012). ACOG statement on HR 3803. Washington, DC.

  • American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). (2016). Well-woman recommendations. Washington, DC.

  • Becker, H. I., Longacre, M. R., & Harper, D. M. (2004). Beyond the pap: Assessing patients’ priorities for the annual examination. Journal of Women’s Health,13(7), 791–798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, M. A., Karasek, D., & Foster, D. G. (2012). Unprotected intercourse among women wanting to avoid pregnancy: Attitudes, behaviors, and beliefs. Women’s Health Issues,22(3), e311–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2016). Chronic diseases: The leading causes of death and disability in the United Stateshttp://www.cdc.gov/chronicdisease/overview/index.htm. Accessed 27 July 2019.

  • Ettner, S. L. (1999). The relationship between continuity of care and the health behaviors of patients: Does having a usual physician make a difference? Medical Care,39(6), 547–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farr, S. L., Hayes, D. K., Bitsko, R. H., Bansil, P., & Dietz, P. M. (2011). Depression, diabetes, and chronic disease risk factors among US women of reproductive age. Preventing Chronic Disease,8(6), A119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finer, L. B., & Zolna, M. R. (2011). Unintended pregnancy in the United States: Incidence and disparities, 2006. Contraception,84(5), 478–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finer, L. B., & Zolna, M. R. (2016). Declines in unintended pregnancy in the United States, 2008–2011. New England Journal of Medicine,374(9), 843–852.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Food and Drug Administration (FDA). (2011). Combined hormonal contraceptives (CHCs) and the risk of cardiovascular disease endpoints. Silver Spring, MD. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/DrugSafety/UCM277384.pdf. Accessed 27 July 2019.

  • Food and Drug Administration (FDA). (2012). FDA drug safety communication: Updated information about the risk of blood clots in women taking birth control pills containing drospirenone. Silver Spring, MD. http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/ucm299305. Accessed 27 July 2019.

  • Foster, D. G., Higgins, J. A., Karasek, D., Ma, S., & Grossman, D. (2012). Attitudes toward unprotected intercourse and risk of pregnancy among women seeking abortion. Women’s Health Issues,22(2), e149–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorenoi, V., Schönermark, M. P., Hagen, A. (2007). Benefits and risks of hormonal contraception for women. GMS Health Technology Assessment,3, Doc6.

  • Greene, M. E., & Merrick, T. (2015). The case for investing in research to increase access to and use of contraception among adolescents. Alliance for Reproductive, Maternal, and Newborn Health. Seattle, WA.

  • Grindlay, K., Burns, B., & Grossman, D. (2013). Prescription requirements and over-the-counter access to oral contraceptives: A global review. Contraception,88(1), 91–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grindlay, K., & Grossmann, D. (2016). Prescription birth control access among U.S. women at risk of unintended pregnancy. Journal of Women’s Health,25(3), 249–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, D., Fernandez, L., Hopkins, K., Amastae, J., Garcia, S. G., & Potter, J. E. (2008). Accuracy of self-screening for contraindications to combined oral contraceptive use. Obstetrics and Gynecology,112(3), 572–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, D., Grindlay, K., Li, R., Potter, J. E., Trussell, J., & Blanchard, K. (2013). Interest in over-the-counter access to oral contraceptives among women in the United States. Contraception,88(4), 544–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, D. K., Fan, A. Z., Smith, R. A., & Bombard, J. M. (2011). Trends in selected chronic conditions and behavioral risk factors among women of reproductive age, Behavioral risk factor surveillance system, 2001–2009. Preventing Chronic Disease,8(6), A120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, J. T., Sawaya, G. F., Blum, M., Stratton, L., & Harper, C. C. (2010). Pelvic examinations and access to oral hormonal contraceptives. Obstetrics and Gynecology,116(6), 1257–1264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, J. T., Weisman, C. S., & Grason, H. (2002). Are two doctors better than one? Women’s physician use and appropriate care. Women’s Health Issues,12(3), 138–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, K., Grossman, D., White, K., Amastae, J., & Potter, J. E. (2012). Reproductive health preventive screening among clinic vs. over-the-counter oral contraceptive users. Contraception,86(4), 376–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Institute of Medicine (IOM). (2011). Clinical preventive services for women: Closing the gaps. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R. K., Darroch, J. E., & Henshaw, S. K. (2002). Contraceptive use among US women having abortions in 2000-2001. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health,34(6), 294–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser Family Foundation (KFF). (2005). Women and heathcare: A national profile. Washington, DC.

