Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Industrial Policy, FDI and Employment: Still ‘Missing a Strategy’

  • Published:
Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper contrasts the effects of trade, inward FDI and technological development upon the demand for skilled and unskilled workers in the UK. By focussing on industry level data panel data on smaller firms, the paper also contrasts these effects with those generated by large scale domestic investment. The analysis is placed within the broader context of shifts in British industrial policy, which has seen significant shifts from sectoral to horizontal measures and towards stressing the importance of SMEs, clusters and new technology, all delivered at the regional scale. This, however, is contrasted with continued elements of British and EU regional policy which have emphasised the attraction of inward investment in order to alleviate regional unemployment. The results suggest that such policies are not naturally compatible; that while both trade and FDI benefit skilled workers, they have adverse effects on the demand for unskilled labour in the UK. At the very least this suggests the need for a range of policies to tackle various targets (including in this case unemployment and social inclusion) and the need to integrate these into a coherent industrial strategy at various levels of governance, whether regional and/or national. This has important implications for the form of any ‘new’ industrial policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Advantage West Midlands (1999) Creating advantage. The West Midlands economic strategy. Birmingham: Advantage West Midlands. Available at: http://www.advantagewm.co.uk/media/publications.asp

  • Amin A, Thrift N (1994) Living in the global. In: Amin A, Thrift N (eds) Globalization, institutions and regional development in Europe. OUP, Oxford

  • Amin A, Tomaney J (1995) The regional development potential of inward investment in the less favoured regions of the european community. In: Amin A, Tomaney J (eds) Behind the myth of the European Union. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Andriani P, Jones CC, Perkmann M, De Propris L, Sena V, Delbridge R, Möslein K, Neely A (2005) Challenging clusters. The prospects and pitfallls of clustering for innovation and economic development. AIM Research, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Arellano M, Bond S (1988) Dynamic panel data estimation using DPD, a guide for users. Institute for fiscal studies working paper

  • Arellano M, Bond S (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev. Econ. Stud. 58:277–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey D (2003) Explaining Japan's Kûdôka (Hollowing Out): a case of government and strategic failure? Asia Pac. Bus. Rev. 10(1)

  • Bailey D (2003a) Globalisation, regions and cluster policies: the case of the rover task force. Policy Stud. 24(2/3)

  • Bailey D, Driffield NL (2002) Hymer and uneven development revisited: FDI and regional inequalities. Contributions in political economy 21:55–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey D, Harte G, Sugden R (1994) British policy towards inward investment. J. World Trade 28(2)

  • Bailey D, Harte G, Sugden R (1999) Regulating transnationals: free markets and monitoring in Europe. In: Keith Cowling (ed) Practical proposals for industrial policy in Europe. Routledge: London

    Google Scholar 

  • Baltagi BH (2005) Econometric analysis of panel data, 3rd ed. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrell R, Pain N (1997) Foreign direct investment, technological change, and economic growth within Europe. Econ. J. 107(445):1770–1786

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrell R, Pain N (1999, April) European growth and integration: domestic institutions, agglomerations and foreign direct investment in Europe. Eur. Econ. Rev. 925–935

  • Begg I et al. (1995) The case for decentralised industrial policy. In: Cheshire P, Gordon I (eds) Territorial competition in an integrating Europe. Avebury, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • Benneworth P (2001) Regional development agencies: The early years. Regional Studies Association, Seaford

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair T (2002) Message from the Prime Minister. Available at the Invest UK website at http://www.InvestUK.com

  • Brander JA, Spencer BJ (1985) Export subsidies and international market share rivalry. J. Int. Econ. 18:83–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Branston JR, Rubbini L, Sugden R, Wilson JR (2006) The healthy development of economies: a strategic framework for competitiveness in the health industry. Rev. Soc. Econ. forthcoming

  • Brech M, Sharp M (1984) Inward investment: policy options for the United Kingdom. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Buffie EF (1993, October) Direct foreign investment, crowding out, and underemployment on the dualistic economy. Oxf. Econ. Pap. 45(4):639–667

    Google Scholar 

  • Charles D, Benneworth P (2001) Are we realizing our potential? Joining up science and technology policy in the english regions. Reg. Stud. 35(1)

  • Cooke P, Morgan K (1998) The associational economy: firms, regions and innovations. OUP: Oxford

  • Cowling K, Sugden R (1993) Industrial strategy: a missing link in british economic policy. Oxf. Rev. Econ. Policy 9:83–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowling K, Sugden R (1994) Beyond capitalism. Pinter, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowling K, Sugden R (1998) Strategic trade policy reconsidered: national rivalry vs free trade vs international cooperation, Kyklos 51(Fasc. 3):339–357

  • Cowling K, Oughton C, Sugden R (1999) A reorientation of industrial policy? Horizontal policies and targeting. in Keith Cowling (ed) Practical proposals for industrial policy in Europe. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) (1994) Competitiveness: helping business to win. HMSO, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) (1995) Competitiveness: forging ahead. HMSO, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) (1996) Competitiveness: creating the enterprise centre of Europe. HMSO: London

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) (1998) Our competitive future: building the knowledge driven economy. The Stationary Office, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) (2005) UK competitiveness indicators: second edition. The Stationary Office, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Doornik J, Bond S, Arellano M (2002) Panel data estimation using DPD for Ox. Available at http://www.nuff.ox.ac.UK/users/doornik/papers/dpd.pdf

  • Driffield NL (1999) The indirect employment effects of FDI into the UK. Bull. Econ. Res. 51(3):207–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driffield NL (2001) The impact on domestic productivity of inward investment in the UK. The Manchester School 69(1):103–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driffield NL (2006) On the search for spillovers from FDI with spatial dependency. Reg. Stud. 40(1):107–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Driffield N, De Propris L (2006) FDI, clusters and technology sourcing. The Cambridge Journal of Economics. forthcoming

  • Driffield NL, Taylor K (2000) FDI and the labour market: a review of the evidence and policy implications. Oxf. Rev. Econ. Policy 16(3):90–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eaton J, Grossman GM (1986) Optimal trade and industrial-policy under oligopoly. Q. J. Econ. 101:383–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EBRD (European Bank for Reconstruction and Development) (1998) Transition report 1998. EBRD, London, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Agraa A (1997) Ak competitiveness policy vs. Japanese industrial policy. The Economic Journal 107(444):1504–1517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eltis W (1996) How low productivity and weak innovativeness undermined UK industrial growth. The Economic Journal 106:184–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florida R (1995) Toward the learning region, Futures 27

  • Fuller C, Bennett RJ, Ramsden M (2002) The economic development role of English RDAs: the need for greater discretionary power. Reg. Stud. 36(4)

  • Girma S, Greenaway D, Wakelin K (2001) Who benefits from foreign direct investment in the UK? Scot. J. Polit. Econ. 48(2):119–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gripaios P, Gripaios R, Munday M (1997) The role of inward investment in urban development: the cases of Bristol, Cardiff and Plymouth. Urban Stud. 34(4):579–603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Görg H, Greenaway D (2004) Much ado about nothing? Do domestic firms really benefit from foreign direct investment? World Bank Res. Obs. 19(2):171–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Görg H, Strobl E (2001) Multinational companies and productivity spillovers: a meta-analysis. Econ. J. 111F:723–739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamermesh Daniel S (1995) Labour demand and the source of adjustment costs. Econ. J. 105(430):620–634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison B (1994) Lean and mean. The changing landscape of corporate power in the age of flexibility. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtz-Eakin D, Newey W, Rosen HS (1988) Estimating vector autoregressions with panel data. Econometrica 56:1371–1375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • House of Commons (2000) BMW, rover and longbridge: 8th report of the house of commons select committee on trade and industry, 1999–2000. Session. House of Commons, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones G (2002) The development of the Annual Business Inquiry. Available at: http://www.statistics.gov.uk/themes/economy/Articles/General/extracts/downloads/development_of_ABI_Nov_2000.pdf

  • Lee S (1999) The competitive disadvantage of England. In: Keith Cowling (ed) Practical proposals for industrial policy in Europe. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovering J (1999) Theory led by policy: the inadequacies of the ‘New Regionalism’ (illustrated from the Case of Wales) Int. J. Urban Reg. Res. 14

  • Lovering J (2001) The coming regional crisis (and how to avoid it) Reg. Stud. 35(4)

  • MacLeod G (2001) New regionalism reconsidered: globalization and the remaking of political economic space Int. J. Urban Reg Res. 25(4)

  • Markusen A (1996) Sticky places in slippery space: a typology of industrial districts. Econ. Geogr. 72

  • Martin, Sunley (2003) Deconstructing clusters: chaotic concept or policy panacea? Journal of Economic Geography 3(1):5–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCrone G (1999) Industrial clusters: a new idea or an old one? Scot. Aff. (4)

  • OECD (1992) Technology and the economy: the key relationships. OECD, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Oughton C (1997) Competitiveness policy in the 1990s. The Economic Journal (107)444

  • Piore M, Sabel C (1984) The second industrial divide: possibilities for prosperity. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitelis C (1994) Industrial strategy: for Britain, in Europe and the world. J. Econ. Stud. 21(5)

  • Pitelis C (2003) Supply-side strategy for productivity, competitivness and convergence for the EU and CEECs. In: Marinova S, Marinov MA (eds.) Foreign direct investment in central and eastern Europe. Ashgate, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter M (1990) The competitive advantage of nations. Macmillan: Basingstoke

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter M (1998) Competitive advantage: creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter M, Ketels HM (2003) UK competitiveness: moving to the next stage. DTI economics paper, No.2. DTI, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam RD (1993) Making democracy work: civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton University Press: Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyke F et al. (1990) Industrial districts and inter-firm co-operation in Italy. International Institute for Labour Studies, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds P, Coates D (1996) Conclusion. In: Coates D (ed) Industrial policy in Britain. Macmillan, Basingstoke

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxenian AL (1994) Regional advantage: culture and competition in silicon valley and route 128. Harvard University Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott A (1996) Regional motors of the global economy. Futures 28

  • Storper M (1995) The resurgence of regional economies, ten year later: the region as a nexus of untraded interdependencies. Eur. Urban Reg. Stud. 2

  • Storper M (1997) The regional world: territorial development in a global economy. Guilford, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor K, Driffield NL (2005) Wage dispersion and the role of multinationals: evidence from UK panel data. Labour Econ. 12(1):223–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Theakston (1996) Whitehall, Westminster and Industrial Policy. In: Coates D (ed) Industrial policy in Britain, Macmillan, Basingstoke

    Google Scholar 

  • Tully J, Berkeley N (2004) Visualising the operating behaviour of sMEs in scetor and cluster: evidence from the West Midlands. Local Econ 19(1)

  • Yannopoulos G, Dunning J (1976) Multinational enterprise and regional development: an exploratory paper. Reg. Stud. 10:389–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waters R, Lawton Smith H (2002) Regional development agencies and local economic development: scale and competitiveness in high-technology Oxfordshire and Cambridgeshire. Eur. Plan. Stud. 10(5)

  • Wren C (2001) The industrial policy of competitiveness: a review of recent developments in the UK. Reg. Stud. 35/9:847–860

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors wish to acknowledge the support of the ESRC under award number RES-000-22-0468.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Economic Development Policy, Birmingham Business School, University House Edgbaston Park Road, Birmingham, B15 2TY, UK

    David Bailey

  2. Aston Business School, Aston University, Aston Triangle, Birmingham, B4 7ET, UK

    Nigel Driffield

Authors
  1. David Bailey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nigel Driffield
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Bailey.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bailey, D., Driffield, N. Industrial Policy, FDI and Employment: Still ‘Missing a Strategy’. J Ind Compet Trade 7, 189–211 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10842-006-7185-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10842-006-7185-8

Keywords

JEL Classification

Search

Navigation