Skip to main content
Log in

Capability of a new paediatric oesophageal Doppler monitor to detect changes in cardiac output during testing of external pacemakers after cardiac surgery

  • Published:
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The Cardio QP™ oesophageal Doppler monitor measures the velocity time integral of the blood flow in the descending aorta. Based on system integrated normograms of the aortic cross-sectional area of a paediatric population, the cardiac output is calculated and displayed.

Objective

Evaluation of the capability of the Cardio QP™ to detect changes in cardiac output during desynchronizing ventricular pacing (VVI) in children after cardiac surgery.

Patients

Eleven children (6 female, 5 male) with epicardial pacemaker electrodes admitted to the paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) after corrective surgery for congenital heart defects. Mean age: 6.3 (2.1–15.0) months, mean body weight: 5.3 (3.5–7.8) kg.

Interventions

After baseline measurements of cardiac output (base I), we performed 3 steps, each lasting 5 min: (1) ventricular pacing (VVI), (2) baseline (base II) recording, (3) atrial pacing (AOO). We measured the effects on haemodynamic parameters and blood gases as well as on the measured cardiac output.

Results

Ventricular pacing, with atrio-ventricular dyssynchrony, led to a significant drop in blood pressure and central venous saturation. Cardiac output parameters showed a decrease in stroke volume (SV) from 4.9±2.2 to 4.2±2.1 ml (P = 0.005) and cardiac index (CI) (2.6±1.1–2.1±0.8 ml/min/m2) (P = 0.009) during ventricular pacing. Cardiac index and haemodynamic parameters during atrial stimulation did not show significant changes from baseline.

Conclusion

The Cardio QP™ seems to be capable of detecting slight changes in cardiac output.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CHD:

Congenital heart defects

CI:

Cardiac index

CO:

Cardiac output

SD:

Stroke distance

SV:

Stroke volume

TED:

Transoesophageal Doppler

VTI:

Velocity time integral

References

  1. Estagnasie P, Djedaini K, Mier L, Coste F, Dreyfuss D. Measurement of cardiac output by transesophageal echocardiography in mechanically ventilated patients. Comparison with thermodilution. Intensive Care Med. 1997;23:753–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kim JJ, Dreyer WJ, Chang AC, Breinholt JP 3rd, Grifka RG. Arterial pulse wave analysis: An accurate means of determining cardiac output in children. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2006;7:532–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tibby SM, Murdoch IA. Measurement of cardiac output and tissue perfusion. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2002;14:303–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bearss MG, Yonutas DN, Allen WT. A complication with thermodilution cardiac outputs in centrally-placed pulmonary artery catheters. Chest. 1982;81:527.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bossert T, Schmitt DV, Mohr FW. Pulmonary artery rupture–fatal complication of catheter examination (thermodilution catheter). Z Kardiol. 2000;89:54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Egan JR, Festa M, Cole AD, Nunn GR, Gillis J, Winlaw DS. Clinical assessment of cardiac performance in infants and children following cardiac surgery. Intensive Care Med. 2005;31:568–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tomaske M, Knirsch W, Kretschmar O, etal. Cardiac output measurement in children: comparison of Aesculon cardiac output monitor and thermodilution. Br J Anaesth. 2008;100:517–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Reisner AT, Xu D, Ryan KL, Convertino VA, Rickards CA, Mukkamala R. Monitoring non-invasive cardiac output and stroke volume during experimental human hypovolaemia and resuscitation. Br J Anaesth. 2011;106:23–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Botte A, Leclerc F, Riou Y, etal. Evaluation of a noninvasive cardiac output monitor in mechanically ventilated children. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2006;7:231–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ehlers KC, Mylrea KC, Waterson CK, Calkins JM. Cardiac output measurements. A review of current techniques and research. Ann Biomed Eng. 1986;14:219–39.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Shoemaker WC, Wo CC, Chien LC, etal. Evaluation of invasive and noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring in trauma patients. J Trauma. 2006;61:844–53; discussion 53–4.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Knirsch W, Kretschmar O, Tomaske M, etal. Cardiac output measurement in children: comparison of the Ultrasound Cardiac Output Monitor with thermodilution cardiac output measurement. Intensive Care Med. 2008;34:1060–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Thom O, Taylor DM, Wolfe RE, etal. Comparison of a supra-sternal cardiac output monitor (USCOM) with the pulmonary artery catheter. Br J Anaesth. 2009;103:800–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Tibby SM, Hatherill M, Durward A, Murdoch IA. Are transoesophageal Doppler parameters a reliable guide to paediatric haemodynamic status and fluid management? Intensive Care Med. 2001;27:201–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Murdoch IA, Marsh MJ, Tibby SM, McLuckie A. Continuous haemodynamic monitoring in children: use of transoesophageal Doppler. Acta Paediatr. 1995;84:761–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Tibby SM, Hatherill M, Murdoch IA. Use of transesophageal Doppler ultrasonography in ventilated pediatric patients: derivation of cardiac output. Crit Care Med. 2000;28:2045–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Schubert S, Schmitz T, Weiss M, etal. Continuous, non-invasive techniques to determine cardiac output in children after cardiac surgery: evaluation of transesophageal Doppler and electric velocimetry. J Clin Monit Comput. 2008;22:299–307.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Alpert JS, Petersen P, Godtfredsen J. Atrial fibrillation: natural history, complications, and management. Annu Rev Med. 1988;39:41–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Lo HM, Lin FY, Lin JL, etal. Impaired cardiac performance relating to delayed left atrial activation after atrial compartment operation for chronic atrial fibrillation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1999;22:379–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. el-Gamel A, Deiraniya AK, Rahman AN, Campbell CS, Yonan NA. Orthotopic heart transplantation hemodynamics: does atrial preservation improve cardiac output after transplantation? J Heart Lung Transplant. 1996;15:564–71.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Fleck T, Schubert S, Redlin M, etal. Influence of external cardiac pacing on cerebral oxygenation measured by near-infrared spectroscopy in children after cardiac surgery. Paediatr Anaesth. 2010;20:553–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Cholley BP, Singer M. Esophageal Doppler: noninvasive cardiac output monitor. Echocardiography. 2003;20:763–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Knirsch W, Kretschmar O, Tomaske M, etal. Comparison of cardiac output measurement using the CardioQP oesophageal Doppler with cardiac output measurement using thermodilution technique in children during heart catheterisation. Anaesthesia. 2008;63:851–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Mohan UR, Britto J, Habibi P, de Munter C, Nadel S. Noninvasive measurement of cardiac output in critically ill children. Pediatr Cardiol. 2002;23:58–61.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Schober P, Loer SA, Schwarte LA. Perioperative hemodynamic monitoring with transesophageal Doppler technology. Anesth Analg. 2009;109:340–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Leblanc F, Delaney CP, Neary PC, etal. Assessment of comparative skills between hand-assisted and straight laparoscopic colorectal training on an augmented reality simulator. Dis Colon Rectum. 2010;53:1323–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Senagore AJ. It’s the unknown unknowns that matter. Dis Colon Rectum. 2010;53:849–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Challand C, Struthers R, Sneyd JR, etal. Randomized controlled trial of intraoperative goal-directed fluid therapy in aerobically fit and unfit patients having major colorectal surgery. Br J Anaesth 2011. doi:10.1093/bja/aer273

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thilo Fleck MD.

Additional information

Fleck T, Schubert S, Stiller B, Redlin M, Ewert P, Nagdyman N, Berger F. Capability of a new paediatric oesophageal Doppler monitor to detect changes in cardiac output during testing of external pacemakers after cardiac surgery.

Thilo Fleck, Stephan Schubert was contributed equally to this work and should be considered as co-first authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fleck, T., Schubert, S., Stiller, B. et al. Capability of a new paediatric oesophageal Doppler monitor to detect changes in cardiac output during testing of external pacemakers after cardiac surgery. J Clin Monit Comput 25, 419–425 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-011-9322-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-011-9322-0

Keywords

Navigation