  • Kaiser Family Foundation (KFF). (2011). Women’s health care chartbook: Key findings from the Kaiser women’s health survey. Washington, DC.

  • Kaiser Family Foundation (KFF). (2014). Women and health in the early years of the Affordable Care Act. Washington, DC.

  • Kerse, N., Buetow, S., Mainous, A. G., Young, G., Coster, G., & Arroll, B. (2004). Physician–patient relationship and medication compliance: A primary care investigation. Annals of Family Medicine,2(5), 455–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ko, J. Y., Farr, S. L., Dietz, P. M., & Robbins, C. L. (2012). Depression and treatment among US pregnant and non-pregnant women of reproductive age, 2005-2009. Journal of Women’s Health,21(8), 830–836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leopold, N., Cooper, J., & Clancy, C. (1996). Sustained partnership in primary care. Journal of Family Practice,42(2), 129–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masiosek, M. V., Coffield, A. B., Flottemesch, T. J., Edwards, N. M., & Solberg, L. I. (2010). Greater use of preventive services in US health care could save lives at little or no cost. Health Affairs,29(9), 1656–1660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGinnis, J. M., & Foege, W. H. (1993). Actual causes of death in the United States. JAMA,270(18), 2207–2212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGlynn, E. A., Asch, S. M., Adams, J., Keesey, J., Hicks, J., DeCristofaro, A., et al. (2003). The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. New England Journal of Medicine,348(26), 2635–2645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peltzman, S. (1987). By prescription only. AEI Journal of Government and Society,3(4), 23–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, J., Kaplan, S. H., Greenfield, S., Li, W., & Wilson, I. B. (2004). Better physician-patient relationships are associated with higher reported adherence to antiretroviral therapy in patient with HIV infection. Journal of General Internal Medicine,19(11), 1096–1103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholle, S. H., & Kelleher, K. (2003). Assessing primary care performance in an obstetrics/gynecology clinic. Women and Health,37(1), 15–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shotorbani, S., Miller, L., Blough, D. K., & Gardner, J. (2006). Agreement between women’s and provider’s assessment or hormonal contraceptive risk factors. Contraception,73(5), 501–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, A. E., & Uddin, S. F. G. (2017). Trends in seeing an obstetrician-gynecologist compared with a general physician among U.S. women, 2000–2015. Obstetrics & Gynecology,130(4), 677–683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, M. A. (1995). Effective physician-patient communication and health outcomes. Canadian Medical Association Journal,152(9), 1423–1433.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. (2014). The guide to clinical preventive services 2014. Rockville, MD.

  • U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. (2018). Screening for cervical cancer: US preventive services task force recommendation statement. JAMA,320(7), 674–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United States Code. Title 21 - FOOD AND DRUGS; Sec. 353 - Exemptions and consideration for certain drugs, devices, and biological products (2006 ed., Supplement 5). https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCODE-2011-title21/USCODE-2011-title21-chap9-subchapV-partA-sec353/summary. Accessed 29 July 2019.

  • World Health Organization (WHO). (2015). Medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use (5th ed.). Geneva, Switzerland:

Download references

Acknowledgements

I wish to express my sincerest appreciation to my colleague at Creighton University, Kelly Dineen, who has offered generous feedback on an earlier version of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kathrine Bendtsen.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bendtsen, K. Bills as Band-Aids: Hopes and Challenges of Expanding Pharmacists’ Prescriptive Authority to Include Contraceptives. HEC Forum 31, 295–304 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-019-09380-w

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-019-09380-w

Keywords

Navigation