Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

What future for student engagement in neo-liberal times?

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper first examines the context that has given student engagement a very strong profile in higher education. It identifies neo-liberalism as the driving force in the present higher education context and argues that student engagement enjoys an elective affinity with it. While neo-liberalism is dominant, student engagement will be strong. But attitudes to student engagement will vary. It examines possible futures for student engagement by discussing how three different scenarios could affect the student engagement enterprise in neo-liberal times. The paper identifies conforming, reforming and reframing scenarios; discourses that fit comfortably with neo-liberal ideas and practice, soften them or challenge them in pursuit of greater social justice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Australasian Survey of Student Engagement (Ausse), (2014). Background. http://www.acer.edu.au/ausse/background.

  • Ball, S. (2004). Performativities and fabrications in the educational economy: Towards the perfect society. In S. Ball (Ed.), The routledge falmer reader in sociology of education (pp. 143–155). London: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, R., & Coate, K. (2005). Engaging the curriculum in higher education. Maidenhead: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, W. (1998). Understanding the futures field. In D. Hicks & R. Slaughter (Eds.), Futures education: World yearbook of education. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G. (2004). Education, accountability, and the ethical demand: Can the democratic potential of accountability be regained? Educational Theory, 54(3), 233–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G. (2005). The learning democracy? Adult learning and the condition of democratic citizenship. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 26(5), 687–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blumer, H. (1954). What is wrong with social theory? American Sociological Review, 19(1), 3–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brookfield, S., & Holst, J. (2011). Radicalizing learning: Adult education for a just world. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryson, C., & Hand, L. (2007). The role of engagement in inspiring teaching and learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 44(4), 349–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charlton, B. (2002). Audit, accountability, quality and all that: The growth of managerial technologies in UK universities. In S. Prickett & P. Erskine-Hill (Eds.), Education! education! education! managerial ethics and the law of unintended consequences (pp. 13–28). Exeter: Imprint Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, M. (2012). The (absent) politics of neo-liberal education policy. Critical Studies in Education, 53(3), 297–310. doi:10.1080/17508487.2012.703139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coates, H. (2007). A model of online and general campus-based student engagement. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 32(2), 121–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coates, H. & McCormick, A. (2014). Engaging University Students: International Insights from System-Wide Studies. Doodrecht: Springer e book http://www.springer.com/education+%26+language/higher+education/book/978-981-4585-62-0.

  • Codd, J. (2005). Education policy and the challenges of globalisation: Commercialisation or citizenship? In J. Codd & K. Sullivan (Eds.), Education policy directions in aotearoa New Zealand (pp. 3–17). Melbourne Aus: Thomson Dunmore Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, S. (2005). The spatial forms and social norms of ‘actually existing neoliberalism’: Toward a substantive analytics. New School University International Affairs Working Paper 2005-04. http://www.gpia.info/files/u1/wp/2005-04.pdf.

  • Davies, B., & Bansel, P. (2007). Neoliberalism and education. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 20(3), 247–259. doi:10.1080/09518390701281751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Santos, M. (2009). Fact-totems and the statistical imagination: The public life of a statistic in Argentina 2001. Sociological Theory, 27(4), 466–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field, J. (2009). Well-being and happiness. Inquiry into the future for lifelong learning, Thematic article 4. Leicester, UK: National Institute of Adult Continuing Education.

  • Fielding, M. (2006). Leadership, radical student engagement and the necessity of person-centred education. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 9(4), 299–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finger, M., & Asún, J. (2001). Adult education at the crossroads: Learning our way out. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fredricks, J., Blumenfeld, P., & Paris, A. (2004). School engagement: potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. doi:10.3102/00346543074001059.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (2001). The global third way debate. Cambridge UK: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagel, P., Carr, R., & Devlin, M. (2011). Conceptualizing and measuring student engagement through the Australasian Survey of Student Engagement (AUSSE): A critique. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(4), 475–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horstmanshof, L., & Zimitat, C. (2007). Future time orientation predicts academic engagement among first year university students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(3), 703–718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Høstaker, R., & Vabø, A. (2005). Higher Education and the transformation to a cognitive capitalism. In by I. Bleiklie & M. Henkel (Eds.), Governing knowledge : A study of continuity and change in higher education : A festschrift in honour of Maurice Kogan (pp. 227–243). http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/1-4020-3504-7_14.

  • Hu, S., & McCormick, A. (2012). An engagement-based student typology and its relationship to college outcomes. Research in Higher Education, 53(1), 738–754. doi:10.1007/s11162-012-9254-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jost, J., Federico, C., & Napier, J. (2009). Political ideology: Its structure, functions and elected affinities. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 307–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kay, J., Owen, D., & Dunne, E. (2012). Students as change agents: Student engagement with quality enhancement of learning and teaching. In I. Solomonides, A. Reid, & P. Petocz (Eds.), Engaging with learning in higher education (pp. 358–380). Oxfordshire UK: Libri Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krause, K.-L. (2012). Addressing the wicked problem of quality in higher education: Theoretical approaches and implications. Higher Education Research & Development, 31(3), 285–297. doi:10.1080/07294360.2011.634381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuh, G., J. Kinzie, J. Buckley, B. Bridges, and J. Hayek. (2006). What Matters to Student Success: A Review of the Literature. Commissioned Report. http://nces.ed.gov/IPEDS/research/pdf/Kuh_Team_Report.pdf.

  • Kuh, G. (2009). The national survey of student engagement: Conceptual and empirical foundations. New Directions for Institutional Research, 141, (pp. 5–20). Wiley Periodicals. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ir.v2009:141/issuetoc.

  • Kuh, G., Cruce, T., Shoup, R., Kinzie, J., & Gonyea, R. (2008). Unmasking the effects of student engagement on first-year college grades and persistence. Journal of Higher Education, 79, 540–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuh, G., Kinzie, J., Schuh, J., Whitt, E., & Associates. (2005). Student success in college: Creating conditions that matter. San Francisco CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, M., & Lawson, H. (2013). New conceptual frameworks for student engagement research, policy, and practice. Review of Educational Research, 83(3), 432–479. doi:10.3102/0034654313480891.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little, B., Locke, W., Scesa, A., & Williams, R. (2009). Report to HEFCE on student engagement. London UK: Centre for Higher Education Research and Information The Open University.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, A. (2009). Toward reflective accountability: using NSSE for accountability and transparency. New Directions for Institutional Research, 141, (pp. 97–106) Wiley Periodicals. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ir.v2009:141/issuetoc.

  • McCormick, A., Gonyea, R., & Kinzie, J. (2013). Refreshing Engagement: NSSE at 13. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 45(3), 6–15. doi:10.1080/00091383.2013.786985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKinnon, A. (2010). Elective Affinities of the protestant ethic: Weber and the chemistry of capitalism. Sociological Theory, 28(1), 109–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMahon, B., & Portelli, J. (2012). The challenges of neoliberalism in education: Implications for student engagement. In B. McMahon & J. Portelli (Eds.), Student engagement in urban school: Beyond neoliberal discourses (pp. 1–10). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. & Istance, D. (2006). Think Scenarios, Rethink Education. Paris: OECD. http://www.oecd.org/document/42/0,2340,en_2649_34521_36507370_1_1_1_1,00.html.

  • O’Neill, A. M. (2005). Individualism, enterprise, culture and curriculum policy. In J. Codd & K. Sullivan (Eds.), Education policy directions in aotearoa New Zealand (pp. 71–86). Australia: Thomson and Dunmore Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olssen, M., & Peters, M. (2005). Neoliberalism, higher education and the knowledge economy: From the free market to knowledge capitalism. Journal of Education Policy, 20(3), 313–345. doi:10.1080/02680930500108718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, S. (2011). Do college student surveys have any validity? The Review of Higher Education, 35(1), 45–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, S. (2013). Have we reached peak NSSE? http://stephenporter.org/reached-peak-nsse/.

  • Salmi, J. (2007). Autonomy from the state vs responsiveness to markets. Higher Education Policy, 20(3), 223–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, D. (2010). Neoliberal ideology and public higher education in the United States. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 8(1), 42–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, J. (2012). When students “Speak Back”: Student engagement towards a socially just society. In B. McMahon & J. Portelli (Eds.), Student engagement in urban school: Beyond neoliberal discourses (pp. 73–90). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomonides, I., Reid, A., & Petocz, P. (2012a). A relational model of student engagement. In I. Solomonides, A. Reid, & P. Petocz (Eds.), Engaging with learning in higher education (pp. 11–24). Oxfordshire UK: Libri Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomonides, I., Reid, A., & Petocz, P. (2012b). The nature of the elephant: Metaphors for student engagement. In I. Solomonides, A. Reid, & P. Petocz (Eds.), Engaging with learning in higher education (pp. 475–485). Oxfordshire UK: Libri Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suspitsyna, T. (2010). Accountability in American education as a rhetoric and a technology of governmentality. Journal of Education Policy, 24(5), 567–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P., Wilding, D., Mockridge, A., & Lambert, C. (2012). Reinventing engagement. In I. Solomonides, A. Reid, & P. Petocz (Eds.), Engaging with learning in higher education (pp. 259–278). Oxfordshire UK: Libri Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, L. (2012). Building student engagement and belonging in Higher Education at a time of change: final report from the What Works? Student Retention & Success programme. Paul Hamlyn Foundation, Higher Education Funding Council for England, The Higher Education Academy and Action on Access.

  • Trowler, V. (2010). Student engagement literature review. Retrieved from http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/assets/documents/studentengagement/StudentEngagementLiteratureReview.pdf.

  • Vandenabeele, J., Vanassche, E., & Wildemeersch, D. (2011). Stories of/on citizenship education: a case of participatory planning. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 30(2), 171–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wimpenny, K., & Savin-Baden, M. (2013). Alienation, agency and authenticity: a synthesis of the literature on student engagement. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(3), 311–326. doi:10.1080/13562517.2012.725223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yorke, M. (2006). Student engagement: Deep, surface or strategic? Keynote address delivered at the Pacific Rim First Year in Higher Education Conference. Gold Coast Campus: Australia, Griffith University.

  • Zepke, N. (2013). Lifelong education for subjective well-being: How do engagement and active citizenship contribute? International Journal of Lifelong Education,. doi:10.1080/02601370.2012.753125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zepke, N., & Leach, L. (2010). Improving student engagement: Ten proposals for action. Active Learning in Higher Education, 11(3), 167–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank one of the anonymous reviewers of this article for their positive engagement with this work; an engagement that has resulted in a number of improvements. I would also like to thank Linda Leach for her ongoing contribution to my thinking.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Education, Massey University, Collinson Village 3.03 Turitea Campus, Private Bag 11-222, Palmerston North, 4442, New Zealand

    Nick Zepke

Authors
  1. Nick Zepke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nick Zepke.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zepke, N. What future for student engagement in neo-liberal times?. High Educ 69, 693–704 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9797-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9797-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation