Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Public goods and public policy: what is public good, and who and what decides?

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Higher education (HE) is usually seen as serving the public good, especially when funded directly by the state, and because of potential social effects such as a reduction in inequality and an increase in social mobility. Public support for higher education is conditional; however, on its capacity, capability and willingness to educate citizens, and to create and disseminate knowledge. But what is the public good and what defines it? Recent years have seen many governments adopt the format of a national strategy or development plan for higher education—setting out national objectives. Similarly, many governments (e.g. Ireland, Netherlands, Hong Kong, Finland and New Zealand) are adopting the policy tool of performance agreements or compacts to better align higher education institutions (HEI) with the national objectives, involving identification of appropriate performance management and indicators. The process by which national objectives are determined varies but may involve a group comprising national and international ‘experts’, sometimes using consultation mechanisms (open or limited). The concept of public good has played a significant role in (re)positioning higher education over recent years. This is especially so in response to growing demands for greater accountability for all public organisations, but also, specific concerns regarding growing higher education access/participation, costs/debt, graduate employability/unemployment, and social/economic impact. This paper takes a practical approach—by asking ‘what is the public good’ and ‘who defines it’ and looking at how different countries are approaching the issue.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://www.sfc.ac.uk/funding/outcome-agreements/outcome-agreements.aspx

  2. RTCs were forerunners of today’s Institutes of Technology.

References

  • AAA&S (2016). Public research universities: serving the public good. Cambridge, MA: American Academy of Arts and Sciences.

  • Bear, L., & Mathur, N. (2015). Introduction: remaking the public good: a new anthropology of bureaucracy. The Cambridge Journal of Anthropology, 33(1), 18–34. https://doi.org/10.3167/ca.2015.330103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benneworth, P., de Boer, H., Cremonini, L., Jongbloed, B., Leisyte, L., Vossensteyn, H. & de Weert, E. (2011) Quality-related funding, performance agreements and profiling in higher education. Enschede, Netherlands: Centre for Higher Education Policy Studies (CHEPS), Universiteit Twente.

  • Benneworth, P., Hazelkorn, E., & Gulbrandsen, M. (2016). The impact and future of arts and humanities research. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bergan, Sjur, Harkavy, Ira, & van’t Land, Hilligje (Eds.). (2013). Reimagining democratic societies: a new era of personal and social responsibility. Higher Education Series, No. 18. Strasberg: Council of Europe.

  • Bleiklie, I. (1998). Justifying the evaluative state. New public management ideals in higher education. European Journal of Education, 33(3), 299–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, E. L. (1996). The scholarship of engagement. Journal of Public Service and Outreach, 1(1), 11–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • British Social Attitudes. (2013). Higher education. Investing in the future? Attitudes to university. London: NatCen Social Research. http://www.bsa.natcen.ac.uk/media/38917/bsa32_highereducation.pdf

  • Brown, R. (2011). The impact of markets. In R. Brown (Ed.), Higher education and the market (pp. 20–52). Abingdon and New York: Routledge.

  • Calhoun, C. (2006). The university and the public good. Thesis Eleven, 84(1), 7–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis, Elias G., Barth, Thornsten, D. & Campbell, David F.J. (2012). The quintuple helix innovation model: global warming as a challenge and driver for innovation. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 1(2), 1–12.

  • Castells, M. (1994). The university system: engine of development in the New World economy. In J. Salmi, J. & A.M. Vespoor (Eds.). Revitalizing higher education (pp. 14–40). Oxford: Pergamon.

  • Clark, B. R. (1983). The higher education system: academic organization in cross-national perspectives. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

  • Dahler-Larsen, P. (2007). Evaluation and public management. In: E. Ferlie, L. E. Lynn Jr., & C. Pollitt (Eds.). The Oxford handbook of public management. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199226443.003.0027.

  • de Boer, H., Jongbloed, B., Benneworth, P., Cremonini, L., Kolster, R., Kottmann, A., Lemmens-Krug, K., & Vossensteyn, H. (2015) Performance-based funding and performance agreements in fourteen higher education systems. Report for the Dutch Ministry of Education, Culture and Science. Enschede, Netherlands: Centre for Higher Education Policy Studies (CHEPS), Universiteit Twente.

  • Delanty, G. (2001). Challenging knowledge: the university in the Knowledge Society, Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.

  • DES. (2011). National strategy for higher education to 2030. Dublin: Department of Education and Skills. http://www.hea.ie/sites/default/files/national_strategy_for_higher_education_2030.pdf

  • DES. (2014). Higher education system performance framework, 2014–2016. Dublin: Department of Education and Skills. https://www.education.ie/en/The-Education-System/Higher-Education/HEA-Higher-Education-System-performance-Framework-2014-2016.pdf

  • DES. (2018). Higher education system performance framework 2018–2020. Dublin: Department of Education and Skills. https://www.education.ie/en/Publications/Education-Reports/higher-education-system-performance-framework-2018-2020.pdf

  • Dill, D. D. (1998). Evaluating the ‘evaluative state’: implications for research in higher education. European Journal of Education, 33, 361–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dill, D. D., & Beerkens, M. (Eds.) (2010). Public policy for academic quality. Analyses of innovative policy instruments. Dordrecht: Springer.

