Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Spatial and environmental effects on hydrophytic macrophyte occurrence in the Upper Rhine floodplain (Germany)

  • Primary Research Paper
  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The occurrence of exclusively submerged macrophytes (hydrophytes) was analyzed on a data set of 608 mapped stream segments with a total length of 106 km from the Upper Rhine floodplain. There were three objectives. The first was to test the evidence of plot-sized bias which occurs when structural homogenous river sections are mapped. In the dataset, with a broad range of areas sampled, this bias was small but the mapping procedure nevertheless had some disadvantages for ecological interpretation of hydrophyte data. The second objective was to test for spatial autocorrelation of species composition among consecutive stream sections. Results showed that spatial autocorrelation is an intrinsic and not easily interpretable feature, which might weaken the interpretative strength of pure species–environment relationships in streams. The third objective was to analyse species–environment relationships, by redundancy analysis. The analyses gave satisfying distribution patterns of the 25 most frequent hydrophytes, using a small group of environmental parameters—current, shading, turbidity and maximum depth. They could be assigned into three groups—rheophilic, potamale and related to groundwater influence. The high amount of unexplained variability in species data is due to the large data set where the high plasticity of most hydrophytes becomes apparent and thus resulting in a broad niche overlap. The study gives a representative overview over one of the richest regions in Germany for hydrophytes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ali, M. M., K. J. Murphy & V. J. Abernethy, 1999. Macrophyte functional variables versus species assemblages as predictors of trophic status in flowing waters. Hydrobiologia 415: 131–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrat-Segretain, M.-H. & G. Bornette, 2000. Regeneration and colonization abilities of aquatic plant fragments. Effect of disturbance seasonality. Hydrobiologia 421: 31–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borcard, D., L. Legendre & P. Drapeau, 1992. Partialling out the spatial component of ecological variation. Ecology 73: 1045–1055.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bornette, G., H. Piegay, A. Citterio, C. Amoros & V. Godreau, 2001. Aquatic plant diversity in four river floodplains: a comparison at two hierarchical levels. Biodiversity and Conservation 10: 1683–1701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buijse, A. D., H. Coops, M. Staras, L. H. Jans, G. J. Van Geest, R. E. Grift, B. W. Ibelings, W. Oosterberg & F. C. J. M. Roozen, 2002. Restoration strategies for river floodplains along large lowland rivers in Europe. Freshwater Biology 47: 889–907.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butcher, R. W., 1933. Studies on the ecology of rivers. I. On the distribution of macrophyte vegetation in the rivers of Britain. Journal of Ecology 21: 58–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carbiener, R., 1969. Aperçu sur quelques effets de la pollution des eaux douces de la zone tempérée sur les biocénoses aquatiques. Bulletin Section de Géographie Paris 80: 45–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carbiener, R., M. Trémolières, J. L. Mercier & A. Ortscheit, 1990. Aquatic macrophyte communities as bioindicators of eutrophication in calcareous oligosaprobe stream waters (Upper Rhine plain, Alsace). Vegetatio 86: 71–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, F. H., P. J. Raven & M. J. Gravelle, 1999. Distribution of the morphological groups of aquatic plants for rivers in the U.K. Hydrobiologia 415: 123–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demars, B. O. L. & D. M. Harper, 1998. The aquatic macrophytes of an English lowland river system: assessing response to nutrient enrichment. Hydrobiologia 384: 75–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodkins, I., B. Rippey & P. Hale, 2005. An application of canonical correspondence analyses for developing ecological quality assessment metrics for river macrophytes. Freshwater Biology 50: 891–904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EU, 2000. Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 Establishing a Framework for Community Action in the Field of Water Policy. The European Parliament, Brussels.

  • Farmer, A. M. & M. S. Adams, 1989. A consideration of the problems of scale in the study of the ecology of aquatic macrophytes. Aquatic Botany 33: 177–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fortin, M.-J. & M. Dale, 2005. Spatial Analysis. A Guide for Ecologists. Cambridge University Press, 365.

  • Frissell, C. A., W. J. Liss, C. E. Warren & M. D. Hurley, 1986. A hierarchical framework for stream habitat classification. Viewing streams in a watershed context. Environmental Management 10: 199–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fritz, R., H. Tremp & A. Kohler, 1998. Klassifizierung und Bewertung der südbadischen Rheinseitengewässer mit Wasserpflanzen. Verhandlungen der Gesellschaft für Ökologie 28: 117–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haury, J., M.-C. Peltre, M. Trémolières, J. Barbe, G. Thiébaut, I. Bernez, H. Daniel, P. Chatenet, G. Haan-Archipof, S. Muller, A. Dutartre, C. Laplace-Treyture, A. Cazaubon & E. Lambert-Servien, 2006. A new method to assess water trophy and organic pollution – the Macrophyte Biological Index for Rivers (IBMR): its application to different types of river and pollution. Hydrobiologia 570: 153–158.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, N. T. H., P. J. Boon & T. A. Rowell, 1998. A revised classification system for British rivers based on their aquatic plant communities. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 8: 555–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isaak, D. J. & W. A. Hubert, 2001. Production of stream habitats gradients by montane watersheds: hypothesis tests based on spatially explicit path analyses. Canadien Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 58: 1089–1103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohler, A., 1971. Zur Ökologie submerser Gefäß-Makrophyten in Fließgewässern. Berichte der Deutschen Botanischen Gesellschaft 84: 713–720.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohler, A. & G. Janauer, 1995. Zur Methodik der Untersuchung von Fließgewässern mit Hilfe von aquatischen Makrophyten. In Steinberg, C. E. W., H. Bernhardt & H. Klapper (eds), Handbuch angewandte Limnologie. Ecomed, 1–22.

  • Krause, W., 1971. Die makrophytische Wasservegetation der südlichen Oberrheinaue. Die Äschenregion. Archiv Hydrobiologie Suppl. 37: 387–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauterborn, R., 1910. Die Vegetation des Oberrheins. Verhandlungen des naturhistorisch-medizinischen Vereins zu Heidelberg 10: 450–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lepš, J. & P. Šmilauer, 2003. Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data Using CANOCO. Cambridge University Press, 269 S.

  • Moran, P. A. P., 1950. Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena. Biometrika 37: 17–23.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Philippi, G., 1969. Laichkraut- und Wasserlinsengesellschaften des Oberrheingebietes zwischen Straßburg und Mannheim. Veröffentlichungen Naturschutz Landschaftspflege Baden-Württemberg 37: 102–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riis, T. & J. F. Biggs, 2001. Distribution of macrophytes in New Zealand streams and lakes in relation to disturbance frequency and resource supply – a synthesis and conceptual model. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 35: 255–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riis, T. & J. F. Biggs, 2003. Hydrologic and hydraulic control of macrophyte establishment and performance in streams. Limnology and Oceanography 48: 1488–1497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riis, T. & K. Sand-Jensen, 2006. Dispersal of plant fragments in small streams. Freshwater Biology 51(2): 274–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robach, F., I. Eglin & M. Trémolières, 1997. Species richness of aquatic macrophytes in former channels connected to a river: a comparison between two fluvial hydrosystems differing in their regime and regulation. Global Ecology and Biography Letters 6: 267–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawada, M., 1999. ROOKCASE: An Excel 97/2000 Visual Basic (VB) Add-In for exploring global and local spatial autocorrelation. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 231–234.

  • Schaumburg, J., C. Schranz, J. Foerster, A. Gutowski, G. Hofmann, P. Meilinger, S. Schneider & U. Schmedtje, 2004. Ecological classification of macrophytes and phytobenthos for rivers in Germany according to the Water Framework Directive. Limnologica 34: 283–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, S. & A. Melzer, 2003. The trophic Index of macrophytes (TIM) – a new tool for indicating the trophic state of running waters. International Review of Hydrobiology 88: 49–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schröder, P. & P. Rey, 1991. Fließgewässernetz Rhein und Einzugsgebiet. IfaH Scientific Publications 1, Konstanz, 305 pp.

  • Scott, W. A., J. K. Adamson, J. Rollinson & T. W. Parr, 2002. Monitoring of aquatic macrophytes for detection of long-term change in river systems. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 73: 131–153.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ter Braak, C. J. F. & P. F. M. Verdonschot, 1995. Canonical correspondence analysis and related multivariate methods in aquatic ecology. Aquatic Sciences 57: 255–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ter Braak, C. J. F. & P. Šmilauer, 2002. CANOCO Reference Manual and CanoDraw for Windows User’s Guide: Software for Canonical Community Ordination (Version 4.5). Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, NY, US, 499 pp.

  • Trémolières, M., I. Eglin, U. Roeck & R. Carbiener, 1993. The exchange process between river and groundwater on the central Alsace floodplain (Eastern France). I. The case of the canalized river Rhine. Hydrobiologia 254: 133–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trémolières, M., U. Roeck, J.-P. Klein & R. Carbiener, 1994. The exchange process between river and groundwater on the central Alsace floodplain (Eastern France). II. The case of a river with functional floodplain. Hydrobiologia 273: 19–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanderpoorten, A. & J.-P. Klein, 1999. A comparative study of the hydrophyte flora from the Alpine Rhine to the Middle Rhine. Application to the conservation of the Upper Rhine aquatic ecosystems. Biological Conservation 87: 163–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiegleb, G., 1988. Analysis of flora and vegetation in rivers. Concepts and applications. In Symoens, J. J. (ed.), Vegetation of Inland Waters. Handbook of Vegetation Science 15/1. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 311–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willby, N. J., V. J. Abernethy & B. O. L. Demars, 2000. Attribute-based classification of European hydrophytes and its relationship to habitat utilization. Freshwater Biology 43: 43–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wisskirchen, R. & H. Haeupler, 1998. Standardliste der Farn- und Blütenpflanzen Deutschlands. Ulmer, Stuttgart, 765 pp.

Download references

Acknowledgements

To Roland Fritz and Sabine Strohmeier many thanks for intensive field work and Dorothea Kampmann for significantly improving the English language. Special thanks to S. M. Thomaz and two anonymous referees for constructive comments. Financial support of the Ministry of Environment and Traffic Baden-Württemberg (Grant No. U22-95.04) is appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Landscape and Plant Ecology, University of Hohenheim, August-von-Hartmannstr. 3, 70593, Stuttgart, Germany

    Horst Tremp

Authors
  1. Horst Tremp
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Horst Tremp.

Additional information

Handling editor: S. M. Thomaz

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tremp, H. Spatial and environmental effects on hydrophytic macrophyte occurrence in the Upper Rhine floodplain (Germany). Hydrobiologia 586, 167–177 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-007-0617-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-007-0617-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation