Abstract
It has been documented that the military intends to increase the number of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) in service while at the same time reducing the number of operators (Dixon et al. 2004). To meet this demand, many of the current UAV operator function will need to be automated. Levels of automation exist along a continuum from fully manual to fully automatic. Different automation strategies have been applied widely in UAV systems. Management by Consent (MBC), where the operator selects the task to be executed, and Management by Exception (MBE), where the computer selects the task to be executed are two proposed levels of automation for future UAV systems. Meanwhile, the optimum operator-to-vehicle ratio for future UAV systems is not yet known. It is expected that the optimum operator-to-vehicle ratio will vary with the level of automation applied to the system. Future UAV systems may require the use of adaptive automation to ensure maximum human–machine performance across varying operator-to-vehicle ratios. This study aims to help determine what levels of automation are most appropriate for different operator-to-vehicle ratios and how adaptive automation should be applied in future UAV systems. We investigated the effect of various operator-to-vehicle ratios and the two automation strategies on UAV mission tasks, results were analyzed using Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and discussed in the last section of the paper.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bainbridge, L.: Ironies of automation. Automatica 19, 775–779 (1983). doi:10.1016/0005-1098(83)90046-8
Dixon, S.R., Wickens, C.D., Chang, D.: Unmanned aerial vehicle flight control: false alarms versus misses. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 48th Annual Meeting. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica (2004)
Draper, M.H., Geiselman, E.E., Liem, L.G., Roe, M.M., Haas, M.W.: Display concepts supporting crew communication of target location in unmanned air vehicles. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 45th Annual Meeting, pp. 85–88. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica (2000)
Endsley, M.R., Kiris, E.O.: The out-of-the-loop performance problem and level of control in automation. Hum. Factors 37(2), 381–394 (1995). doi:10.1518/001872095779064555
Endsley, M.R.: Level of automation: humans and automated systems. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomic Society 41st Annual Meeting, pp. 200–204 (1997)
Endsley, M.: The application of human factors to the development of expert systems for advanced cockpits. In: Proceeding of the Human Factors Society 31st Annual Meeting, pp. 1388–1392. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica (1987)
Ephrath, A., Curry, R.: Detection by pilots of system failures during instrument landings. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. SME-7, 841–848 (1977)
Federal Aviation Administration: Interim operational approval guidance 08-01, Unmanned Aircraft Systems Operations in the National Airspace Systems, Aviation Safety Unmanned Aircraft Program Office Air-160, FAA (2008)
Fitts, P.M. (ed.): Human Engineering for an Efficient Air-Navigation and Traffic-Control System. National Research Council, Washington, DC (1951)
Mouloua, M., Gilson, R., Kring, J., Hancock, P.: Workload, situation awareness, and teaming issues for UAV/UCAV operations. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomic Society 45th Annual Meeting, pp. 162–165 (2001)
Nelson, J.T., Lefebvre, A.T., Andre, S.T.: Managing multiple uninhibited aerial vehicles: changes in number of vehicles and types of target symbology. In: Proceedings of the 26th Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation, and Education Conference. Orlando, FL (2004)
Newcome, L.: Unmanned Aviation: A Brief History of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston (2004)
Parasuraman, R.: Human use and abuse of automation. In: Proceedings of the Second Automation Technology and Human Performance Conference, pp. 42–47. Cocoa Beach, FL (1997)
Prabhala, S.V., Gallimore, J.J., Narayanan, S.: Human effectiveness issues in simulated uninhabited combat aerial vehicles. In: Proceedings of the 2003 Winter Simulation Conference. New Orleans, LA (2003)
Ruff, H.A., Narayanan, S., Draper, M.H.: Human interaction with levels of automation and decision-aid fidelity in the supervisory control of multiple simulated teleoperated air vehicles. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, Special Issue on Virtual Environments and Mobile Robots: Control, Simulation, and Robot Pilot Training, vol. 11(4), pp. 335–351, August (2002)
Ruff, H.A., Calhoun, G.L., Draper, M.H., Fontejon, J.V., Guilfoos, B.J.: Exploring automation issues in supervisory control of multiple UAVs. In: Proceedings of the Human Performance, Situation Awareness, and Automation Technology Conference. Daytona Beach, FL (2004)
Sheridan, T.B., Verplank, W.: Human and computer control of undersea teleoperators. Man–Machine Systems Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, MIT, Cambridge (1978)
Sheridan, T.: Humans and Automation: System Design and Research Issues. Wiley, New York (2002)
Tsang, P., Wilson, G.: Mental workload. In: Salvendy, G. (ed.) Handbook of Human Factors. John Wiley, New York (1997)
Tso, K.S., Tharp, G.K., Tai, A.T., Draper, M.H., Calhoun, G.L., Ruff, H.A.: A human factors testbed for command and control of unmanned air vehicles. 22nd Digital Avionics Systems Conference, Indianapolis, IN (2003)
Tso, K.S., Tharp, G.K., Zhang, W., Tai, A.T.: A multi-agent operator interface for unmanned aerial vehicles. In: Proceedings of the 18th Digital Avionics Systems Conference. St. Louis, MO (1999)
Wiener, E.L.: The impact of automation on aviation human factors. In: Proceedings of the FAA/NASA Advanced Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Human Factors in Air Traffic Control and Aviation Maintenance, Daytona Beach, FL (1993)
Wierwille, W.W., Casali, J.G.: A validated rating scale for global mental workload measurement applications. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 27th Annual Meeting, pp. 129–133. Human Factors Society, Santa Monica (1983)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, D., Wasson, R. & Vincenzi, D.A. Effects of System Automation Management Strategies and Multi-mission Operator-to-vehicle Ratio on Operator Performance in UAV Systems. J Intell Robot Syst 54, 795–810 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-008-9288-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-008-9288-4