  • Duderstadt, James J. (2000). A university for the 21st century. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

  • Enders, J. (2013). The university in the audit society: on accountability, trust and markets. In L. Engwall & E. Scott (Eds.), Trust in Universities (pp. 53–68). London: Portland Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, H. & Leydesdorff, L. (1997). Universities and the global knowledge economy: a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Andover, U.K.: Thomson Learning.

  • Eurobarometer. (2009). Students and higher education reform. Survey among students in higher education institutions, in the EU Member States, Croatia, Iceland, Norway and Turkey. Special Target Survey. Analytical Report. Brussels: DG Education and Culture. http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/flash/fl_260_en.pdf

  • Europa. (2006). Delivering on the modernisation agenda for universities: Education, research and innovation. Communication to the Council and the European Parliament, (COM) 2006 208 final. http://www.madrimasd.org/proyectoseuropeos/documen- tos/doc/education_research_and_innovation.pdf

  • Ferlie, E., Musselin, C., & Andresani, G. (2008). The steering of higher education systems: a public management perspective. Higher Education, 56(3), 325–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forfás. (2011). Report of the research prioritization steering group Dublin: Forfás.

  • Geiger, R. (1986). Private sectors in higher education. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.

  • Gibson, A., & Hazelkorn, E. (2017). Arts and humanities research, redefining public benefit, and research prioritization in Ireland. Research Evaluation, 26(3), 199–210. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvx012

  • Goodwin, M. L. (2016). What really caused Brexit? Newsweek. http://europe.newsweek.com/Brexit-causes-result-who-voted-leave-eu-analysis-matthew-goodwin-483100?rm=eu

  • Green, A. (1997). Education, globalization and the nation state. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Guston, D.H. (2000). Between politics and science. Assuring the integrity and productivity of research. New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Guston, D. H., & Keniston, K. (1994). Introduction: The social contract for science. In D. H. Guston & K. Keniston (Eds.), The fragile contract. University science and the federal government (pp. 1–41). Cambridge and London: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harman, G. (2011). Competitors of rankings: new directions in quality assurance and accountability. In J. C. Shin, R. K. Toutkoushian, & U. Teichler (Eds.), University rankings. Theoretical basis, methodology and impacts on global higher education (pp. 35–54). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazelkorn, E. (2016). Contemporary debates part i: theorising civic engagement. In J. Goddard, E. Hazelkorn, L. Kempton, & P. Vallance (Eds.), (2016). The civic university: the policy and leadership challenges (pp. 34–64). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hazelkorn, E. (2018). Reshaping the world order of higher education: The role and impact of rankings on national and global systems. Policy Reviews in Higher Education, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322969.2018.1424562.

  • Hazelkorn, E., & Gibson, A. (2017). Public goods and public policy: what is public good, and who and what decides? (CGHE Working Papers No. 18). London. Retrieved from http://www.researchcghe.org/perch/resources/publications/wp18.pdf

  • Hazelkorn, E., Gibson, A., & Harkin, S. (2015). From Massification to globalisation: reflections on the transformation of Irish higher education. In K. Rafter (Ed.), The state in transition (pp. 235–260). Dublin: New Island.

    Google Scholar 

  • HEA. (2013). Guidelines for completion of mission-based performance compacts. Dublin: Higher Education Authority http://www.hea.ie/sites/default/files/2._guidelines_for_completion_of_compact.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • HEA. (2015). Towards a performance evaluation framework: Profiling Irish higher education 2012–2013. Dublin: Higher Education Authority. http://www.hea.ie/sites/default/files/institutional_profiles_2012-13_pdf_version.pdf

  • HEA. (2016). Building world class systems of higher education: benchmarking international experiences and challenges, system roundtable, march. Unpublished transcripts.

  • HEFCE. (2010). Public perceptions of the benefits of higher education. Bristol and London: Higher Education Funding Council for England. http://www.hefce.ac.uk/media/hefce/content/pubs/2010/rd2410/rd24_10.pdf

  • ICSTI. (2015). Innovation 2020. Dublin: Department of Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation. https://www.djei.ie/en/Publications/Publication-files/Innovation-2020.pdf

  • Immerwahr, J. & Johnson, J. (2010) Squeeze play 2010: continued public anxiety on cost, harsher judgments on how colleges are run. Washington D.C. and San Jose: Public Agenda and National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education.

  • Innovation Taskforce. (2010). Innovation Ireland. Report of the innovation taskforce. Dublin: Government of Ireland.

  • Ipsos MORI Social Research Institute. (2010). Public perceptions of the benefits of higher education. Bristol: HEFCE. http://www.hefce.ac.uk/media/hefce/content/pubs/2010/rd2410/rd24_10.pdf

  • Jaschik, S. (2015). Well-prepared in their own eyes, inside higher Ed.

