Abstract
In this paper, we compare several 0-1 linear programs for solving the satellite mission planning problem. We prove that one of them presents a smaller integrality gap. Our explanation is based on stable set polytope formulations for perfect graphs.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barcia P, Cerdeira JO (2003) Node packings on cocomparability graphs. Oper Res Lett 31: 341–342
Bensanna E, Verfaillie G, Agnése JC, Bataille N, Blumstein D (1996) Exact and approximate methods for the daily management of an earth observation satellite. In: Proc. of the 4th Int. Symposium on Space Mission Operations and Ground Data Systems, Munich, Germany
Bensanna E, Lemaître M, Verfaillie G (1999) Earth observation satellite management. Constraints 4: 293–299
Gabrel V, Murat C (2003) Mathematical programming for earth observation satellite mission planning. In: Ciriani TA, Fasano G, Gliozzi S, Tadei R (ed.) Operations Research in Space and Air, Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 103–122
Gabrel V (2005) An extensive comparison of 0–1 linear programs for SPOT5 daily mission planning problem. Annales du LAMSADE no. 4–5
Gilmore PC, Hoffman AJ (1964) A characterization of comparability graphs and of interval graphs. Can J Math 16: 539–548
Grütschel M, Lovàsz L, Schrijver A (1988) Geometric algorithms and combinatorial optimization, Springer-Verlag
Pnueli A, Lempel A, Even S (1971) Transitive orientation of graphs and identification of permutation graphs. Can J Math 23(1): 160–175
Vasquez M, Hao JK (2001) A Ȍlogic-constrainedȍ knapsack formulation and a tabu algorithm for the daily photograph scheduling of an earth observation satellite. J Comp Optim and Appl 20: 137–157
Vasquez M, Hao JK (2003) Upper bounds for the SPOT5 Daily Photograph Scheduling Problem. J Comb Optim 7: 87–103
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gabrel, V. Strengthened 0-1 linear formulation for the daily satellite mission planning. J Comb Optim 11, 341–346 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-006-7912-4
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-006-7912-4