Skip to main content
Log in

Definiteness marking in Germanic: morphological variations on the same syntactic theme

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Germanic languages display a remarkable range of variation with respect to the interaction of the definite article and adjectival modification. In Swedish, Norwegian, and Faroese, adjectival modification causes, for instance, a doubling of the definite article. In languages like English, Dutch, and German, however, the definite article does not double. In addition to these two patterns, two other patterns can be distinguished (instantiated by Icelandic and Danish respectively). Despite this wide range of variation, I claim that that the syntactic derivation of definite DPs with an adjective is uniform across all Germanic languages. I argue that the presence of an adjective triggers movement of D over the adjective in order to meet the licensing requirement of the adjective. I argue that the cross-linguistic variation should be attributed to two non-syntactic factors. The first factor is whether the definite article is an affix or a free morpheme. The second one is the ordering of operations in a post-syntactic morphological component of the grammar. As far as the latter factor is concerned, I propose that two operations in this component, Chain Reduction and Local Dislocation, are not inherently ordered with respect to each other. Instead, languages display parametric variation with regard to which of these two operations is applied first. In combination with differences with respect to the first factor mentioned above, this accounts for the attested variation in definiteness marking. It also offers interesting new insights into the cross-linguistic distribution of possessor doubling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abels, Klaus. 2003. Successive cyclicity, anti-locality, and adposition stranding. PhD thesis. Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut.

  • Abney, Steven Paul. 1987. The English noun phrase in its sentential aspect. PhD thesis. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

  • Baker, M. 2008. The syntax of agreement and concord. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, Judy B. 1991. DPs in French and Walloon: evidence for parametric variation in nominal head movement. Probus 3: 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, Judy B. 2001. The DP-hypothesis. In The handbook of contemporary syntactic theory, edited by Mark Reuben Baltin and Chris Collins, 536-561. Oxford: Blackwell.

  • Bierwisch, Manfred. 1967. Syntactic features in morphology: general problems of so-called pronominal inflection in German. In To honour Roman Jakobson, 239-270. The Hague: Mouton.

  • Bobaljik, Jonathan David. 2002. A-chains at the PF-interface: copies and covert movement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20: 197–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bobaljik, Jonathan David, and Susi Wurmbrand. 2005. The domain of agreement. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 23: 809–865.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonneau, José, Pierre Pica, and Takashi Nakajima. 1998. A restrictive/non-restrictive distinction in possessive nominals. In Proceedings of the 17th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, edited by Kimary Shanin, Susan Blake, and Eun-Sook Kim, 88-101. Stanford: CSLI.

  • Börjars, Kersti. 1994. Swedish double determination in a European typological perspective. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 17: 219–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Börjars, Kersti. 1998. Feature distribution in Swedish noun phrases. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist Inquiries: the framework. In Step by step, ed. R. Martin, D. Michaels, and J. Uriagereka, 89–155. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: a life in language, edited by Michael Kenstowicz, 1-52. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

  • Cinque, Guglielmo. 1993. On the evidence of partial N-movement in the Romance DP. University of Venice working papers in linguistics 3(2): 21–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and functional heads: a crosslinguistic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Del Gobbo, Francesca. 2004. On prenominal relative clauses and appositive adjectives. In Proceedings of the 23rd West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, edited by Vineeta Chand, Ann Kelleher, Angelo J. Rodríguez, and Benjamin Schmeiser, 101-114. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.

  • Delsing, Lars-Olof. 1988. The Scandinavian Noun Phrase. Working papers in Scandinavian Syntax 42: 57–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delsing, Lars-Olof. 1989. A DP-analysis of the Scandinavian Noun Phrase. Talk given at the Colloquium on Noun Phrase structure. Manchester.

  • Delsing, Lars-Olof. 1993. The internal structure of noun phrases in Scandinavian languages: a comparative study. PhD thesis, Lund University.

  • Delsing, Lars-Olof. 1998. Possession in Germanic. In Possessors, predicates and movement in the determiner phrase, edited by Artemis Alexiadou and Chris Wilder, 87-108. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  • Einarsson, Stéfan. 1945. Icelandic: grammar, texts, glossary. Baltimore: John Hopkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Embick, David, and Alec Marantz. 2008. Architecture and blocking. Linguistic Inquiry 39(1): 1–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Embick, David, and Rolf Noyer. 2001. Movement operations after syntax. Linguistic Inquiry 32(4): 555–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Georgi, Doreen, and Gereon Müller. 2010. Noun-Phrase structure by reprojection. Syntax 13(1): 1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giusti, Giulana. 1994. Enclitic articles and double definiteness: a comparative analysis of nominal structure in Romance and Germanic. The Linguistic Review 11: 241–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimm, Jacob. 1870. Deutsche Grammatik, Band 1. Berlin.

  • Grohmann, Kleanthes K., and Liliane Haegeman. 2003. Resuming reflexives. Nordlyd 31(3): 46–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halle, Morris, and Alec Marantz. 1993. Distributed Morphology and the pieces of inflection. In The view from building 20, edited by Kenneth Hale and Samuel Jay Keyser, 111-176. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

  • Hankamer, Jorge, and Line Mikkelsen. 2002. A morphological analysis of definite nous in Danish. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 14(2): 137–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hankamer, Jorge, and Line Mikkelsen. 2005. When movement must be blocked: a reply to Embick & Noyer. Linguistic Inquiry 36(1): 85–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harley, Heidi, and Rolf Noyer. 2003. Distributed morphology. In The second Glot international state-of-the-article book: the latest in linguistics, edited by Lisa Cheng and Rint Sybesma, 463-496. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

  • Heck, Fabian, Gereon Müller, and Jochen Trommer. 2008. A phase-based approach to Scandinavian definiteness marking. In Proceedings of the 26th West Coast Conference on Linguistics, edited by Charles B. Chang and Hannah J. Haynie, 226-233. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.

  • Holmes, Philip, and Ian Hincliffe. 1994. Swedish: a comprehensive grammar. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Julien, Marit. 2002. Determiners and word order in Scandinavian DPs. Studia Linguistica 47(2): 154–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Julien, Marit. 2003. Double definiteness in Scandinavian. Nordlyd 31(1): 230–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Julien, Marit. 2005. Nominal phrases from a Scandinavian perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katzir, Roni. 2011. Morpho-semantic mismatches, structural economy, and licensing. Linguistic Inquiry 42(1): 45–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kayne, Richard S. 1994. The anti-symmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kester, Ellen-Petra. 1993. The inflectional properties of Scandinavian adjectives. Studia Linguistica 47(2): 139–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kester, Ellen-Petra. 1996. The nature of adjectival inflection. PhD thesis, Utrecht University.

  • Leu, Thomas. 2008. The internal syntax of determiners. PhD thesis, New York University.

  • Leu, Thomas. 2009. From Greek to Germanic: Poly-(*in)-definiteness and weak/strong adjectival declension. In Merging features: computation, interpretation and acquisition, edited by José M. Brucart, Anna Gavarró, and Jaumé Solà, 293-310. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Lohrmann, Susanne. 2010. The structure of DP and its reflex in Scandinavian. PhD thesis, University of Stuttgart.

  • Müller, Gereon. 2002. Remarks on nominal inflection in German. In More than words: a festschrift for Dieter Wunderlich, edited by Ingrid Kaufman and Barbara Stiebels, 113-145. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.

  • Nunes, Jairo. 2001. Sideward movement. Linguistic Inquiry 32(2): 303–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pesetsky, David. 1998. Some optimality principles of sentence pronunciation. In Is the best good enough?, edited by Pilar Barbosa, Danny Fox, Paul Hagstrom, Martha Mc Ginnis, and David Pesetsky, 331-384. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

  • Pesetsky, David, and Esther Torrego. 2007. The syntax of valuation and the interpretability of features. In Phrasal and clausal architecture: syntactic derivation and interpretation, edited by Simin Karimi, Vida Samiian, and Wendy K. Wilkins, 262-294. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  • Rezac, M. 2003. The fine structure of cyclic Agree. Syntax 6(2): 156–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritter, Elizabeth. 1992. Cross-linguistic evidence for number phrase. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 37: 197–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roehrs, Dorian. 2009. Demonstratives and definite articles as nominal auxiliaries, vol. 140, Linguistics Today. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roehrs, Dorian. 2006. The morphosyntax of the Germanic noun phrase: determiners move into the determiner phrase. PhD thesis, Indiana University.

  • Santelmann, Lynn. 1993. The distribution of double determiners in Swedish: den support in D. Studia Linguistica 47(2): 154–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoorlemmer, Erik (2009). Agreement, Dominance and Doubling: the morphosyntax of DP. PhD thesis, Leiden University. http://hdl.handle.net/1887/13952

  • Sigurdðsson, Halldór Ármann. 1993. The structure of the Icelandic NP. Studia Linguistica 47: 177–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sigurdðsson, Halldór Ármann. 2006. The Icelandic Noun Phrase: central traits. Arkiv för Nordisk Filologi 121: 193–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stroh-Wollin, Ulla. 2009. On the development of definiteness markers in Scandinavian. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 83: 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Surányi, Balász. 2005. Head movement and reprojection. Annales Universitatis Scientiarum Budapestinensis de Rolando Eötvös Nominatae. Sectio Linguistica. XXVI: 313-342.

  • Svenonius, Peter. 2008. The position of adjectives and other phrasal modifiers in the decomposition of DP. In Adjectives and adverbs: syntax, semantics, and discourse, edited by Louise McNally and Christopher Kennedy, 16-42. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Taraldsen, Knut Tarald. 1990. D-projections and N-projection in Norwegian. In GLOW essays for Henk van Riemsdijk, edited by Joan Mascaró and Marina Nespor, 419-431. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.

  • Taraldsen, Knut Tarald. 1991. Two arguments for functional heads. Lingua 84(2/3): 85–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vangsnes, Øystein Alexander. 1999. The identification of functional architecture. PhD thesis, University of Bergen.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erik Schoorlemmer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schoorlemmer, E. Definiteness marking in Germanic: morphological variations on the same syntactic theme. J Comp German Linguistics 15, 107–156 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10828-012-9048-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10828-012-9048-5

Keywords

Navigation