Skip to main content
Log in

Intergenerational Transmission of Disadvantage: Negative Parental Selection, Economic Upheaval, and Smoking

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Family and Economic Issues Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recessions negatively impact the health of individuals experiencing hardship. In this paper, we investigate whether there are also long-term effects for those born during difficult economic times through the effects on their health behavior. Based on a theoretical model of parental socialization against smoking and using data from the German Socioeconomic Panel, we assess smoking behavior of children born in the years immediately after the fall of the Berlin Wall in the East. Using a difference-in-differences specification with West Germans as a control group, we find that men born during this time were 40% more likely to smoke in young adulthood than men born during the years before or afterwards. The fall of the Berlin Wall led to enormous social and economic upheaval and resulted in a stark drop in incomes and fertility in East Germany. Fertility, however, dropped least among the lower educated and younger mothers. The resulting negative parental selection, as measured by parental education and childhood family environment, explains about one fifth of the higher incidence of smoking of those born during this time. We posit that the effect of negatively selected parents was amplified by the compounding effect of disadvantage in childhood caused by the economic upheaval, which likely reduced both the amount and quality of parental socialization against smoking, leading to the increased smoking rates that we observe.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Thanks to Nick Cox for writing the statsby command for Stata that we used to make this graph (Cox, 2010).

  2. For completeness, we provide the results for women in the Appendix Table 11. The results for women show an effect of being born during the period of Transition that is about one third smaller than the results for men and at a lower level of statistical significance. However, we ask the reader to keep in mind that the identification assumption of parallel trends is violated for women.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank two anonymous referees for helpful comments and Catarina Meneses for research assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kristin J. Kleinjans.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11.

Table 7 Main sample—percentages and means
Table 8 Mother sample—percentages and means
Table 9 OLS: parallel trends
Table 10 Placebo analysis—men’s smoking
Table 11 Difference-in-differences estimates: women’s smoking

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kleinjans, K.J., Gill, A. Intergenerational Transmission of Disadvantage: Negative Parental Selection, Economic Upheaval, and Smoking. J Fam Econ Iss 43, 799–814 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10834-021-09791-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10834-021-09791-3

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation