Abstract
Confirmatory factor analysis was used to test the construct validity of an attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder-inattention, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder-hyperactivity/impulsivity, oppositional defiant disorder toward adults, academic and social competence factor model with teacher ratings of Thai adolescents (n = 872) with the Child and Adolescent Disruptive Behavior Inventory. The five-factor model resulted in an adequate fit in an absolute sense (i.e., CFI = .960; TLI = .985; RMSEA = .065; and WRMR = .883). All the items had significant and substantial loadings on their respective factors (i.e., > .78) with the five-factors showing discriminant validity. The five-factor model also resulted in similar results for boys and girls separately as well as younger and older adolescents. The current findings with the teacher version of the measure in conjunction with earlier research with mothers’ and fathers’ ratings of Brazilian, Thai, and American children (Burns et al., Psychological Assessment, 20, 121-130, 2008) and Thai adolescents (Burns et al., Psychological Assessment, 21, 635-641, 2009) provide increasing support for the construct validity of Child and Adolescent Disruptive Behavior Inventory within multiple cultures. Procedures are also outlined to improve the content validity as well as test the construct validity of forthcoming parent and teacher DSM-V ADHD/ODD rating scales.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amador-Campos, J. A., Forns-Santacana, M., Martorell-Balanzó, B., Guàrdia-Olmos, J., & Peró-Cebollero, M. (2005). Confirmatory factor analysis of parents’ and teachers’ ratings of DSM-IV symptoms of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity disorder in a Spanish sample. Psychological Reports, 97, 847–860.
American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, fourth edition, text revision. Washington: American Psychiatric Association.
Barkley, R. A., & Murphy, K. R. (2006). Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: A clinical workbook (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford.
Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford.
Burns, G. L., & Haynes, S. N. (2006). Clinical psychology: Construct validation with multiple sources of information and multiple settings. In M. Eid & E. Diener (Eds.), Handbook of Multimethod Measurement in Psychology (pp. 401–418). Washington: American Psychological Association.
Burns, G. L., Gomez, R., Walsh, J. A., & Moura, M. A. (2003). Understanding source effects in ADHD rating scales: reply to DuPaul. Psychological Assessment, 15, 118–119.
Burns, G. L., Desmul, C., Walsh, J. A., Silpakit, C., & Ussahawanitchakit, P. (2009). A multitrait (ADHD-IN, ADHD-HI, ODD toward adults, academic and social competence) by multisource (mothers and fathers) evaluation of the invariance and convergent/discriminant validity of the child and adolescent disruptive behavior inventory with Thai adolescents. Psychological Assessment, 21, 635–641.
Burns, G. L., Moura, M. A., Walsh, J. A., Desmul, C., Silpakit, C., & Sommers-Flanagan, J. (2008). Invariance and convergent and discriminate validity between mothers’ and father’s ratings of oppositional defiant disorder toward adults, ADHD-HI, ADHD-IN, and academic competence factors within Brazilian, Thai, and American Children. Psychological Assessment, 20, 121–130.
Bussing, R., Fernandez, M., Harwood, M., Hou, W., Garvan, C. W., Eyberg, S. M., et al. (2008). Parent and teacher SNAP-IV ratings of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder symptoms. Assessment, 15, 317–328.
DuPaul, G. J., Power, T. J., Anastopoulous, A. D., Reid, R., McGoey, K. E., & Ikeda, M. J. (1997). Teacher ratings of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder symptoms: factor structure and normative data. Psychological Assessment, 9, 463–444.
Gomez, R., Harvey, J., Quick, C., Scharer, I., & Harris, G. (1999). DSM-IVAD/HD: Confirmatory factor models, prevalence, and gender and age differences based on parent and teacher ratings of Australian primary school children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 40, 265–274.
Haynes, S. N., Richard, D. C. S., & Kubany, E. S. (1995). Content validity in psychological assessment. Psychological Assessment, 7, 238–247.
Moxey, L. M., & Stanford, A. J. (1992). Context effects and the communicative functions of quantifiers: Implications for their use in attitude research. In N. Schwarz & S. Sudman (Eds.), Context effects in social and psychological research (pp. 279 – 296) New York: Springer
Muthen, L. K., & Muthen, B. O. (1998–2009). Mplus user’s guide (5th ed.). Los Angeles: Muthen & Muthen.
Pepper, S. C. (1981). Problems in the quantifications of frequency expression. In D.W. Fiske (Ed.), Problems with the language impression: New directions for methodology of social and behavior science (Vol. 9, pp. 25 – 41). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Schwarz, N. (1999). How the questions shape the answers. American Psychologist, 54, 93–105.
Taylor, T. K., Burns, G. L., Rusby, J. C., & Foster, E. M. (2006). Oppositional defiant disorder toward peers: initial evidence for two separate constructs. Psychological Assessment, 18, 439–443.
Waschbusch, D. A., & Sparkes, S. J. (2003). Rating scale assessment of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and oppositional defiant disorder (ODD): is there a normal distribution and does it matter? Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 21, 261–281.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shipp, F., Burns, G.L. & Desmul, C. Construct Validity of ADHD-IN, ADHD-HI, ODD toward Adults, Academic and Social Competence Dimensions with Teacher Ratings of Thai Adolescents: Additional Validity for the Child and Adolescent Disruptive Behavior Inventory. J Psychopathol Behav Assess 32, 557–564 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-010-9185-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-010-9185-6