Abstract
Environmental governance research has paid insufficient attention to scholarship on values even though environmental values is a well-studied field. This paper begins to unpack the relationship between values and governance with a particular focus on protected areas governance and in light of ideas such as the distinction between held values and assigned values. We report on research from four case studies in Canada, Ghana and Tanzania, each of which investigated the values, interests and objectives of people in a rural community and ways in which these are reflected, or not, in governance arrangements for an adjacent protected area. Despite very diverse contexts, two held values that were encountered in each of the four case studies could be described as responsibility toward future generations and respect for and appreciation of nature. The existence of what may be universal values does not negate the importance of culture and place: similar held values are translated, through the particular circumstances of different individuals, communities and cultures, into a diversity of assigned values, interests and positions. The attention that governance processes have given to local people’s fundamental held values in three of the cases, and the ignoring of such values in the fourth, have had important implications for the relationship between community members and the adjacent protected area. We argue that systems for governance would do well to explicitly engage with values by supporting local articulation of values and by facilitating dialogue and deliberation amongst diverse stakeholders around their values.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
This case study and the methodology used are described in greater detail in Robinson and Sasu (in press).
Respondents were referring to their own rather than their children’s opportunities to see wildlife.
This case study and the methodology used are described in greater detail in Bennett et al. (2010).
First Nations is a term referring to the various indigenous peoples of Canada, although usually excluding Métis and Inuit.
This case study is described in greater detail in Murray and King (in press.).
This case study is described in greater detail in Robinson (2012).
References
Adger, W. N., Brown, K., Fairbrass, J., Jordan, A., Paavola, J., Rosendo, S., and Seyfang, G. (2003). Governance for Sustainability: Towards a ‘Thick’ Analysis of Environmental Decisionmaking. Environment and Planning A 35: 1095–1110.
Bennett, N., Lemelin, R. H., and Ellis, S. (2010). Aboriginal and Local Perspectives on the Community Benefits of Conservation: A Case Study of a Proposed Canadian National Park and the Lutsel K’e Dene First Nation. Geography Research Forum 30: 105–134.
Berkes, F., Colding, J., and Folke, C. (2000). Rediscovery of Traditional Ecological Knowledge as Adaptive Management. Ecological Applications 10: 1251–1262.
Biermann, F. (2008). Earth system governance: a research agenda. In Young, O. R., King, L. A., and Schroeder, H. (eds.), Institutions and Environmental Change: Principal Findings, Applications, and Research Frontiers, Applications, and Research Frontiers. MIT, Cambridge, pp. 277–301.
Brechin, S. R. (1999). Objective Problems, Subjective Values, and Global Environmentalism: Evaluating the Postmaterialist Argument and Challenging a New Explanation. Social Science Quarterly 80: 793–809.
Brechin, S. R., and Kempton, W. (1994). Global Environmentalism - a Challenge to the Postmaterialism Thesis. Social Science Quarterly 75: 245–269.
Brown, T. C. (1984). The Concept of Value in Resource Allocation. Land Economics 60: 231–246.
Callicott, J. B. (1994). Toward a global environmental ethic. In Tucker, M. E., and Grim, J. A. (eds.), Worldviews and Ecology, Orbis Books. Maryknoll, New York, pp. 30–40.
Checkland, P. B., and Haynes, M. G. (1994). Varieties of Systems Thinking: The Case of Soft Systems Methodology. System Dynamics Review 10: 189–197.
Checkland, P. B., and Scholes, J. (1990). Soft Systems Methodology in Action. Wiley, New York.
Cooperrider, D. L., and Whitney, D. K. (2005). Appreciative Inquiry: A Positive Revolution in Change. Berrett-Koehler Publishers, San Francisco.
Dietz, T., and Stern, P. C. (1988). Science, Values, and Biodiversity. BioScience 48: 441–445.
Elias, A. A., Jackson, L. S., and Cavana, R. Y. (2004). Changing Positions and Interests of Stakeholders in Environmental Conflict: A New Zealand Transport Infrastructure Case. Asia Pacific Viewpoint 45: 87–104.
Ellis, S. (2003). Which Way to Denendeh?: Past Failures and Future Opportunities for Traditional Knowledge and Environmental Decision Making in the Northwest Territories. Unpublished Masters thesis, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada,
Ellis, S., and Enzoe, G. (2008). The land that we keep for us: An aboriginal perspective on conservation – The case of Thaidene Nene/East Arm of Great Slave Lake. Paper presented at the Canadian Parks for Tomorrow Conference, Calgary, Canada, May 2008.
Emerton, L., and Mfunda, I. (1999). Making Wildlife Economically Viable for Communities Living Around the Western Serengeti, Tanzania. Evaluating Eden Working Paper no. 1. International Institute for Environment and Development, London.
Fischhoff, B. (1991). Value Elicitation: Is there Anything in there? American Psychologist 46: 835–847.
Fisher, R., and Ury, W. (1991). Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In. Penguin, New York.
Graham, J., Amos, B., and Plumptre, T. (2003). Governance Principles for Protected Areas in the 21st Century. Report prepared for the Vth World Parks Congress, Durban, South Africa Institute on Governance, Ottawa.
Gregory, R., Lichtenstein, S., and Slovic, P. (1993). Valuing Environmental Resources: A Constructive Approach. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 7: 177–197.
Griffith, R. (1987). Northern Park Development: The Case of Snowdrift. Alternatives 14: 26–30.
Hackel, J. (1990). Conservation Attitudes in Southern Africa: A Comparison between KwaZulu and Swaziland. Human Ecology 18: 203–209.
Jones, R. M. (2005). Leadership and the Far Side of Public Learning. In Scholz, J. T., and Stiftel, B. (eds.), Adaptive Governance and Water Conflict: New Institutions for Collaborative Planning. Resources for the Future, Washington D.C., pp. 164–173.
Lockwood, M. (1999). Humans Valuing Nature: Synthesising Insights from Philosophy, Psychology and Economics. Environmental Values 8: 381–401.
Lockwood, M. (2005). Integration of Natural Area Values: Conceptual Foundations and Methodological Approaches. Australian Journal of Environmental Management 12: 8–19.
Lockwood, M. (2010). Good Governance for Terrestrial Protected Areas: A Framework, Principles and Performance Outcomes. Journal of Environmental Management 91: 754–766.
McKenzie, C. J. (1998). An Effective Tool for Mediating Public Policy Disputes. Planning Quarterly 1998: 22–25.
Miller, C. A. (2006). Framing Shared Values: Reason and Trust in Environmental Governance. In Bauer, J. (ed.), Forging Environmentalism: Justice, Livelihood and Contested Environments. M.E. Sharpe, Armonk, pp. 377–394.
Murray, G. D., and King, L. A. (in press). First Nations Values in Protected Area Governance: Tla-o-Qui-Aht Tribal Parks and Pacific Rim National Park Reserve. Human Ecology, in press.
Northwest Territories Bureau of Statistics (2004). Socio-economic Scan. Government of Northwest Territories Bureau of Statistics, Yellowknife.
Nussbaum, M. C. (1999). In Defense of Universal Values. Idaho Law Review 36: 379–447.
Olsson, P. (2007). The Role of Vision in Framing Adaptive Co-Management Processes: Lessons from Kristianstads Vattenrike, Southern Sweden. In Armitage, D., Berkes, F., and Doubleday, N. (eds.), Adaptive Co-Management: Collaboration, Learning and Multi-Level Governance. University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver, pp. 268–285.
Posey, D. A. (1999). Cultural and Spiritual Values of Biodiversity: A complementary contribution to the global biodiversity assessment. UNEP and Intermediate Technology Publications, Nairobi, Leiden and London.
Robinson, L. W. (2012). Case Study Report: Rwamchanga, Tanzania. PAPR Working Paper No. 14. [online] URL: http://www.papr.co.ca/index.php?p=1_25_Papers.
Robinson, L. W., and Fuller, A. M. (2010). Towards an Ecosystem Approach to Policy Process: Insights from the Sustainable Livelihoods and Ecosystem Health Approaches. International Journal of Sustainable Development 13: 393–411.
Robinson, L. W., and Sasu, K.A. (in press). The Role of Values in a Community-Based Conservation Initiative in Northern Ghana. Environmental Values, in press.
Sagoff, M. (1999). Kantian and Utilitarian Approaches to the Value of Biodiversity. In Posey, D. A. (ed.), Cultural and Spiritual Values of Biodiversity: A Complementary Contribution to the Global Biodiversity Assessment. UNEP and Intermediate Technology Publications, Nairobi Leiden and London, pp. 463–466.
Schkade, D. A., and Payne, J. W. (1994). How People Respond to Contingent Valuation Questions: A Verbal Protocol Analysis of Willingness to Pay for an Environmental Regulation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 26: 88–109.
Schultz, P. W. (1999). Values as Predictors of Environmental Attitudes: Evidence for Consistency Across 14 Countries. Journal of Environmental Psychology 19: 255–265.
Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Are there Universal Aspects in the Structure and Contents of Human Values? Journal of Social Issues 50: 19.
Sharpe, B. (1998). ‘First the Forest’: Conservation, ‘Community’ and ‘Participation’ in South-West Cameroon. Africa 68: 25–45.
Uphoff, N., and Langholz, J. (1998). Incentives for Avoiding the Tragedy of the Commons. Environmental Conservation 25: 251–261.
Vermeulen, S. (2007). Partnerships for Tropical Conservation. Oryx 41: 434–440.
Waltner-Toews, D., and Kay, J. J. (2005). The Evolution of an Ecosystem Approach: The Diamond Schematic and an Adaptive Methodology for Ecosystem Sustainability and Health. Ecology and Society 10: 38. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss1/art38/.
Watkins, J. M., Mohr, B. J., and Beckhard, R. (2001). Appreciative inquiry: Change at the speed of imagination. Josey-Bass, San Fracisco.
Williams, D. (2001). Macro-Policy and Cumulative Effects: Elements Necessary to Move from Government to Governance. Paper presented at the 14th Annual PAT-Net Conference, Changing Discourses: Democracy, Institutions and Civil Space, Leiden, The Netherlands, 21–23 June 2001.
Winter, C., and Lockwood, M. (2004). The Natural Area Value Scale: A New Instrument for Measuring Natural Area Values. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management 11: 11–20.
Young, O. R. (1996). The Effectiveness of International Governance Systems. In Young, O. R., Demko, G. J., and Ramakrishna, K. (eds.), Global Environmental Change and International Governance, University Press of New England. University Press of New England, Hanover, pp. 1–46.
Young, O. R., King, L. A., and Schroeder, H. (2008). Institutions and Environmental Change: Principal Findings, Applications and Research Frontiers. MIT, Cambridge.
Acknowledgements
The research on which this paper was based was financially supported by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada and the International Development Research Centre. We also would like to thank our Jilinkon, Lutsel K’e, Rwamchanga and Tla-o-qui-aht respondents and community partners
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Robinson, L.W., Bennett, N., King, L.A. et al. “We Want Our Children to Grow Up to See These Animals:” Values and Protected Areas Governance in Canada, Ghana and Tanzania. Hum Ecol 40, 571–581 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-012-9502-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-012-9502-7