  • Kerr, C. (2001). The uses of the university (5th ed.). Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

  • King, R. (2009). Governing universities globally. Organizations, regulation and rankings. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

  • Lijphart, A. (1975) The politics of accommodation: pluralism and democracy in the Netherlands, (2nd rev. ed.). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

  • Lijphart, A. (2012). Patterns of democracy (revised edition). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

  • Lumina Foundation. (2013). America’s call for higher education redesign. Study of the American public’s opinion on higher education. Indianapolis: Lumina Foundation.

  • Marginson, S. (2018). Public/private in higher education: a synthesis of economic and political approaches. Studies in Higher Education, 43(2), 322–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2016.1168797.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, S. (2016). Higher education and the common good. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

  • Marginson, S. (2011). Higher education and public good. Higher Education Quarterly, 65(4), 411–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massaro, V. (2010). Cui bono? The relevance and impact of quality assurance. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 32(1), 17–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMahon, Walter W. (2009). Higher learning, greater good: the private and social benefits of higher education. Baltimore, MA: John Hopkins University Press.

  • Meek, V. (2003). Market coordination, research management and the future of higher education in the post-industrial era. 2nd meeting of the UNESCO Regional Scientific Committee for Asia and the Pacific, 2003(5).

  • MoECS – Dutch Ministry of Education, Culture, and Science. (2011). Quality in diversity: strategic agenda for higher education, research and science, https://www.government.nl/documents/reports/2012/08/30/quality-in-diversity

  • MoECS – Dutch Ministry of Education, Culture, and Science. (2015a) The value of knowledge: strategic agenda for higher education and research 2015–2025, https://www.government.nl/binaries/government/documents/reports/2015/07/01/the-value-of-knowledge/the-value-of-knowledge.pdf

  • MoECS – Dutch Ministry of Education, Culture, and Science (2015b) “Wetenschappelijke krachten bundelen voor topprestaties”, https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/ministeries/ministerie-van-onderwijs-cultuur-en-wetenschap/nieuws/2015/11/27/wetenschappelijke-krachten-bundelen-voor-topprestaties

  • Neave, G. (1998). The evaluative state reconsidered. European Journal of Education, 33(3), 265–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, J. H. (1933). On the scope and nature of university education. London: J.M. Dent.

  • New Zealand Productivity Commission. (2016). New models of tertiary education – draft report. Wellington, NZ: NZPC.

  • OECD. (2014a). Education at a glance. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.

  • OECD. (2014b). Innovation policy review the Netherlands. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.

  • Public Agenda. (2016, 12 September). Public opinion on higher education. http://www.publicagenda.org/pages/public-opinion-higher-education-2016

  • Pusser, B. (2006). Reconsidering higher education and the public good: the role of public sphere. In W. Tierney (Ed.), Governance and the public good (pp. 11–27). Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, S. L. (2006). Globalisation, GATS and trading in education services. In J. Kallo & R. Rinne (Eds.), Supranational regimes and national education policies: encountering challenge. Helsinki, Finland: Finnish Education Research Association.

  • Rowland, F. (2002). The peer-review process. Learned Publishing, 15, 247–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. A. (1954). The pure theory of public expenditure. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 36(4), 387–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. (1997). Academic capitalism. Politics, policies and the entrepreneurial university. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. (1999). Knowledge as a global public good. In I. Kaul, I. Grunberg, & M. A. Stern (Eds.), Global public goods: international cooperation in the 21st century. New York: The United Nations Development Programme.

  • Stoker, G. (2006). Public value management: a new narrative for networked governance? American Review of Public Administration, 36(1), 41–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074005282583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trow, M. (1974). Problems of the transition from elite to mass higher education. Reprinted in Burrage, m. (ed). Martin trow. Twentieth-century higher education. From elite to mass to universal. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins university press.

  • UPP Foundation. (2018). Civic university commission progress report. London: UPP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Usher, A. (2015). Stop saying higher education is a public good. HESA one thought blog.

  • Vallance, P. (2016). The historical roots and development of the civic university. In J. Goddard, E. Hazelkorn, L. Kempton, & P. Vallance (Eds.), (2016). The civic university: the policy and leadership challenges (pp. 16–33). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Van Vught, F.A. (Ed.). (1989). Governmental strategies and innovation in higher education, higher education policy series. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

  • Weingarten, H., Hicks, M., Jonker, L., Smith, C. & Arnold, H. (2015). Canadian postsecondary performance: impact 2015. Toronto: Higher Education Quality Council of Ontario.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Global Higher Education, UCL Institute of Education, London, London, UK

    Ellen Hazelkorn

  2. Higher Education Policy Research Unit (HEPRU), Dublin Institute of Technology, Dublin, Ireland

    Ellen Hazelkorn

  3. Cultures, Academic Values and Education Research Centre (CAVE), Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland

    Andrew Gibson

Authors
  1. Ellen Hazelkorn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andrew Gibson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ellen Hazelkorn.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hazelkorn, E., Gibson, A. Public goods and public policy: what is public good, and who and what decides?. High Educ 78, 257–271 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0341-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0341-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation