Abstract
Key supplier-side factors that affect the usage level of mobile Internet were identified and the procedural mechanism among the independent and dependent variables was investigated. For this, a research model was introduced to describe associations among four external variables (access quality, service variety, cost rationality, and ease of use), an intermediate variable (usefulness) and a dependent variable (the usage level of mobile Internet). Through the on-line survey, data were gathered from actual mobile Internet users. Confirmatory factor analysis and path analysis were applied to test the overall integrity of the research model and of proposed hypotheses. All four external variables affected user perceptions on the usefulness of mobile Internet. Among them, service variety and cost rationality had a relatively larger influence on perceived usefulness. Perceived usefulness of the mobile Internet had a positive effect on its usage, confirming the important role of usefulness as a significant mediator between the four external variables and the dependent variable. Meanwhile, the cost rationality was the only external variable with direct influence on the MI usage. Theoretical and practical implications of the study results are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams, D. A., Nelson, R. R., & Todd, P. A. (1992). Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology: A replication. MIS Quarterly, 16(2), 227–247.
Alderfer, C. P. (1969). An empirical test of a new theory of human needs. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 4(2), 142–175.
Allee, V. (2000). The value evolution, addressing larger implications of an intellectual capital and intangibles perspective. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 1(1), 17–32.
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423.
Bagozzi, R. P., Yi, Y., & Phillips, L. W. (1991). Assessing construct validity in organizational research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(3), 421–458.
Barki, H., & Hartwick, J. (1989). Rethinking the concept of user involvement. MIS Quarterly, 13(1), 53–61.
Bharati, P., & Chaudhury, A. (2006). Product customization on the web. Information Resources Management Journal, 19(2), 69–81.
Bowman, C., & Ambrosini, V. (2000). Value creation versus value capture: Towards a coherent definition of value in strategy. British Journal of Management, 11(1), 1–15.
Chae, M., Kim, J., Kim, H., & Ryu, H. (2002). Information quality for mobile internet services: A theoretical model with empirical validation. Electronic Markets, 12(1), 38–46.
Chin, J. P., Diehl, V. A., & Norman, K. L. (1988). Development of an instrument for measuring user satisfaction of the human-computer interface. In E. Soloway, D. Frye & S. B. Sheppard (Eds.), Proceedings of the CHI 88: Conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 213–218). New York, NY: ACM.
Chin, J. P., Todd, W. W., & Todd, P. A. (1995). On the use usefulness, and ease of use of structural equation modeling in MIS research: A note of caution. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 237–246.
Cyr, D., Head, M., & Ivanov, A. (2006). Design aesthetics leading to m-loyalty in mobile commerce. Information & Management, 43, 950–963.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.
Davis, F. D. (1993). User acceptance of information technology: System characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 38(3), 475–487.
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003.
Delone, W. H., & Mclean, E. R. (1992). Information system success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information System Research, 3(1), 60–95.
Dodds, W. B., Monroe, K. B., & Grewal, D. (1991). Effects of price, brand and price information on buyers’ product evaluation. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(3), 307–319.
Fichman, R. G., & Kemerer, C. F. (1999). The illusory diffusion of innovation: An examination of assimilation gaps. Information Systems Research, 10(3), 255–275.
Garbarino, E. C., & Edell, J. A. (1997). Cognitive effort, affect, and choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(2), 147–158.
Hong, S. J., & Tam, K. Y. (2006). Understanding the adoption of multipurpose information appliances: The case of mobile data services. Information Systems Research, 17(2), 162–179.
Igbaria, M. (1994). An examination of the factors contributing to technology acceptance, accounting. Management and Information Technologies, 4(4), 205–224.
Igbaria, M., & Iivari, J. (1997). Personal computing acceptance factors in small firms: A structural equation model. MIS Quarterly, 21(3), 279–305.
Igbaria, M., Zinatelli, M., Cragg, P., & Cavaye, A. L. M. (1995). The effects of self-efficacy on computer usage. International Journal of Management Science, 23(6), 587–605.
Internet Statistics Information System (ISIS) (2002). 2002 Survey on the Usage of Wireless Internet, (retrieved August 31, 2005, from http://isis.nic.or.kr/report_DD_View/upload/mobile200412_eng(1).pdf).
Jarvenpaa, S. L., Lang, K. R., Takeda, Y., & Tuunainen, V. K. (2003). Mobile commerce at crossroads. Communications of the ACM, 46(12), 41–44.
Karahanna, E., Straub, D. W., & Chervany, N. L. (1999). Information technology adoption across time: A cross-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and post-adoption beliefs. MIS Quarterly, 23(2), 183–213.
Kim, H., & Kim, J. (2002). An empirical study on the factors affecting mobile internet usage. Information Systems Review, 12(3), 89–112.
Kim, J., Kim, H., Lee, Y. & Lee, I. (2001). The 3rd mobile internet survey, project report, MBIZ consortium.
Kim, H., Kim, J., & Lee, Y. (2005). An empirical study of use contexts in the mobile internet, focusing on the usability of information architecture. Information Systems Frontiers, 7(2), 175–186.
Kim, H., Chan, H., & Gupta, S. (2007). Value-added adoption of mobile internet: An empirical investigation. Decision Support Systems, 43, 111–126.
Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: The Guilford.
Lee, Y., & Benbasat, I. (2003). Interface design for mobile commerce. Communications of the ACM, 46(12), 49–52.
Liao, Z., & Cheung, M. T. (2001). Internet-based e-shopping and consumer attitudes: An empirical study. Information and Management, 38(5), 299–306.
Lim, H. (2006). M-loyalty: Winning strategy for mobile carriers. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 23(4), 208–218.
Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, New York: Prentice Hall.
Mao, E., Srite, M., Thatcher, J. B., & Yaprak, O. (2005). A research model for mobile phone service behaviors: Empirical validation in the U.S. and Turkey. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 8(4), 7–28.
Maslow, H. A. (1954). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper.
Mathieson, K. (1991). Predicting user intentions: Comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior. Information System Research, 2(3), 173–191.
McClelland, D. (1995). Studies in motivation. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
McClelland, D., & Burnham, D. H. (1976). Power is a great motivator. Harvard Business Review, 54(2), 100–110.
McKinney, V., Yoon, K., & Zahedi, F. (2002). The measurement of web-customer satisfaction: An expectation and disconfirmation approach. Information Systems Research, 13(3), 296–315.
Moore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. (1991). Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information Systems Research, 2(3), 192–222.
Nysveen, H., Pedersen, P., & Thorbjornsen, H. (2005). Intentions to use mobile services: Antecedents and cross-service comparisons. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33(3), 330–346.
Pagani, M. (2004). Determinants of adoption of third generation mobile multimedia services. Journal of International Marketing, 18(3), 46–59.
Pavlou, P. A., & Stewart, D. W. (2000). Measuring the effects and effectiveness of interactive advertising : A research agenda, Journal of Interactive Advertising, 1(1).
Pedersen, P. (2005). Adoption of mobile internet services: An exploratory study of mobile commerce early adopters. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 15(2), 203–222.
Parthasarathy, M., & Bhattrcherjee, A. (1998). Understanding post-adoption behavior in the context of online services. Information Systems Research, 9(4), 362–379.
Rai, A. L., Lang, S. S., & Welker, R. B. (2002). Assessing the validity of IS success models: An empirical test and theoretical analysis. Information Systems Research, 13(1), 50–69.
Rao, S., & Troshani, I. (2007). A conceptual framework and propositions for the acceptance of mobile services. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 2(2), 61–73.
Schachter, S. (1959). The psychology of affiliation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Schwab, D. P. (1980). Construct validity in organization behavior. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, vol. 2. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
Seddon, P. (1997). Respecification and extension of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success. Information Systems Research, 8(3), 240–253.
Segars, A. H., & Grover, V. (1993). Re-examining perceived ease of use and usefulness: A confirmatory factor analysis. MIS Quarterly, 17(4), 843–851.
Siau, K., & Shen, Z. (2003). Building customer trust in mobile commerce. Communications of the ACM, 46(4), 91–94.
Szajna, B. (1996). Empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model. Management Science, 42(1), 85–92.
Turel, O., Serenko, A., Detlor, B., Collan, M., Nam, I., & Puhakainen, J. (2006). Investigating the determinants of satisfaction and usage of mobile IT Services in four countries. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 9(4), 6–27.
Venkatesh, A., & Davis, F. D. (1996). A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test. Decisions Science, 27(3), 451–481.
Venkatesh, V., Ramesh, V., & Massey, A. P. (2003). Understanding usability in mobile commerce. Communications of the ACM, 46(12), 53–36.
Walter, A., Ritter, T., & Gemunden, H. G. (2001). Value creation in buyer-seller relationships. Industrial Marketing Management, 30(4), 365–377.
Wang, Y. S., Lin, H. H., & Luarn, P. (2006). Predicting consumer intention to use mobile service. Information Systems Journal, 16, 157–179.
Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2–22.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
An erratum to this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10796-009-9224-6
Appendix
Appendix
1.1 Appendix 1. Exploratory factor analysis
Construct | Item | Factor 1 | Factor 2 | Factor 3 | Factor 4 | Factor 5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Access quality | SQ1 | .149 | .115 | .152 | .684 | .184 |
SQ2 | .207 | 9.8E-04 | .7.8E-02 | .836 | −1.8E-02 | |
SQ3 | 3.9E-01 | .107 | .108 | .836 | 4.9E-02 | |
Service Variety | SV1 | .671 | .235 | .118 | .174 | −.246 |
SV2 | .666 | 6.1E-02 | 5.8E-02 | 8.1E-02 | 2.4E-02 | |
SV3 | .789 | −6.9E-02 | .110 | 4.0E-02 | .217 | |
SV4 | .724 | −9.8E-02 | .172 | 8.8E-02 | .115 | |
SV5 | .554 | 5.4E-02 | .321 | .101 | 2.9E-02 | |
SV6 | .711 | .297 | 4.2E-02 | 7.2E-02 | 1.7E-02 | |
SV7 | .612 | .261 | .164 | 9.5E-02 | .204 | |
Cost rationality | CR1 | .108 | 7.7E-02 | .139 | 9.5E-02 | .890 |
CR2 | .115 | 3.8E-02 | .205 | .102 | .881 | |
Perceived Usefulness | PU1 | .316 | .188 | .562 | .178 | 6.2E-02 |
PU2 | .166 | .112 | .862 | .108 | .154 | |
PU3 | .182 | 6.4E-02 | .856 | .115 | .180 | |
Perceived Ease of use | PE1 | .145 | .783 | .168 | 3.3E-02 | −9.9E-02 |
PE2 | 4.9E-02 | .796 | 9.7E-02 | 2.6E-02 | −3.7E-02 | |
PE3 | 4.2E-03 | .680 | 2.8E-02 | .130 | 7.6E-02 | |
PE4 | .199 | .740 | 2.9E-02 | 3.6E-02 | .203 | |
Eigenvalue | 5.508 | 2.093 | 1.847 | 1.547 | 1.164 | |
Explanation dispersion | 28.992 | 11.015 | 9.721 | 8.144 | 6.125 | |
Accumulation dispersion | 28.992 | 40.006 | 49.728 | 57.872 | 63.997 |
1.2 Appendix 2. Confirmatory factor analysis
Indicator | Loading | T-stat. (*p ≤ 0.05) | Cronbach’s Alpha | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Access quality | SQ1 | 0.528 | 9.193* | 0.746 |
SQ2 | 0.754 | 11.856* | ||
SQ3 | 0.685 | 11.219* | ||
Service variety | SV1 | 0.600 | 10.263* | 0.834 |
SV2 | 0.545 | 9.125* | ||
SV3 | 0.617 | 12.033* | ||
SV4 | 0.609 | 11.255* | ||
SV5 | 0.522 | 9.106* | ||
SV6 | 0.635 | 11.262* | ||
SV7 | 0.608 | 10.708* | ||
Cost rationality | CR1 | 0.707 | 11.453* | 0.853 |
CR2 | 0.830 | 12.773* | ||
Perceived usefulness | PU1 | 0.484 | 8.988* | 0.784 |
PU2 | 0.716 | 14.691* | ||
PU3 | 0.748 | 14.475* | ||
Perceived ease of use | PE1 | 0.813 | 12.755* | 0.776 |
PE2 | 0.690 | 10.976* | ||
PE3 | 0.522 | 8.105* | ||
PE4 | 0.708 | 11.321* |
1.3 Appendix 3. Analysis of discriminant validity (*p < 0.05)
Division | Access quality | Service variety | Cost rationality | Perceived usefulness | Perceived ease of use |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Access Quality | 1 | ||||
Service Variety | 0.385 (5.437)* | 1 | |||
Cost Rationality | 0.251 (3.374)* | 0.297 (4.272)* | 1 | ||
Perceived Usefulness | 0.375 (5.284)* | 0.510 (8.490)* | 0.442 (6.980)* | 1 | |
Perceived Ease of use | 0.234 (2.974)* | 0.368 (5.266)* | 0.146 (1.968)* | 0.317 (4.414)* | 1 |
1.4 Appendix 4. Survey question items
Variables | Question items |
---|---|
Access Quality | MI is responsive. |
MI is stable to use. | |
MI provides good access. | |
Service Variety | MI offers location-specific information. |
MI offers customized information. | |
MI offers necessary information. | |
MI offers services I need. | |
MI enables better communicate with others. | |
MI offers timely information. | |
With MI, I can do my work regardless of time and location. | |
Cost Rationality | The price for MI’s paid service is acceptable. |
The price for MI access is acceptable. | |
Perceived Usefulness | MI saves me time/effort over other means of performing the same tasks. |
MI enables me to perform many tasks better than through other means. | |
MI provides a greater value than other ways of performing the same task. | |
Perceived Ease of Use | Learning to operate MI keypad is easy for me. |
MI screen is clear and understandable. | |
I find MI to be flexible to interact with. | |
Navigating through MI is easy. | |
MI Usage | How often do you use MI? |
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shin, Y.M., Lee, S.C., Shin, B. et al. Examining influencing factors of post-adoption usage of mobile internet: Focus on the user perception of supplier-side attributes. Inf Syst Front 12, 595–606 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-009-9184-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-009-9184-x