Abstract
In recent decades internationalization has risen to prominence in higher education institutions (HEIs). Scholars have identified several rationales for internationalization. There is however a lack of conceptual understanding and empirical evidence for which rationale(s) for internationalization are chosen by a given HEI and why. The goal of this article is to fill this gap. We develop and test a conceptual framework to predict the salience of a given rationale for a specific HEI. The framework integrates factors at multiple levels, namely competitive and institutional forces in the global and national contexts, the organizational goals and the influence of internal actors. The empirical analysis employs information on more than 400 European HEIs from two large datasets on their organizational characteristics and from a large-scale survey on internationalization of universities. The findings show that the HEIs embedded in a global context more frequently conceive internationalization as an instrumental to prestige. The national contexts do not greatly affect HEIs’ rationales, and the amount of resources is less important than the competition for resources. Organizational goals as well as the influence of students, faculty members and middle managers on the internationalization process partly predict the prominence of specific rationales. The paper closes discussing the findings and the implication for scholarly research.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
One-way ANOVA on 309 HEIs from EUMIDA dataset. Given the strong between-country variation, it is appropriate to conceive resources as a country-level variable (Glick 1985).
The average correlation of the responses (within HEIs) is 0.45 compared to a 0.08 correlation between all responses.
We excluded the type of HEI variable, because of conceptual overlap with the—“doctorate awarding” variable and strong correlation (0.66).
HEI value from the respondents means can produce non ordinal scores, such as 1.5. Hence, we opted for the respondent as level 1. To test the robustness, we run the models also with the university mean value as level 1 (approximated to integer values), obtaining almost identical results.
We crosschecked the results with the binary responses obtaining very similar findings. Results are available upon request.
We use robust standard errors to account for potential heteroskedasticity problems.
References
Aghion, P., Dewatripont, M., Hoxby, C., Mas-Colell, A., & Sapir, A. (2008). Higher aspirations: An agenda for reforming European Universities. Bruegel blueprint July 5, 2008.
Altbach, P. G., & Knight, J. (2007). The internationalization of higher education: Motivations and realities. Journal of Studies in International Education, 11(3), 290–305.
Alvesson, M. (2002). Understanding organizational culture. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Becher, T., & Trowler, P. (2001). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the culture of disciplines. London: McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
Bitektine, A. (2011). Toward a theory of social judgments of organizations: The case of legitimacy, reputation, and status. Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 151–179.
Cantwell, B., & Taylor, B. J. (2013). Global status, intra-institutional stratification and organizational segmentation: A time-dynamic tobit analysis of ARWU position among US universities. Minerva, 51(2), 195–223.
Cattaneo, M., Meoli, M., & Paleari, S. (2015). Why do universities internationalize? Organizational reputation and legitimacy. In D. L. Audretsch, E. M. Meoli, & S. Vismara (Eds.), University evolution, entrepreneurial activity and regional competitiveness. Dordrecht: Springer.
Chan, W. W., & Dimmock, C. (2008). The internationalization of universities globalist, internationalist and translocalist models. Journal of Research in International Education, 7(2), 184–204.
Cooper, D., Hinings, B., Greenwood, R., & Brown, J. (1996). Sedimentation and Transformation in organizational change: The case of canadian law firms. Organization Studies, 17(4), 623–647.
De Wit, H. (1999). Changing rationales for the internationalisation of higher education. International Higher Education, 15, 2.
De Wit, H. (2002). Internationalization of higher education in the United States of America and Europe: A historical, comparative, and conceptual analysis. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishers.
Deem, R. (2001). Globalisation, new managerialism, academic capitalism and entrepreneurialism in universities: Is the local dimension still important? Comparative Education, 37(1), 7–20.
Denson, N., & Zhang, S. (2010). The impact of student experiences with diversity on developing graduate attributes. Studies in Higher Education, 35(5), 529–543.
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160.
Douglass, J. A. (2005). How all globalization is local: Countervailing forces and their influence on higher education markets. Higher Education Policy, 18, 445–473.
Egron-Polak, E., & Hudson, R. (2014). Internationalization of higher education—Growing expectations, fundamental values. Paris: International Association of Universities.
EUMIDA. (2009). EUMIDA handbook—Collection of institutional-level data on tertiary educational institutions at the European level. Bruxelles: The European Communities.
Fielden, J. (2006). Internationalisation and leadership—What are the issues? The leadership and development challenges of globalisation and internationalisation. Leadership summit. Leadership Foundation for Higher Education (pp. 3–9).
Glick, W. H. (1985). Conceptualizing and measuring organizational and psychological climate: Pitfalls in multilevel research. Academy of Management Review, 10(3), 601–616.
Horn, A. S., Hendel, D., & Fry, G. W. (2007). Ranking the International dimension of top research Universities in the United States. Journal of Studies in International Education, 11(3–4), 330–358.
Horta, H. (2009). Global and national prominent universities: Internationalization, competitiveness and the role of the State. Higher Education, 58(3), 387–405.
Hudson, R. (2015). Dominated by economics? Evidence of changing drivers of internationalization and its funding within higher education institutions in Europe. Higher Education Policy. doi:10.1057/hep.2015.4.
Huisman, J., & van der Wende, M. (2004). On cooperation and competition. National and European policies for the internationalisation of higher education. Bonn: Lemmens.
Huisman, J., & van der Wende, M. (2005). On cooperation and competition II. Institutional responses to internationalisation, Europeanisation and globalisation. Bonn: Lemmens.
Jones, K., & Subramanian, S. V. (2012). Developing multilevel models for analysing contextuality, heterogeneity and change. Bristol: Center for Multilevel Modelling.
Kim, T. Y., Shin, D., Oh, H., & Jeong, Y. C. (2007). Inside the iron cage: Organizational political dynamics and institutional changes in presidential selection systems in Korean universities, 1985–2002. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(2), 286–323.
Knight, J. (1999). Internationalisation of higher education. In Oecd (Ed.), Quality and internationalisation in higher education. Paris: OECD.
Knight, J. (2004). Internationalization remodeled: Definition, approaches and rationales. Journal of Studies in International Education, 8(1), 5–31.
Knight, J., & de Wit, H. (1995). Strategies for internationalisation of higher education: Historical and conceptual perspectives. In H. de Wit (Ed.), Strategies for the internationalisation of higher education. A comparative study of Australia, Canada, Europe and the United States of America (pp. 5–32). Amsterdam: EAIE Secretariat.
Kraatz, M. S., & Block, E. S. (2008). Organizational implications of institutional pluralism. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 243–275). Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
Lepori, B., Bonaccorsi, A., Daraio, A., Daraio, C., Gunnes, H., Hovdhaugen, E., et al. (2013). ETER—European tertiary education register. London: RISIS—Research Infrastructure for Research and Innovation Policy.
Lepori, B., Seeber, M., & Bonaccorsi, A. (2015). Competition for talent. Country and organizational-level effects in the internationalization of European Higher Education Institutions. Research Policy, 44(3), 789–802.
Luijten-Lub, A. (2007). Choices in internationalisation. How higher education institutions respond to internationalisation, Europeanisation, and globalisation. Enschede: CHEPS.
Luijten-Lub, A., Van der Wende, M., & Huisman, J. (2005). On cooperation and competition: A comparative analysis of national policies for internationalisation of higher education in seven Western European Countries. Journal of Studies in International Education, 9(2), 147–163.
Marginson, S. (2006). Dynamics of national and global competition in higher education. Higher Education, 52(1), 1–39.
Marginson, S., & Rhoades, G. (2002). Beyond national states, markets, and systems of higher education: A glonacal agency heuristic. Higher Education, 43(3), 281–309.
Maringe, F. (2010). The meaning of globalization and internationalization in HE: Findings from a world survey. In F. Maringe & N. Foskett (Eds.), Globalisation and internationalisation in higher education: Theoretical, strategic and management perspectives. London: Continuum.
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized Organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. The American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.
Musselin, C. (2007). Are universities specific organisations? In G. Krücken, A. Kosmützky, & M. Torka (Eds.), Towards a multiversity? Universities between global trends and national traditions (pp. 63–84). Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.
Neave, G., & Huisman, J. (2001). The European dimension in higher education: An excursion into the modern use of historical analogues. In P. Maassen & G. Neave (Eds.), Higher education and the nation state. The international dimension of higher education (pp. 13–73). Amsterdam: Pergamon.
Niederl, A., Bonaccorsi, A., Lepori, B., Brandt, T., De Filippo, D., Schmoch, U., et al. (2014). Mapping the European higher education landscape: New insights from the EUMIDA project. In A. Bonaccorsi (Ed.), Knowledge, diversity and performance in European higher education (pp. 13–46). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
OECD. (2004). Internationalization and trade of higher education—Challenges and opportunities. Paris: OECD.
Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. The Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145–179.
Pache, A. C., & Santos, F. (2010). When worlds collide: The internal dynamics of organizational responses to conflicting institutional demands. The Academy of Management Review, 35(3), 455–476.
Pedersen, J. S., & Dobbin, F. (2006). In search of identity and legitimation: Bridging organizational culture and neoinstitutionalism. American Behavioral Scientist, 49(7), 897–907.
Powell, W. W., & DiMaggio, P. J. (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Saisana, M., d’Hombres, B., & Saltelli, A. (2011). Rickety numbers: Volatility of university rankings and policy implications. Research Policy, 40(1), 165–177.
Scott, J. C. (2006). The mission of the university: Medieval to postmodern transformations. Journal of Higher Education, 77(1), 1–39.
Seeber, M., & Lepori, B. (2014). The Internationalization of European higher education institutions. In A. Bonaccorsi (Ed.), Knowledge, diversity and performance in european higher education (pp. 138–166). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Seeber, M., Lepori, B., Montauti, M., Enders, J., de Boer, H., Weyer, E., et al. (2015). European Universities as Complete Organizations? Understanding identity, hierarchy and rationality in public organizations. Public Management Review, 17(10), 1444–1474.
Snijders, T., & Bosker, R. (2004). Multilvel analysis. London: SAGE.
Stegmueller, D. (2013). How many countries for multilevel modeling? A comparison of frequentist and Bayesian approaches. American Journal of Political Science, 57(3), 748–761.
Suchman, M. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610.
Taylor, J. (2004a). Towards a strategy of internationalization: Lessons and practice from four universities. Journal of Studies in International Education, 8(2), 149–171.
Taylor, P. J. (2004b). World city network: A global urban analysis. London: Routledge.
Teichler, U. (2004). The changing debate on internationalisation of higher education. Higher Education, 48, 5–26.
Teixeira, P., Rocha, V., Biscaia, R., & Cardoso, M. F. (2014). Public and private higher education in Europe: Competition, complementarity or world apart? In A. Bonaccorsi (Ed.), Knowledge, diversity and performance in european higher education (pp. 84–108). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
van Damme, D. (2001). Quality issues in the internationalisation of higher education. Higher Education, 41(4), 415–441.
Van der Wende, M. (2007). Internationalization of higher education in the OECD countries: Challenges and opportunities for the coming decade. Journal of Studies in International Education, 11(3–4), 274–289.
van Raan, A. F. J. (2007). Bibliometric statistical properties of the 100 largest European universities: Prevalent scaling rules in the science system. eprint arXiv:0704.0889.
Zilber, T. B. (2008). The work of meanings in institutional processes. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 151–168). Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
Zucker, L. G. (1977). The role of institutionalization in cultural persistence. American Sociological Review, 42(5), 726–743.
Acknowledgments
We thank the two reviewers for their very insightful comments. We are grateful to Eva Egron-Polak and Ross Hudson of the International Association of Universities (IAU) for making available the data of the internationalization survey; we also thank Michele Meoli, Kelvyn Jones, Rense Nieuwenhuis and Dimitri van Maele for discussing the statistical method, Michael Wise for carefully proofreading the manuscript, and members of the Centre for Higher Education Governance Ghent—especially Julie Birkholz—for their comments on an earlier version of the paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Seeber, M., Cattaneo, M., Huisman, J. et al. Why do higher education institutions internationalize? An investigation of the multilevel determinants of internationalization rationales. High Educ 72, 685–702 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9971-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9971-x