Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Young Students’ Arithmetic-Algebraic Structure Sense: an Empirical Model and Profiles of Students

  • Published:
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A theoretical model describing young students’ (Grade 3) arithmetic-algebraic structure sense was formulated and validated empirically (n = 130), hypothesizing that young students’ arithmetic-algebraic structure sense consists of five distinct but correlated factors; structure in numerical equivalence and word-problem modeling, structure in arithmetic, mathematical structure in number sequences, varying quantities and number correspondences, structure in patterns, and structure in functions. Data analysis suggested that arithmetic and arithmetic-algebraic tasks can be categorized based on the proposed model. Analysis traced three categories of students that represent different profiles of students. Students of the basic arithmetic structure sense profile approach flexibly simple arithmetic and patterning tasks that do not require generalization; students of the advanced arithmetic structure profile exhibit an awareness of local relations by describing the underlined relations in a variety of numerical situations. Students of the emergent arithmetic-algebraic profile utilize the awareness of mathematical structural relations to symbolize functional relations. A structural model showed the importance of grasping structure in patterns and describing the mathematical structure in numerical situations to develop structure in functions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Availability of data and material upon request.

References

  • Baroody, A. J., Ginsburg, H. P., & Waxman, B. (1983). Children’s use of mathematical structure. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 14(3), 156–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bastable, V., & Schifter, D. (2008). Classroom stories: Examples of elementary students engaged in early algebra. In J. Kaput, D. W. Carraher, & M. L. Blanton (Eds.), Algebra in the early grades (pp. 165–184). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanton, M., & Kaput, J. (2005). Characterizing a classroom practice that promotes algebraic reasoning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 36(5), 412–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanton, M. L., & Kaput, J. J. (2011). Functional thinking as a route into algebra in the elementary grades. In J. Cai & E. Knuth (Eds.), Early algebraization: A global dialogue from multiple perspectives (pp. 5–23). Springer-Verlag.

  • Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carraher, D. W., & Schliemann, A. D. (2018). Cultivating early algebraic thinking. In C. Kieran (Ed.), Teaching and learning algebraic thinking with 5-to 12-year-olds (pp. 107–138). Springer.

  • Cooper, T. J., & Warren, E. (2011). Years 2 to 6 students’ ability to generalise: Models, representations and theory for teaching and learning. In J. Cai & E. Knuth (Eds.), Early algebraization: A global dialogue from multiple perspectives (pp. 187–214). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • DiStefano, C., & Hess, B. (2005). Using confirmatory factor analysis for construct validation: An empirical review. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 23(3), 225–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driscoll, M. (1999). Fostering algebraic thinking: A guide for teachers, grades 6–10. Educational Development Center Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freudenthal, H. (1983). Didactical phenomenology of mathematical structures. Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freudenthal, H. (1991). Revisiting mathematics education: China lectures. Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujii, T., & Stephens, M. (2001). Fostering an understanding of algebraic generalisation through numerical expressions: The role of quasi-variables. In H. Chick, K. Stacey, & J. Vincent (Eds.), Proceedings of ICMI-12 (pp. 258–264). Melbourne University.

  • Hitt, F., Saboya, M., & Zavala, C. C. (2017). Rupture or continuity: The arithmetico-algebraic thinking as an alternative in a modelling process in a paper and pencil and technology environment. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 94(1), 97–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoch, M., & Dreyfus, T. (2005). Structure sense in high school algebra: The effect of brackets. In H. L. Chick & J. L. Vincent (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 49– 56). University of Melbourne.

  • Kieran, C. (1989). The early learning of algebra: A structural perspective. In S. Wagner & C. Kieran (Eds.), Research issues in the learning and teaching of algebra (pp. 33–56). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

  • Kieran, C. (2018). Seeking, using, and expressing structure in numbers and numerical operations: A fundamental path to developing early algebraic thinking. In C. Kieran (Ed.), Teaching and learning algebraic thinking with 5-to 12-year-olds (pp. 79–105). Springer.

  • Kieran, C., & Martínez-Hernández, C. (2022). Structure sense at early ages: The case of equivalence of numerical expressions and equalities. In T. Rojano (Ed.), Algebra structure sense development amongst diverse learners (pp. 35–66). Routledge.

  • Linchevski, L., & Livneh, D. (1999). Structure sense: The relationship between algebraic and numerical contexts. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 40(2), 173–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research, 35(6), 382–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madej, L. (2022). Primary school students’ knowledge of the equal sign – the Swedish case. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 20, 321–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, J. (1996). Expressing generality and roots of algebra. In N. Bednarz, C. Kieran, & L. Lee (Eds.), Approaches to algebra: Perspectives for research and teaching (pp. 65–86). Kluwer Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, J., Stephens, M., & Watson, A. (2009). Appreciating mathematical structure for all. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 21(2), 10–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, P., Rittle-Johnson, B., McEldoon, K., & Taylor, R. (2012). Measure for measure: What combining diverse measures reveals about children’s understanding of the equal sign as an indicator of mathematical equality. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 43(3), 316–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNeil, N. M., Weinberg, A., Hattikudur, S., Stephens, A. C., Asquith, P., Knuth, E. J., & Alibali, M. W. (2010). A is for apple: Mnemonic symbols hinder the interpretation of algebraic expressions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 625–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulligan, J., Oslington, G., & English, L. (2020). Supporting early mathematical development through a ‘pattern and structure’intervention program. ZDM Mathematics Education, 52(4), 663–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2017). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Authors.

  • Ng, S. F. (2018). Function tasks, input, output, and the predictive rule: How some Singapore primary children construct the rule. In C. Kieran (Ed.), Teaching and learning algebraic thinking with 5-to 12-year-olds (pp. 167–193). Springer.

  • Nylund, K. L., Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(4), 535–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papic, M. M., Mulligan, J. T., & Mitchelmore, M. C. (2011). Assessing the development of preschoolers’ mathematical patterning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 42(3), 237–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinto, E., Cañadas, M. C., & Moreno, A. (2022). Functional relationships evidenced and representations used by third graders within a functional approach to early algebra. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 20, 1183–1202.

  • Pittalis, M., Pitta-Pantazi, D., & Christou, C. (2018). A longitudinal study revisiting the notion of early number sense: Algrebraic arithmetic a catalyst for number sense development. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 20(3), 222–247.

  • Pittalis, M., Pitta-Pantazi, D., & Christou, C. (2020). Young students’ functional thinking modes: The relation between recursive patterning, covariation thinking and correspondence relation. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 51(5), 631–674.

  • Radford, L. (2018). The emergence of symbolic algebraic thinking in primary school. In C. Kieran (Ed.), Teaching and learning algebraic thinking with 5- to 12-year-olds (pp. 3–25). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ralston, N. C., Li, M., & Taylor, C. (2018). The development and initial validation of an assessment of algebraic thinking for students in the elementary grades. Educational Assessment, 23(3), 211–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rittle-Johnson, B., Matthews, P. G., Taylor, R. S., & McEldoon, K. L. (2010). Assessing knowledge of mathematical equivalence: A construct modeling approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(1), 85–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rojano, T. (2022). Algebra structure sense development amongst diverse learners: Theoretical and empirical insights to support in-person and remote learning. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, S. J., Schifter, D., & Bastable, V. (2011). Connecting arithmetic to algebra: Strategies for building algebraic thinking in the elementary grades. Heinemann.

  • Sibgatullin, I. R., Korzhuev, A. V., Khairullina, E. R., Sadykova, A. R., Baturina, R. V., & Chauzova, V. (2022). A systematic review on algebraic thinking in education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 18(1), em2065.

  • Stephens, A. C., Ellis, A. B., Blanton, M., & Brizuela, B. M. (2017). Algebraic thinking in the elementary and middle grades. In J. Cai (Ed.), Compendium for research in mathematics education (pp. 386–420). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Subramaniam, K., & Banerjee, R. (2011). The arithmetic-algebra connection: A historical-pedagogical perspective. In J. Cai & E. Knuth (Eds.), Early algebraization: A global dialogue from multiple perspectives (pp. 87–107). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Taherdoost, H. (2016). How to design and create an effective survey/questionnaire; A step by step guide. International Journal of Academic Research in Management, 5(4), 37–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkat, H., Askew, M., Watson, A., & Mason, J. (2019). Architecture of mathematical structure. For the Learning of Mathematics, 39(1), 13–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vergnaud, G. (1982). A classification of cognitive tasks and operations of thought involved in addition and subtraction problems. In T. P. Carpenter, J. M. Moser, & T. A. Romberg (Eds.), Addition and subtraction: A cognitive perspective (pp. 39–59). Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, E. (2003). The role of arithmetic structure in the transition from arithmetic to algebra. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 15(2), 122–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wijns, N., Verschaffel, L., De Smedt, B., De Keyser, L., & Torbeyns, J. (2021). Stimulating preschoolers’ focus on structure in repeating and growing patterns. Learning and Instruction, 74, 101444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Education, University of Cyprus, P.O.Box 20537, 1678, Nicosia, Cyprus

    Marios Pittalis

Authors
  1. Marios Pittalis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marios Pittalis.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pittalis, M. Young Students’ Arithmetic-Algebraic Structure Sense: an Empirical Model and Profiles of Students. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 21, 1865–1887 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-022-10333-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-022-10333-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation