Skip to main content
Log in

Perceptions of Ethical Behaviour among Business Faculty in Canada

  • Published:
Journal of Academic Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Faculty members at Canadian business schools were surveyed regarding their ethical perceptions of behaviours related to undergraduate instruction. Fifty-five behavioural statements were listed and respondents were asked to rate the extent to which they felt each behaviour was ethical or unethical. The only item that respondents endorsed as unequivocally unethical (90% indicated it was “definitely unethical”) was “Becoming sexually involved with an undergraduate in one of your classes.” We also compared the results of our sample to those of an American sample. Overall, an interesting pattern of differences emerged between the responses obtained in Canada and the U.S. In general, the direction of the significant differences was such that Canadian professors viewed the behaviours in question as less ethical than did their American counterparts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Academy of Management (2002). Academy of Management code of ethical conduct. Academy of Management Journal 45, 291–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahart, A.M. & Sackett, P.R. (2004). A new method for examining relationships between individual differences measures and sensitive behavior criteria: Evaluating the unmatched count technique. Organizational Research Methods 7, 101–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50, 179–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I. & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashkanasy, N.M., Trevor-Roberts, E. & Earnshaw, L. (2002). The Anglo cluster: Legacy of the British empire. Journal of World Business 27, 28–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, D.J. (1972). Self-perception theory. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 6, 1–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birch, M., Elliott, D. & Trankel, M.A. (1999). Black and white and shades of gray: A portrait of the ethical professor. Ethics & Behaviour 9, 243–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braxton, J. (Ed.) (1994). Special issue: Perspectives on research misconduct, Journal of Higher Education 65.

  • Byrne, J.A. (1992, April). Can ethics be taught? Harvard gives it the old college try. Business Week 6, 34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canadian Association of University Teachers (2004). CAUT Almanac of Post-Secondary Education in Canada (3rd ed.). Ottawa, ON: CAUT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, M.K. (1998). Predicting unethical behavior: A comparison of the theory of reasoned action and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Business Ethics 17, 1825–1834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choong, P., Ho, S.K. & McDonald, R.A. (2002). An examination of the effects of social desirability bias on business ethics: Research results. International Journal of Management 19, 3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (revised ed.). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, L.G., Elliott-Howard, F. & DuFrene, D.D. (1997). The ethical issues rating scale: An instrument for measuring ethical orientation of college students toward various business practices. Educational and Psychological Measurement 57, 515–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, F.R., Anderson, L.M. & Lawrimore, K.W. (1990). Perspectives on business ethics in management education. SAM Advanced Management Journal 9, 26–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J.R. & Welton, R.E. (1991). Professional ethics: Business students’ perceptions. Journal of Business Ethics 10, 451–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dill, D. (Ed.) (1982). Special issue: Ethics and the academic profession. Journal of Higher Education 53.

  • Duizend, J. & McCann, G.K. (1998). Do collegiate business students show a propensity to engage in illegal business practices? Journal of Business Ethics 17, 229–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engle, T.J. & Smith, J.L. (1990). The ethical standards of accounting academics. Issues in Accounting Education 5, 7–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J. (1989). Ethical values and decision processes of male and female business students. Journal of Education for Business 64, 234–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtschneider, D.H. (2001). Academic ethics: A state of the field. In J. Dienhart, D. Moberg & R. Duska (Eds.), The Next Phase of Business Ethics: Integrating Psychology and Ethics (pp. 483–493). Oxford, UK: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewellyn, P.A.G. (1996). Academic perceptions: Ethics in the information systems discipline. Journal of Business Ethics 15, 559–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, J.B., Bearden, W.O. & Richardson, L.D. (1990). Perceived conduct and professional ethics among marketing faculty. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 18, 185–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miesing, P. & Preble, J.F. (1985). A comparison of five business philosophies. Journal of Business Ethics 4, 465–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robie, C. & Kidwell, R.E., Jr. (2003). The “ethical” professor and the undergraduate student: Current perceptions of moral behavior among business school faculty. Journal of Academic Ethics 1, 153–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sauser, W.I., Jr. (1990). The ethics of teaching business: Toward a code for business professors. SAM Advanced Management Journal 9, 33–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, R.E., Harris, O.J. & Williamson, S. (1993). A comparison of ethical evaluations of business school faculty and students. Journal of Business Ethics 12, 611–619.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, R.E., Harris, O.J. & Williamson, S. (1994). Evaluations of ethical situations by university faculty: A comparative study. Journal of Education for Business 69, 145–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick, B.G., Keith-Spiegel, P. & Pope, K.S. (1991). Ethics of teaching: Beliefs and behaviors of psychologists as educators. American Psychologist 46, 506–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trevino, L.K. (1986). Ethical decision making in organizations: A person-situation interactionist model. Academy of Management Review 11, 601–617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viswesvaran, C., Deshpande, S.P. & Joseph, J. (2000). Are ethicality perceptions of different counterproductive behaviors affected by workplace dependencies. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 30, 2050–2057.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, J.A., Longenecker, J.G., McKinney, J.A. & Moore, C.W. (1988). Ethical attitudes of students and business professionals: A study of moral reasoning. Journal of Business Ethics 7, 249–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Robie, C., Keeping, L.M. Perceptions of Ethical Behaviour among Business Faculty in Canada. J Acad Ethics 2, 221–247 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-004-4306-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-004-4306-z

Keywords

Navigation