Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

What the Cārvākas Originally Meant

More on the Commentators on the Cārvākasūtra

  • Published:
Journal of Indian Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This essay proposes to review the problems of reconstructing and interpreting ancient texts, particularly philosophical commentaries, in the context of the Cārvāka/Lokāyata system of India. Following an overview of the Indian philosophical text tradition and the ontological and epistemological positions of the Cārvākas, three cases are discussed: (1) when there is no invariance in the text and the commentary, (2) when commentators differ among themselves in their interpretations, and (3) when contradictory interpretations are offered. The paper further discusses why certain commentaries are to be treated as inconsistent with the base text and concludes that innovations inconsistent with the intention of the author should be treated differently from glosses that seek to explain the author’s original intentions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations and References

  • Avacūrṇi. (1969). Anon. in ṢDSam (M. K. Jain, Ed.). Calcutta: Bharatiya Jnanapith.

  • Bhattacharya, B. (1926). Foreword to Tattvasaṅgraha (E. Krishnamacharya, Ed.). Baroda: Oriental Institute.

  • Bhattacharya R. (2009) Studies on the Cārvāka/Lokāyata. Società Editrice Fiorentina, Firenze

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya R. (2010) Lokāyata Darśana and a comparative study with Greek Philosophy. In: Ghose P. (Ed.) Materialism and immaterialism in India and the west: varying Vistas. Centre for Studies in Civilizations, New Delhi, pp 21–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronkhorst J. (2007) Greater magadha. E. J. Brill, Leiden

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chattopadhyaya D. (1989) Defence of materialism in Ancient India. People’s Publishing House, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • C/L. Cārvāka/Lokāyata. (1990), eds. D. Chattopadhyaya in collaboration with M. Gangopadhyaya. New Delhi: Indian Council of Philosophical Research.

  • Dasgupta, S. (1975). A history of indian philosophy (vols. 1–5). Delhi: MLBD (reprint).

  • Epigraphia Indica. (1892), ed. J. Burgess (vol. 1). Calcutta.

  • Franco, E. (1991). Paurandarasūtra. In M. A. Dhaky (Ed.), Aspects of indology. Pt. Dalsukhbhai Malvania Felicitation Volume (vol. III). Varanasi: Sagarmal Jain P.V. Research Institute.

  • Franco, E. (1997). Dharmakīrti on compassion and rebirth, Universität Wien, Wien: Arbeitkreis für Tibetische und Buddhistische Studien

  • Franco, E., Preisendanz, K. (1998). Materialism, Indian School of. In E. Craig (Ed.), Routledge encyclopedia of philosophy (Vol. 6). London: Routledge.

  • Frauwallner, E. (1973). History of indian philosophy (vol. 2). Delhi: MLBD (translation of Geschichte der indischen Philosophie, Band II. Salzburg: Otto Muller Verlag, 1956).

  • Gangopadhyaya M.K. (1984) Indian logic in its sources: The validity of inference. Munshiram Manoharlal, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Guṇaratna. Tarka-rahasya-dīpikā. (1905–1914), comm. on Haribhadra, ṢDSam, edited by L. Suali. Calcutta: The Asiatic Society.

  • Goldin, Paul. R (2008). Review of teaching the Daode Jing (G. D. DeAngelis & W. G. Frisina Eds.), New York: Oxford University Press. Journal of the American Oriental Society, 128(4, October–December pp. 479–452).

  • GrBh. Cakradhara. Granthibhaṅga. See NM.

  • Jacobi H. (1918) A contribution towards the early history of indian philosophy. Indian Antiquary 47: 101–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Jha, G. (1937–1939). Introduction. The Tattvasaṇgraha by Shantarakṣita (Vols. I—II). Delhi: MLBD (reprint 1986).

  • KA. Kauṭilīya Arthaśāstra. (1965–1972). Edited and translated by R. P. Kangle. Bombay: University of Bombay, Parts 1-3.

  • KS. Vātsyāyana. Kāmasūtra with Jayamaṅgalā. Varanasi: Chowkhambha, (n.d.)

  • Mahābhārata, The. (1933–1966). Critically edited by V. S. Sukthankar & others. Poona: Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute.

  • Mahābhārata, The. Vulgate (1832 Śaka /1910 CE) with Nīlakaṇṭha’s commentary, Bhāratabhāvadīpa, ed. Pancanana Tarkaratna. Kalikata: Vangavasi.

  • Mookerjee S. (1935) The buddhist philosophy of universal flux. Calcutta University, Calcutta

    Google Scholar 

  • Namai M. (1976) A survey of Bārhaspatya philosophy. Indological Review (Kyoto) 2: 29–74

    Google Scholar 

  • NM. Jayantabhaṭṭa. (1982–1984). Nyāyamañjari with Cakradhara’s Granthibhaṇga, ed. G. Sastri (in three parts). Varanasi: Sampurnanand Sanskrit Visvavidyalaya.

  • NS. Nyāyasūtra. Tarkavāgiśa, Phaṇibhūṣaṇa, Nyāya Darśana Vātsyāyana Bhāṣya (1981–1989) (in Bengali). Calcutta: West Bengal State Book Board (reprint).

  • NS. Nyāyasūtra. Trans. M.K. Gangopadhyaya (1982). Nyāya, Calcutta: Indian studies.

  • Preisendanz K. (2008) Text, commentary, annotation: Some reflections on the philosophical genre. Journal of Indian Philosophy 36: 599–618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PVSVṬ. Karṇakagomin. (1943). Pramāṇa-vārttika-svopajña-vṛtti-ṭīkā Rahula Sankrityayana (Ed.). Ilahabad: Kitab Mahal.

  • Ratnaprabhā. (1967). Commentary on Vādi Devasūri’s Pramāṇa-nyāya-tattvālokālaṃkāra, English trans. and comm. by H. S. Bhattacharya. Bombay: Jain Sahitya Vikas Mandal.

  • Sāyaṇa-Mādhava. (1978). Sarvadarśanasaṃgraha (V. S. Abhyankar, Ed.). Poona: BORI (reprint).

  • ṢDSam. Haribhadra. (1969). Ṣaḍdarśanasamuccaya, with Guṇaratna’s and Somatilakasūri’s commentaries (M. K. Jain Ed.) Calcutta: Bharatiya Jnanapitha.

  • Shastri, D. R. (1944). Bārhaspatyadarśana. “Cārvāka-pañcāśikā” (in Bnagla), Bharatavara, 32: 1, (Asadha 1351 Bengali year).

  • Shastri, D. R. (1959). Cārvāka Darśana (in Bengali). Purogami Prakashani: Kolkata (Reprinted with additions in 1982 by the West Bengal State Book Board, Kolkata).

  • Solomon, E. A. (1977–1978). Bhaṭṭa Udbhaṭa. Annals of the Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute 58–59, 986–987.

  • SMS. Sarvamatasaṃgraha. (1915), edited by T. G. Sastri, Trivandram.

  • Sri Aurobindo. (2001). The life divine. Pondicherry: Sri Aurobindo Ashram (reprint).

  • SVR. Vādidevasūri. (1988). Syādvādaratnākara (M. L. Osval, Ed.). Delhi: Bhartiya Book Corporation (reprint).

  • TS. Śāntarakṣita. (1981). Tattvasaṇgraha (D. Shastri Ed.). Varanasi: Bauddha Bharati.

  • TSP. Kamalaśīla. Tattvasaṇgrahapañjikā. See TS.

  • Vācaspati Miśra. Bhāmatī in Brahmasūtra. (1982). The Brahmasūtra with Śaṇkara Bhāṣya and Bhāmatī, Kalpataru and Parimala, edited by P. A. Sastri, V. L. S. Pansikar. Varanasi: Chowkhamba Sanskrit Series Office (reprint of the N. Sagar ed.).

  • Vallée Poussin, L. de (1908). Materialism (India). In J. Hastings (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Religion and Ethics. Edinburgh: T & T Clark.

  • Vanamamalai, N. (1973). Materialist thought in early Tamil literature. In Social Scientist, 2(4), 25–41 (available in JSTOR archive).

  • Vasu, S. C. (1982). The Siddhānta Kaumudī of Bhaṭṭojī Dīkṣita. Delhi. MLBD (reprint).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Pavlov Institute, 98 Mahatma Gandhi Road, Kolkata, 700 007, India

    Ramkrishna Bhattacharya

Authors
  1. Ramkrishna Bhattacharya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ramkrishna Bhattacharya.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bhattacharya, R. What the Cārvākas Originally Meant. J Indian Philos 38, 529–542 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-010-9103-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-010-9103-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation