Abstract
Group assessment is an important collaborative learning structure for development of graduate teamwork competencies. However, group assessments are often associated with poorer learning outcomes due to highly negative student experiences involving tension and conflict. In this study, an online tool incorporating four strategic ‘GATES’ (Team structure, Communication, Leadership, and Situation monitoring/Mutual support) was designed to support the social processes required for team cohesion. The ‘GATES’ tool was evaluated using mixed methods in an observational, correlational (cross-sectional) study of 693 undergraduate and post-graduate university students and five academics in five Allied Health university courses with a group assessment task. Participants completed two anonymous questionnaires (previous experiences and current experiences) that generated both quantitative and qualitative data. In the first, 95.19% (178/187) of respondents reported a previous group assessment experience, and the experience was negative for 19.1% (34/178) of these students, with 85.3% (29/34) attributing this to group member behaviour. All academics reported issues with previous group assessments they had delivered. Of the students who used the tool (n = 52), there was no statistically significant association between gender, CALD status, or age with group assessment experience. However, 56.9% (29/52) of students and all five academics found the tool useful for getting the group started early, and for managing team issues. The tool appeared most helpful with organisation and planning than in managing team issues, potentially due to the tool negating issues before they arose. Overall, our study’s findings indicate that ‘GATES’ keeps students on track and provides timely support during the team management process.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
AHRQ - Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2015). TeamSTEPPS (Team Strategies and Tools to Enhance Performance and Patient Safety): AHRQ. Available from:https://www.ahrq.gov/teamstepps/index.html
Alexander, B. (2006). Web 2.0: A new wave of innovation for teaching and learning? Educause Review, 32–44. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2006/1/web-20-a-new-wave-of-innovation-for-teaching-and-learning.
Amaro, D. J., Abriam-Yago, K., & Yoder, M. (2006). Perceived barriers for ethnically diverse students in nursing programs. Journal of Nursing Education, 45(7), 247–254. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-33746351471&partnerID=40&md5=ef763facfd00a0d6f46f98e5a745d3ed.
Boughton, M. A., Halliday, L. E., & Brown, L. (2010). A tailored program of support for culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) nursing students in a graduate entry Masters of Nursing course: A qualitative evaluation of outcomes. Nurse Education in Practice, 10(6), 355–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2010.05.003
Burdett, J., & Hastie, B. (2009). Predicting satisfaction with group work assignments. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 6(1), 61–71.
Cranmer, S. (2006). Enhancing graduate employability: Best intentions and mixed outcomes. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 169–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572041
Davidhizar, R., & Shearer, R. (2005). When your nursing student is culturally diverse. Health Care Manager, 24(4), 356–363. https://doi.org/10.1097/00126450-200510000-00009
Dittman, D. R., Hawkes, M., Deokar, A. V., & Sarnikar, S. (2010). Improving virtual team collaboration outcomes through collaboration process structuring. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 11(4), 195–210.
Duncan, T. A. (2013). Differentiated contracts: Giving students freedom to learn. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 49(4), 174–179.
Elgort, I., Smith, A. G., & Toland, J. (2008). Is wiki an effective platform for group course work? Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(2), 195–210.
Fearon, C., Starr, S., & McLaughlin, H. (2011). Value of blended learning in university and the workplace: Some experiences of university students. Industrial and Commercial Training, 43(7), 446–450.
Freeman, K. A. (1996). Attitudes toward work in project groups as predictors of academic performance. Small Group Research, 27(2), 265–282.
Gardner, J. (2005). Barriers influencing the success of racial and ethnic minority students in nursing programs. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 16(2), 155–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043659604273546
Goold, A., Craig, A., & Coldwell, J. (2008). The student experience of working in teams online. Hello! Where are you in the landscape of educational technology? Proceedings of ASCILITE 2008.
Gudmundsson, A., & Southey, G. (2012). Self-directed student work groups using blended learning. The E-Journal of Business Education & Scholarship of Teaching, 6(2), 12–19.
Guo, Z., & Stevens, K. J. (2011). Factors influencing perceived usefulness of wikis for group collaborative learning by first year students. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(2), 221–242.
