Abstract
Some of the solutions reported in a recent paper (Akyol and Baykasoglu in J Intell Manuf 30(2):557–573, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-016-1262-6) are infeasible, jeopardising the conclusion that “best results for the 75% of the 320 test instances for the ALWABP-2” were obtained. In this note, we explore the contributions of the paper, show that some of the solutions are indeed infeasible and point out possible inconsistencies in the employed heuristic that may be causing this issue.
References
Akyol, S. D., & Baykasoglu, A. (2019). A multiple-rule based constructive randomized search algorithm for solving assembly line worker assignment and balancing problem. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 30(2), 557–573. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-016-1262-6.
Akyol, S. D., & Baykasoğlu, A. (2019). ErgoALWABP: A multiple-rule based constructive randomized search algorithm for solving assembly line worker assignment and balancing problem under ergonomic risk factors. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 30(1), 291–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-016-1246-6.
Borba, L., & Ritt, M. (2014). A heuristic and a branch-and-bound algorithm for the assembly line worker assignment and balancing problem. Computers and Operations Research, 45, 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2013.12.002.
Chaves AA, Lorena LAN, Miralles C (2007) Clustering search approach for the assembly line worker assignment and balancing problem
Emre, C., & Bulent, D. M. (2020). A novel optimization approach for segmented rabbit chase oriented U-type assembly line design: an application from lighting industry. Assembly Automation, 40(3), 483–510. https://doi.org/10.1108/AA-02-2019-0020.
Janardhanan, M. N., Li, Z., & Nielsen, P. (2019). Model and migrating birds optimization algorithm for two-sided assembly line worker assignment and balancing problem. Soft Computing, 23(21), 11263–11276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-018-03684-8.
Miralles, C., Garcia-Sabater, J. P., Andres, C., & Cardos, M. (2007). Advantages of assembly lines in sheltered work centres for disabled. A case study. International Journal of Production Economics, 110(1–2), 187–197.
Miralles, C., García-Sabater, J. P., Andrés, C., & Cardós, M. (2008). Branch and bound procedures for solving the assembly line worker assignment and balancing problem Application to Sheltered Work centres for Disabled. Discrete Applied Mathematics, 156(3), 352–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dam.2005.12.012.
Moreira, M. C. O., Ritt, M., Costa, A. M., & Chaves, A. A. (2012). Simple heuristics for the assembly line worker assignment and balancing problem. Journal of Heuristics, 18(3), 505–524. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10732-012-9195-5.
Ritt, M., & Costa, A. M. (2018). Improved integer programming models for simple assembly line balancing and related problems. International Transactions in Operational Research, 25(4), 1345–1359.
Scholl, A., & Voß, S. (1997). Simple assembly line balancing-heuristic approaches. Journal of Heuristics, 2(3), 217–244.
Vilà, M., & Pereira, J. (2014). A branch-and-bound algorithm for assembly line worker assignment and balancing problems. Computers and Operations Research, 44, 105–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2013.10.016.
Zhang, Z., Tang, Q. H., Ruiz, R., & Zhang, L. (2020). Ergonomic risk and cycle time minimization for the U-shaped worker assignment assembly line balancing problem: A multi-objective approach. Computers and Operations Research, 118, 104905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2020.104905.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Michels, A.S., Costa, A.M. A note to: A multiple-rule based constructive randomized search algorithm for solving assembly line worker assignment and balancing problem. J Intell Manuf 32, 2121–2124 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-020-01632-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-020-01632-8