Skip to main content
Log in

A Survey on Methods for Elaborated Modeling of the Mechanics of a Small-Size Helicopter. Analysis and Comparison

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

RED-UAS 2011 paper. When designing new control techniques for unmanned helicopters, the development of mathematical models that reproduce the dynamics of the real platform is a matter of importance. This allows the usage of model-based approaches that achieve better adaptation of the control laws to the real system. In these cases, the objective is not to obtain complex equations like those required for high-fidelity simulations. Instead, the aim is to derive simple and manageable models that ease the derivation of the control laws, maintaining at the same time their capability to reproduce the main behavior of the real system. The dynamics of a small-size helicopter with a stiff main rotor are mainly described by its mechanical model. Accordingly, this paper analyzes in detail three representative methods for elaborated modeling of the mechanics of small-size helicopters: Newton–Euler, Lagrange and Kane. For that purpose, the most general case is considered: two rigid bodies, fuselage and main rotor. As a consequence, the resulting models account for most significant modeling issues in the mechanical behavior of a small-size helicopter, such as the gyroscopic effect. Although the equations obtained using the three approaches are equivalent in the sense that they generate the same numerical results in simulation, Kane’s method holds some unique advantages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baruh, H.: Analytical Dynamics. McGraw Hill, New York (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baruh, H.: Another look at the describing equations of dynamics. J Chin Soc Mech Eng Trans Chin Inst Eng 21(1), 15–23 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Borri, M., Bottasso, C., Mantegazza, P.: Equivalence of Kane’s and Maggi’s equations. Meccanica 25(4), 272–274 (1990)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Kane, T.R., Levinson, D.A.: Dynamics, Theory and Applications. McGraw Hill, New York (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kane, T.R., Likins, P.W., Levinson, D.A.: Spacecraft Dynamics. McGraw Hill, New York (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kondak, K., Bernard, M., Losse, N., Hommel, G.: Elaborated modeling and control for autonomous small size helicopters. VDI-Ber. 1956, 207–216 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kondak, K., Bernard, M., Meyer, N., Hommel, G.: Autonomously flying VTOL-robots: modeling and control. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 736–741 (2007)

  8. Motiongenesis Kane 5.x.: Forces, motion and codegeneration software. http://www.motiongenesis.com/ (2012). Accessed June 2012

  9. Papastavridis, J.: A panoramic overview of the principles and equations of motion of advanced engineering dynamics. Appl. Mech. Rev. 51(4), 239–265 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Piedboeuf, J.: Kane’s equations or Jourdain’s principle? In: IEEE Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems, vol. 2, pp. 1471–1474 (1993)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luis A. Sandino.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sandino, L.A., Bejar, M. & Ollero, A. A Survey on Methods for Elaborated Modeling of the Mechanics of a Small-Size Helicopter. Analysis and Comparison. J Intell Robot Syst 72, 219–238 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-013-9821-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-013-9821-y

Keywords

Navigation