Skip to main content
Log in

On Compromise Mixed Allocation in Multivariate Stratified Sampling with Random Parameters

  • Published:
Journal of Mathematical Modelling and Algorithms in Operations Research

Abstract

For estimating the population mean Clark and Steel (Stat. 49, 1970–207 2000) worked out the optimum allocation of sample sizes to strata and stages with simple additional constraints to use different type of allocations in different strata. Ahsan et al. (Aligarh J. Statist. 25, 87–97 2005) used the same idea to work out optimum allocation in univariate stratified sampling and called it a ‘Mixed Allocation’. Later on Varshney and Ahsan (J. Indian Soc. Agr. Stat. 65(3), 291–296, 2011) extended this work for multivariate stratified sampling and called it a compromise mixed allocation. This article presents a more realistic approach to the compromise mixed allocation by formulating the problem as a Stochastic Nonlinear Programming Problem in which the stratum-wise measurement costs and the sample stratum standard deviations are independent random variables with known probability distributions. The application of this approach is exhibited through a numerical example with normal distributions of the random parameters. The proposed compromise mixed allocation is compared with some other well known compromise allocations available in multivariate stratified sampling literature. It is found that the author’s proposed compromise mixed allocation is the most efficient allocation among the discussed allocations. A simulation study is also carried out to support the claim made by the authors on the basis of the results of the numerical example.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ahsan, M.J., Najmussehar, Khan, M.G.M.: Mixed allocation in stratified sampling. Aligarh J. Statist. 25, 87–97 (2005)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Chatterjee, S.: A note on optimum allocation. Skand. Akt. 50, 40–44 (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Clark, R.G., Steel, D.G.: Optimum allocation of samples to strata and stages with simple additional constraints. Stat. 49, 197–207 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cochran, W.G.: Sampling Techniques. Wiley, New York (1977)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Díaz-García, J.A., Gary-Tápia, M.M.: Optimum allocation in stratified surveys: stochastic programming. Comput. Statist. Data Anal. 51, 3016–3026 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Jahan, N., Khan, M.G.M., Ahsan, M.J.: A generalized compromise allocation. J. Indian Statist. Assoc. 32, 95–101 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kozak, M.: On sample allocation in multivariate surveys. Comm. Statist. Simul. Comput. 35, 901–910 (2006a)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Kozak, M.: Multivariate sample allocation: application of random search method. Stat. Trans. 7(4), 889–900 (2006b)

    Google Scholar 

  9. LINGO: LINGO-User’s Guide. Published by LINDO SYSTEM INC., 1415, North Dayton Street, Chicago, Illinois, 60622, USA (2001)

  10. Melaku, A.: Asymptotic normality of the optimal allocation in multivariate stratified random sampling. Sankhya B 48(2), 224–232 (1986)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Rao, S.S.: Optimization Theory and Applications. Wiley Eastern limited, New Delhi (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  12. R Core Team: A language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing, Vienna, Austria, http://www.r-project.org/ (2012)

  13. Sukhatme, P.V., Sukhatme, B.V., Sukhatme, S., Asok, C.: Sampling Theory of Surveys with Applications. Iowa State University Press, Iowa, U.S.A. and Indian Society of Agricultural Statistics, New Delhi (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Varshney, R., Ahsan, M.J.: Compromise mixed allocation in multivariate stratified sampling. J. Indian Soc. Agr. Stat. 65(3), 291–296 (2011)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Yates, F.: Sampling Methods for Censuses and Surveys. Charles Griffin and Co. Ltd., London (1960)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ummatul Fatima.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fatima, U., Varshney, R., Najmussehar, S. et al. On Compromise Mixed Allocation in Multivariate Stratified Sampling with Random Parameters. J Math Model Algor 13, 523–536 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10852-013-9242-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10852-013-9242-8

Keywords

Navigation