Hansen, R. (2006). Benefits and problems with student teams: Suggestions for improving team projects. Journal of Education for Business, 82(1), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEB.82.1.11-19
Jaques, D., & Salmon, G. (2007). Learning in groups: A handbook for face-to-face and online environments (4th ed.). Routledge.
Jeon, Y. H., & Chenoweth, L. (2007). Working with a culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) group of nurses. Collegian (royal College of Nursing, Australia), 14(1), 16–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1322-7696(08)60543-0
Kashefi, H., Ismail, Z., & Yusof, Y. M. (2012). Supporting engineering students’ thinking and creative problem solving through blended learning. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 56, 117–125.
King, S., Taylor, E., Satzinger, F., Carbonaro, M., & Greidanus, E. (2008). Developing interdisciplinary team competencies in a blended learning course: Impact on student learning. Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice, 6(1), 1–6.
Kuisma, R. (2007). Portfolio assessment of an undergraduate group project. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 32(5), 557–569. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930601116904
Lejk, M., & Wyvill, M. (2002). Peer assessment of contributions to a group project: Student attitudes to holistic and category-based approaches. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(6), 569–577. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293022000020327
Leximancer. (2017). Leximancer Manual Version 4.5. 144. https://doc.leximancer.com/doc/LeximancerManual.pdf.
Livingstone, D., & Lynch, K. (2000). Group project work and student-centred active learning: Two different experiences. Studies in Higher Education, 25(3), 325–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/713696161
Matters, H., Winter, J., & Nowson, C. (2004). Enhancing learning for culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) students. Focus on Health Professional Education: A Multi-Disciplinary Journal, 6(1), 26–36.
Mutch, A. (1998). Employability or learning? Groupwork in higher education. Education + Training, 40(2), 50–56.
Nordberg, D. (2008). Group projects: More learning? Less fair? A conundrum in assessing postgraduate business education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(5), 481–492. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930701698835
Oakley, B., Felder, R. M., Brent, R., & Elhajj, I. (2004). Turning student groups into effective teams. Journal of Student Centered Learning, 2(1), 9–34.
Orr, S. (2010). Collaborating or fighting for the marks? Students’ experiences of group work assessment in the creative arts. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(3), 301–313.
Saldana, J. (2009). Coding manual for qualitative researchers. SAGE Publications.
Scott-Ladd, B., & Chan, C. C. A. (2008). Using action research to teach students to manage team learning and improve teamwork satisfaction. Active Learning in Higher Education, 9(3), 231–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787408095848
Sharp, S. (2006). Deriving individual student marks from a tutor’s assessment of group work. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(3), 329–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930500352956
Stowell, M. (2004). Equity, justice and standards: Assessment decision making in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29(4), 495–510. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930310001689055
Webb, N. M. (1993). Collaborative group versus individual assessment in mathematics: Processes and outcomes. Educational Assessment, 1(2), 131–152. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326977ea0102_3
Witney, D., & Smallbone, T. (2011). Wiki work: Can using wikis enhance student collaboration for group assignment tasks? Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 48(1), 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2010.543765
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Prof Jillian Hamilton and Prof Lisa Nissen for their ongoing support for this research, and the academics who have generously allowed us to test the tool in their courses. This study was funded by a QUT Faculty of Health Learning and Teaching Grant.
Funding
This study was supported by a Queensland University of Technology, Faculty of Health Learning and Teaching Grant (2016).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Judith Singleton: conceptualisation, methodology, investigation, software expertise, formal analysis, resources, data curation, visualisation, supervision, project administration, writing – all draft versions including review and editing.
Johanna Kenyon: conceptualisation, methodology, investigation, validation, writing – all draft versions including review and editing, project administration.
Kaitlyn Watson: methodology, data analysis, visualisation, editing of later draft versions including final version.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Consent to Publish
All three authors consent to the availability of the supplementary material online and to provide raw data if requested. All authors declare that this is original work and has not already been published elsewhere.
Ethics Approval
Ethical clearance was obtained from QUT (Ethical Approval Number 1600000550). Informed consent was obtained from all participants in this research study as per the study’s ethics’ protocol.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare they have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Singleton, J.A., Watson, K.E. & Kenyon, J.J. GATES: An Online Step-Wise Tool to Develop Student Collaborative Teamwork Competencies. Innov High Educ 47, 23–43 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-021-09569-3
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-021-09569-3