Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Fuzzy-PLOS Guidance Law for Precise Trajectory Tracking of a UAV in the Presence of Wind

  • Short Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The combination of pursuit and line of sight guidance laws, called PLOS, is used to steer an unmanned aerial vehicle along a desired path. In the previous studies, the parameters of this guidance law are tuned by trial and error and are constant, during the flight. In this research, it will be shown that the optimal value of these parameters depends on the initial conditions of the problem and the wind conditions. For this reason, a fuzzy system is proposed to generate the instantaneous optimal value of these parameters, in such a way that the flying vehicle converges to the desired path in less time and follows it more accurately, in the presence of wind. For this purpose, a cost function is defined to penalize the distance from the desired path and the control effort. Then, the parameters of the fuzzy system are optimized for different initial and wind conditions. During the flight, the optimized fuzzy systems determine the parameters of the guidance algorithm in an online manner, in such a way that the desired path is better followed. The obtained results show that online adjustment of the PLOS guidance law improves its performance in the presence of wind by about 20%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The codes generated during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. All data generated for analysis during this study are included in this published article

All data generated for analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Javad Asghari]; Writing - original draft preparation: [Javad Asghari]; Writing - review and editing: [Hadi Nobahari]; Supervision: [Hadi Nobahari].

References

  1. Park, S., Deyst, J., How, J.: A new nonlinear guidance logic for trajectory tracking. AIAA Guid, Navig, Control Conf Exhibit. (2004). https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2004-4900

  2. Park, S., Deyst, J., How, J.P.: Performance and lyapunov stability of a nonlinear path following guidance method. J Guidance, Control, Dyn. (2007). https://doi.org/10.2514/1.28957

  3. Nelson, D.R., Blake Barber, D., McLain, T.W., Beard, R.W.: Vector field path following for small unmanned air vehicles. Am Control Conf. (2006). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACC.2006.1657648

  4. Jarrett, C., Perry, K., Stol, K.A.: Controller comparisons for autonomous railway following with a fixed-wing UAV. Int Conf Autom, Robot Appl. (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICARA.2015.7081132

  5. Ratnoo, A., Sujit, P.B., Kothari, M.: Adaptive optimal path following for high wind flights. IFAC Proceed. (2011). https://doi.org/10.3182/20110828-6-IT-1002.03720

  6. Zamurad Shah, M., Samar, R., and Bhatti, A. I.: Lateral control for UAVs using sliding mode technique. IFAC Proc. (2011). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICET.2013.6743506

  7. Kang, Y., Hedrick, J.K.: Linear tracking for a fixed-wing UAV using nonlinear model predictive control. IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol. (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-017-2881-8

  8. Prodan, I., Bencatel, R., Olaru, S., De Sousa, J. B., Stoica, C., and Niculescu, S. I.: Predictive control for autonomous aerial vehicles trajectory tracking. IFAC Proc. (2012). https://doi.org/10.3182/20120823-5-NL-3013.00078

  9. Zhao, Shulong, et al.: A novel data-driven control for fixed-wing UAV path following. IEEE International Conference on Information and Automation (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-017-0472-2

  10. Rucco, A., Pedro Aguiar, A., Pereira, F.L., Borges, J., de Sousa: A predictive path-following approach for fixed-wing unmanned aerial vehicles in presence of wind disturbances. Second Iberian Robot Conf. (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27146-048

  11. Gavilan, F., Vazquez, R., Camacho, E.F.: An iterative model predictive control algorithm for UAV guidance. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/TAES.2015.140153

  12. Saurav, R., Sohil, L.D., Ghosh, S.: Variable L1 Guidance Strategy for Path Following of UAVs. Int Conf Unmanned Aircraft Syst. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICUAS48674.2020.9214056

  13. Singh, M., Manoharan, A., Ratnoo, A., Sujit, P.B.: Three dimensional uav path following using sdre guidance. Int Conf Unmanned Aircraft Syst. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICUAS.2019.8798259

  14. Kothari, M., Postlethwaite, I., Gu, D.-W.: A Suboptimal Path Planning Algorithm Using Rapidly-Exploring Random. Trees. Int. J. Aerosp, Innov. (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61403-84

  15. Sujit, P.B., Saripalli, S., Sousa, J.B.: An evaluation of UAV path following algorithms. Eur Control Conf. (2013). https://doi.org/10.23919/ECC.2013.6669680

  16. Sujit, P.B., Saripalli, S., Sousa, J.B.: Unmanned aerial vehicle path following: A survey and analysis of algorithms for fixed-wing unmanned aerial vehicless. IEEE Control Syst Magaz. (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/MCS.2013.2287568

  17. Kothari, M., Postlethwaite, I., Gu, D.-W.: UAV path following in windy urban environments. J Intell Robot Syst. (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-013-9873-z

  18. Pelizer, G.V., Da Silva, N.B.F., Branco, K.R.L.J.: Comparison of 3D Path-Following Algorithms for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles. Int. Conf. Unmanned Aircr, Syst. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICUAS.2017.7991338

  19. Xavier, D. M., Silva Natassya, B.F., and Branco Kalinka, R.L.J.C.: Path-following algorithms comparison using Software-in-the-Loop simulations for UAVs. IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCC47284.2019.8969604

  20. Karimi, A., Nobahari, H., Siarry, P.: Continuous ant colony system and tabu search algorithms hybridized for global minimization of continuous multi-minima functions. Comput. Optim. Appl. 45, 639–661 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10589-008-9176-7

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization: [Hadi Nobahari]; Data curation: [Javad Asghari]; Formal analysis and investigation: [Javad Asghari]; Methodology: [Hadi Nobahari, Javad Asghari]; Software: [Javad Asghari]; Validation: [Hadi Nobahari, Javad Asghari]; Visualization: [Hadi Nobahari,

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hadi Nobahari.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

This paper does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Consent to Participate

Not Applicable.

Consent for Publication

Not Applicable.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nobahari, H., Asghari, J. A Fuzzy-PLOS Guidance Law for Precise Trajectory Tracking of a UAV in the Presence of Wind. J Intell Robot Syst 105, 18 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-022-01635-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-022-01635-y

Keywords

Navigation